May 21, 2013

U.S. commanders give upbeat war effort reviews

 U.S. commanders give upbeat war effort reviews
(Photo: , AP)

Story Highlights

Assessments could be interpreted as leeway for to order another round of
Maj. Gen. Robert Abrams, for example, cited “astounding” progress in the Zaray district of Kandahar
Panetta has not yet recommended to Obama a specific pace of withdrawals for 2013

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — U.S. commanders are offering glowing reviews of their 2012 , upbeat assessments that could be interpreted as leeway for President Obama to order another round of troop withdrawals next summer.

Obama faces a tension between calls by Democrats and even some Republicans to wind down the war more quickly and the military’s desire to avoid a too-fast pullout that might squander hard-won sacrifices.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has not yet recommended to Obama a specific pace of withdrawals for 2013. But during the ’s two-day visit to the this past week, commanders suggested that things are going better than is generally believed by an American public weary of war after 11 years.

Maj. Gen. Robert Abrams, for example, cited “astounding” progress in the Zaray district of Kandahar province, where the Taliban once held sway. He said Afghan forces are now “dominating” in that district. Abrams is the top coalition commander in .

Abrams told reporters he foresees a smaller by next summer, but he was not recommending or predicting any U.S. reductions. He was arguing that Afghan forces are performing so well that they should be able to hold their ground in 2013 with less coalition combat power.

No decision on 2013 U.S. troop withdrawals is likely to be announced until after Afghan President Hamid Karzai meets with Obama in Washington in early January. The U.S. now has 66,000 .

Panetta announced in Kabul on Thursday that Karzai had agreed to go to Washington the week of Jan. 7 to discuss the pace of coalition troop withdrawals as well as a U.S. military role in his country after December 2014, when the international coalition’s combat mission is to end.

Obama withdrew 23,000 U.S. troops this year, following a drawdown of 10,000 in 2011. There have been calls in Congress for Obama to accelerate the withdrawal next year, and from commanders’ own assessments of progress, it appears such a speedup could be coming.

Commanders portrayed the Taliban as fraying and failing, though not defeated.

Maj. Gen. Larry Nicholson, the international coalition’s deputy chief of staff for operations, said the Taliban had aspired to pull off a series of high-level assassinations in 2012 and regain territory they lost in 2011.

“They have failed at every one” of those objectives, Nicholson told reporters.

Nicholson also said, by way of illustrating how much things have changed in Afghanistan in recent years, that in the former Taliban stronghold of Helmand province, U.S. Marines are now complaining of boredom because there is so little fighting for them to do.

He was not arguing for further U.S. troop reductions in 2013 but observing that if Helmand is a model for Afghanistan, it may show that coalition forces can step back and give Afghan forces the lead role without sacrificing security and giving the Taliban new hope for a revival.

Col. Christopher Boyle, the operations chief on Abrams’ staff in Kandahar, said the Taliban are facing financial and other pressures.

“More and more we are seeing fracturing” in Taliban leadership circles, Boyle said, with factions fighting each other for territory and resources.

Abrams did acknowledge that the Taliban will keep “coming back” until there is some sort of reconciliation with the Afghan government.

For his part, Panetta has not telegraphed his recommendations to Obama on future troop levels.

The main message of his visit to Afghanistan, possibly his last as defense secretary, was one of reassurance to Afghans that they will not be abandoned after 2014. And he made a pitch for patience among Americans tired of war.

“For the first time since 9/11, we have a chance to achieve the mission that we are embarked upon,” Panetta said, alluding to the defeat of al-Qaeda and the stabilization of Afghanistan. “To achieve that mission will require a continued commitment, continued perseverance, continued partnership and continued sacrifice on the part of our nations.”

U.S., Britain press China and Russia on Syria

0d12af0c39da1612ee570851af007bb5 U.S., Britain press China and Russia on Syria

(PhatzRadio / ) — WASHINGTON – President Obama and British Prime Cameron renewed their call Wednesday for Russia and China to join the other countries in condemning the violent crackdown against opponents of ’s regime in Syria.

The two called on the international community to support U.N. special envoy Kofi Annan as he makes his case to Russia and China that it’s in their interests to condemn Assad.

“That’s the most important thing we can do right now,” Obama said at a news conference with Cameron.

STORY: Poll: Half of Americans back faster pullout from Afghanistan
PHOTOS: Cameron visits Washington
BLOG: Brits bring out the stars for state dinner at White House

The president again resisted calls for U.S. military action to stop the bloodshed in the conflict that has left at least 7,500 dead.

Both Russia and China have balked at Security Council measures aimed at Assad, saying also must be pressured to stop fighting.

Cameron suggested that Russia could be open to persuasion in light of the specter of the “bloodied, broken, butchering people nightly on the television screens.”

“It’s going to take a lot of hard work, it’s going to take a lot of patient diplomacy, but I think it’s actually in Russia’s interests that we deal with this problem,” Cameron said.

The two leaders met for about an hour of one-on-one talks before being joined by aides.

068add9cf327f7f9a70871c29fd0a79e U.S., Britain press China and Russia on Syria

By , AP

President Obama and first lady, Michelle, pose for an official photo with David Cameron at the White House .

Beyond the situation in Syria, the two sides discussed strategy for winding down the 10-year-old war in Afghanistan, preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed country and the U.S. and Britain’s economies.

While the situation in Afghanistan has been complicated by Sunday’s massacre of 16 civilians allegedly gunned down by a U.S. soldier and the burning of Qurans at a U.S. military base, Obama seemed reluctant to speed up the withdrawal of troops.

Presently, 23,000 Americans are scheduled to leave by September, and the United States is scheduled to end its combat role by the end of 2014.

“I don’t anticipate at this stage that we’re going to be making any sudden additional changes to the plan that we currently have,” Obama said.

On Iran, Obama and Cameron were in lock step, saying that there is a window for diplomacy and sanctions to persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear program. That position collides with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s view that the situation is more dire. Still, Obama was less sanguine that efforts by the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany to restart talks with Tehran will prove fruitful.

“There’s been a tendency for Iran in these negotiations … to delay, to stall, to do a lot of talking but not actually move the ball forward,” Obama said.

At a formal welcoming ceremony at the White House, Obama made light of the fact that British soldiers burned the White House during the War of 1812. Cameron, tongue firmly in cheek, apologized.

“I am a little embarrassed, as I stand here, to think that 200 years ago my ancestors tried to burn this place down,” Cameron said. “Now, looking around me, I can see you’ve got the place a little better defended today. You’re clearly not taking any risks with the Brits this time.”

Cameron, who joined Obama for an NCAA college basketball game Tuesday in Dayton, Ohio, was honored with a state dinner Wednesday night. Among the guests were actor George Clooney and Vogue editor Anna Wintour.

House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH

c12934b6a81a2e7ab3ace3ba7531fe27 House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
CAPTION
By , AP

(PhatzRadio / ) — The political pressure on the ’ union to agree to immediate testing for is ratcheting up.

Members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter on Tuesday to Committee Chairman Fred Upton, requesting hearings on the continuing between the league and the players on the subject of HGH testing.

In the new following the long , the two sides announced that they would begin testing during the 2011 season. But the union has balked, questioning the scientific validity of the testing.

However, the House committee says if the test is good enough to be used by the World Anti-Doping Agency for Olympic testing, it should be good enough for testing of players.

The letter cited NFL TV analyst , a former player, as saying that “the union is backing off because they have players guilty of using this substance . . . (and) there are many who believe it is 20% of the league.”

The letter ends by saying, “ will allow us to learn about these issues, hearing from top scientists about the validity of HGH testing and from the NFL and the about the extent of HGH use in the league and their plans for testing to eliminate such use. . . .we urge you to hold hearings on this issue as soon as possible.”

The letter was signed by , Reps. Henry Waxman, G.K. Butterfield and Bobby Rush.

The NFL issued a statement in response on Tuesday that read,

“The committee’s commitment to this issue, but there should be no need for this hearing if the union would simply live up to its agreements. One was made in August as part of the new to begin testing for HGH and another was reached with Congressmen Issa and Cummings on October 14. The October 14 agreement was to begin collections immediately and then work out the remaining details of the HGH testing program promptly. We stand ready to move forward.”

Said executive director DeMaurice Smith Tuesday: “Players’ health and safety and the integrity of the game go hand in hand. I applaud the Members in their request for a hearing and look forward to fully discussing all of these issues as soon as possible. We are sending letters to the teams immediately in order to assist Congress in its fact-finding mission.””

House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH

help House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
009b06f38695de0d0d383c24bf894a9e House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
help House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
1df4af0e6e8f900d91267ca68edfd555 House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
help House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
7f14bbf0b0c13fca3af83ff82c0b71ca House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
help House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
7c7d24e16ce9807a51c9caae4d336d4f House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
help House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH
91aee22704ce22d64901b00c11bedef5 House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH

325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 House committee urges hearings on NFL testing for HGH

Source: Obama likely to endorse ‘millionaire’s surtax’

0041820a97258a0d0dd1cf189712706a Source: Obama likely to endorse millionaires surtax
President talks about US as he speaks at a fundraiser in Dallas, Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. Obama is fundraising in Dallas and will speak at Children’s Laboratory School at Eastfield College in Mesquite, Texas., on the American Jobs Act. (AP Photo/)

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

The so-called “millionaire’s surtax” would be 5.6% of income over $1 million
It would raise more than enough to cover the president’s $447 billion jobs bill, a source says

Washington () — President Barack Obama will use a news conference Thursday morning to push Congress to act on his jobs plan, a senior said.

Obama will likely endorse the so-called “millionaire’s surtax” included in a jobs bill filed by on Wednesday night, the official said.

The surtax in the bill introduced by Harry Reid is a 5.6% on earnings over $1 million — up from the 5% initially proposed.

It would raise more than enough to fully pay for the president’s $447 billion jobs bill within the required 10-year window, a Senate Democratic leadership aide said.

The tax hike would kick in in 2013, rather than 2012 as previously proposed.

“It satisfied our caucus’ desire for this surtax on millionaires to pay for (the jobs plan) and is consistent with the president saying no in 2012,” a Senate Democratic leadership aide told CNN.

The president’s top advisers have said they aim to present a unified Democratic front on jobs.

The president’s news conference is scheduled for 11 a.m. ET.

(Phatforums News / ) — President Obama not only has a political problem with the economy, but with voters’ confidence in his ability to handle it.

By a margin of 44%-11%, voters say the economy is getting worse, not better, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll — and only 29% say the economy will get better if Obama is re-elected.

The Quinnipiac poll also says that voters believe Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney would do a better job on the economy than Obama, by a margin of 49%-39%; Rick Perry gets the nod over Obama by a margin of 45%-42%.

Overall, voters disapprove of the job President Obama is doing, by a margin of 55%-41%.

“The trend isn’t good for President Barack Obama,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. “His disapproval has gone up 9% since the summer, from 46% in July to 52% in September to 55% today.”

Some good news for Obama in the Quinnipiac poll: More voters continue to blame predecessor George W. Bush for the state of the bad economy, by a margin of 51%-32%.

“The political challenge for the president will be whether he can make voters believe his eventual GOP opponent is a carbon copy of the former president,” Brown said. “The fact that voters are unsure whether the economy will improve if he is re-elected is not a good sign for Obama.”

Brown also said: “The president is stuck at a politically unhealthy level for someone who wants to be re-elected. His standing with the American people is obviously closely related to their views of the economy.”

More from the poll:

The president’s job approval among Democrats, 77%-18%, is lower than his disapproval among Republicans, 91%-7%. Independent voters disapprove 56%-38%.

Men disapprove 60%-36% and women disapprove 51%-46%. Black voters approve 81%-15%, but disapproval is 62%-34% among white voters and 50%-45% among Hispanic voters.

Obama, GOP duel over taxes and the debt ceiling

e9709b75b6e63cc2ec8d1b9165996a7d Obama, GOP duel over taxes and the debt ceiling

(Phatforums Blog/ USA Today) – Facing higher unemployment and the prospect of a government default, President and the Republicans offered very different views Saturday on the role of taxes in a deal to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion .

In his weekly , President Obama called for a “balanced” approach that combines with additional revenue through the elimination of for wealthy Americans.

Obama also pledged cooperation with the Republicans, saying that “with a recovery that’s still fragile and isn’t producing all the jobs we need, the last thing we can afford is the usual partisan game-playing in Washington.”

Republicans say Obama’s revenue plans amount to tax hikes that will kill jobs, and their radio address focused on the Friday jobs report showing that the has risen to 9.2%.

“Mr. President, Americans are asking you, ‘where are the jobs?’,” said Rep. , R-Wa. “We invite you to change course and work with us to empower, not burden, our nation’s small businesses, families, and entrepreneurs.”

Obama meets with Republican and Democratic Sunday in the latest round of negotiations over the debt ceiling.

The parties are working against a deadline of Aug. 2, the day the Treasury Department says it won’t be able to pay the nation’s bills. But they remain divided over spending and taxes.

ae4efbd6d7b2d458da680c8694bc0674 Obama, GOP duel over taxes and the debt ceiling

CAPTION
By Susan Walsh, AP
In calling for a balanced approach to , Obama said must look at cutting domestic and defense spending, while “addressing the challenges” of big entitlement programs like Medicare.

“The good news is, we agree on some of the big things,” Obama said. “We agree that after a decade of racking up deficits and debt, we finally need to get our fiscal house in order.”

Republicans like Rodgers say they will oppose any tax increase.

“If we’ve learned anything, it’s that we cannot spend, tax, or borrow our way to prosperity,” Rodgers said in the GOP radio remarks.

The president’s radio address:

Earlier this week, we did something that’s never been done here at the White House — we had a Twitter Town Hall. I even sent my first live tweet as President. The questions at the town hall were sent in from across the country and covered all kinds of topics — from jobs and the economy to education and energy.

Lots of people also submitted different versions of another question. They’d start by saying that our politics has grown so contentious. Then they’d ask, When will both parties in Congress come together on behalf of the people who elected them?

That’s a really important question, and it goes to the heart of a debate we’re having right now in this country — and that’s the debate about how to tackle the problem of our deficits and our debt.

Now, there are obviously real differences in approach. I believe we need a balanced approach. That means taking on spending in our domestic programs and our defense programs. It means addressing the challenges in programs like Medicare so we can strengthen those programs and protect them for future generations. And it means taking on spending in the tax code — spending on tax breaks and deductions for the wealthiest Americans.

But I also know that Republicans and Democrats don’t see eye to eye on a number of issues. And so, we’re going to continue working over the weekend to bridge those gaps.

The good news is, we agree on some of the big things. We agree that after a decade of racking up deficits and debt, we finally need to get our fiscal house in order. We agree that to do that, both sides are going to have to step outside their comfort zones and make some political sacrifices. And we agree that we simply cannot afford to default on our national obligations for the first time in our history; that we need to uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America

With a recovery that’s still fragile and isn’t producing all the jobs we need, the last thing we can afford is the usual partisan game-playing in Washington. By getting our fiscal house in order, Congress will be in a stronger position to focus on some of the job-creating measures I’ve already proposed — like putting people to work rebuilding America’s infrastructure, or reforming our patent system so that our innovators and entrepreneurs have a greater incentive to generate new products, or making college more affordable for families. And businesses that may be holding back because of the uncertainty surrounding the possibility of a default by the U.S. government will have greater confidence to invest and create jobs.

I know we can do this. We can meet our fiscal challenge. That’s what the American people sent us here to do. They didn’t send us here to kick our problems down the road. That’s exactly what they don’t like about Washington. They sent us here to work together. They sent us here to get things done.

Right now, we have an extraordinary — and extraordinarily rare — opportunity to move forward in a way that makes sure our government lives within its means, that puts our economy on a sounder footing for the future, and that still invests in the things we need to prosper in the years to come. And I’m hopeful that we will rise to the moment, and seize this opportunity, on behalf of all Americans, and the future we hold in common. Thanks everyone, and have a great weekend.

08e15d402aa6552b3e238d43d10384cf Obama, GOP duel over taxes and the debt ceiling
CAPTION
By Evan Vucci, AP
The Republican address:

Hello, I’m Cathy McMorris Rodgers, I have the privilege of representing Washington’s Fifth Congressional District, and I serve as vice chair of the House Republican Conference.

‘Where are the jobs?’

It’s the only question worth asking after yesterday’s unemployment report. Our economy is actually creating fewer jobs month-to-month right now. More than 14 million people are out of work. They’ve been unemployed, on average, for 40 weeks, a new record.

The Obama Administration promised its ‘stimulus’ would keep unemployment below eight percent. Two and a half years later, the unemployment rate is more than nine percent and still rising. That’s unacceptable. America can do better.

By and large, it’s uncertainty that’s holding our economy back, whether it’s uncertainty about our overwhelming debt, uncertainty about energy prices, or uncertainty about all the burdensome mandates coming down from Washington. Small business owners are pleading for government to just get out of the way.

The Republican majority in the House has been listening. We’re focused on implementing our Plan for America’s Job Creators, which is designed to remove government barriers to private sector job growth — the kind of growth the ‘stimulus’ promised but failed to deliver. You can check out the details of our plan for yourself at Jobs.GOP.gov.

As a part of this blueprint, we’ve passed legislation to stop policies that drive up gas prices and expand domestic energy production to help lower costs and create jobs.

We’ve voted to modernize the patent system to help America’s innovators level the playing field.

And we’ve approved a budget that pays down our debt over time and makes Washington live within its means.

Unfortunately, the Democrat-led Senate hasn’t considered any of these jobs bills. Not a single one. In fact, it’s been more than 800 days since the Senate last passed a budget.

President Obama has said he’s open to job creation ideas from anyone in any party. If that’s the case, he should encourage Democrats in the Senate to take up the jobs bills the House has passed.

From the look of things, the Democrats who run Washington don’t have a jobs plan; they have a spending agenda. They’re proposing a rehash of what’s already been tried: more spending, more taxes, and bigger government. These are the Washington-knows-best policies that steered us towards a dead end.

If we’ve learned anything, it’s that we cannot spend, tax, or borrow our way to prosperity. To create jobs and set our country on a sound fiscal course, we must stop spending money we don’t have.

That’s why Republicans have maintained there can be no increase in the national debt limit unless it is accompanied by serious spending cuts and reforms. To be truly serious, these cuts should exceed the amount by which President Obama wants the debt limit increased. And there can be no job-crushing tax hikes on families and small businesses.

Washington Democrats disagree. They say that to reduce our out-of-control debt, the American people should sacrifice in the form of higher taxes. That’s where they’re wrong. The American people have already sacrificed in lost jobs, more debt, and chronic uncertainty. It’s time for Washington to do the sacrificing.

Last month, more than 150 economists echoed this viewpoint. ‘We will not succeed in balancing the federal budget and overcoming the challenges of our debt,’ they wrote, ‘until we succeed in committing ourselves to government policies that allow our economy to grow.’ Tax hikes won’t help our economy grow — they would just make matters worse.

If we do this right, we can reduce uncertainty in the short-term and pay down our debt over the long-term. That’s what our job creators need and that’s what our children deserve.

Mr. President, Americans are asking you, ‘where are the jobs?’ We invite you to change course and work with us to empower, not burden, our nation’s small businesses, families, and entrepreneurs. We can do this if we work together.

Again, you can learn more about the Republicans’ jobs plan at Jobs.GOP.gov. Thanks you for listening.