June 20, 2013

More Young People Delay Sex, Try Oral Sex First, CDC Says

dab916c5293fd5e6e9a9c4d36c726e02 More Young People Delay Sex, Try Oral Sex First, CDC Says

U.S. report also finds same-sex encounters more common for women than

THURSDAY, March 3 (HealthDay News) — More young people are waiting to have sex, and more women than men are engaging in same-sex encounters, according to a new report detailing Americans’ evolving sexual behaviors and preferences.

In statistics compiled from interviews with 13,500 men and women aged 15 to 44, the 2006-2008 National Survey of Growth also indicates that more than half of young people under age 24 who have had did so before having vaginal intercourse.

Other revelations from the survey, released March 3 by the National Center for Health Statistics of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, include three times as many women over 18 reporting being bisexual as men.

The CDC estimates that 19 million sexually transmitted infections occur each year, along with 50,000 new diagnoses of HIV infection. One function of the report is to provide public health researchers with information to develop prevention strategies targeting high-risk groups, lead author Anjani Chandra said.

“Traditionally, people tend to focus on vaginal intercourse, but they sort of forget about other types of sexual behavior,” said Chandra, a health scientist at the National Center for Health Statistics, which last released a similar report using data from 2002.

Some of the findings include:

* More young people reported never having any sexual contact with another person. In 2002, about 22 percent of youths aged 15 to 24 said they fit this description, while 27 percent of males and 29 percent of females did so in 2006-2008.
* White youths aged 15 to 24 were more likely (57 percent) than blacks or Hispanics of the same age (39 percent) to report engaging in oral sex before ever having intercourse.
* Twice as many women (12.5 percent) reported any same-sex contact as men (5.2 percent), a number that held steady since 2002.
* About 3.5 percent of women reported they were bisexual, compared to 1.1 percent of men. About 1.1 percent of women and 1.7 percent of men said they were homosexual.
* About 35 percent of females and 44 percent of males reported ever having anal sex with an opposite-sex partner.

Bill Albert, chief program for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, said he is encouraged by the disclosure that more young people have had no sexual contact.

“The view is, when it comes to teens and sex . . . that things are bad and getting worse,” Albert said. “I don’t want to be Pollyanna-ish and say that there’s nothing but good news here, but by and large the news is good.”

But Albert said he believes that the statistics indicating most youths are engaging in oral sex before intercourse may be nebulous.

“What is ‘before’ — an hour, or two days? My strong suspicion here is that sexual activity tends to co-occur . . . they’re probably going to have vaginal sex shortly thereafter,” he said. “For some young people, they’re running the bases backwards. They used to go from more casual to more intimate, but that’s not necessarily the case these days.”

Sexuality expert Dr. Jennifer Berman said it’s not surprising that young people engage in oral sex first because it’s now considered a way to gain status and prestige among their peers.

Also, “It often has to do with sexual or the lack thereof,” said Berman, director of the Berman Women’s Wellness Center in Beverly Hills, Calif. “Young people don’t perceive oral sex as sex and think they’re still virgins if there’s no penetration.”

Chandra and Berman had very different takes on why twice as many women reported same-sex contact as men.

“Whether [the discrepancy] is real or they simply have a higher comfort level reporting that, I can’t say,” Chandra said. “Their comfort . . . may bolster their honesty and disclosure level.”

Berman said she feels the disclosure is genuine, but fueled by societal forces.

“In the [sexuality] field and in L.A., we think that same-sex experiences with women are a lot of times related to and alcohol,” she said, “or designed and choreographed for men’s pleasure.”

Berman was critical of the scope and structure of the national report, saying it “left out very productive, active generations” by excluding participants 45 and older and omitting details about sexual habits such as the use of contraceptives, lubricants or .

“It’s an interesting sample,” she said. But, “it certainly doesn’t enable people in the field to form valid conclusions . . . or form systems or supports.”

More information

For more on sexual attraction and orientation, visit the Nemours Foundation.

SOURCES: Anjani Chandra, Ph.D., health scientist, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; Bill Albert, chief program officer, National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; Jennifer Berman, M.D., director, Berman Women’s Wellness Center, Beverly Hills, Calif.; March 3, 2011, National Center for Health Statistics, report, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Identity in the : Data from the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth

Why not call it a Facebook revolution?

8164219770bd6ca2f9366b3c1e3f6037 Why not call it a Facebook revolution?

Egyptian protesters use Facebook to fuel the revolution fire.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* The uprisings had a strong assist from contemporary
* What else makes Facebook
* The real Facebook revolution is global, and it’s only just getting geared up

RELATED TOPICS

* Facebook Inc.
* Inc.
* Middle East
* North Africa

Chris Taylor is San Francisco bureau chief for tech-news site Mashable, a CNN.com content partner.

(CNN) — Tunisians filled the streets with the help of Twitter. ’s protests were coordinated on Facebook pages like that of activist Wael Ghonim. Libyan dissenters spread the word about their “day of rage” last week the same way.

And yet, in these heady days where the entire Middle East seems to be inspired to organize online in revolt against autocracy, it has become fashionable for experts to dismiss the role of social media in 2011′s revolutions.

“People protested and brought down governments before Facebook was invented,” the New Yorker’s Malcolm Gladwell opined on February 2. A few weeks later, The Financial Times’ Gideon Rachman reminded us that “the French managed to storm the Bastille without the help of Twitter — and the Bolsheviks took the Winter Palace without pausing to post photos of each other on Facebook.”

True enough — and utterly irrelevant. Those uprisings had a strong assist from contemporary technology too. The Bolshevik revolution would hardly have happened without the telegraphs and trains that spirited Lenin to the Finland station at the right moment. And what would the French revolution have been without the latest high-tech gadget, hot from the workshop of Dr. Joseph Guillotin?

Yes, of course, technology alone doesn’t make revolutions. The will of the people is the most vital ingredient. To foment revolt, first let their resentment simmer for a few decades. But that doesn’t mean social media cannot provide wavering revolutionaries with vital aid and comfort.

Remember the kids interviewed in Tahir Square the night Mubarak resigned? What struck me most was what they were doing while waiting for the reporter to finish his introduction: thumbing on their smartphones. Want to hazard a guess at the they were checking?

Consider what Facebook is: It’s the internet, refined and focused like a laser beam that bounces off you and your acquaintances with unsurpassed speed. None of its features are particularly new. They’re tried and tested. We’ve been sharing instant messages, blog-like daily details and rants, and coordinating projects and meetups online since those Tahir Square kids were babes in arms.

We’ve just never done all that in the same place, in front of so many of our friends, for hours at a time. We’ve never created a club that’s half a billion people strong and growing faster than ever, a club with room in it for literally any point of view. And we’ve certainly never carried that club in our pockets, around the world.

Consider what else that makes Facebook: Democracy in action, or at least the closest thing we see in our daily lives. A cacophony of viewpoints explode out of the briefest statements. Could you imagine how many comments you’d get on your Facebook wall in the next 10 minutes if you posted “I <3 Ghadaffi?” (Go ahead, try it. We’ll wait.)

Now imagine you’re a dictator trying to infiltrate those acres of free speech. Can’t be done. Who wants to friend a Libyan secret policeman? (Ask your pals, they probably now think you are one.) Keeping a beady eye on who said what to whom in this cacophony could take a lifetime. You could, of course, shut down the entire internet. Mubarak tried that, and it quickly became apparent that he’d also cut off the country’s lifeblood: commerce and tourism.

Or you could do what China has done for the last two years, and block access to Twitter and Facebook specifically. In which case, you draw attention to their power, and give rise to homegrown copycats (such as Renren.com and Kaixin001, in China’s case.)

Gladwell is right to argue that only strong social ties create revolutions. But he is wrong to say that Twitter and Facebook constitute weak social ties. He may believe this because he is a highly productive writer, and may never have been sucked into a two-hour Facebook hole.

Those of us who have know what it’s like down there. It isn’t some kind of vapid virtual bar scene. Okay, there is an element of that: The sense of perpetual party is what draws so many there in the first place. But what keeps us there is the fact that barriers between friends — lack of time, too much distance, lazy years-long silences — are annihilated.

The faces of Egypt’s Revolution 2.0

Post a quick dumb comment on an old estranged friend’s status update, and the next thing you know you’re trading viewpoints like college roommates. Start a Facebook group for your passion project, and realize you were never alone in wanting to make your ideal real.

It is impossible to live in that kind of environment — and make no mistake, we are starting to live there — without noticing how much the real world fails to measure up. As Facebook continues to spread — the trend line suggests it will reach 3 billion users, or roughly half the planet, by 2017 — more and more monolithic cultures are in for a shock.

True, not all of them are Middle East-style powder kegs. But sparks can ignite in all sorts of ways. For example, the fastest-growing segment of Facebook users is over 55. Think what a smart, self-aware network of grandmas could do for the world’s poorest regions.

So perhaps there is one reason not to call events in Egypt and its ilk a Facebook revolution. The real Facebook revolution is global, and it’s only just getting geared up.

Report: Libyan capital deserted; opposition seizes major city

9fef28914ff08c38d6339f1dd2faf373 Report: Libyan capital deserted; opposition seizes major city

CNN crew greeted as ‘liberating heroes’
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* NEW: The says it’s looking at “all options”
* Libyan state TV: A statement from Gadhafi is imminent
* Government forces tighten their on Tripoli, sources say
* Gunfire erupts at dawn Thursday as chanting crowds flee

Benghazi, Libya (CNN) — The Libyan capital was a ghost town Thursday morning, witnesses said, as anti-government protesters declared victory elsewhere after reportedly seizing control of the country’s third-largest city.

Misrata — also spelled as Misurata — is now in the hands of the opposition, who have driven out the mercenaries, according to witnesses and multiple media reports.

Witnesses and multiple reports also said that the town of Az Zintan was under opposition control.

The opposition also controls Libya’s second-largest city, Benghazi, where crowds cheered as international journalists drove through the city. The only shooting that could be heard was celebratory gunfire.

“When they saw us arrive, they just exploded with cheers and clapping, people saying “thank you, thank you” in English, throwing candy and dates inside the car,” CNN’s Ben Wedeman told AC360.

“It was just this incredible welcome that really drove home the point that these people are desperate for the world’s attention, desperate to get their stories out,” said Wedeman, the first Western television correspondent to enter and report from Libya during the crisis.

in their 20s were guarding the city with shotguns, clubs or hunting knives.

“They certainly aren’t lacking in enthusiasm, in serious dedication to defending their city,” Wedeman said. “What they’re lacking is the sort of thing that Moammar Gadhafi’s forces have: tanks, anti-aircraft guns, aircraft, warships.”

But the capital, Tripoli, was a different story. Sounds of gunfire erupted at dawn Thursday as chanting crowds fled. Government security forces tightened their grip on the Libyan capital, according to sources. In one of the neighborhoods, no one was allowed in or out.

“There’s nobody walking in the street, nobody is trying to get out, even to look through the window,” a resident who did not want to be identified for security reasons told AC360. “It’s a little scary.”

The caller said she is risking her life by talking to the media.

“I’ve been trying to keep my identity hidden,” the woman said. “There are reported kidnappings happening in homes for anybody credible that is talking to the media and giving them the truth about what’s happening in Libya.”

CNN could not confirm reports for many areas in Libya. The Libyan government maintains tight control on communications and has not responded to repeated requests from CNN for access to the country. CNN has interviewed numerous witnesses by phone.

As the unrest entered its 10th day, governments around the world scrambled to get their citizens out of the country, while leaders asked Gadhafi to halt actions against demonstrators. Libyan state television reported Thursday that a statement from Gadhafi is imminent.

A ferry chartered by the to evacuate citizens from Libya remained in port in Tripoli because of bad Thursday. Citizens are safe onboard and the ship is expected to leave at some point Thursday, diplomatic sources said.
When they saw us arrive, they just exploded with cheers and clapping, people saying “thank you, thank you” in English.
–Ben Wedeman, CNN senior international correspondent

RELATED TOPICS

* Tripoli
* Benghazi
* Libya
* Moammar Gadhafi
* Political Dissent
* Protests and Demonstrations

In his strongest and most direct statements to date on the unrest in Libya, U.S. President Barack said a unified international response was forming against Gadhafi’s use of violence against protesters.

“The suffering and bloodshed is outrageous and it is unacceptable,” Obama said Wednesday.

He announced that Secretary of State Hillary would travel to Geneva, Switzerland, on Monday to join a Council meeting to negotiate a resolution on Libya.

The Pentagon is looking at “all options” it can offer Obama in dealing with the Libyan crisis, a senior U.S. military official told CNN, in the first indication the crisis could take on a military dimension.

“Our job is to give options from the military side and that is what we are thinking about now,” said the official, who declined to be identified because of the extremely sensitive nature of the situation. “We will provide the president with options should he need them.”

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has called for sanctions against the nation and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said those responsible for attacks on civilians must be held legally accountable.

Because of the difficulties from reporting from within the country, it has been difficult to determine how many people have died in the violence.

Human Rights Watch said earlier this week that at least 233 people have been killed during the unrest. In Benghazi alone, at least 202 people have been killed since protests began last week, said the head of the largest trauma hospital there.

Ibrahim Dabbashi, Libya’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations, has said the death toll could be as high as 800. And in a speech to senate, the Italian foreign minister placed the toll as high as 1,000 deaths, citing unconfirmed reports.

He said the claim from official sources that 200 to 300 people have died nationwide lacks credibility.

For his part, a defiant Ghadafi has vowed to die a martyr, and urged his supporters to take back the streets from anti-government protesters.

He blamed the unrest on “rats” who are “agents” of foreign intelligence services and warned that people who carry weapons against the country will be executed.

The U.N. Human Rights Council is expected to meet Friday to consider a resolution to suspend Libya from the council, the French foreign ministry said.

How Important Is Sex in a Marriage?

e523ae6d4179bfa85cfac7ab7d88921e How Important Is Sex in a Marriage?

So many married seem to struggle to keep passion alive in their relationship. And it’s no wonder: There’s no shortage of factors that wreak havoc on sex lives ?- from busy schedules to kids to changing, aging bodies. Without physical intimacy, what’s left to hold a together? Plenty, one would think: shared history, family, friendship. So just how important is sex and passion to a ?

“Work + Kissing = a Happy Marriage”

Dan Cronin

It’s hard for me to comment on the notion of aging bodies affecting passion, because I met my wife 11 years ago and age has only made her more beautiful. I, on the other hand, am a different story. I’m looking more and more like Elliot Gould each day. (No offense, Elliot Gould. You’re just much older than I am.) So you’d have to ask her. But as for the mundane rhythms of life ?- from the hectic schedules to the screaming babies ?- it all adds up to a situation that seems a bit more like two shift workers trying to keep a business afloat than it does a healthy marriage. Sex is hugely important. Especially when it’s part of the deal that you’re not allowed to go anywhere else to get it. I used to hate it when I heard people say things like “Marriage is work,” but when routine sets in I realize that marriage is work. And it’s worth it. But my one little secret? Kissing. Married couples don’t like they did when they were dating, and they should really, really try. What better way to save a marriage than a little mouth-to-mouth resuscitation?

“Do Whatever It Takes”

Cathi Hanauer & Daniel Jones

Cathi: Virtually every marriage, no matter how steamy at the beginning, goes through sexual dry spells. As long as you have other ways of connecting and having fun together during those dry spells, that’s okay. The problem comes when sex and passion drop out of a marriage purely because caring for each other is so low on your list of priorities that you start to treat one another like roommates. Often, making time to have sex can end up being less about the physical act than about taking a moment to reconnect, share a laugh or a moment of affection and remember why you’ve committed to this person in the first place.

Dan: See, I wonder if this is one of those questions that’s different for and . Married or not, most seem to need sex regularly. For women, I believe passion is an essential: a sense of desiring and being desired. But sex with their husbands? I’ll bet many could take it or leave it. (By the way, I’m talking about everyone else’s sex life here, not my own, which is, of course, perfect.)

What is important for all of us married people is that we air our expectations and needs and work at ways to meet them. Some people schedule dates with their spouse, go to hotels, watch porn, take ballroom dancing lessons, send dirty text messages to each other ?- whatever it takes, as long as you’re honest and not overly greedy. Don’t be embarrassed about what you need. And don’t keep your needs and desires in marriage all to yourself as your resentment festers and divorce looms. In marriage, a little effort to please the other person can go a long way.
“Sex Fizzles Long before Love”

Dr. Sarah Stedman

An ideal marriage would be one that includes a balance between mind, spirit and body. So the becomes: Which of these components truly anchors a marriage through “better or worse”? It is my belief that sex and passion can be part of any relationship ?- and are therefore pretty easy to attain. Everything else requires a certain depth of intimacy and commitment to the . When the physical component is missing or troubled for whatever reason, it is even more important for the other sustaining elements to be present.

As we grow older, our bodies change ?- but so do our notions about romantic and sexual love. So in their young married years, couples need to recognize the importance of becoming one another’s dearest friend, of building together and stimulating each other intellectually, because a couple’s sex life is likely to fizzle out long before their love for one another. And if that is done successfully, people will realize that life holds few joys more satisfying than the process of growing old with your life partner.
“It’s All about Intimacy”

Michele Weiner-Davis, MSW

Sex is very important to a marriage. Just ask the one out of every three spouses who’s in a marriage where there’s a sexual desire gap. That is, one spouse is desperately unhappy because this person isn’t having sex nearly as often as he or she would like, and the other wonders, “What’s the big deal? It’s just sex.” But for the spouse yearning for more touch, it is a big deal. Sex isn’t just a physical release, it’s about feeling wanted, connected and loved.

When this sort of misunderstanding occurs, intimacy on all levels fades. Couples stop spending time together, snuggling on the couch, engaging in meaningful conversation, laughing at each other’s jokes. Friendship is replaced by resentment, hostility and a painful distancing. This puts marriages at risk of infidelity and/or divorce. But the good news is that regardless of the reasons for a sexual meltdown ?- whether it’s due to biological, personal or relationship issues ?- excellent help is available. Anyone wanting a more robust and passionate love life can have it
“Sex Keeps Love Alive”

Dr. Ruth

I think sex is the glue that holds a relationship together. If one or both partners is sexually frustrated, that’s likely to wreak havoc on the relationship, often in ways that the couple doesn’t even realize. They may be snapping at each other over other matters when the real conflict stems from problems in the sexual arena. The more discord there is in a relationship, the less likely it is that the couple is going to want to have sex. This in turn establishes a vicious cycle that causes not only the couple’s sex life, but also the relationship, to spiral downward.

Another pitfall of an asexual relationship is that all physical contact can eventually cease. Hugs and kisses aren’t a substitute for sex, but such physical contact is also a necessary component of a healthy relationship. If two people are acting like roommates, then after a while their reasons for staying together become increasingly questionable. For these reasons, it’s vital for couples of any age to be proactive and to keep the fires of passion burning. If their sexual fires become completely extinguished, slowly but surely their relationship will die out too.

Sex and Divorce

40dbdf5a50de2dfac6768c87b0fc8d73 Sex and Divorce

Coping with divorce and the prospect of new sexual relationships can be emotionally challenging, to say the least. Here’s a look at some of the pitfalls and opportunities you’ll encounter as you rebuild your sex life.

When it comes to divorce and new relationships, there’s a memorable line from the 1989 Rob Reiner film, When Harry Met Sally. Soon-to-be-married Marie and Jess have each just gotten off the phone from consoling their single friends, Harry and Sally, who are suffering the tremors of emotional uncertainty brought on by the aftermath of their first sexual encounter together. Afterward, Marie turns to Jess and pleads: “Please tell me I will never have to be out there again!”

That we understand this sentiment should come as no surprise. When married, our sexual routine was a safe bet. We either had sex or we didn’t. We were familiar with our partner’s moves, and we knew what was expected of us. Whatever else it may have been, it was safe. And our needs were — to varying extents, depending on the — being met. After a break-up, however, things are neither “safe” nor predictable. We’re not only dealing with a painful recovery process, but we’re also wondering if we’ll ever have a satisfying relationship — or whether we’ll be able to love or be loved — again.

Sex and divorce are two of the most emotionally potent subjects of our time. When combined, they create a psychological cocktail with all the portents of both ecstasy and hangover, of pleasure and pain, of risk and failure. And, as with any strong elixir, the subliminal message reads: handle with care.

Unless you left your ex for someone else, break-up usually means being single again. And being single again means that you’re going to face, in one way or another, the potential of new relationships and their inherent sexuality. And sexuality, for all the self-help manuals that have proliferated in North America over the last few decades, still remains a mystery to some extent. Sex is the private poetry that flows between two individuals — even if only for the moment — carrying with it a unique signature of communication at its most intimate. It’s a physical and emotional union where our most primal expressions of self are laid bare to another being.

Divorce, on the other hand, no matter how common it has become in our society, is still a painful psychological process of denial and acceptance, grief and growth, death and rebirth. How is one to manage both the pain of divorce and the uncertainty of new sexual encounters when dealing with one comes so close upon the heels of the other? Coping with divorce and the prospect of intimate sexual relationships thereafter is like having each foot in a different camp: which deserves the most attention?

The answer lies in finding the root that connects them both: in dealing with one issue, you ultimately find yourself dealing with both. And in order to begin that process, you need to examine the dynamics of the partnership that’s ended and identify a starting point uniquely your own.

Being out in the cold

According to Jill Fein, a certified Imago relationship therapist and LCSW practicing in Lincolnwood, IL, some people want to get right back on the horse after splitting up with their spouse — and the sooner, the better. “It’s a way to reassure themselves that they’re still desirable,” she says. “Others are very cautious: they want to protect themselves from ever being hurt again. Many clients have told me they’d love to be in a relationship if there were a guarantee they wouldn’t get hurt. But opening your heart to someone is a risk — and it’s the risk you have to take if you want to be in a relationship.”

There’s absolutely no doubt that the prospect of new sexual relationships is going to bring emotional issues related to your break-up to the forefront. If you have unresolved hurt or anger, these are going to affect your sexuality and your ability to become involved in a fulfilling manner. Post-divorce sex can either salt the existing wounds or be a loving, satisfying experience; it depends on where you are on your “healing curve.”

Being dumped can bring on low self-esteem, feelings of personal failure, rejection, and abandonment. And these will have a tremendous impact on how you perceive your sexual attractiveness and the way you interact sexually. In addition, there’s still a considerable divide between and with respect to sexual objectives and attitudes that govern sexual behavior.

Looking for Mr./Ms. Goodbar

Feelings of abandonment or rejection can manifest themselves in a number of ways. You could experience some sexual inhibitions and feel fearful of sexual contact, since rejection can have a debilitating effect on your sense of inner self and body image. Alternatively, you could use your sexuality as a vehicle to act out your anger and to regain a sense of control, or as an attention-getting device, attempting to repair your damaged self-esteem.

A woman who has been left by her spouse often loses much of her self-confidence and self-esteem, notes Toronto-based individual and marital therapist Karen Solomon-Ament. “She needs to feel love and acclamation, and so she’ll have sex with the guy who gives her attention and fulfills her immediate need. Then she wakes up the next morning hating herself. It can also be a way of retaliating from being in a relationship where she felt impotent, neglected, or rejected.” Of course, men can end up on this emotional rollercoaster, too.

Solomon-Ament says that this is really a form of self-sabotage: that by using casual sex specifically to deal with unresolved issues, you’re only effecting a temporary cure that carries one hell of an emotional hang-over — not to mention the physical dangers of having sex with someone you don’t know well. Your self-esteem and sense of self-worth continue to be assaulted the “morning after,” and you’re actively denying yourself all of the joy and fulfillment of a loving sexual relationship.

Sex with your ex

Many couples who’ve split up avoid the whole prospect of being out in the cold by continuing to have a sexual relationship even though the relationship is over. It’s a way of remaining in the safe, secure sexual we know and delaying the inevitable plunge into the unknown singles market. Therapists, however, are quick to point out that it “ain’t over ’till it’s over.” In other words, while sex with your ex can provide a wonderful release, you need to let go sexually in order to fully heal, grow, and move on to a new life. And that won’t happen until you and your ex can agree to stay out of each other’s beds.

Sharon admits to having an on-again, off-again affair with her ex-husband, Dave, for four years after they split up. “Every time we’d make love, I’d think ‘This feels so great — he must want to get back together with me.’ And each time, I ended up hurt and disappointed, because all he wanted was the sex.” The last time they slept together, Dave told her he was engaged to someone else. “It was like a cold bucket of water in the face,” Sharon remembers. “I asked him how he could cheat on his fiancée, and he replied that it wasn’t really cheating if it was just with me.” She suddenly realized that he intended to go on having sex with her even after his marriage to another woman, and that she had to terminate their sexual relationship if she wanted to get over him and move on with her life. “It was a bit like getting divorced again — really sad and painful,” she says. “And it took Dave years to stop making passes at me whenever I’d see him; he just couldn’t believe that I was never going to sleep with him again.”

Abusive marriages

If you’ve left behind an abusive marriage, there are probably a number of very deep emotional issues that need to be tackled before you should consider starting an intimate, sexual relationship. The main risk of entering into new relationships lies in repeating an established pattern: the relationship may be new, but your role as a victim will be all too familiar.

“Before getting into a new relationship, you should consider therapy,” advises Debra Burrell, a psychotherapist who provides “Mars-Venus” counseling and workshops based on the work of Dr. John Gray. “Make sure you’re not the same person who was the victim in the abusive relationship. You need to learn how to spot the warning signs early on, and how to attract a different type of mate.”

Burrell emphasizes that unresolved emotional issues stemming from an abusive marriage can result in the individual finding themselves in the same type of toxic relationships over and over again.

Sexually repressed marriages

When coming from a sexually repressed marriage, there are two common reactions: to choose another partner with low sexual requirements; or to get out there and make up for lost time! If you felt sex-starved by an unresponsive marital partner, then you’re going to have a great deal of pent-up urges that want expression. And finding a sexually responsive partner can open up a whole new realm of joy.

There are risks, however, to becoming sexually active immediately following a break-up. Burrell points out that you’re not likely to be very discriminating at this stage, and that you’ll only become more discerning with time. The difference between sexual experimentation as acting-out behavior — as opposed to the positive enjoyment of one’s freedom — depends on a number of psychological factors. Whether or not it’s okay to “go out and play” for a while depends on you: your background, religious beliefs, and personal history.

“If you’re inclined to have sex immediately after break-up, you need to accept that it’s raw sex,” says Solomon-Ament. “It’s primal. Sex for its own sake is okay as long as it’s consenting and not abusive or destructive to either partner.”

And remember to have safe sex each and every time you sleep with someone. You can’t tell whether someone has a sexually transmitted disease (STD) by looking at them: nice people get AIDS and herpes, too. If you don’t know what safe sex is (and you may not after a long-term, monogamous marriage), ask your doctor about safe-sex practices, or get a book such as Sex for Dummies by Dr. Ruth K. Westheimer or The Kinsey Institute New Report on Sex and read all about it before having sex with a new partner.

Most therapists agree that it takes a minimum of one to two years to heal from a divorce. You’re extremely vulnerable after a break-up, so if you’re not sure about whether you really want to have sex, or why you are having sex, it’s best to wait until you know.

Performance anxiety and inhibitions

Sexual performance anxiety in men is not uncommon after divorce. If this is the case, visit a physician to find out whether there’s a physical cause for your impotence. If physical problems have been ruled out, consider seeking help from a therapist who specializes in sexual issues. Non-organic impotence can be caused by anxiety or guilt: it often emerges when the relationship has not had a final ending or closure; or when it has broken down because the ’s wife was cheating on him; or sometimes even if the was the one who did the cheating.

Interestingly, though not surprisingly, men often try and work their problems out themselves rather than going for help. For health reasons, however, men suffering from impotence should find out whether the cause is organic or non-organic with the help of a medical practitioner. Then, when they’re ready, they can choose to seek help from a doctor or therapist.

Jill Fein suggests that anyone who has been in a long-term partnership may feel some sexual inhibition with a new partner. “It’s normal to have inhibitions after divorce,” she says. “There’s the fear of being naked in front of someone new — to leave the security of being with someone who has seen you change over the years.”

If you’re used to a sexual routine in which the ability to please and be pleased has been mapped out by experience, you’ll be facing a whole new set of questions, such as: “What’s expected of me now?” “Is there anything more about sex I should know?” or “What kind of sexual behavior is considered acceptable?” These concerns should eventually subside through the process of learning and sharing with a new sexual partner.

“There’s a terrible embarrassment about revealing yourself after years and years of marriage,” says Monica Morris, the author of Looking for Love in Later Life (Avery Publishing). “Both men and women feel like this. Men are afraid they won’t measure up, that they won’t be able to deliver — especially older men, although younger men also experience this… Sex is such a problem for men. Either they have an erection, or they don’t — there’s no faking it.”

Sexual inhibitions in a woman can have a great deal to do with negative body image. Becky Wilborn, president of the Diet Center in Manhattan, points out that being — or even feeling — overweight affects every area of a woman’s life: including her vitality, self-expression, and self-esteem. While she is taking part in the sexual act, this woman’s mind is likely to be engaged with thoughts such as: “I hope he doesn’t see this part of my body, or that part…” rather than concentrating on pleasure. Before she can truly enjoy and wholeheartedly participate in sex, she needs to deal with her body-image issues.

Body Image and Sex

Our body image is what is triggered in our minds when we look in the mirror: how we perceive and feel about ourselves. And there are huge gender differences. Although things are changing, says Wilborn, generally speaking, women are more concerned about appearance and body weight than men. Women are trained from childhood to believe that their appearance is extremely important and they must invest considerable time, effort, and expense in maintaining it if they want to be happy and successful.

Poor body image almost inevitably translates into bad sex. If you’re trying to flatten your stomach or worried about how your thighs look, for example, you’re unlikely to derive much pleasure from the sex act. Dr. Thomas Cash, a researcher into the link between body image and sex at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA has found that women who like the way they look reach orgasm more frequently than those who were preoccupied with their “physical defects”: they reported reaching orgasm 73% of the time compared with only 42% for women with a negative body image.

Very often, weight gain in a woman is a substitute “problem” for an underlying emotional issue she doesn’t want to deal with. For example, if she’s been hurt by a painful break-up and she’s terrified about her future prospects, she might gain weight out of a subconscious wish to become “undesirable” and thereby protect herself from having to face the pain and fear of rejection.

Wilborn, who estimates that 75% of her clients are women, points out that some women start to gain weight before a break-up to avoid sex with their husbands, from whom they feel emotionally estranged. “For some, the extra weight is there because of intimacy issues: the weight is a cushion protecting her from having to have sex with her husband. After a divorce, being overweight can be a barrier between a woman and a new relationship.”

Even a stunning woman can have a poor body image; she feels ugly or undesirable, and that translates into a negative energy that she sends out to men. Most women and men, whether they realize it or not, are attracted to a person’s energy far more than their physiology. The key to positive sexual energy is truly accepting and loving yourself — and that includes your body.

Ask yourself: “How do I feel about my body?” If the answer is a list of dislikes and complaints, then you can be pretty sure you have a self-esteem or body-image problem. The first step to renovating your poor self-image is to identify the belief that’s responsible for it, figure out where this belief came from, and deal with the experience that caused it. If you’re having trouble figuring out the original “trigger” for your negative thoughts, try writing a history of your body: how it looked from early childhood to present day. Maybe your dislike of your body began with a teenage case of acne, or with a sudden weight gain when you started taking birth-control pills, or with a critical boyfriend. Pick up a copy of The Body Image Workbook: An 8-Step Program for Learning to Like Your Looks by Thomas F. Cash, Ph.D. for help.

Men are not immune from feelings of low self-esteem or poor body image, either. “Men feel very much like this, too,” says Monica Morris. “Especially older men, although younger men also experience this. They’re afraid they won’t measure up, that they won’t be able to deliver. This seems to be a constant problem with men at any age.”

What men want

There’s an old saying that sex is emotional for women and physical for men. Although it’s dangerous to make generalizations about the way all men are, researchers have found that men are aroused mainly through their senses: particularly through sight, although sound and smell play their parts, too. And, as male arousal tends to be generated by physiological rather than psychological stimuli, men are far more likely than women to be ready for sex very soon after divorce.

The impetus to get involved again can be strengthened by a man’s need to fill the emotional gap that has been created by loss of a partner: having sex means that men can be intimate without having to talk about their feelings. It’s also a validation of their egos, which is especially important when the ego is bruised. Hence, many men are interested in having sex as early as the first date. “Sleeping around to build up self-esteem is a common mistake,” says Debra Burrell. “They’re seeking attention to make them feel loved and lovable, but ultimately, it always backfires.”

Frank asked his wife for a divorce after he discovered that she had been cheating on him with one of his best friends for over a year. He felt deeply betrayed and hurt by both of them, and ended up having a string of one-night stands in an effort to reassure himself about his attractiveness to women — and to make himself feel better. “At first, it was great,” he says. “Going to bed with different women made me feel like some kind of stud — and I was also trying to rub my ex’s nose in the fact that I had multiple sex partners. But after a while, I realized that sex with virtual strangers was not ultimately fulfilling: sure, I wanted sex, but I also wanted to fall asleep with my arms around a woman I loved.”

Frank discovered that he missed the emotional intimacy and touching of marriage as much as he missed the sex, and decided to stop sleeping around until he found someone with whom he really “connected.” He also started going for regular therapeutic massages, which he found lowered his stress level and filled some of his need to be touched by another .

For men, a desire to have sex doesn’t necessarily translate into a desire for a relationship. For women, however, having sex tends to have different, more powerful implications.

What women want

Women are more likely to glean a sense of being loved from non-sexual behaviors — having flowers bought for them, receiving loving letters, or having a man demonstrate his feelings through appreciative — than through the mere act of having sex. They’re also more likely to want to sort out their post-divorce issues before getting involved sexually again.

For women, sex is usually more than physical gratification. It’s an emotional investment — what Jill Fein calls “opening your heart.” Most men are able to walk away after sex and go about their business without a second thought, but women are left wondering where they stand. If her break-up is very fresh, the potential damages of becoming involved sexually far outweigh the potential benefits.

Respecting these differences makes sense, especially for women. Hence, a good rule of thumb should be: “What’s the hurry?”

Learning to trust again

Having sex can be one of the most intimate acts we can share as human beings. By its very nature, the sexual act makes us vulnerable to one another. And divorce has everything to do with the loss of our faith, idealism, and our trust in others and in relationships. Getting involved again is about learning to trust once more and, before we can do that, we must first heal, deal with our emotional issues, and get a positive sense of self.

Whatever you’re doing sexually, it should feel good, have a sense of “rightness,” and enhance your life with fulfillment and well-being. If you need help getting to that place, don’t be afraid to ask for it. Above all, it’s beneficial to have a healthy awareness of the sexual differences between men and women — this awareness will enable you to celebrate them in yourself and in your new partner.

Senator Harry Reid Wants to Ban Brothels in Nevada

ce8d16b9ea50847a1e6c7a3320620a4f Senator Harry Reid Wants to Ban Brothels in Nevada

CARSON CITY, Nev. — U.S. Senator wants to ban brothels in .

The democratic senate majority leader said it’s time for Nevada to outlaw so the silver state can attract more investment and businesses.

While addressing a joint session of the Nevada Senate and Assembly, Reid told lawmakers, “We should do everything we can to make sure the world holds Nevada in the same high regard you and I do. If we want to attract to Nevada that puts people back to work, the time has come for us to outlaw prostitution.”

But Reid’s ideas have caused a firestorm of controversy and head-scratching from officials and citizens alike as to why the senator would propose the outlawing of prostitution — a source of state revenue.

“I frankly don’t understand why the good senator is concerning himself with this issue when there are huge problems to be solved in Washington, D.C.,” said Richard Osborn, the county manager for Nye County.

Osborn reportedly said that the taxes raised by legal brothels help other programs and in 2010 more than $150,000 was paid and that money was used to for veterans’ care and ambulance service in Nye County.

Dennis Hof, owner of the Moonlite Bunny Ranch in Nevada told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that Reid is attacking the civil rights of the who work in brothels.

“These women have a right to work. He should be proud of us. We have a clean industry,” Hof said.

And Gov. Sandoval, a Republican, said he’s never heard that brothels detract from getting new businesses to come to Nevada noting that prostitution is a local issue.

Lance Gilman, owner of the Mustang Ranch and Wild Horse Resort stated in a news release that it is illegal prostitution that includes underage girls and “repulsive” pimps that tarnishes the image of Nevada not legally operated establishments.

“As we understand it, the legislative agenda is busy addressing a multi-billion dollar shortfall. The legal brothel industry helps support the small rural counties where they are located, and thus this action seems unwise,” Gilman said.

There are 10 rural Nevada counties (under 400,000 residents) that permit legal prostitution where brothels are licensed, taxed and regulated.

Budget-cutters take aim at nuclear modernization funds

7d69bec5f3d1dbee4cdc709e10cbb01e Budget cutters take aim at nuclear modernization funds

In hardball negotiations over the START nuclear arms treaty last year, Senate wrested a commitment from the to redouble work to overhaul the nation’s nuclear infrastructure.

USA/President Barack agreed to spend an additional $5 billion over 10 years on the effort, including some $650 million in the 2011 fiscal year.

The funds would be used to refurbish facilities and upgrade to provide safer and more secure devices, for example by making it impossible for them to be detonated if they are stolen by extremist groups. Obama and Senate Democrats even agreed that if it became necessary to cut discretionary spending in the future, the funding for nuclear modernization would be considered on the same basis as defense spending, making it harder to trim.

Somebody should have told House Republicans.

House budget-cutters working on the resolution to fund the through the end of the current fiscal year in September have eliminated the increased funding for nuclear modernization.

That’s not the last word on it though. Jon Kyl, the No. 2 Senate Republican who led the fight for nuclear modernization, says he will work to add the back in when the Senate takes up the resolution.

“I’m confident that the commitments to fully fund the modernization program made by the president and leaders from the Senate Appropriations Committee during debate on START will bear fruit and enable to work with our House colleagues to rectify this issue,” he said.

Iranian warships enter Suez Canal amid Israeli concern

b246c4b537be1df07f18ab4074eb42a2 Iranian warships enter Suez Canal amid Israeli concern

Two Iranian warships have entered the Suez Canal to make a passage to the Mediterranean Sea, canal officials say.

Iranian officials have said the warships are headed to Syria for training, a mission has described as a “provocation”.

“They entered the canal at 0545 (0345 GMT),” Suez Canal officials said.

It is believed to be the first time since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution that Iranian warships have passed through the waterway.

Iran’s request stated the vessels would have no equipment, nuclear materials or chemicals on board, the Egyptian defence ministry is quoted as saying.

A Suez Canal official said Egypt could only have denied transit through the strategic waterway in case of war.

But the significance of the deployment is entirely diplomatic, says the BBC’s diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus.

Analysis
Jonathan Marcus BBC Diplomatic Correspondent

The passage of two Iranian naval vessels through the Suez Canal represents yet another clear sign of Tehran’s widening strategic horizons.

And for Israel and its main ally – the US – it sends multiple signals.

It underscores that if a significant number of Western warships can operate in the Gulf – what Iran sees as its maritime backyard, then Iran too can deploy vessels to the Mediterranean – what Nato countries would regard as their maritime backyard.

The Iranian ships are to be based at a Syrian port, thus solidifying and symbolizing the close ties between Damascus and Tehran.

And coming at a time of significant turmoil in the region, the deployment illustrates that Iran is eager to secure its widening strategic interests. If this annoys the Israelis or the Americans, then so much the better.

* Iran’s unprecedented Suez transit

He says the two Iranian vessels do not represent any significant threat to either the Israeli or US vessels in the Mediterranean.

The ships involved are the Alvand – thought to be a British-built Vosper Mark 5 class frigate – and a supply vessel, the Kharg, also British-built.

The Alvand, a missile-carrying frigate, was launched in 1968. It is an impressive vessel by the standards of the Iranian navy, but no match for comparable Western warships nor the sophisticated missile boats of the Israeli navy, our correspondent says.

What is clear is that this deployment is not a direct response to the current upheavals in the , he adds.

Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency reported in January that Iranian navy cadets were going on a year-long training mission through Suez and into the Mediterranean – well before the protests that have swept the leaders of Tunisia and Egypt from power.

But coming in the wake of these political changes the Iranian deployment will be seen by the Israeli in particular as even more destabilising, our correspondent says.

e0edb82dfdae74b066da259d64085dd5 Iranian warships enter Suez Canal amid Israeli concern
Map

Israel considers Iran a threat because of its controversial nuclear programme, of ballistic missiles, support for Lebanese and Palestinian militant groups, and Tehran’s repeated anti-Israel rhetoric.

Last week, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said: “To my regret, the international community is not showing readiness to deal with the recurring Iranian provocations. The international community must understand that Israel cannot forever ignore these provocations.”

New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies-UPDATED!

b87457bb8538f263f83b64787d39a3e9 New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies UPDATED!

Lubben’s told so many different versions of her “path,” she herself may not know which parts are true.

Update: Previously non-working links have been repaired, and Episode 2 expanded by the filmmaker)

LOS ANGELES—Now that the 2011 AVN Awards are over, it’s time to start thinking about 2012… and one of the early favorites for next year’s Reuben Sturman Award might just be documentary makers Michael Whiteacre and Lydia Lee (who performed in adult movies under the name Julie Meadows).

The reason for considering such an honor? The pair have just released on YouTube the first two parts of their upcoming feature-length documentary, The Devil and Shelley Lubben—and it’s a blockbuster!

Anyone who’s been reading AVN for the past few years knows who Shelley Lubben is. She runs the non-profit (though likely not non-profit for her personally) Pink Cross Foundation, whose mission is to “save” porn stars from themselves; that is, from their occupation of making sexually explicit videos.

Lubben, who’s most recently been outspoken on the subject of requiring porn stars to wear condoms and other “barrier protection” while filming—she’s for it, of course—is herself a former performer, in that she made 17 movies in 1993 and 1994 (she claims more but has yet to provide any proof). But part of her schtick is that she claims to have contracted both herpes and papilloma virus (HPV) during her brief stint in front of the cameras—and that’s where Whiteacre and Lee begin their dissection of Lubben’s web of lies.

“As a survivor of the porn industry, I contracted human papilloma virus and herpes, a non-curable disease which later led to my battle with cervical cancer, where I had to have half of my cervix removed,” Lubben is seen announcing from a rostrum in Episode 1. “I also battled with severe anemia due to hemorrhaging I experienced for 12 years—in fact, I am still battling with damages to my reproductive organs. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry, but after eight long, hard years of recovery, and by the grace of God almighty, I escaped that hell and stand here, a mom with three beautiful daughters, thanks to a wonderful man, a godly man who stood by me in my horrible recovery. I have the perfect life.”

“I want you all to know that the last thing I want to do, people, is talk about porn,” she continues, “but my compassion for those people who are in modern-day slavery right now—I was overwhelmed, and so I went back to the industry and I began to reach out to them, and of course, I’ve been called every name in the book, you can imagine, but that didn’t stop me, and I founded Pink Cross Foundation, a non-profit organization that reaches out to workers, offering help, a way out, education, friendship. We go to porn conventions; we go to nightclubs, and heck, I even sing porn star karaoke to them.”

There’s just one problem with those statements: They’re likely a pack of lies—and Whiteacre and Lee detail just how false her words are, usually by using… her own words!

But that comes a bit later. The beginning of Episode 1 traces Lubben’s origins, from her birth in Pasadena to her eventual move to nearby Glendora… and her mental move to Cloud Cuckooland.

“Shelley began hearing voices at age 7, when Jesus told her one day she’d be famous,” narrator Sam Phillips intones, followed on-screen with a title card quoting Lubben from her self-published book, The Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn: “I loved Jesus very much. He used to talk to me all the time. And so I always knew that I was special but it seemed that no-one else saw that about me.”

According to the episode, Lubben’s parents stopped taking her to church at around age 9, and so of course it wasn’t long before she began misbehaving.

“Shelley began making up wild stories about men trying to kidnap her, but she would eventually come clean and nothing would change,” Phillips says over images of family life in the ’60s. “Her mother still called her ‘peculiar’ rather than ‘talented,’ and her father still spent his spare time working in the garage. By turns lazy and hyperactive, and unhappy competing with her baby brother for mom’s attention, Shelley was a difficult child to manage.”

But by Lubben’s own admission, she was a cheat and a liar.

“I cheated my way through high school,” she admits in her book, which is quoted on-screen. “I officially do not deserve my high school diploma, but I was so smart, I was able to cheat my way through. I was a nightmare as a teenager, so I began having sex, smoking pot, drinking alcohol, just partying, and my dad basically said, ‘Listen, if you don’t get your act together, I’m going to kick you out.’ I was about 18 years old, almost 18.”

But sure enough, after losing her driver’s license and being caught stealing from a local store, her dad did just what he promised. But that’s okay, because Lubben had already learned the lessons she’d need for later life.

“I learned to become a in high school, so imagine what I learned on the street,” Lubben is seen telling an audience. “Now I’m a con-artist, now I’m learning how to rip men off, how to get their money, how to manipulate con-men out of every last dollar; how to get exactly what I wanted from a man. And I loved it because I got all the attention I ever wanted.”

“The attention was like a drug for me. I was desperate for attention. Of course, the fast money was a major attraction,” title cards quote her as having written. “I became a professional liar and could literally lie my way out of anything,” she wrote on a Christian blog.

It’s a point that Whiteacre and Lee make several times during the course of the episode: One of Lubben’s primary motivations is her insatiable need to be noticed—a desire that easily led her into porn… by way of six years as a prostitute—a part of her history that she quickly forgets whenever it’s convenient to do so.

Fortunately, Lubben has appeared in videos from several seminars at which she spoke after she was “saved” from the horrors of porn, and some of the early ones tell quite a different story than what she related in the clip that begins this episode.

“Working as a prostitute, giving blowjobs—that’s right; did I say that word?—giving blowjobs on the street with men ejaculating on my face, getting blood on my face… I didn’t take care of myself,” she admits to various audiences. “I hadn’t even been to a doctor since I had a baby. That was the only time I ever went [to] doctors. From age 18 to 26, I went to the doctor’s one time… I got pregnant by tricks three times. Two out of the three times I had miscarriages because my reproductive system was messed up from all the multiple partners I was having, and how many times did clients break condoms on me? Too many times. Two of the times ended in miscarriages because I was so physically unhealthy because we don’t go to the doctor and we don’t go to the dentist; there’s no time for that. It’s all about the money.”

Helpfully, the filmmakers remind us that the Centers for Disease Control have some idea of how easily sexually transmitted diseases—like the ones Lubben claims to have contracted while performing—are acquired.

“HPV is so common that at least 50% of sexually active men and women get it at some point in their lives,” a title card reads. “Condoms may lower the risk of developing HPV-related diseases, but HPV can infect areas that are not covered by a condom.”

“And the number one reason for getting HPV, the doctor told me, is from having multiple sex partners,” Lubben then tellssome unidentified videographer… and us.

“So according to Shelley,” Lee summarizes, “she was a prostitute for six years before getting into porn, she was a prostitute as a porn star, and she was a prostitute shortly thereafter in 1994, and that’s not multiple partners?”

The end of Episode 1 features Lubben relating some of her memories of her days as a prostitute, when, for instance, she and a madam she was with would “pull 10, 15 tricks a day.” She also told of a Chinese man who picked her up at a strip club by offering her $200 to spend the night—but once they got to their hotel room, his cock turned out to be so small the condom kept slipping off.

“He ejaculated on me and in me,” Lubben says on tape, then a title card continues with a quote from her book: “I jumped off the and ran to the bathroom to try and clean myself out. Tagi asked me in his rough Chinese accent, ‘What’s wong?’[sic] What’s wrong? Was he kidding? Everything was wrong! I didn’t want to get pregnant again from a prostitution act and give birth to some ugly Asian baby.”

Pregnant again? Yep—and as title cards elaborate, “Shelley’s third pregnancy resulted in the birth of her daughter, Tiffany Ann Moore, on June 29, 1988. That means Shelley had two of her three miscarriages prior to 1988. That’s five and a half years before she walked onto a porn set. However, the story Shelley likes to tell conveniently shifts all the blame from herself—and onto the porn industry.”

And sure enough: “I’ve had several miscarriages due to the trauma in the industry,” Lubben claims on videotape. “I had hemorrhaging for 12 years and severe anemia. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry.”

Episode 2, titled “Roxy’s Rape,” deals with another set of Shelley “Roxy” Lubben lies: Her claim that at least some of the sex she had on camera was non-consensual.

“I was in the industry for the years of 1993 to 1994 where I was forced to have unprotected sex,” Lubben tells various audiences in a compiled segment. “I was brutally raped on the set when I contracted herpes in a six-man gangbang, on a dirty ranch, unsupervised, on a dirty picnic table…. I was forced and was coerced to do sex acts that I did not agree with… I was also a drug addict alcoholic, much like many of the other people working in the industry. I also was jaded, mentally ill, and traumatized from all the pornography and sex I was subjected to, all the brutality.”

As Whiteacre points out, her choice of words is interesting, considering that the Penal Code defines rape in part as, “force, violence, coercion, duress, menace, or the threat of immediate unlawful bodily injury,” as well as if the victim is intoxicated, drugged, mentally ill or mentally deficient.

“Here’s where Mrs. Lubben has a problem: She has to get around the fact that she actively, willingly sought in the porn industry, which by and large does not use condoms; booked the shoot, showed up, shot the scene, signed a contract and model release in the presence of others, acknowledging that she did not have diminished capacity, and that she was giving all necessary consent and waiving all liability,” Whiteacre analyzes. “She did the scene, she was paid, she cashed the check, and then she didn’t file a police report. So how to get around that? Here’s where Shelley goes all in. Short of being a minor, which obviously she wasn’t, she now claims that virtually every other element which might possibly negate her consent was present. She was forced, threatened, drugged, drunk, mentally ill, with no evidence of anything; just her word 15, 16, 17 years later.”

Also weighing in against Lubben’s version is one actor who participated in the “six-man gangbang” (Filmco’s Roxy A Gang Bang Fantasy) which Lubben references, actor Guy DaSilva.

“She was very aggressive in the scene; very aggressive, and so were the guys, but in no kind of dangerous kind of way, in any kind of threatening way, or harmful, where anyone was hurt or forced to do something they didn’t want to do,” DaSilva told Whiteacre and Lee. “That absolutely did not take place. She called the shots and then the guys including myself were just going through what we were told to do, and there was a director involved who was basically shooting it and ‘letting it fly.’ He wasn’t really even ‘directing’ the scene. For the most part, he just let it go and she carried it. She was not drunk or anything. She was capable of knowing what she was doing. Coherent.”

But, according to Lubben, not only was she personally assaulted on the set, but so is everyone who participates in making adult movies—and they all salve the pain by using drugs.

“On the movie set, it’s absolutely horrible and degrading for women,” Lubben claims. “In the background you can hear women throwing up, you can hear them crying—because it hurts… You know what women do before they do a scene? We go outside with other porn actors, we lay down lines of meth, we take big bottles and chug that down, and we’re ready. They beat the girls, they feed them—force-feed them drugs. Drugs are always provided. You can get Vicodin, that’s a huge drug. Xanax, alcohol, meth, cocaine—heroin is very big, and after a day of working with nothing but filth, bodily fluids, an unclean set—because all of the movies are done on private mansions, so there’s nothing regulated about this industry.”

Most of the rest of the episode consists of current and former performers—Melissa Monet, Nina Hartley, Danny Wylde, Monica Foster, Kayden Kross—putting the lie to Lubben’s claims, with Hartley being one of the most eloquent and logical.

“I’ve been on about 700 sets; I’ve done about a thousand scenes, 1200 scenes, give or take, and honestly, in all that, I’ve had ten experiences where I actually went, ‘Ew, never again with that person, that director’,” she tells the filmmakers. “And even then I would never call them rape; I would just call them, ‘Ew, that guy’s a jerk; I just won’t work with him again.’”

“No one ever kept me on a set,” she continues. “It’s not possible to hold somebody on a set against their will, and nowadays, with cell phones, the LAPD would love to have a phone call from some young in a closet on a set saying, ‘Please, please, come get me now, please!’ Oh, my God; what a field day they would have with that! It doesn’t happen. We don’t need to force anybody to be on a set; they come every day from the bus station going, ‘Please, please pick me; no, pick me!’”

Equally logical is Kayden Kross’s explanation of why there aren’t rapists in porn.

“She makes it sound like we don’t have a say in the matter; she turns it into rape,” Kross sardonically analyzes. “She says that she was raped, that we’re all being raped every time you show up to set. And I’m just saying, I mean, there would be a lot more rapists, I think, if that were the case, because look how easy we make it: You know, we drive ourselves there; we give you notice when we’re going to be there; we sit down in the makeup chair so you can make us look exactly how you want us to look—it’s really a good gig for rapists, I think. But then, you know, there’s the whole object of having to pay for it and there’s the whole thing where she can just say, ‘No, I’m not showing up.’ It kind of gets in the way if you really want to be a hardcore rapist, but definitely, if you just want to rape on the side, that’s easy.”

Hartley, however, gets to one of the core issues that separates the sexually normal world from the whacky religious one when it comes to sex.

“We’re still battling upstream,” Hartley asserts, “against the idea that women are delicate flowers who need protection from men, that sex is still something men want and women have, or it’s something that men do and women are, and still we are fighting the battle that women have sexual agency of their own; they have their own desires, their own needs, their own wants and their own ways of getting them.”

The religious aspect of this is something that greatly Whiteacre.

“What Shelley doesn’t get is that if Satan does exist in this world, he exists in the idea that the world somehow owes you a living,” Whiteacre told AVN. “That’s the philosophy that drives thieves and grifters and other criminals… The key to this ‘new improved’ Shelley Lubben is that her time in exile was spent sojourning at the Champions Centre in Tacoma, Washington. It’s a church and ministry training facility that spits out little clones who all recite the same mantra: ‘I’m a Champion’; ‘Jesus will help me lead a Champion life!’, etc. Shelley learned how to be a convincing public speaker, how to use logical fallacies like proof by assertion and appeal to authority, and how to get people to pass the plate.

“At the core of this kind of religious conversion is the need to make your old life look as as terrible and evil and sinful as possible, so that your salvation appears that much more miraculous,” he continued. “Now that Lubben looks back on her life with these new-found religious perspectives, all the little stray pieces from her old life fit neatly into new packages: The voices she’s been hearing since childhood are actually God and Jesus; Satan entered her body to give her the strength to get through a gang bang; hearing the moon tell her to ‘fuck off’ proves that she was demon-possessed, etc.

“Pornography is Lubben’s dragon, which is a convenient one to tilt at because that sentiment provides enormous job security,” he assessed. ” There will always be a natural human desire to explore sexuality. But, in a Lubben-centric world, her enemy is the enemy of the true church, because Lubben and the true church are one and the same.”

Um… All hail St. Shelley?

In any case, Whiteacre’s and Lee’s documentary promises the best analysis of a vocal enemy of the adult industry than has been produced in many years, and can be enjoyed by adult industry members and fans alike.

Westboro Baptist Church targeted by Anonymous

cbadb00e5f59d7761a04a8777af61c43 Westboro Baptist Church targeted by Anonymous

Hacker group Anonymous appears to have singled out its next target – the controvesial anti-gay in the .

An open letter, purporting to be from Anonymous, accused the church of bigotry and fanaticism.

It warned that Westboro’s websites would be attacked if the congregation did not stop its public protests.

In a defiant response, the church said it would not be silenced, and urged Anonymous to “bring it”.

Westboro Baptist Church has been widely condemned for its aggressive anti-gay campaigning.

A number of US states have passed legislation, banning Westboro’s members from protesting close to funerals.

The church’s leader, pastor , was banned from entering the by the Office in 2009.
Activist hackers

Anonymous is known for its “hacktivism”, targeting individuals, companies and governments whose behavior it objects to.

The group recently crashed a number of Egyptian government websites, in support of the country’s pro-democracy protests.

It also attacked several online companies that it believed had helped clamp down on Wikileaks’ activity, including Paypal and Amazon.

Fred Phelps Pastor Fred Phelps was banned from travelling to the UK in 2009.

Laying out its case against Westboro Baptist Church, the letter said: “We have always regarded you and your ilk as an assembly of graceless sociopaths and maniacal chauvinists & religious zealots, however benign, who act out for the sake of attention & in the name of religion”.

Despite being posted on an Anonymous news site, there was some uncertainty surrounding the provenance of the letter.

Further messages on the same questioned its authenticity.

The confusion is understandable, according to from firm Sophos.

“Anonymous is a headless organisation,” he said.

Mr Cluley warned that its followers could potentially be led into mounting a major hack under false pretenses.

“There are dangers in future that someone may pose as Anonymous and say that they want an attack”.

The Westboro Baptist Church issued a statement, branding Anonymous “a puddle of pimple-faced nerds”.

It called the threat a “bad miscalculation”, and appeared to goad Anonymous to action, with the phrase “bring it!”.

The church’s website, godhatesfags.com was unavailable.