June 19, 2013

Your Husband’s Naughty Online Habits Are Not Cheating — Get Over It!

c86c34e52aae510b5a7f7282ab6bfe34 Your Husbands Naughty Online Habits Are Not Cheating    Get Over It!

(PhatzNewsRoom / The Frisky) — Online porn is one of the sad realities of most marriages. I am sure there are many out there who don’t look at online porn. But they are probably dead. The vast majority of others have and will utilize the service again and again.

It’s not cheating. But many hate it. A woman I know actually left her husband for a time. From her anger, I assumed he must have been looking at porn or something equally shocking and horrifying. “Nope,” she told me. “It was just boobs.” Just boobs, eh? And why is that so bad?

One CafeMom reader said that her husband’s porn habit is really harming her marriage. Her case is unique because she is a new mom, but a lot of others weighed in as well. Many said porn is no big deal, but others said he is an ! He must be stopped!

I say, they need to chill out. I get it. Pornography can be really annoying. I will say I minded my husband looking at it a lot less a few years ago when I felt confident about my body and looks. Now, I have less in that department and it makes me paranoid that he finds other women more attractive than me.

But I still get it.

Honestly, there are a lot of times I don’t feel like having with someone besides myself, too. I have my own likes and dislikes and I use porn as well. I just use a different kind. Men are visual. Women are more auditory. I will read erotica and get the same effect. So wouldn’t I be a hypocrite to complain?

It’s not that porn is never a problem. If a child sees it or your husband can’t seem to stop or you are going for long with no sex and he is constantly looking at porn, then yes, by all means, be angry. Have a chat with him. Go into counseling. There are porn addictions and people with serious issues in that department.

But the average , looking at a few or videos a day isn’t an addict. If it really bothers you, ask to be included. Ask him to show you what it is he likes and try to tap into what about it turns him on. If you listen, you might learn from his porn and make your relationship even better.

Man Watches Porn & Discovers His Wife Is an Adult Star

22d159ce882da10eee1da7f067df06bf Man Watches Porn & Discovers His Wife Is an Adult Star

(Phatforums News / The Stir) — So, file this under awkward. A man who went online to look at “for the first time” in his life (while he was in a ) was treated to the shock of his life when he saw his wife of 16 years boning a bunch of in said porno films. I mean, you think you know someone …

After seeing the unsettling clips, the man, identified as , ran home to confront his wife — who, of course, at first denied it. But then when showed her the clips — you know, the ones starring her and her ladybits — she had no choice but to come clean and admit her dirty past. What she did after that, though, is downright shocking.

She told Ramadan that despite their almost two--long , and despite the four children they had together, she never loved him. That’s right, Ramadan had been had. was on him. And if that wasn’t enough salt in his wounds, the pornos were made with an ex-boyfriend of hers. So there. As Ramadan explained: “[My wife] first denied it and accused me of being insane before I faced her with the films … she then confessed to be still in love with her boyfriend, saying he is as young as her and that I am an .” Nice.

Now, look, this is a pretty crazy story. So crazy that it’s almost kind of hard to swallow (no intended), but if it is true, let this be a lesson to all: Find out everything you can/confess everything you can before getting married. Especially if you have a past in pornography. ‘Cause your spouse is gonna find out. And it’s gonna get ugly. If your wife or dude really loves you, it won’t matter that you did of kinky stuff to make some cash at one point or another in your life. I mean, it’ll matter and come as a major shock, but if you’re upfront from the get-go, there really isn’t anything that’s going to crop up later down the road. Unless you, you know, do porn with your ex while you’re still married. That could be a cause for some .

4 Sex Myths That Most Guys Believe

b0562dee9c43cfd4ba061b6aaa0d8eed 4 Sex Myths That Most Guys Believe

(Phatforums Blog/ The Frisky) – Many men have some very disturbed ideas about and biology. For instance, a good friend of mine spent years believing that girls pee out their butts; he thought this until he was age 21. He was a certified EMT.

The subtler sex myths, though, may be the most damaging ones. They can ruin relationships and , even if they seem extremely obvious. Here’s a look at a few of the more common sex myths that a large number of guys tend to believe.

: don’t look at . It never occurs to men that women engage their through . Hell, it doesn’t occur to many women, because women often use literary erotica or more subtle pictures of half-naked to accomplish what men use pornography for. This is a disservice to gender relations, folks—if we’re going to get along truly as equals, we need to accept that as a species, we’re all ridiculously horny.

Myth: are the only way to judge good sex. Male biology is such that we can’t contemplate how sex could possibly be enjoyable without an orgasm. It’s the objective for us. If we can’t bring a woman to orgasm during sex, we’ll automatically assume that the sex was bad, and this view is pretty well enforced in pop culture.

The thing is, many women don’t have orgasms and are perfectly satisfied with the sex that they’re having. If you try to tell a guy this, though, he’ll assume that you’re just being polite. It’s this kind of willful ignorance that led us to doubt that the female orgasm existed in the first place.

Myth: There’s a right sex “schedule.” Many guys will get uptight about the relationship they’re in when the sex slows down after that frantic first supercharged couple of months. They’ll worry that they should be having a ton more sex. In reality, people have different schedules and sexual needs, and there’s nothing uncommon about having sex once a week, or even less frequently for some couples. Schedules can be changed, too, but many men get convinced that anything less than 20 times a week is a sexual Great Depression. A couple might turn out to be sexually incompatible, but usually that’s got a lot more to do with biology and bedroom wants than too much or too little sex.

Myth: Longer is better. Many men judge sex like you’d judge a game of Jenga—the longer the tower is standing, the better the game. They’ll try to push sex regularly past the hour mark, and get frustrated or disappointed if they’re unable to have ridiculous sex that approaches tantric levels of longevity.

The reality is that longer sex doesn’t necessarily equal better sex. It usually just results in a lot of sore body parts, and less time for everything else in life. That’s not to say that faster is better, but just that time shouldn’t really be a consideration at all in sex. If your guy keeps a stopwatch on the nightstand, tell him that it’s not some kind of backward race, and you’re not Secretariat the racehorse.

What porn did to a marriage

9f91b2fc8c94b32d5f52f68d29532eb8 What porn did to a marriage

The blog begins with a startling confession:

Hi, my name is John, and I was a addict. I’m also a believer in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and am married to an amazing and beautiful of God.

Church leaders have long struggled talking about sex, much less . But Relevant magazine made a daring move this month when it printed a blogger’s confession about how his addiction to affected his .

The blogger is John Buckingham, and he is an English teacher, Relevant says. Buckingham said in the story that his addiction to pornography started when he was 12. He thought it would end after his accepted his marriage proposal in early 2010.

Yet four months after getting married, Buckingham says he succumbed. He started watching pornography again. Burdened by guilt, Buckingham said he told his what he had done.

She was devastated. All the love and trust and intimacy we had worked so hard to build for the last four months was called into and our marriage was shaken to its very core. I feared it wouldn’t stand, and I wouldn’t have blamed her in the least for walking out altogether. She had every right to do so.

She didn’t, and as Buckingham suggests later in his article, he didn’t give up either. He says he talked with other Christian about their struggles but felt that they were using “softening rhetoric” (“I messed up;’ “I stumbled”) to minimize what they were doing.

He writes:

The sin of lust isn’t just a mistake, a mess-up or a problem…it is no less than an act of sin that is reprehensible to God and nothing short of honestly confessing and repenting of that sins is good enough for God.

Rachel Buckingham, John’s wife, writes a follow-up blog explaining how she felt after hearing her husband’s confession.

I no longer felt safe or loved. I was suddenly bombarded with lies—he doesn’t find me attractive; it’s my fault he strayed; I’m not beautiful; I’m not sexy; I am a horrible wife; I’m a failure; he is stuck with me; he doesn’t love me …

Buckingham writes more about his struggle. I’ll leave it to readers to decide if they think he has overcome his addiction.

But his confession left me with two questions:

Is pornography now such a pervasive problem in the church that leaders need to talk more openly about?

And can people of faith like Buckingham actually learn how to overcome their struggles while living in a sexually-charged culture where lurid images are just a mouse-click away?

New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies-UPDATED!

b87457bb8538f263f83b64787d39a3e9 New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies UPDATED!

Lubben’s told so many different versions of her “path,” she herself may not know which parts are true.

Update: Previously non-working links have been repaired, and Episode 2 expanded by the filmmaker)

LOS ANGELES—Now that the 2011 Awards are over, it’s time to start thinking about 2012… and one of the early favorites for next year’s Reuben Sturman Award might just be documentary makers Michael Whiteacre and Lydia Lee (who performed in movies under the name Julie Meadows).

The reason for considering such an honor? The pair have just released on YouTube the first two parts of their upcoming feature-length documentary, The Devil and Shelley Lubben—and it’s a blockbuster!

Anyone who’s been reading AVN for the past few years knows who Shelley Lubben is. She runs the non-profit (though likely not non-profit for her personally) Pink Cross Foundation, whose mission is to “save” stars from themselves; that is, from their occupation of making sexually explicit videos.

Lubben, who’s most recently been outspoken on the subject of requiring porn stars to wear condoms and other “barrier protection” while filming—she’s for it, of course—is herself a former performer, in that she made 17 movies in 1993 and 1994 (she claims more but has yet to provide any proof). But part of her schtick is that she claims to have contracted both herpes and human papilloma virus (HPV) during her brief stint in front of the cameras—and that’s where Whiteacre and Lee begin their dissection of Lubben’s web of lies.

“As a survivor of the porn industry, I contracted human papilloma virus and herpes, a non-curable disease which later led to my battle with cervical cancer, where I had to have half of my cervix removed,” Lubben is seen announcing from a rostrum in Episode 1. “I also battled with severe anemia due to hemorrhaging I experienced for 12 years—in fact, I am still battling with damages to my reproductive organs. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry, but after eight long, hard years of recovery, and by the grace of God almighty, I escaped that hell and stand here, a mom with three beautiful daughters, thanks to a wonderful man, a godly man who stood by me in my horrible recovery. I have the perfect life.”

“I want you all to know that the last thing I want to do, people, is talk about porn,” she continues, “but my compassion for those people who are in modern-day slavery right now—I was overwhelmed, and so I went back to the industry and I began to reach out to them, and of course, I’ve been called every name in the book, you can imagine, but that didn’t stop me, and I founded Pink Cross Foundation, a non-profit organization that reaches out to adult industry workers, offering help, a way out, education, friendship. We go to porn conventions; we go to nightclubs, and heck, I even sing porn star karaoke to them.”

There’s just one problem with those statements: They’re likely a pack of lies—and Whiteacre and Lee detail just how false her words are, usually by using… her own words!

But that comes a bit later. The beginning of Episode 1 traces Lubben’s origins, from her birth in Pasadena to her eventual move to nearby Glendora… and her mental move to Cloud Cuckooland.

“Shelley began hearing voices at age 7, when Jesus told her one day she’d be famous,” narrator Sam Phillips intones, followed on-screen with a title card quoting Lubben from her self-published book, The Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn: “I loved Jesus very much. He used to talk to me all the time. And so I always knew that I was special but it seemed that no-one else saw that about me.”

According to the episode, Lubben’s parents stopped taking her to church at around age 9, and so of course it wasn’t long before she began misbehaving.

“Shelley began making up wild stories about men trying to kidnap her, but she would eventually come clean and nothing would change,” Phillips says over images of family life in the ’60s. “Her mother still called her ‘peculiar’ rather than ‘talented,’ and her father still spent his spare time working in the garage. By turns lazy and hyperactive, and unhappy competing with her baby brother for mom’s attention, Shelley was a difficult child to manage.”

But by Lubben’s own admission, she was a cheat and a liar.

“I cheated my way through high school,” she admits in her book, which is quoted on-screen. “I officially do not deserve my high school diploma, but I was so smart, I was able to cheat my way through. I was a nightmare as a teenager, so I began , smoking pot, drinking alcohol, just partying, and my dad basically said, ‘Listen, if you don’t get your act together, I’m going to kick you out.’ I was about 18 years old, almost 18.”

But sure enough, after losing her driver’s license and being caught stealing from a local store, her dad did just what he promised. But that’s okay, because Lubben had already learned the lessons she’d need for later life.

“I learned to become a hustler in high school, so imagine what I learned on the street,” Lubben is seen telling an audience. “Now I’m a con-artist, now I’m learning how to rip men off, how to get their , how to manipulate con-men out of every last dollar; how to get exactly what I wanted from a man. And I loved it because I got all the attention I ever wanted.”

“The attention was like a drug for me. I was desperate for attention. Of course, the fast money was a major attraction,” title cards quote her as having written. “I became a professional liar and could literally lie my way out of anything,” she wrote on a Christian blog.

It’s a point that Whiteacre and Lee make several times during the course of the episode: One of Lubben’s primary motivations is her insatiable need to be noticed—a desire that easily led her into porn… by way of six years as a prostitute—a part of her history that she quickly forgets whenever it’s convenient to do so.

Fortunately, Lubben has appeared in videos from several seminars at which she spoke after she was “saved” from the horrors of porn, and some of the early ones tell quite a different story than what she related in the clip that begins this episode.

“Working as a prostitute, giving blowjobs—that’s right; did I say that word?—giving blowjobs on the street with men ejaculating on my face, getting blood on my face… I didn’t take care of myself,” she admits to various audiences. “I hadn’t even been to a doctor since I had a baby. That was the only time I ever went [to] doctors. From age 18 to 26, I went to the doctor’s one time… I got pregnant by tricks three times. Two out of the three times I had miscarriages because my was messed up from all the multiple partners I was having, and how many times did clients break condoms on me? Too many times. Two of the times ended in miscarriages because I was so physically unhealthy because we don’t go to the doctor and we don’t go to the dentist; there’s no time for that. It’s all about the money.”

Helpfully, the filmmakers remind that the Centers for Disease Control have some idea of how easily sexually transmitted diseases—like the ones Lubben claims to have contracted while performing—are acquired.

“HPV is so common that at least 50% of sexually active men and women get it at some point in their lives,” a title card reads. “Condoms may lower the risk of developing HPV-related diseases, but HPV can infect areas that are not covered by a condom.”

“And the number one reason for getting HPV, the doctor told me, is from having multiple sex partners,” Lubben then tellssome unidentified videographer… and us.

“So according to Shelley,” Lee summarizes, “she was a prostitute for six years before getting into porn, she was a prostitute as a porn star, and she was a prostitute shortly thereafter in 1994, and that’s not multiple partners?”

The end of Episode 1 features Lubben relating some of her memories of her days as a prostitute, when, for instance, she and a madam she was living with would “pull 10, 15 tricks a day.” She also told of a Chinese man who picked her up at a strip club by offering her $200 to spend the night—but once they got to their hotel room, his cock turned out to be so small the condom kept slipping off.

“He ejaculated on me and in me,” Lubben says on tape, then a title card continues with a quote from her book: “I jumped off the bed and ran to the bathroom to try and clean myself out. Tagi asked me in his rough Chinese accent, ‘What’s wong?’[sic] What’s wrong? Was he kidding? Everything was wrong! I didn’t want to get pregnant again from a prostitution act and give birth to some ugly Asian baby.”

Pregnant again? Yep—and as title cards elaborate, “Shelley’s third pregnancy resulted in the birth of her daughter, Tiffany Ann Moore, on June 29, 1988. That means Shelley had two of her three miscarriages prior to 1988. That’s five and a half years before she walked onto a porn set. However, the story Shelley likes to tell conveniently shifts all the blame from herself—and onto the porn industry.”

And sure enough: “I’ve had several miscarriages due to the trauma in the industry,” Lubben claims on videotape. “I had hemorrhaging for 12 years and severe anemia. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry.”

Episode 2, titled “Roxy’s Rape,” deals with another set of Shelley “Roxy” Lubben lies: Her claim that at least some of the sex she had on camera was non-consensual.

“I was in the industry for the years of 1993 to 1994 where I was forced to have unprotected sex,” Lubben tells various audiences in a compiled segment. “I was brutally raped on the set when I contracted herpes in a six-man gangbang, on a dirty ranch, unsupervised, on a dirty picnic table…. I was forced and was coerced to do sex acts that I did not agree with… I was also a drug addict alcoholic, much like many of the other people working in the industry. I also was jaded, mentally ill, and traumatized from all the pornography and sex I was subjected to, all the brutality.”

As Whiteacre points out, her choice of words is interesting, considering that the California Penal Code defines rape in part as, “force, violence, coercion, duress, menace, or the threat of immediate unlawful bodily injury,” as well as if the victim is intoxicated, drugged, mentally ill or mentally deficient.

“Here’s where Mrs. Lubben has a problem: She has to get around the fact that she actively, willingly sought employment in the porn industry, which by and large does not use condoms; booked the shoot, showed up, shot the scene, signed a contract and model release in the presence of others, acknowledging that she did not have diminished capacity, and that she was giving all necessary consent and waiving all liability,” Whiteacre analyzes. “She did the scene, she was paid, she cashed the check, and then she didn’t file a police report. So how to get around that? Here’s where Shelley goes all in. Short of being a minor, which obviously she wasn’t, she now claims that virtually every other element which might possibly negate her consent was present. She was forced, threatened, drugged, drunk, mentally ill, with no evidence of anything; just her word 15, 16, 17 years later.”

Also weighing in against Lubben’s version is one actor who participated in the “six-man gangbang” (Filmco’s Roxy A Gang Bang Fantasy) which Lubben references, actor Guy DaSilva.

“She was very aggressive in the scene; very aggressive, and so were the guys, but in no kind of dangerous kind of way, in any kind of threatening way, or harmful, where anyone was hurt or forced to do something they didn’t want to do,” DaSilva told Whiteacre and Lee. “That absolutely did not take place. She called the shots and then the guys including myself were just going through what we were told to do, and there was a director involved who was basically shooting it and ‘letting it fly.’ He wasn’t really even ‘directing’ the scene. For the most part, he just let it go and she carried it. She was not drunk or anything. She was capable of knowing what she was doing. Coherent.”

But, according to Lubben, not only was she personally assaulted on the set, but so is everyone who participates in making adult movies—and they all salve the pain by using drugs.

“On the movie set, it’s absolutely horrible and degrading for women,” Lubben claims. “In the background you can hear women throwing up, you can hear them crying—because it hurts… You know what women do before they do a scene? We go outside with other porn actors, we lay down lines of meth, we take big bottles and chug that down, and we’re ready. They beat the girls, they feed them—force-feed them drugs. Drugs are always provided. You can get Vicodin, that’s a huge drug. Xanax, alcohol, meth, cocaine—heroin is very big, and after a day of working with nothing but filth, bodily fluids, an unclean set—because all of the movies are done on private mansions, so there’s nothing regulated about this industry.”

Most of the rest of the episode consists of current and former performers—Melissa Monet, Nina Hartley, Danny Wylde, Monica Foster, Kayden Kross—putting the lie to Lubben’s claims, with Hartley being one of the most eloquent and logical.

“I’ve been on about 700 sets; I’ve done about a thousand scenes, 1200 scenes, give or take, and honestly, in all that, I’ve had ten experiences where I actually went, ‘Ew, never again with that person, that director’,” she tells the filmmakers. “And even then I would never call them rape; I would just call them, ‘Ew, that guy’s a jerk; I just won’t work with him again.’”

“No one ever kept me on a set,” she continues. “It’s not possible to hold somebody on a set against their will, and nowadays, with cell phones, the LAPD would to have a phone call from some young woman in a closet on a set saying, ‘Please, please, come get me now, please!’ Oh, my God; what a field day they would have with that! It doesn’t happen. We don’t need to force anybody to be on a set; they come every day from the bus station going, ‘Please, please pick me; no, pick me!’”

Equally logical is Kayden Kross’s explanation of why there aren’t rapists in porn.

“She makes it sound like we don’t have a say in the matter; she turns it into rape,” Kross sardonically analyzes. “She says that she was raped, that we’re all being raped every time you show up to set. And I’m just saying, I mean, there would be a lot more rapists, I think, if that were the case, because look how easy we make it: You know, we drive ourselves there; we give you notice when we’re going to be there; we sit down in the makeup chair so you can make us look exactly how you want us to look—it’s really a good gig for rapists, I think. But then, you know, there’s the whole object of having to pay for it and there’s the whole thing where she can just say, ‘No, I’m not showing up.’ It kind of gets in the way if you really want to be a hardcore rapist, but definitely, if you just want to rape on the side, that’s easy.”

Hartley, however, gets to one of the core issues that separates the sexually normal world from the whacky religious one when it comes to sex.

“We’re still battling upstream,” Hartley asserts, “against the idea that women are delicate flowers who need protection from men, that sex is still something men want and women have, or it’s something that men do and women are, and still we are fighting the battle that women have sexual agency of their own; they have their own desires, their own needs, their own wants and their own ways of getting them.”

The religious aspect of this is something that greatly interests Whiteacre.

“What Shelley doesn’t get is that if Satan does exist in this world, he exists in the idea that the world somehow owes you a living,” Whiteacre told AVN. “That’s the philosophy that drives thieves and grifters and other criminals… The key to this ‘new improved’ Shelley Lubben is that her time in exile was spent sojourning at the Champions Centre in Tacoma, Washington. It’s a church and ministry training facility that spits out little clones who all recite the same mantra: ‘I’m a Champion’; ‘Jesus will help me lead a Champion life!’, etc. Shelley learned how to be a convincing public speaker, how to use logical fallacies like proof by assertion and appeal to authority, and how to get people to pass the plate.

“At the core of this kind of religious conversion is the need to make your old life look as as terrible and evil and sinful as possible, so that your salvation appears that much more miraculous,” he continued. “Now that Lubben looks back on her life with these new-found religious perspectives, all the little stray pieces from her old life fit neatly into new packages: The voices she’s been hearing since childhood are actually God and Jesus; Satan entered her body to give her the strength to get through a gang bang; hearing the moon tell her to ‘fuck off’ proves that she was demon-possessed, etc.

“Pornography is Lubben’s dragon, which is a convenient one to tilt at because that sentiment provides enormous job security,” he assessed. ” There will always be a natural human desire to explore . But, in a Lubben-centric world, her enemy is the enemy of the true church, because Lubben and the true church are one and the same.”

Um… All hail St. Shelley?

In any case, Whiteacre’s and Lee’s documentary promises the best analysis of a vocal enemy of the adult industry than has been produced in many years, and can be enjoyed by adult industry members and fans alike.

Historic Win for the Porn Industry at Cambridge Debate

8b01bad88a87e75407a716fb1241bc4f Historic Win for the Porn Industry at Cambridge Debate

CAMBRIDGE, U.K.—The last eight years or so I have been participating in student debates at various universities across the U.K., so when I received an e-mail last September inviting me to Cambridge, I accepted it with some pride but didn’t really give it a second thought. It wasn’t until the Telegraph newspaper among others, picked up the story in January that I realised that this debate was to be one of historical importance.

This was the first time the Cambridge had debated something of an adult nature so they had done their well and pulled in the big guns on each side. The motion was ‘The house believes does a good public service’ —a proposition which was supported by myself, educator Jessi “The Sexademic” Fisher and porn star/ex-teacher Johnny Anglais. It was opposed by antiporn feminist Gail Dines, child psychologist Dr. Richard Woolfson and your very own Shelley ‘Loopy-Lou’ Lubben.

Sensing that this debate was going to be important for the industry to win and remembering that I had a clean slate of always winning debates to uphold, I immediately started researching not only the best arguments to make, but also the opposition. The more I read about them, the more I realised that their success at Cambridge would be an ideal marketing tool for their campaigns. So with the help of some American industry folk, mainly Michael Whiteacre (director of the documentary The Devil and Shelley Lubben), Martin John Barker (who did a similar exposé on the moral entrepreneurs who instigated the campaign against “video nasties” in the U.K. in 1984), porn academic Dr Clarissa Smith and several U.K., and European porn producers, I got a plan of action together.

Before the debate, I had a photo shoot for the socialist Guardian newspaper with Gail Dines, who told me that she had just come from teaching the Philosophy Department at Cambridge as an invited guest. This, I thought, gave her the advantage of having primed part of the audience with her argument at length. Not good.

The event was black-tie and included a lovely dinner with silver service. I was somewhat dismayed to see that they had placed me opposite Shelley Lubben. I thought she was going to be as aggressive as I had seen her in various online; however, the Shelley Lubben who sat opposite me was a very different one from the one on . She appeared very nervous and almost frail. She didn’t eat much of her starter and left the room on her own as soon as her main course was delivered, for what seemed about an hour.

Let the debate commence!

On February 17, the hall of the debate was truly awesome. Just walking in and seeing more than 500 students clapping and cheering our entrance, knowing that there were a further 300 students watching the debate by video link in adjacent rooms, was both awe-inspiring and daunting in equal measures. No sooner had we sat down on opposing sides of the central atrium than it was my turn to start the debate. I was meant to be the closing speaker for the proposition but I had asked to go first as I wanted to set the tone for the evening.

My speech was very well received and wasn’t interrupted, which is always a good sign. It was my role to focus on feminism as well as on Lubben—I had agreed on a game plan with my counterparts—so I took the opportunity to prime the audience with some facts about her so-called “victim” status. I wanted Lubben to have an uphill struggle convincing the audience that she had a real degree, real illnesses and had experienced a porn industry that was common to most porn stars, as opposed to one experienced by somebody with a serious affective disorder. I was obviously very successful in doing this, as Shelley looked crestfallen and Dines was staring straight at me with eyes of black thunder when I returned to my seat.

Of the three speakers in opposition, Dines was certainly the most rhetorically accomplished, although anyone who was not a Marxist would see her argument as necessarily extremely left-wing and somewhat dated. Nevertheless she got a good round of applause at the end.

Then came Jessi who immediately took down Dines’s argument, supporting her own version with citations of various sex studies and historical facts, as well as giving a personal account of how watching porn at 11 years old encouraged her to take control of her and become a sex educator. She delivered her speech extremely well, speaking to the audience and gaining eye contact with every sentence. At the end, Dines dished out her thunder eyes to Jessi too.

Dr. Richard Woolfson’s speech was okay but he made the mistake of not backing up anything he said with quotes or citations, which automatically gave his speech the feel of conjecture. By now Dines was beginning to show the strain, and I sensed she was feeling that she had severely underestimated her opposition.

The nicest surprise of the evening was Johnny Anglais’s speech. He was eloquent, funny and far more highly educated than I’m sure the audience was expecting. He spoke of his experience inside the industry as well as compared it to other jobs he’d had before where he felt far more exploited. He sat down to a huge round of applause.

By now Dines was looking pretty desperate and Lubben appeared to be almost physically deflating. I had to remind myself how power hungry and nasty she has been with her campaign in the past in order to stop myself from feeling sorry for her and feeling guilty for being so slick in putting her down. Surely now was the time for her to take revenge on me.

However as soon as Lubben took the stand she started rambling wildly, slurring her words and generally not linking her ideas together very well. I immediately assumed that she’d had too much to drink but as someone later pointed out she hadn’t touched a drop all night. She was nowhere near as aggressive or punchy in her delivery as I had previously seen. In fact, she looked completely resigned to the realization that she couldn’t compete with the arguments of the opposition. The attack on my films that she had started in The Tab’s paper earlier that week was not continued.

It was painful to watch. She would later be described in the U.K. as a “walking car crash.” To make matters, worse she committed the cardinal sin—which you never do in the U.K.—of evangelising about Christianity. She talked of being one of the “chosen ones.” This was met with laughs of disbelief by the audience.

The way that votes are counted at Cambridge is the same as in the Houses of Parliament. There are three doors to exit the room; the “Ayes,” the “Noes” and “Abstentions.” It was reassuring to see the majority of the audience leave the room via the “Ayes” exit. Sure enough, we beat the opposition 231 votes to their 187, with 197 abstentions. It felt good, very good.

In the Green Room afterwards, Gail Dines had a go at me for picking on “poor Shelley Lubben” who, according to her, was not powerful in the U.S. and had had no influence in shutting down AIM Healthcare. Gail accused me of making a personal attack against Shelley, which, in her eyes, was unnecessary and cruel. I pointed out that I hadn’t made personal attacks against the other two members of the opposition, only the one who put her personal story up as the central theme of her argument. Gail replied that she had not researched the opposition for weaknesses, claiming that her argument ought to be enough to convince the audience that she was right. I think she now realises she underestimated . Big mistake.

To learn more about Anna Span, please access her diaries here.

Did Shelley Lubben Blow the Cambridge Porn Debate?

f0f666d19c54099adff899297348c6d4 Did Shelley Lubben Blow the Cambridge Porn Debate?

CAMBRIDGE, England—Debates on have become so common in the States that you can buy tickets to them on Goldstar. (Not really.) In Merry Old England, however, they apparently still generate a hullabaloo, which also means a packed house, as was the case Thursday night on the storied campus of Cambridge University, in the Cambridge Union, where the pro and con sides faced off in a contest that pitted, if we may be so bold, open-minded libertarians against closed-minded autocrats.

According to Cambridge First, which was on the scene, the place was “sweltering despite the outside as students sought to find any corner they could squeeze into to watch the debate.”

The site says that the “headline act,” such as it was, was the self-proclaimed former porn star/prostitute/junkie/ and current anti porn crusader, Pink Cross Foundation founder Shelley Lubben (photo, left). Those of us who are fortunate enough to have witnessed a Lubben performance in person—at a CalOSHA meeting, perhaps—or even on tape—in the new documentary The Devil and Shelley Lubben, say—know that over-the-top Lubben histrionics are inevitable. The simply has an itch that can’t seem to be scratched, even when she is addressing an audience from one of the oldest and most revered universities in the world. Who knows, maybe she has a thing for student bodies, but Thursday, according to Cambridge First, she apparently punted instead of scoring.

The evening was not just about having a good debate; a proposition was put before the gathering: “This house believes that pornography does a good public service,” it stated, and in the end it passed by 44 votes, reportedly due to Lubben’s lunacy.

“For this much-publicized debate,” Cambridge First reported, “the proposers were Britain’s first female porn director Anna Span (photo, right), teacher-cum-porn star Johnny Anglais, and self-professed ‘sexademic’ Jessi Fischer; the opposers, born-again-Christian and ex-porn star Shelley Lubben, feminist activist Dr Gail Dines, and psychologist Dr Richard Woolfson.”

The tone of the evening was set by Span, who, as Anna Arrowsmith, ran unsuccessfully for Parliament last year. She opened the debate with an accusation that “moral entrepreneurs” were using “thinly-veiled, conservative arguments” to inflict a “fully-fledged moral panic.”

However, Cambridge First reported that for much of the evening, the opposers were making headway with the students. “Despite the porn’s eventual victory in the house, the opposition’s arguments seemed the stronger up until the home straight. Broadly-speaking, [their] counter-points were pornography harms children and degrades women.”

The proposers’ arguments, on the other hand, centered around the claims that “pornography empowers woman and is a good education tool.”

“The problem is not pornography,” Fischer said at one point. “The problem is our immature national attitude to sex.” Clearly referring to the U.K., he could have been speaking about any number of countries.

Dines, who has written books on the subject of pornography—despite knowing little about it—and is notably fond of writing reviews of the Expo without actually attending it—made her typical claim that all porn distorts reality and degrades women.

“In Pornland,” she said, “boys can be boys. In Pornland, there are no women; only hot girls.” Oh, how miserably ill-informed she is! In reality, women, real women, abound.

Still, the barely post-pubescent audience seemed to buy into the silliness, as well as into Dr Woolfson’s remarks about porn watching developing unhealthy sexual attitudes toward sex, which elicited affirmations that “resonated around the chamber.” Not a good sign for those in favor of the sexually explicit arts and leisures. Was it possible that the typical Brit’s inner prude extended even to the ancient halls of the country’s presumably more liberal educational institutions? Were things really that bad?

Actually, they were not. As it turned out, it was more a of the students’ English reserve needing to be surmounted by a generous dosage of American hysterics—courtesy, of course, of Shelley Lubben.

“When Ms. Lubben took to the floor, arguably the headline act, her passion and anger hid her argument,” wrote Hugh Morris for Cambridge First. “The audience did not react well to this.

“Resting on the lectern, her high-heeled shoe subconsciously beating on the floor, her impassioned on the porn industry strayed from the academic debate.

“’This is nothing funny or glamorous about this industry,’ she said. ‘Pornography doesn’t do a good public service because it is lying to you. I have the evidence. It’s lying to you. It’s modern day slavery.’

“And with that, the Cambridge students voted for porn.”

For the global anti-porners among us, that last-minute turn-around has to be a bitter pill to swallow. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is not a part of the game plan. Goals, and not flubbed kicks on goal, are the expected outcomes; homeruns, for the Yanks, and not called third strikes.

But for those of us who have seen this movie before—and who know that the opposers’ reliance on the Shelley Lubbens of the world only mires them in unproven lunatic conspiracies of on-set rape, rampant drug use, underage trafficking and the pervasive abuse of women—does nothing more than to hinder, if not destroy, any rational claims they may have to make about porn.

Lubben is, to put it another way, the anti-porn movement’s version of a Birther; someone who, despite empirical evidence to the contrary, refuses to admit that the guy is a legitimate citizen.

While Dines’ academic credentials tend to get her an automatic pass by the establishment, despite her non-existent scholarship on the subject, Lubben, who is supposed to bring street cred and a still-viable sex appeal to the table, is also kind of like Sarah Palin, an utterly alienating lightning rod for the base.

Yes, let her debate! Put her on the ballot! Let her run for president! She’s a winner!

U.S. Gov. Mistakenly Shutters 84,000 Websites for Child Porn

04b617c122da0706035860df28baba21 U.S. Gov. Mistakenly Shutters 84,000 Websites for Child Porn

CYBERSPACE—Anyone want to bet that that the will never again mistakenly shutter websites it believes are involved in illegal activity? I didn’t think so. As Homeland Security and the Department of Justice, by way of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), become more aggressive in their determination to take offline websites that deal in counterfeit goods and pornography, innocent website operators are being swept up in the net.

In the latest snafu, TorrentFreak has reported that last Friday 84,000 site owners were “surprised by a rather worrying banner that was placed on their domain.”

A message on the banner read, ominously, “Advertisement, distribution, transportation, receipt, and possession of child pornography constitute federal crimes that carry penalties for first time offenders of up to 30 years in federal prison, a $250,000 fine, forfeiture and restitution.”

Unfortunately for everyone involved, the 84,000 sites were not involved in child pornography, but were simply hosted by a large DNS service provider.

“The domain in question is mooo.com, which belongs to the DNS provider FreeDNS,” reported TorrentFreak. “It is the most popular shared domain at afraid.org and as a result of the authorities’ actions a massive 84,000 subdomains were wrongfully seized as well. All sites were redirected to the banner below.

“The FreeDNS owner was taken by surprise and quickly released the following statement on their website. ‘Freedns.afraid.org has never allowed this type of abuse of its DNS service. We are working to get the issue sorted as quickly as possible.’”

By today, most of the domains are back online, but the residual effects of being targeted by your own government for a you did not commit has domain owners are feeling understandable skittish, and even defensive. One posted the following message in reaction.

“One of the customers quickly went out to assure visitors that his site was not involved in any of the alleged crimes.

“You can rest assured that I have not and would never be found to be trafficking in such distasteful and horrific content,” the site owner wrote. “A little sleuthing shows that the whole of the mooo.com TLD is impacted. At first, the legitimacy of the alerts seems to be questionable—after all, what reputable agency would display their warning in a fancily formatted image referenced by the underlying HTML? I wouldn’t expect to see that.”

As for the enforcement agencies presumably responsible for the error, an does not seem to be forthcoming, or even an acknowledgement that anything went wrong. A press release posted to the Homeland security website Tuesday serves up bucketfuls of self-congratulations for taking 10 websites offline, but makes no mention of the 84,000 sites.

“For all its positive impact, the has also unfortunately created a new way for child predators to commit their inexcusable crimes,” Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division is quoted as saying. “The production and distribution of child pornography wreak havoc on innocent lives. With these domain seizures, we are taking our fight against child pornography to websites that facilitate the exchange of these abusive images.”

False accusations wreak peoples’ lives, too, but the government must be saving that warning for a later press release.

New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies

b87457bb8538f263f83b64787d39a3e9 New Documentary Exposes Shelley Lubben’s Lies

Lubben’s told so many different versions of her “path,” she herself may not know which parts are true.

LOS ANGELES—Now that the 2011 AVN Awards are over, it’s time to start thinking about 2012… and one of the early favorites for next year’s Reuben Sturman Award might just be documentary makers Michael Whiteacre and Lydia Lee (who performed in adult movies under the name Julie Meadows).

The reason for considering such an honor? The pair have just released on YouTube the first two parts of their upcoming feature-length documentary, The Devil and Shelley Lubben—and it’s a blockbuster!

Anyone who’s been reading AVN for the past few years knows who Shelley Lubben is. She runs the non-profit (though likely not non-profit for her personally) Pink Cross Foundation, whose mission is to “save” porn stars from themselves; that is, from their occupation of making sexually explicit videos.

Lubben, who’s most recently been outspoken on the subject of requiring porn stars to wear condoms and other “barrier protection” while filming—she’s for it, of course—is herself a former performer, in that she made 17 movies in 1993 and 1994 (she claims more but has yet to provide any proof). But part of her schtick is that she claims to have contracted both herpes and papilloma virus (HPV) during her brief stint in front of the cameras—and that’s where Whiteacre and Lee begin their dissection of Lubben’s web of lies.

“As a survivor of the porn industry, I contracted human papilloma virus and herpes, a non-curable disease which later led to my battle with cervical cancer, where I had to have half of my cervix removed,” Lubben is seen announcing from a rostrum in Episode 1. “I also battled with severe anemia due to hemorrhaging I experienced for 12 years—in fact, I am still battling with damages to my reproductive organs. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry, but after eight long, hard years of recovery, and by the grace of God almighty, I escaped that hell and stand here, a mom with three beautiful daughters, thanks to a wonderful man, a godly man who stood by me in my horrible recovery. I have the perfect life.”

“I want you all to know that the last thing I want to do, people, is talk about porn,” she continues, “but my compassion for those people who are in modern-day slavery right now—I was overwhelmed, and so I went back to the industry and I began to reach out to them, and of course, I’ve been called every name in the book, you can imagine, but that didn’t stop me, and I founded Pink Cross Foundation, a non-profit organization that reaches out to adult industry workers, offering help, a way out, education, friendship. We go to porn conventions; we go to nightclubs, and heck, I even sing porn star karaoke to them.”

There’s just one problem with those statements: They’re likely a pack of lies—and Whiteacre and Lee detail just how false her words are, usually by using… her own words!

But that comes a bit later. The beginning of Episode 1 traces Lubben’s origins, from her birth in Pasadena to her eventual move to nearby Glendora… and her mental move to Cloud Cuckooland.

“Shelley began hearing voices at age 7, when Jesus told her one day she’d be famous,” narrator Sam Phillips intones, followed on-screen with a title card quoting Lubben from her self-published book, The Truth Behind the of Porn: “I loved Jesus very much. He used to talk to me all the time. And so I always knew that I was special but it seemed that no-one else saw that about me.”

According to the episode, Lubben’s parents stopped taking her to church at around age 9, and so of course it wasn’t long before she began misbehaving.

“Shelley began making up wild stories about men trying to kidnap her, but she would eventually come clean and nothing would change,” Phillips says over images of family life in the ’60s. “Her mother still called her ‘peculiar’ rather than ‘talented,’ and her father still spent his spare time working in the garage. By turns lazy and hyperactive, and unhappy competing with her baby brother for mom’s attention, Shelley was a difficult child to manage.”

But by Lubben’s own admission, she was a cheat and a liar.

“I cheated my way through high school,” she admits in her book, which is quoted on-screen. “I officially do not deserve my high school diploma, but I was so smart, I was able to cheat my way through. I was a nightmare as a teenager, so I began having , smoking pot, drinking alcohol, just partying, and my dad basically said, ‘Listen, if you don’t get your act together, I’m going to kick you out.’ I was about 18 years old, almost 18.”

But sure enough, after losing her driver’s license and being caught stealing from a local store, her dad did just what he promised. But that’s okay, because Lubben had already learned the lessons she’d need for later life.

“I learned to become a in high school, so imagine what I learned on the street,” Lubben is seen telling an audience. “Now I’m a con-artist, now I’m learning how to rip men off, how to get their , how to manipulate con-men out of every last dollar; how to get exactly what I wanted from a man. And I loved it because I got all the attention I ever wanted.”

“The attention was like a drug for me. I was desperate for attention. Of course, the fast money was a major attraction,” title cards quote her as having written. “I became a professional liar and could literally lie my way out of anything,” she wrote on a Christian blog.

It’s a point that Whiteacre and Lee make several times during the course of the episode: One of Lubben’s primary motivations is her insatiable need to be noticed—a desire that easily led her into porn… by way of six years as a prostitute—a part of her history that she quickly forgets whenever it’s convenient to do so.

Fortunately, Lubben has appeared in videos from several seminars at which she spoke after she was “saved” from the horrors of porn, and some of the early ones tell quite a different story than what she related in the clip that begins this episode.

“Working as a prostitute, giving blowjobs—that’s right; did I say that word?—giving blowjobs on the street with men ejaculating on my face, getting blood on my face… I didn’t take care of myself,” she admits to various audiences. “I hadn’t even been to a doctor since I had a baby. That was the only time I ever went [to] doctors. From age 18 to 26, I went to the doctor’s one time… I got pregnant by tricks three times. Two out of the three times I had miscarriages because my reproductive system was messed up from all the multiple partners I was having, and how many times did clients break condoms on me? Too many times. Two of the times ended in miscarriages because I was so physically unhealthy because we don’t go to the doctor and we don’t go to the dentist; there’s no time for that. It’s all about the money.”

Helpfully, the filmmakers remind us that the Centers for Disease Control have some idea of how easily sexually transmitted diseases—like the ones Lubben claims to have contracted while performing—are acquired.

“HPV is so common that at least 50% of sexually active men and women get it at some point in their lives,” a title card reads. “Condoms may lower the risk of developing HPV-related diseases, but HPV can infect areas that are not covered by a condom.”

“And the number one reason for getting HPV, the doctor told me, is from having multiple sex partners,” Lubben then tellssome unidentified videographer… and us.

“So according to Shelley,” Lee summarizes, “she was a prostitute for six years before getting into porn, she was a prostitute as a porn star, and she was a prostitute shortly thereafter in 1994, and that’s not multiple partners?”

The end of Episode 1 features Lubben relating some of her memories of her days as a prostitute, when, for instance, she and a madam she was living with would “pull 10, 15 tricks a day.” She also told of a Chinese man who picked her up at a strip club by offering her $200 to spend the night—but once they got to their hotel room, his cock turned out to be so small the condom kept slipping off.

“He ejaculated on me and in me,” Lubben says on tape, then a title card continues with a quote from her book: “I jumped off the bed and ran to the bathroom to try and clean myself out. Tagi asked me in his rough Chinese accent, ‘What’s wong?’[sic] What’s wrong? Was he kidding? Everything was wrong! I didn’t want to get pregnant again from a act and give birth to some ugly Asian baby.”

Pregnant again? Yep—and as title cards elaborate, “Shelley’s third pregnancy resulted in the birth of her daughter, Tiffany Ann Moore, on June 29, 1988. That means Shelley had two of her three miscarriages prior to 1988. That’s five and a half years before she walked onto a porn set. However, the story Shelley likes to tell conveniently shifts all the blame from herself—and onto the porn industry.”

And sure enough: “I’ve had several miscarriages due to the trauma in the industry,” Lubben claims on videotape. “I had hemorrhaging for 12 years and severe anemia. I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry.”

Episode 2, titled “Roxy’s Rape,” deals with another set of Shelley “Roxy” Lubben lies: Her claim that at least some of the sex she had on camera was non-consensual.

“I was in the industry for the years of 1993 to 1994 where I was forced to have unprotected sex,” Lubben tells various audiences in a compiled segment. “I was brutally raped on the set when I contracted herpes in a six-man gangbang, on a dirty ranch, unsupervised, on a dirty picnic table…. I was forced and was coerced to do sex acts that I did not agree with… I was also a drug addict alcoholic, much like many of the other people working in the industry. I also was jaded, mentally ill, and traumatized from all the pornography and sex I was subjected to, all the brutality.”

As Whiteacre points out, her choice of words is interesting, considering that the California Penal Code defines rape in part as, “force, violence, coercion, duress, menace, or the threat of immediate unlawful bodily injury,” as well as if the victim is intoxicated, drugged, mentally ill or mentally deficient.

“Here’s where Mrs. Lubben has a problem: She has to get around the fact that she actively, willingly sought employment in the porn industry, which by and large does not use condoms; booked the shoot, showed up, shot the scene, signed a contract and model release in the presence of others, acknowledging that she did not have diminished capacity, and that she was giving all necessary consent and waiving all liability,” Whiteacre analyzes. “She did the scene, she was paid, she cashed the check, and then she didn’t file a police report. So how to get around that? Here’s where Shelley goes all in. Short of being a minor, which obviously she wasn’t, she now claims that virtually every other element which might possibly negate her consent was present. She was forced, threatened, drugged, drunk, mentally ill, with no evidence of anything; just her word 15, 16, 17 years later.”

Also weighing in against Lubben’s version is one actor who participated in the “six-man gangbang” (Filmco’s Roxy A Gang Bang Fantasy) which Lubben references, actor Guy DaSilva.

“She was very aggressive in the scene; very aggressive, and so were the guys, but in no kind of dangerous kind of way, in any kind of threatening way, or harmful, where anyone was hurt or forced to do something they didn’t want to do,” DaSilva told Whiteacre and Lee. “That absolutely did not take place. She called the shots and then the guys including myself were just going through what we were told to do, and there was a director involved who was basically shooting it and ‘letting it fly.’ He wasn’t really even ‘directing’ the scene. For the most part, he just let it go and she carried it. She was not drunk or anything. She was capable of knowing what she was doing. Coherent.”

But, according to Lubben, not only was she personally assaulted on the set, but so is everyone who participates in making adult movies—and they all salve the pain by using drugs.

“On the movie set, it’s absolutely horrible and degrading for women,” Lubben claims. “In the background you can hear women throwing up, you can hear them crying—because it hurts… You know what women do before they do a scene? We go outside with other porn actors, we lay down lines of meth, we take big bottles and chug that down, and we’re ready. They beat the girls, they feed them—force-feed them drugs. Drugs are always provided. You can get Vicodin, that’s a huge drug. Xanax, alcohol, meth, cocaine—heroin is very big, and after a day of working with nothing but filth, bodily fluids, an unclean set—because all of the movies are done on private mansions, so there’s nothing regulated about this industry.”

Most of the rest of the episode consists of current and former performers—Melissa Monet, Nina Hartley, Danny Wylde, Monica Foster, Kayden Kross—putting the lie to Lubben’s claims, with Hartley being one of the most eloquent and logical.

“I’ve been on about 700 sets; I’ve done about a thousand scenes, 1200 scenes, give or take, and honestly, in all that, I’ve had ten experiences where I actually went, ‘Ew, never again with that person, that director’,” she tells the filmmakers. “And even then I would never call them rape; I would just call them, ‘Ew, that guy’s a jerk; I just won’t work with him again.’”

“No one ever kept me on a set,” she continues. “It’s not possible to hold somebody on a set against their will, and nowadays, with cell phones, the LAPD would love to have a phone call from some young woman in a closet on a set saying, ‘Please, please, come get me now, please!’ Oh, my God; what a field day they would have with that! It doesn’t happen. We don’t need to force anybody to be on a set; they come every day from the bus station going, ‘Please, please pick me; no, pick me!’”

Equally logical is Kayden Kross’s explanation of why there aren’t rapists in porn.

“She makes it sound like we don’t have a say in the matter; she turns it into rape,” Kross sardonically analyzes. “She says that she was raped, that we’re all being raped every time you show up to set. And I’m just saying, I mean, there would be a lot more rapists, I think, if that were the case, because look how easy we make it: You know, we drive ourselves there; we give you notice when we’re going to be there; we sit down in the makeup chair so you can make us look exactly how you want us to look—it’s really a good gig for rapists, I think. But then, you know, there’s the whole object of having to pay for it and there’s the whole thing where she can just say, ‘No, I’m not showing up.’ It kind of gets in the way if you really want to be a hardcore rapist, but definitely, if you just want to rape on the side, that’s easy.”

Hartley, however, gets to one of the core issues that separates the sexually normal world from the whacky religious one when it comes to sex.

“We’re still battling upstream,” Hartley asserts, “against the idea that women are delicate flowers who need protection from men, that sex is still something men want and women have, or it’s something that men do and women are, and still we are fighting the battle that women have sexual agency of their own; they have their own desires, their own needs, their own wants and their own ways of getting them.”

The religious aspect of this is something that greatly interests Whiteacre.

“What Shelley doesn’t get is that if Satan does exist in this world, he exists in the idea that the world somehow owes you a living,” Whiteacre told AVN. “That’s the philosophy that drives thieves and grifters and other criminals… The key to this ‘new improved’ Shelley Lubben is that her time in exile was spent sojourning at the Champions Centre in Tacoma, Washington. It’s a church and ministry training facility that spits out little clones who all recite the same mantra: ‘I’m a Champion’; ‘Jesus will help me lead a Champion life!’, etc. Shelley learned how to be a convincing public speaker, how to use logical fallacies like proof by assertion and to authority, and how to get people to pass the plate.

“At the core of this kind of religious conversion is the need to make your old life look as as terrible and evil and sinful as possible, so that your salvation appears that much more miraculous,” he continued. “Now that Lubben looks back on her life with these new-found religious perspectives, all the little stray pieces from her old life fit neatly into new packages: The voices she’s been hearing since childhood are actually God and Jesus; Satan entered her body to give her the strength to get through a gang bang; hearing the moon tell her to ‘fuck off’ proves that she was demon-possessed, etc.

“Pornography is Lubben’s dragon, which is a convenient one to tilt at because that sentiment provides enormous job ,” he assessed. ” There will always be a natural human desire to explore . But, in a Lubben-centric world, her enemy is the enemy of the true church, because Lubben and the true church are one and the same.”

Um… All hail St. Shelley?

In any case, Whiteacre’s and Lee’s documentary promises the best analysis of a vocal enemy of the adult industry than has been produced in many years, and can be enjoyed by adult industry members and fans alike.

TripAdvisor ‘dirtiest hotel’ owner: Arrested on child porn charge

41719008afef99a471d31d51e3f777f7 TripAdvisor ‘dirtiest hotel’ owner: Arrested on child porn charge

The owner of the Desert Inn hotel in Daytona Beach, Fla. – recently named one of TripAdvisor’s 10 dirtiest hotels in the USA – has been arrested in connection with a case, the Daytona Beach News-Journal reports.

The arrest follows a month-long investigation by the and local police that was prompted by a 13-year-old boy’s complaint.

On Wednesday, about 70 FBI agents and police officers raided the hotel, the News-Journal says. They arrived seeking evidence that Dennis Devlin, 57, and a 20-year-old hotel employee hired the boy to perform acts on video.

“I think he (Devlin) uses the hotel as a front for other sex crimes,” Daytona Beach Police Chief Mike Chitwood told city commissioners Wednesday night. “What I do know is that this (the hotel) is a den of iniquity.”

* PHOTO GALLERY: TripAdvisor’s 10 dirtiest hotels
* ALSO ONLINE: Is it risky to order from a hotel pizza flyer?
* ALSO ONLINE: Hotels in Egypt will ‘suffer badly’

The News-Journal reported that on Thursday, a judge denied Devlin bail.

Devlin was charged with one count of promoting sexual activity with a child and one count of lewd and lascivious acts with a child, according to the News-Journal. The 20-year-old employee is charged with two counts of promoting sexual activity with a child and one count of lewd and lascivious acts with a child.

The police chief also told city commissioners that he believes there are more victims.

This wasn’t the first time that Devlin faced similar charges. In a sidebar story about Devlin’s criminal record, the paper says:

“As early as the summer of 1991, court records show, the hotelier was confronted with allegations he offered teens to pose for nude pictures. While Devlin was arrested six times between 1991 and 1996, he was acquitted of 22 counts related to illegal activities with boys. Devlin, 57, was convicted of the second-degree felony but had his record cleared when his accuser “10 years after the alleged incident” recanted his accusations of molestation.”

According to the News-Journal, the investigation was prompted by a complaint from the 13-year-old boy, who told the FBI that Devlin’s 20-year-old employee had gone to his grandmother’s house to recruit him for a job – installing cameras. The grandmother agreed. The job, however, was different than what he’d been told, the article says.