May 20, 2013

U.S. says it sent B-2 stealth bombers over South Korea

130328013535 b 2 spirit bomber story top U.S. says it sent B 2 stealth bombers over South Korea

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

The planes flew to South Korea and back in one mission, the U.S. says
It says the flights show its ability “to conduct quickly”
U.S. and chiefs spoke by phone Wednesday evening
A previous announcement about B-52 flights over South Korea angered the North

() — The United States said Thursday it sent to South Korea to participate in annual amid spiking tensions with North Korea.

The B-2 Spirit bombers flew more than 6,500 miles from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri to South Korea, dropping inert munitions there as part of the exercises, before returning to the U.S. mainland, the U.S Forces in Korea said in a statement.

The mission by the planes, which can carry both conventional and nuclear weapons, “demonstrates the United States’ ability to conduct long range, precision strikes quickly and at will,” the statement said.

The U.S. military’s announcement earlier this month that it was flying B-52 bombers over South Korea to participate in the routine exercises prompted an angry reaction from the regime of Kim Jong Un, which has unleashed a torrent of threats in the past few weeks.

There was no immediate reaction to the U.S. statement Thursday from the North’s state-run .

“The United States is steadfast in its alliance commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea, to deterring aggression, and to ensuring peace and stability in the region,” the statement said, using South Korea’s official name. “The B-2 bomber is an important element of America’s enduring and robust extended deterrence capability in the Asia-Pacific region.”

The disclosure of the B-2 flights comes a day after North Korea said it was cutting a key military hotline with South Korea, provoking fresh expressions of concern from U.S. officials about Pyongyang’s recent rhetoric. There are several hotlines between North and South Korea.

“North Korea is not a so it wouldn’t be smart to dismiss its provocative behavior as pure bluster,” a U.S. official said Wednesday.

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel spoke by phone to his South Korean counterpart, Kim Kwan-jin, on Wednesday evening, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said, noting the “heightened tension on the Korean Peninsula.”

The recent saber-rattling from Pyongyang has included threats of pre-emptive nuclear strikes against the United States and South Korea, as well as the declaration that the armistice that stopped the Korean War in 1953 is null and void.

On Tuesday, the North said it planned to place military units tasked with targeting U.S. bases under combat-ready status.

Most observers say North Korea is still years away from having the technology to deliver a nuclear warhead on a missile, but it does have plenty of conventional military firepower, including medium-range ballistic missiles that can carry high explosives for hundreds of miles.

Tensions escalated on the Korean Peninsula after the North carried out a long-range rocket launch in December and an underground nuclear test last month, prompting the U.N. Security Council to step up sanctions on the secretive regime.

Pyongyang has expressed fury over the sanctions and the annual U.S.-South Korean military exercises, which are due to continue until the end of April.

The North has claimed that the exercises are tantamount to threats of nuclear war against it.

Sharp increases in tensions on the Korean Peninsula have taken place during the drills in previous years. The last time the North cut off military communications with the South was during similar exercises in March 2009.

Obama defends drone strikes

a069c74b40b065a76cc19c173c1ade68 Obama defends drone strikes
(By Chris Kaufman, AP)

( News / USA Today) — President Obama is defending his use of attacks in Pakistan and elsewhere, saying they have been used to kill more terrorists than civilians.

“I want to make sure that people understand actually have not caused a huge number of ,” Obama said during a forum with YouTube and -plus. “For the most part, they have been very precise, precision strikes against al Qaeda and their affiliates. And we are very careful in terms of how it’s been applied.”

In his most extended public comments on drones, Obama disputed the “perception” that “we’re just sending in a whole bunch of strikes willy-nilly.”

“This is a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists, who are trying to go in and harm Americans, hit American facilities, American bases and so on,” Obama said.

Obama added: “It is important for everybody to understand that this thing is kept on a very tight leash. It’s not a bunch of folks in a room somewhere just making decisions. And it is also part and parcel of our overall authority when it comes to battling al Qaeda. It is not something that’s being used beyond that.”

The president also disputed about drone activity in Iraq, saying they have been “a little overwritten.”

“The truth of the matter is we’re not engaging in a bunch of drone attacks inside of Iraq,” Obama said. “There’s some surveillance to make sure that our is protected.”

A at the YouTube/Google forum persisted, wondering about the use of drones and national sovereignty.

Said Obama:

Well, you know, I think that we have to be judicious in how we use drones.

But understand that probably our ability to respect the sovereignty of other countries and to limit our into somebody else’s territory is enhanced by the fact that we are able to pinpoint strike on al in a place where the capacities of that military in that country may not be able to get them.

So, obviously, a lot of these strikes have been in the Fattah and going after al Qaeda suspects, who are up in very tough terrain along the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. For us to be able to get them in another way would involve probably a lot more intrusive military actions than the one that we’re already engaging in.

That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be careful about how we proceed on this. And you know, obviously, I’m looking forward to a time where al Qaeda is no longer operative network and, you know, we can refocus a lot of our assets and attention on other issues.

But this is something that we’re still having to deal with, there’s still active plots that are directed against the United States, and I think we are on the offense now. Al Qaeda’s been really weakened, but we’ve still got a little more work to do, and we’ve got to make sure that we’re using all our capacities in order to deal with it.

NATO deploys helicopters to raise pressure on Gaddafi

3c0331febad75ebfce553e8839d09fed NATO deploys helicopters to raise pressure on Gaddafi

(Reuters) – British and French were used to strike inside Libya for the first time overnight Saturday, hitting targets in the oil port of Brega as NATO forces stepped up their air war against Muammar Gaddafi.

A NATO-led military alliance extended its mission to protect civilians in Libya for a further 90 days this week, and France said it was stepping up military pressure as well as working with those close to Gaddafi to try to persuade him to quit.

“This was the first operational mission flown by Apaches at sea,” British Secretary of State for Defense said.

“The additional capabilities now being employed by NATO further reinforces the UK’s enduring commitment and NATO’s determination to… ensure that the people of Libya are free to determine their own future.”

Military analysts say attack helicopters will allow more precise strikes against pro-Gaddafi forces hiding in built-up areas than the high- used so far, while reducing the risk of .

But given the vulnerability of helicopters to ground fire, their deployment also increases the risk of Western forces suffering their first casualties of the campaign.

Critics of the war have warned of “mission creep” but NATO has said the use of helicopters would not presage the deployment of ground troops, which Western nations have ruled out.

Now in its fourth month, the Libyan conflict is deadlocked, with rebels unable to break out of their strongholds and advance toward Tripoli, where Gaddafi appears to be entrenched.

The helicopter attacks struck military targets around the eastern town of Brega, location of an oil .

Rebel forces, who have taken control of the eastern city of Benghazi, swept west through Brega early in the uprising before beating a retreat from near Gaddafi’s home town of Sirte in late March. Gaddafi’s forces have since dug in around the .

“The Apaches were tasked with against a regime radar installation and a military checkpoint, both located around Brega,” said Major General Nick Pope, the Chief of the Defense Staff’s Strategic Communications Officer.

“In the same area, Royal Air Force ground attack aircraft destroyed another military installation, whilst a separate RAF mission successfully attacked two ammunition bunkers at the large Waddan depot in central Libya.”

DIPLOMATIC SETBACKS

In the latest diplomatic setback for Gaddafi, China made its first confirmed contact with Libyan rebels this week following a spate of defections by high profile figures including senior oil official and former prime minister Shokri Ghanem.

Libyan rebels and NATO have made Gaddafi’s departure a condition for agreeing a ceasefire in the conflict, but he emphatically told visiting South African President Jacob Zuma this week he would not leave Libya.

“He is more and more isolated,” French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe told Europe 1 radio. “There have been more defections around him and we have received messages from his close entourage which has understood that he must leave power.”

In Beijing, a terse Chinese Foreign Ministry statement said Beijing’s ambassador to Qatar, Zhang Zhiliang, had met and “exchanged views on developments in Libya” with Mustafa Abdel Jalil, the chairman of the rebel council that is trying to offer itself as a credible temporary alterative to Gaddafi.

The ministry gave no details but the meeting itself was an indication that Beijing wants to keep open lines of communication with the rebel forces.

The United Nations has said government-held parts of Libya were running out of food and the capital Tripoli this week saw the first big protest in months against Gaddafi’s 41-year rule.

Gaddafi says the rebels are armed criminals and al Qaeda militants, and has called the NATO intervention an act of colonial aggression designed to grab Libya’s plentiful oil.

Western governments say they believe they are wearing down Gaddafi’s ability to control Libya through a combination of diplomatic pressure and military action.

Rebels control the east of Libya around Benghazi and the Western Mountains stretching from the town of Zintan, 150 km (95 miles) south of Tripoli, toward the border with Tunisia.

In Misrata, rebel leader Abdelsalam reported fighting in Dafniyah to the west of the city that is now in rebel hands.

He said revolutionaries in Zlitan had been supplied with weapons and telecommunications equipment from Misrata and Benghazi, and had been waging attacks at night, “but not on the scale that threatens Gaddafi’s forces’ iron grip on Zlitan.”

Zlitan is the next town to the west of Misrata, and one of only three between there and Tripoli. A rebel spokesman there, Mabrouk, said security in the town was tight.

(Additional reporting by Zohra Bensemra in Misrata, Abdelaziz Boumzar in Bir Ayyad, Libya, John Irish in Paris, Christina Fincher in London, David Brunnstrom in Brussels and Joseph Nasr in Rabat; Writing by Lin Noueihed; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)

Libya says Gaddafi survives air strikes, but son killed

e9071c3aac444c6fd9cb81200757e102 Libya says Gaddafi survives air strikes, but son killed

(Reuters) – Libyan leader survived a strike on a Tripoli house that killed his youngest son Saif al-Arab and three young grandchildren, a said on Sunday.

Libyan officials took journalists to the house, which had been hit by at least three missiles. The roof had completely caved in at places, leaving mangled rods of steel hanging down among splintered chunks of concrete.

“What we have now is the law of the jungle,” government spokesman Ibrahim told a news conference. “We think now it is clear to everyone that what is happening in Libya has nothing to do with the protection of civilians.”

The deaths have not been independently confirmed. But they would be sure to heap pressure on NATO — which denies targeting the Gaddafi family — from opponents of the mission who say it goes beyond its U.N. mandate to protect civilians.

It would also show the vulnerability of Gaddafi himself.

Fighting in Libya’s civil war, which grew from protests for greater political freedom that have spread across the , has reached stalemate in recent weeks with neither side capable of achieving a .

Ibrahim said Gaddafi’s youngest son, Saif al-Arab, was killed in the attack. Saif al-Arab, 29, is one of Gaddafi’s less prominent sons, with a limited role in the . Ibrahim described him as a student who had studied in Germany.

The grandchildren killed were pre-teens, Ibrahim said.

“The leader himself is in good health. He wasn’t harmed,” he said. “His wife is also in good health.

“This was a direct operation to assassinate the leader of this country. This is not permitted by international law. It is not permitted by any moral code or principle.”

NATO DENIES GADDAFI

NATO denied targeting Gaddafi, or his family, but said in a statement it had launched on military targets in the same area of Tripoli as the bombed site seen by reporters.

“NATO continued its against regime military installations in Tripoli overnight, including striking a known command and control building in the Bab al-Aziziyah neighborhood shortly after 1800 GMT Saturday,” it said.

NATO’s commander of Libya operations, Canadian Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, said the target was part of a strategy to hit command centers that threaten civilians.

“All NATO’s targets are military in nature…We do not target individuals,” he said in a statement.

Any appearance of an assassination attempt against Gaddafi is likely to lead to accusations that the British- and French-led strikes are overstepping the provisions of the U.N. resolution to protect civilians.

Britain said on Sunday it was investigating reports the ambassador’s residence in Tripoli had been attacked, along with other countries’ diplomatic premises.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a long-time ally of Gaddafi, called the attack attempted murder.

“There is no doubt the order was given to kill Gaddafi. It doesn’t matter who else is killed, kill Gaddafi… a murder, this is a murder,” he said in Caracas.

Konstantin Kosachev, head of the international affairs committee in the lower house of Russia’s parliament, told Interfax: “More and more facts indicate that the purpose of the anti-Libyan coalition is to physically destroy Gaddafi.”

NATO’s Bouchard said: “I am aware of unconfirmed media reports that some of Gaddafi’s family members may have been killed. We regret all loss of life.”

British Prime Minister David Cameron declined to comment on what he also called the “unconfirmed report.”

He told BBC television: “The targeting policy of NATO and the alliance is absolutely clear. It is in line with the U.N. resolution 1973 and it is about preventing a loss of civilian life by targeting Gaddafi’s war-making machine, so that is obviously tanks and guns, rocket launchers, but also command and control as well.”

SECOND CLOSE CALL

Gaddafi, who seized power in a 1969 coup, is fighting an uprising by rebels who have seized much of eastern Libya. He describes the rebels as religious extremists and Western agents who seek to control Libya’s oil.

Inside part of the villa hit late on Saturday, a beige sofa was virtually untouched, but debris had caved in on some striped upholstered chairs. The blasts were heard across the city.

A table football machine stood outside in the garden in a wealthy residential area. Glass and debris covered the lawns and what appeared to be an unexploded missile lay in one corner.

It appeared to be the second NATO strike near to Gaddafi in 24 hours. A missile struck near a television station early on Saturday when the Libyan leader was making an address in which he said he would never step down and offered talks to rebels.

The rebels say they cannot trust Gaddafi. The past days have seen fierce shelling of rebel outposts in the west. A rebel spokesman in Zintan said government forces showered the city with up to 30 Grad missiles late in the evening.

Tripoli has also declared a sea blockade on the western outpost of Misrata, potentially robbing the rebels of a vital aid link to their eastern heartland. An International Organization for Migration ship, the Red Star One, was waiting offshore to deliver aid and evacuate migrants and the wounded.

A rebel spokesman and an oil official said an air strike destroyed a Gaddafi convoy after his forces killed five civilians in fighting in the eastern towns of Jalu and Awlijah. More fighting also broke out close to the Tunisia-Libyan border, scene of repeated skirmishes over the past days.

Celebratory rifle fire and car horns rang out in the rebels’ eastern capital of Benghazi as news of the attack spread.

However, the rebels’ military spokesman Ahmed Bani, a former colonel in Gaddafi’s army, told Reuters: “We don’t believe it. I’m sure if he was killed it was not by an air strike. We know him (Gaddafi) as a man with a big mouth.”

The announcement of the attack was made live on state television, which later showed hundreds of people in and around Gaddafi’s compound, chanting and vowing revenge.

“We will fight and fight if we have to,” Ibrahim said. “The leader offered peace to NATO yesterday and NATO rejected it.”

Gaddafi’s daughter was killed in a U.S. air strike in 1986, ordered after a bomb attack on a West Berlin discotheque killed two U.S. servicemen. Washington linked Tripoli to the attack.

(Additional reporting by Tarek Amara and Abdelaziz Boumzar in Dehiba, Deepa Babington and Michael Georgy in Benghazi, Matthew Tostevin in Tunis, Justyna Pawlak in Brussels; Writing by Ralph Boulton and Alison Williams; Editing by Angus MacSwan)