May 18, 2013

NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

a24f56074a44dfd4d3049261995476d1 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent
#83 of the Patriots runs with the ball against the during the 2013 game at Gillette Stadium on January 13, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(January 12, 2013 – Source: Elsa/Getty Images North America)

(PhatzRadio / AP / SI Feature) — PHOENIX — Thanks to the culture established by their tight-lipped , the New England Patriots in the era have been well known for their refusal to re-live the past, always choosing to focus on the future and moving ahead rather than looking back.

So much for that.

In an uncharacteristically detailed discussion of the club’s failed Wes Welker free-agent , held court for about 20 minutes with reporters at the ’s annual meeting at the Arizona Biltmore on Monday, claiming Welker is a Denver Bronco today because the player’s agent, , did not serve his interests well. Though Kraft’s session served the purpose of a he-said, she-said exchange with Welker’s representatives, the owner’s primary point was Welker turned down more money in New England to sign with Denver. had the offering $2 million more than the Patriots over the course of a two-year contract, however.

Welker accepted a two-year, $12 million contract to join the last Wednesday. Though reports were New England’s offer was for $ over two years, Kraft said with incentives Welker could have earned $16 million in 2013-2014 with the Patriots, providing he performed comparably to his recent production level. Kraft said while Welker will earn $6 million from Denver in 2013, he could have earned $8 million in New England with incentives this season.

“In Wes’s case, we were willing to go what we considered above his market value,” Kraft said. “I really believe in this case, his agents misrepresented, in their mind, what his market value was. When you come right down to the bottom line, he accepted a deal in Denver which is less money than what we offered him.

“In fact, he has a one-year deal in Denver for $6 million. Our last offer…..was a $10 million offer with incentives that would have earned him another $6 million if he performed the way he had the previous two years. But in Denver, he’s going to count $4 million against the cap this coming year and $8 million the second year. There is no guarantee that he plays the second year there.”

True, but left unsaid by Kraft is that there is also no guarantee Welker would have realized all $6 million of incentives from the Patriots, either. If he under performs with the Broncos, Denver can release him before the 2014 season and not have to pay him the $6 million he’s owed next year. The Broncos would have then had him for one season at $6 million (a $4 million signing bonus and a $2 million base salary in 2013). In New England, Welker would have only topped that $6 million this year, and thus left money on the table if he reached his incentives, which is also not a given. So in a sense, Kraft is trying to have it both ways with his logic and his re-creation of the Welker negotiations.

Kraft told Sirius Radio Monday that Welker’s agents “played poker, [but] they overplayed their hand.” He characterized both Welker and the Patriots “losers” because of it. Dunn could not be reached for comment Monday, but Sunday he told Comcast SportsNet New England that he believes the Patriots didn’t want Welker back.

“Everyone in our organization wanted Wes Welker back,” Kraft said. “Anyone who doubts that, or thinks we weren’t serious, just doesn’t get it. I’ve owned the team 19 years and I’ve known in the end we have to have certain limits and restraints. Like I’ve said many times, I really wanted Wes to be with us through the rest of his career, but it takes two sides to do a deal.”

The Patriots, in fact, had essentially moved on from Welker even before Welker and the Broncos struck their deal last Wednesday afternoon. Believing Welker to be likely on his way out of town, the Patriots started negotiating with Rams free-agent slot receiver Danny Amendola on Tuesday, the first day of free agency and quickly agreed to terms on a five-year, $28.5 million contract. The Patriots didn’t reveal the deal with Amendola until after news of Welker’s signing in Denver had surfaced Wednesday.

“Wes Welker, just to be very clear, was our first choice to be with the team,” Kraft said. “When free agency came and his agents kept on insisting on a very high number that was beyond our number, we had to go to work on alternatives. Our second alternative was Danny Amendola. He had offers from other teams. So we made a judgment that Wes, unfortunately probably wouldn’t be with us. We made this commitment to Amendola.

“Wednesday, I personally got a call from Wes and he told me about this offer from Denver. He called Bill [Belichick] as well. We met and chatted. We have a lot of people, we’ve committed a lot of money to this inside position — you have Gronk [tight end Rob Gronkowski], you have [tight end Aaron] Hernandez, you have Danny [Amendola] now — it was just unfortunately a little bit too late. If he had called one day earlier, he would have been with us.”

Welker-gate, of course, didn’t just involve the Patriots’ ultra-productive slot receiver, who caught 110 passes or more in five of his six seasons in New England. It was partly a story about as well, given the Patriots quarterback made it well known he wanted Welker back with the team. Brady even restructured his contract this spring rather dramatically to give the franchise more room and negotiation flexibility.

After Welker joined the Broncos, there were reports that some people close to Brady were furious the Patriots would let the quarterback’s favorite target depart — especially after Brady had worked with the club to lower his own salary cap numbers this year and next year. But Kraft downplayed any negative reaction from Brady and said he was no more upset than anyone else that Welker jumped to Peyton Manning’s stable of receivers in Denver.

“I don’t answer to Tom Brady,” Kraft said. “He’s an important member of the team and we’ve chatted. He did what he did to put us in the best position to build a team around him and win games. We’ve chatted about it. But he has never…..it has been reported that he, or people close to him, have made certain comments. None of that is true. I’ve spoken with him directly. Whomever is creating that impression is mistaken.

“I mean, we’re all upset that he’s not with us. But we’re building a team. He never put a demand or expected anything when we did what he did. He never put quid pro quos, and to be honest, we wouldn’t have accepted them had he done that. He did what he thought [he should], and it’s given our team a real competitive advantage to be in a position to win. And now it’s how well our personnel people make the decisions.”

NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

a24f56074a44dfd4d3049261995476d1 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent
#83 of the Patriots runs with the ball against the during the 2013 game at on January 13, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(January 12, 2013 – Source: Elsa/Getty Images North America)

(PhatzRadio / AP / SI Feature) — PHOENIX — Thanks to the culture established by their tight-lipped , the Patriots in the era have been well known for their refusal to re-live the past, always choosing to focus on the future and moving ahead rather than looking back.

So much for that.

In an uncharacteristically detailed discussion of the club’s failed free-agent , held court for about 20 minutes with reporters at the ’s annual meeting at the Arizona Biltmore on Monday, claiming Welker is a Denver Bronco today because the player’s agent, , did not serve his interests well. Though Kraft’s session served the purpose of a he-said, she-said exchange with Welker’s representatives, the owner’s primary point was Welker turned down more money in New England to sign with Denver. had the offering $2 million more than the Patriots over the course of a two-year contract, however.

Welker accepted a two-year, $12 million contract to join the Broncos last Wednesday. Though reports were New England’s offer was for $ over two years, Kraft said with incentives Welker could have earned $16 million in 2013-2014 with the Patriots, providing he performed comparably to his recent production level. Kraft said while Welker will earn $6 million from Denver in 2013, he could have earned $8 million in New England with incentives this season.

“In Wes’s case, we were willing to go what we considered above his market value,” Kraft said. “I really believe in this case, his agents misrepresented, in their mind, what his market value was. When you come right down to the bottom line, he accepted a deal in Denver which is less money than what we offered him.

“In fact, he has a one-year deal in Denver for $6 million. Our last offer…..was a $10 million offer with incentives that would have earned him another $6 million if he performed the way he had the previous two years. But in Denver, he’s going to count $4 million against the cap this coming year and $8 million the second year. There is no guarantee that he plays the second year there.”

True, but left unsaid by Kraft is that there is also no guarantee Welker would have realized all $6 million of incentives from the Patriots, either. If he under performs with the Broncos, Denver can release him before the 2014 season and not have to pay him the $6 million he’s owed next year. The Broncos would have then had him for one season at $6 million (a $4 million signing bonus and a $2 million base salary in 2013). In New England, Welker would have only topped that $6 million this year, and thus left money on the table if he reached his incentives, which is also not a given. So in a sense, Kraft is trying to have it both ways with his logic and his re-creation of the Welker negotiations.

Kraft told Sirius Radio Monday that Welker’s agents “played poker, [but] they overplayed their hand.” He characterized both Welker and the Patriots “losers” because of it. Dunn could not be reached for comment Monday, but Sunday he told Comcast SportsNet New England that he believes the Patriots didn’t want Welker back.

“Everyone in our organization wanted Wes Welker back,” Kraft said. “Anyone who doubts that, or thinks we weren’t serious, just doesn’t get it. I’ve owned the team 19 years and I’ve known in the end we have to have certain limits and restraints. Like I’ve said many times, I really wanted Wes to be with us through the rest of his career, but it takes two sides to do a deal.”

The Patriots, in fact, had essentially moved on from Welker even before Welker and the Broncos struck their deal last Wednesday afternoon. Believing Welker to be likely on his way out of town, the Patriots started negotiating with Rams free-agent slot receiver Danny Amendola on Tuesday, the first day of free agency and quickly agreed to terms on a five-year, $28.5 million contract. The Patriots didn’t reveal the deal with Amendola until after news of Welker’s signing in Denver had surfaced Wednesday.

“Wes Welker, just to be very clear, was our first choice to be with the team,” Kraft said. “When free agency came and his agents kept on insisting on a very high number that was beyond our number, we had to go to work on alternatives. Our second alternative was Danny Amendola. He had offers from other teams. So we made a judgment that Wes, unfortunately probably wouldn’t be with us. We made this commitment to Amendola.

“Wednesday, I personally got a call from Wes and he told me about this offer from Denver. He called Bill [Belichick] as well. We met and chatted. We have a lot of people, we’ve committed a lot of money to this inside position — you have Gronk [tight end Rob Gronkowski], you have [tight end Aaron] Hernandez, you have Danny [Amendola] now — it was just unfortunately a little bit too late. If he had called one day earlier, he would have been with us.”

Welker-gate, of course, didn’t just involve the Patriots’ ultra-productive slot receiver, who caught 110 passes or more in five of his six seasons in New England. It was partly a story about Tom Brady as well, given the Patriots quarterback made it well known he wanted Welker back with the team. Brady even restructured his contract this spring rather dramatically to give the franchise more salary cap room and negotiation flexibility.

After Welker joined the Broncos, there were reports that some people close to Brady were furious the Patriots would let the quarterback’s favorite target depart — especially after Brady had worked with the club to lower his own salary cap numbers this year and next year. But Kraft downplayed any negative reaction from Brady and said he was no more upset than anyone else that Welker jumped to Peyton Manning’s stable of receivers in Denver.

“I don’t answer to Tom Brady,” Kraft said. “He’s an important member of the team and we’ve chatted. He did what he did to put us in the best position to build a team around him and win games. We’ve chatted about it. But he has never…..it has been reported that he, or people close to him, have made certain comments. None of that is true. I’ve spoken with him directly. Whomever is creating that impression is mistaken.

“I mean, we’re all upset that he’s not with us. But we’re building a team. He never put a demand or expected anything when we did what he did. He never put quid pro quos, and to be honest, we wouldn’t have accepted them had he done that. He did what he thought [he should], and it’s given our team a real competitive advantage to be in a position to win. And now it’s how well our personnel people make the decisions.”

NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent  NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

 NFL: Patriots owner Robert Kraft upset with Wes Welker’s agent

NFL: Wes Welker may test the free-agent market … and why shouldn’t he?

f331aeff9b1b144ddcb8b905f631003d NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?
#83 of the Patriots reacts after a play against the Baltimore during the 2013 at on January 20, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(, 2013 – Source: Elsa/Getty Images North America)

(PhatzRadio / SI) — The buzz about ’s approaching free agency seems to change by the hour, but the latest update from multiple outlets is this: Welker is prepared to talk with other franchises.

The ‘s Jeff Howe tweeted late Tuesday that there is “nothing imminent” between Welker and the Patriots, then ’s reported that Welker “has no plans to re-sign with the team before first testing the free-agent market.”

And, quite frankly, Welker should go dip his toe in the water. Why wouldn’t he at this point? The Patriots have been playing contract chicken with their six-time leading receiver for more than a year now, with Welker consistently hinting that he’d like a long-term deal.

The Patriots, thus far, have balked at those requests, convinced that Welker’s set his above market value.

They may be correct there — Welker has turned himself into a star in , but would he be able to replicate his success elsewhere, without the benefit of the Patriots’ offensive scheme and Tom Brady throwing him passes? If Welker can find one team convinced that he can, the Patriots might wind up regretting their hardline stance.

At the very least, if New England refuses to cave to Welker’s demands, the diminutive slot receiver deserves to see what’s out there. No player in the NFL has more catches than Welker since 2007 (672), and that total is greater than any receiver has ever put up over a six-year span.

Again, Brady and the Patriots deserve a lot of the credit there. But not so much that Welker should feel obligated to stay.

Welker played last season on the , and it looked for awhile — as Welker somehow opened the regular season playing behind Julian Edelman — that New England was making plans to move on without him in 2013. Welker broke up those plans with four consecutive 100-yard receiving games, starting in Week 3, as he again fell into his role as Brady’s old reliable.

“Everybody knows how I feel about Wes, our whole team feels that way about Wes,” Brady told the “Dennis and Callahan” radio show in January. “He’s just one of the best players I’ve played with and played against. He’s just a phenomenal player, and he’s been the heart and soul of what our team is all about. He’s been so selfless, and the way that he carries himself and commits himself to help our team win, it’s second-to-none.

“But like I said, those aren’t my decisions.”

Brady did his part, restructuring his deal to clear about $15 million off the Patriots’ for the next two seasons. That move left New England with an estimated $25 million to spend under the cap for next season — leaving plenty of room to give Welker a comfortable deal and still upgrade elsewhere.

So, what exactly is Welker’s value?

Dwayne Bowe just re-upped in Kansas City for a little more than $11 million per year, about in line with what Vincent Jackson received in free agency last season.

But those players are prototypical No. 1 receivers, capable of producing just about anywhere. Welker, on the other hand, is a slot guy, who needs a perfect offensive fit. Something like $8 million per year, then, makes more sense (Welker made $9.515 million last season on the franchise tag).

Would Welker accept a multi-year deal with an $8 million yearly average? More importantly, is that even too far north for New England?

Either way, there’s no reason just yet for Welker to settle and re-sign for less than what he wants. He may not find a Bowe-like deal in free agency, but, if nothing else, Welker has earned the right to take a look around.

NFL: Wes Welker may test the free-agent market … and why shouldn’t he? is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?  NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?  NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?  NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?  NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?

 NFL: Wes Welker may test the free agent market … and why shouldn’t he?

NFL: Tom Brady signs cap-friendly, three-year extension with Patriots

ccd552e0124023d0da7752c67e16273a NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots
#12 of the Patriots walks off the field after a play against the Baltimore during the 2013 at Gillette Stadium on , 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(, 2013 – Source: Elsa/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / SI Feature) — Tom Brady took a huge step today to ensure he’ll retire a Patriot, agreeing to a three-year that will keep him under center for through the 2017 season, when he will be 40 years old.

For the second time in his illustrious career, Brady is doing something players in this day and age simply do not do: As he did in 2005, Brady, a told SI.com, is signing a contract with New England that will pay him significantly less money than the market will bear, in large part to help the Patriots stay competitive for the next five seasons.

Amazingly, according to the source, the deal is for an eye-poppingly conservative $27 million, which is less than half his worth by any measure.

The extension will pay Brady a $3 million signing bonus immediately, in addition to salaries of $7 million in 2015, $8 million in 2016 and $9 million in 2017. Brady told Sports Illustrated five years ago he wanted to play until he was 40, at least, and this will accomplish that. He turns 40 on Aug. 3, 2017.

The upshot of the deal is to give the Patriots massive cap relief in a flat-cap era. He was due to count $43.6 million on the New England in 2013 and 2014. Now, his cap numbers will add up to $28.6 million in the next two years, a savings of $15 million in cap dollars at a time the Patriots have they want to sign to help keep the team atop the , which they have dominated since Brady took over at quarterback in 2001.

After the Patriots move money around to lessen the blow of Brady’s money in a flat-cap era — the NFL’s is expected to be virtually the same in the next two years as it was last season, about $121 million a year — here will be Brady’s cap numbers over the next five seasons, according to a source with knowledge of the contract:

2013: $13.8 million
2014: $14.8 million
2015: $13 million
2016: $14 million
2017: $15 million

The Patriots can do this by guaranteeing his salaries for the next three and giving him much of the money in a chunk of a bonus right now. That, the source with knowledge of the contract said, is what the Patriots intend to do. And history points to Brady doing the same thing eight offseasons ago.

SI VAULT: Tom Brady is Sports Illustrated’s 2005 Sportsman of the Year

In 2005, after his third Super Bowl title, Brady agreed to a six-year, $60 million deal, which at the time was dwarfed by ’s contract, which averaged $14.2 million a year. This year, clearly, he is doing exactly the same thing — in fact, giving the team even more of a hometown discount — with one goal in mind: to keep the Patriots competitive for the rest of his career. He’s putting his money where his mouth is. He knows it’s easy for him to make millions in endorsements. One teammate once said about Brady he would be such a sore loser he’d do whatever it took to never lose. At a time when the growing market for quarterbacks pegs the average per year at about $20 million — Drew Brees and are there, and it’s likely Super Bowl champ will be there soon — Brady’s average over the next six years will be consistently about 30 percent lower.

It’s very likely Brady feels the same way today as he felt in 2005, when he did the last sub-market deal. “To be the highest-paid, or anything like that, is not going to make me feel any better,” he said in 2005. “That’s not what makes me happy. In this game, the more one player gets, the more he takes away from what others can get. Is it going to make me feel any better to make an extra million, which, after taxes, is about $500,000? That million might be more important to the team.”

In an important free agency period, when New England will be fighting to stay relevant and win its first Super Bowl since the 2004 season, they should have the financial ammunition to fortify the team. They could bolster the pass rush by signing free agent Dwight Freeney of the Colts, or the secondary by signing veteran safety Ed Reed, also a free agent. On offense, they could open the wallet to re-sign Brady’s favorite receiver, , or maybe aim higher for a younger franchise receiver like Mike Wallace of the Steelers. All of a sudden, New England will have an additional $15 million of cap freedom, while two-thirds of the teams in the league struggle to do anything in free agency because they’re so snug to the cap.

NFL: Tom Brady signs cap-friendly, three-year extension with Patriots is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots  NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots  NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots  NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots  NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots

 NFL: Tom Brady signs cap friendly, three year extension with Patriots

NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team

f331aeff9b1b144ddcb8b905f631003d NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team
#83 of the reacts after a play against the Baltimore Ravens during the 2013 at on , 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(, 2013 – Source: Elsa/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / SI) — The ’s two-week window opened on Monday and will run through March 4. Because the 2013 salary cap has not been set officially yet, the final numbers on franchise (and transition) tags are still a bit up in the air.

However, with the cap projected to settle at $121 million, would run from close to $15 million for quarterbacks down to just shy of $3 million for punters/kickers.

Which players could wind up playing the 2013 season under a franchise tag designation? We take a team-by-team look at the possibilities:

: Is LB Paris Lenon worth an estimated $9.5 million? How about $10.7 million for CB Greg Toler? It’s a resounding no in both cases, so the Cardinals likely will sit on the franchise tag this season.

: CB Brent Grimes could draw a second straight tag, though the cost would be astronomical for a guy who played one game in 2012 (Achilles). The better bets are either LT Sam Baker or S William Moore.

Baltimore Ravens: Baltimore will keep the franchise tag in its back pocket, in case it needs it for Joe Flacco.

Buffalo Bills: The decision will come down to FS Jairus Byrd or G Andy Levitre. Consider Byrd the obvious front-runner to get the tag, with Levitre a fallback option.

: Of Carolina’s season-ending depth chart, only DT Dwan Edwards could be an unrestricted free agent amongst the starters. He’s not worth an $8 million-plus tag.

Chicago Bears: The Bears really have to keep Pro Bowl DT around, even at the expense of LB Brian Urlacher.

: There are multiple possibilities here, led by DE Michael Johnson and OT Andre Smith. The darkhorse is Mike Nugent, who drew the franchise tag in 2012.

Cleveland Browns: K Phil Dawson grabbing the tag for a third straight year would cost Cleveland $5.5 million. Forget that. Punter Reggie Hodges, another candidate, finished 31st in yards per punt.

Dallas Cowboys: LB Anthony Spencer was a letdown under the tag in 2012, and RB Felix Jones has done nothing to justify $8.1 million for 2013. There doesn’t appear to be a real franchise tag possibility here.

Denver Broncos: The Broncos will use the tag on LT Ryan Clady.

Detroit Lions: General manager Martin Mayhew said the Lions won’t use the tag this season. That decision puts them at risk of losing DE Cliff Avril, S Louis Delmas, RT Gosder Cherilus, CB Chris Houston and LBs Justin Durant and DeAndre Levy.

Green Bay Packers: Greg Jennings is the only realistic candidate here. Don’t count on it — Green Bay has enough depth at WR to avoid paying more than $ for Jennings.

Houston Texans: The price for safeties under the franchise tag is the third cheapest, behind only kickers/punters and tight ends. Thus, Glover Quin could earn that designation.

Indianapolis Colts: Two possibilities are off the board after the Colts told WR Austin Collie and DE Dwight Freeney they would not be re-signed. Punter Pat McAfee makes sense at less than $3 million.

Jacksonville Jaguars: A report out of Jacksonville Monday stated that the team is “unlikely” to hand out the franchise tag. Looking at the Jaguars’ roster, that choice appears to be a smart one.

Kansas City Chiefs: The Chiefs may wind up having to decide whether to tag WR Dwayne Bowe or LT Branden Albert. Their goal is to re-sign one so they can tag the other.

Miami Dolphins: Is LT Jake Long still worth $10 million? If the Dolphins decide he’s not, RB Reggie Bush and DT Randy Starks also could be options — the Dolphins used the tag in 2011 on DT Paul Soliai, then re-signed him prior to ’12. According to reports, the team won’t franchise CB Sean Smith.

Minnesota Vikings: The Vikings need to keep RT Phil Loadholt, after he and Matt Kalil combined to bookend a very good Minnesota line. Tagging Loadholt would put the Vikings in deep financially at their tackle spots.

New England Patriots: WR ? That’s apparently a negative. So, New England can choose between RT Sebastian Vollmer or CB . The latter would be a gamble, especially at more than $10 million, but he was an impact player for the Patriots.

New Orleans Saints: From a salary cap standpoint, the Saints don’t have the necessary money to tag anyone. Otherwise, LT Jermon Bushrod would be the obvious pick.

New York Giants: LT Will Beatty leads the way, though S Kenny Phillips would be cheaper. So too would TE Martellus Bennett.

New York Jets: The Jets are not allowed to tag S LaRon Landry, per a clause in his 2012 contract, and RB Shonn Greene does not deserve $8 million. TE Dustin Keller could be in play at around $6 million, though he was hurt for most of last season.

Oakland Raiders: This is a cap-strapped spot, too, so Oakland may not go the franchise tag route. If it does, TE Brandon Myers might make the most sense, both from a personnel and financial standpoint.

Philadelphia Eagles: The Eagles reportedly will not use their tag. They have no candidates beside CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie anyway, and he has not shown any reason lately that he should receive upwards of $10 million.

Pittsburgh Steelers: Another team with salary cap problems. WR Mike Wallace and CB Keenan Lewis would be atop the tag list, if the Steelers go down that road. But don’t count on it.

San Diego Chargers: The Chargers have a bunch of pending that don’t really fit the franchise tag qualifications — CBs Quentin Jammer and Antoine Cason, LB Shaun Phillips and NT Aubrayo Franklin, for starters.

San Francisco 49ers: The relatively low price at safety could lead to Dashon Goldson being hit with a tag. Could TE Delanie Walker, a key part of the 49ers’ Colin Kaepernick-led offense, be Plan B?

Seattle Seahawks: Seattle will return most of its starting lineup next season. K Steven Hauschka is a tag possibility, given the manageable price at that position.

St. Louis Rams: Can St. Louis justify nearly $11 million for oft-injured WR Danny Amendola? RB Steven Jackson normally would be a possibility, if his departure was not so clearly set in stone.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: The Bucs currently have about $30 million to spend under the cap, so the tag is in play. DE Michael Bennett should be the guy, if Tampa Bay opts to use it.

Tennessee Titans: Per a report last week, the Titans will tag TE Jared Cook. Doing so may push K Rob Bironas to free agency.

Washington Redskins: Washington is down $18 million in cap space due to NFL-mandated penalties, so a franchise tag would not be the best use of cash. Luckily for the Redskins, they don’t have a lot of must-keep pending free agents — tagging Fred Davis for a second straight year, off a season-ending injury, would be nonsensical.

NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team  NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team  NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team  NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team  NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team

 NFL: Franchise tag breakdown by team

NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl

17e4be3244f8f2b0e198afa2155562e1 NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl
#23 of the warms up prior to playing against the during the 2013 game at on January 13, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(January 12, 2013 – Source: Jim Rogash/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / AP) — HONOLULU — Houston running back says players are going to step up at the this year, but don’t expect 100 percent effort.

Foster said Friday after practicing with his AFC teammates that it’s unrealistic to expect full effort from the ’s top athletes when they’re limited in the plays they’re able to run.

“This isn’t basketball — you can’t go play a pickup ,” Foster said.

Foster said if the NFL expects 100 percent effort from its stars and are willing to cancel the game if they don’t see that, then the game will likely be scrapped.

“I think it’s an honor and a tradition, but for you to expect the best athletes in the NFL to come out and play a game 100 percent when you can’t , you can’t blitz, you can’t do all these things, it’s not going to be competitive like everybody wants it to be,” Foster said.

Effort has emerged as the top theme for this year’s Pro Bowl as NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has made clear the all- won’t be played going forward if it’s second-rate football.

Denver quarterback said that would be a shame, meaning players have to play better to keep it around.

Manning said the NFL will lose the value of players interacting if the Pro Bowl goes away, which helps to keep the league strong. The of the game over the years, he said, is for younger players to have interactions with older veterans, like Minnesota running back chatting with former Chargers great .

“Don’t tell me there’s not great value in that conversation,” Manning said.

“If they cancel this, then I think the NFL will lose that,” Manning said. “Is there monetary value in that conversation? I would argue yes. I would argue that’s helping keep the NFL as great as it is. So I’d hate for it to be canceled.”

The AFC and NFC squads took team photos at a resort on Oahu’s west side before practicing separately on a 50-yard field in front of family, friends and some fans.

AFC defenders played a little more defense than in two prior practices. During seven-on-seven drills, Kansas City safety Eric Berry picked off a Manning pass and Jets cornerback Antonio Cromartie intercepted Houston quarterback Matt Schaub. On one play, Indianapolis quarterback Andrew Luck gave the ball to Foster, who looked downfield to throw a pass but didn’t.

“Throw that,” Colts linebacker Robert Mathis dared Foster.

“I want to make sure Ray Anderson’s paying attention,” a Denver coach shouted to the players after Jets safety LaRon Landry broke up a pass, referring to the NFL executive who earlier this week said the league would make a decision about the Pro Bowl by April. Anderson was at the practice.

Wide receivers A.J. Green and Victor Cruz said part of practice is about getting the timing and rhythm right between players.

“It’s just getting comfortable with the plays, getting comfortable with the little nuances of the playbook really quickly and once you get acclimated, it’s fairly easy,” said Cruz, the New York Giants star.

NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl  NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl  NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl  NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl  NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl

 NFL Pro Bowl: Don’t expect 100 percent play at Pro Bowl

NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens

e8919b0f94d23af0a53b6bd1d4096090 NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens
Tom Brady (12) slides to avoid a hit from free Reed (20) during the second quarter of the at .(Photo: David Butler II, )

(PhatzRadio/ ) — Let us end the controversy over a quarterback’s slide here.

Tom Brady was fined $10,000 by the on Wednesday for in the against the , .com’s Ian Rapoport reported. The Patriots quarterback raised his leg as he hit the deck in the second quarter, nearly taking out Ravens safety in the process.

The actual figure of the fine is relatively insignificant. What matters is that Brady was penalized whatsoever.

This move seems like it belongs in the “stars are just like us” segment of “US Weekly.” Relax, defensive players (or maybe just ) — quarterbacks have to pay when they endanger others, too!

But it’s hard not to laugh at the fine when you consider that 49ers running back was docked $10,500 for wearing his socks too low in the . So sartorial missteps are $500 in penalties worse than reckless plays. Noted, NFL. Noted.

Here’s hoping all of this money went to an important cause, such as an organization dedicated to sock-droopiness awareness

NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens  NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens  NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens  NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens  NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens

 NFL Report: Tom Brady fined $10K for slide vs. Ravens

NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title

ccd552e0124023d0da7752c67e16273a NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title
#12 of the walks off the field after a play against the during the 2013 AFC Championship game at on , 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(, 2013 – Source: Elsa/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / AP) — FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — Tom Brady stood helplessly with his hands on his hips after his tipped pass was intercepted. He walked slowly to the sideline, removed his helmet and sat on the bench.

A fourth-quarter comeback chance was gone. The end of his season was less than seven minutes away.

leave teams with “either euphoria or crash landing.

“For us,” said Monday, “it was crash landing.”

Not even the NFL’s best offense or an improving young defense could soften the blow. The 28-13 loss to the Baltimore in the AFC championship game Sunday night left the Patriots without a Super Bowl title for the eighth straight year and sent them into an offseason when they could lose two key players.

Wide receiver and Aqib Talib can become .

Belichick, of course, will be back.

“Yeah. I’ll be here. You’ll have to deal with me again next year,” the coach, known for revealing little to reporters, said in a rare light-hearted moment during his season-ending news conference. “I know that’s disappointing for a lot of you. Until I’m told otherwise, I plan on being here.”

Belichick, the NFL’s longest tenured coach, is looking ahead to his 14th season with the Patriots. He led them to Super Bowl wins in his second, fourth and fifth seasons — but none since.

Only Brady and defensive tackle remain from any of those championship teams.

“That whole era is over with. It’s gone,” defensive end Rob Ninkovich said. “This is a whole new team. This is a different bunch of guys so we all have to experience it and learn for ourselves what that’s like.”

The Patriots did reach the Super Bowl twice in the five seasons before this one. They lost both to the New York Giants, the latest coming last season. Then they stocked their defense with draft choices — end Chandler Jones, linebacker Dont’a Hightower, cornerback Alfonzo Dennard and safety Tavon Wilson.

That was promising but hardly a guarantee of continued success.

“Guys only think about what’s going to happen the year that they’re in,” placekicker Stephen Gostkowski said, surrounded by trash bags and cartons filled with players’ belongings. “No matter what’s happened in the past it doesn’t mean that anything good’s going to happen in the future. Each year’s different.

“Coming in day one of training camp we had no idea what this team was going to be and you kind of feel your way through throughout the games.”

The Patriots started slowly with a 3-3 record. Then they won seven straight before losing to the NFC champion , 41-34 after rallying from a 31-3 deficit. They ended the regular season with two wins.

There were plenty of positives — an offense that led the NFL with 34.8 points and 427.9 yards per game and a defense that was second in the league with 41 takeaways.

Brady had his usual outstanding season, finishing fourth in the NFL with 4,827 yards passing and throwing for 34 touchdowns and eight interceptions. But against the Ravens on Sunday he produced just one touchdown as the Patriots were held scoreless in the second half.

The 13 points were their fewest since a 16-9 loss to the New York Jets on Sept. 20, 2009.

“It’s hard to win these games,” Brady said Monday during his weekly appearance on WEEI radio. “Unfortunately for us, because we’ve had a lot of success, nothing means anything unless you win the last game of the year.”

Belichick won’t wait long to work toward that goal again.

He must decide whether to keep Welker, the NFL’s leader with 672 receptions over the past six seasons, and Talib, who solidified the secondary when he was traded by Tampa Bay after the eighth game.

The Patriots placed the franchise tag on Welker this season and could do so again. They also could sign him to a multiyear contract, or let him go.

Will he be back?

“I’m not sure,” he said in the losing locker room Sunday night. “I’m not worried about that right now.”

Talib’s return also is uncertain.

“We’ll see what happens in the future,” he said, “but I definitely had the most fun I had playing in a long time here.”

Not on Sunday.

Talib left with a thigh injury in the first quarter. Other defensive starters played sparingly with tackle Kyle Love leaving in the opening quarter with a knee injury and Jones limited by an ankle injury to two snaps.

The absence of tight end Rob Gronkowski was probably the costliest. He watched the game from owner Robert Kraft’s box after breaking his left arm the previous Sunday in a 41-28 divisional win over the Houston Texans.

And Brady had his usual struggles against the Ravens.

“Baltimore’s always been a tough team for us,” he said. “Even when we play our best they’re a tough team for us and they play very well.”

The momentum began to shift Sunday when Brady mismanaged the clock and the Patriots settled for a field goal on the last play before intermission. In the second half, threw touchdown passes on three of Baltimore’s first four possessions and New England lost two interceptions and one fumble on three of its last four.

At the most critical time, Brady and his teammates collapsed.

But “there were a lot of positives from this football team,” Belichick said. “We wouldn’t have gotten to where we were without a lot of good, consistent performances from a lot of people.”

More of them on Sunday might have sent the Patriots back to the Super Bowl.

“A season that’s very much alive and with great hopes and expectations and energy suddenly crashes and it’s over,” Belichick said. “That’s where we are today. It’s stopped. It’s over. We’re onto next year.”

NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title  NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title  NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title  NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title  NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title

 NFL: Pats season ends with “crash landing” and no title

NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?

64e94d9101acd443e4c33d0c9af0e583 NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?
Belichick of the looks on during the 2013 game at on January 13, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(January 12, 2013 – Source: Jared Wickerham/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / SI) — Bill Belichick haters gleefully will point to the Patriots’ string of recent playoff disappointments as evidence that the crafty ball coach has lost a step. It has been , after all, since won a Super Bowl (its third in four years), and twice Belichick’s team has fallen to the Giants with the Trophy on the line.

Still, few coaches have been better in the conference finals — and the other three teams taking the field this weekend would love to replicate Belichick’s success.

The Patriots have reached the AFC title game six times under Belichick’s watch. They’ve won in five of those trips, the lone setback coming in a thriller against the Colts during the 2006 season.

Contrast that 5-1 mark to the rest of the coaches participating Sunday. The Harbaugh brothers are a combined 0-3 in the conference finals, with John losing to Belichick’s Patriots one year ago and the Steelers in 2009; and Jim’s 49ers gaffing away their chance to the Giants last season. Mike Smith, meanwhile, has never reached this playoff depth as the Falcons’ head coach.

How much of an edge does Belichick’s past triumphs give New England this week (and, possibly, at the Super Bowl) over a coaching field that has never made it beyond the conference finals?

That’s just one of the storylines in the forefront as the NFL crowns its conference champions. Here are a few other subplots to track:

• Making the leap to “elite” levels

SI’s wrote this week that has claimed in the of . There are plenty of out there, though, that could use a little more convincing.

It’s hard to argue with Flacco’s performance thus far in the playoffs — Baltimore’s QB has posted a 613 yards, five touchdowns, zero interceptions and a 120.0 passer rating, while taking down Andrew Luck and Peyton Manning in back-to-back weekends.

But he has been here, to this conference-finals stage, before. Twice, actually. Both times, he and his fell short.

Flacco and Atlanta quarterback Matt Ryan have followed similar career arcs. Ryan was the No. 3 pick in the 2008 draft; Flacco came off the board 15 selections later. Since then, Ryan has accumulated the statistics to join the “elite QB” discussion, culminating with a 2012 regular season in which he threw for 4,719 yards, 32 touchdowns and led the league with a 68.6 completion percentage.

Like Flacco, however, Ryan has not been able to get Atlanta over the top. It took until last week, in fact, for the Falcons to finally secure a playoff victory under Ryan’s watch, and he will make his NFC championship debut on Sunday.

A Ravens-Falcons Super Bowl would silence just about all the critics of Flacco and Ryan. Can they deliver that matchup?

• Colin Kaepernick’s dangerous dual-threat

Kaepernick delivered a record-setting performance in the divisional round, rushing for 181 yards and two touchdowns, plus throwing for 263 yards and another pair of scores, as the 49ers dismantled Green Bay’s defense.

Atlanta’s D has been stingier than the Packers this season, especially at home, but Russell Wilson still found room to run for 60 yards and a score last week.

The key to the , then, might be how well Atlanta can keep Kaepernick in the pocket. The 49ers’ young QB is dangerous enough throwing the ball — add in open lanes to run, and there may be no stopping the San Francisco offense.

• Is this really it for Tony Gonzalez?

Gonzalez said earlier that he was 95-percent sure that he would retire at the end of the season. This week, he bumped that number up to 97 percent.

As plenty of people have speculated, it appears that a Falcons Super Bowl win (or, at the very least, a Super Bowl appearance) could give Gonzalez a feather in his career cap and nudge him into the sunset.

Here’s the thing, though: Gonzalez is still really, really good.

He proved that again last week against Seattle, hauling in six catches, including a tip-toeing touchdown in the back of the end zone. Gonzalez will no doubt be a key figure again as the Falcons try to solve San Francisco.

An Atlanta win might allow Gonzalez to say farewell to his home fans in triumphant fashion. No one would complain one bit if he opted to come back for one more year instead.

• And as for Ray Lewis …

That other retirement tour just keeps on adding stops.

Lewis informed the Ravens prior to the playoffs that this was his “last ride.” Whether or not that extra tidbit of motivation has helped carry the Ravens through the wild-card and divisional rounds, it no doubt has to be in the minds of Lewis’ teammates.

The future has played a key role in the past against (more on that here). He will need to be at his best for the Ravens to get through this week. If that happens, get ready to enter Ray Lewis overload in the two weeks prior to the Super Bowl.

• The impact of Rob Gronkowski’s injury

In a word: massive.

The Patriots finally got their hulking tight end back for Week 17, only to see him leave their win over Houston after suffering another fracture in his troublesome left arm.

The media spent much of Super Bowl week last year on Gronk Watch, to see if Gronkowski could play through an ankle injury. There will be no such mystery this playoff season — the Patriots placed Gronkowski on injured reserve a couple of days ago.

His absence opens a huge hole in the Patriots’ offense. Aaron Hernandez will take on an even bigger role as a weapon for Tom Brady, but New England actually countered Gronkowski’s injury last week by getting the ball to its running backs (especially Shane Vereen) more.

Belichick has had a week to figure out his Plan B with Gronkowski out of the lineup. Given Brady’s past struggles against the Ravens, that’s one more headache neither he nor Belichick really needed.

• How much does the past matter?

The coaching legacy discussion above put this topic on the table, but there are other historical elements at play this weekend.

To wit: The Falcons have won four straight against the 49ers, plus beat San Francisco in the team’s only previous playoff meeting (Jan. 9, 1999). Matt Ryan has a 2-0 record versus San Francisco, too.

Of course, none of those matchups came with Jim Harbaugh coaching the 49ers, and Atlanta has yet to see Colin Kaepernick first-hand. Ryan may still draw a little confidence from his past successes against San Francisco, even if they don’t mean a whole lot right now.

Brady has to hope the past does not matter much, either. He has played some of the worst of his career against Baltimore, including a zero-passing TD, two-interception performance in last season’s AFC title game.

• Jacoby Jones … game-changer?

One of the bright spots for the Texans last week was the spark provided by Danieal Manning in the return game. Manning averaged 54 yards on four kickoff returns, a mark that was buoyed by a 94-yard scamper to open the contest.

The Ravens have to like seeing that tape. They boast one of the league’s most lethal return men in Jones, who averaged 30 yards per chance and took two kickoffs back to the house during the regular season. He has the potential to flip the field if New England gives him the opportunity.

NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again? is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?  NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?  NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?  NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?  NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?

 NFL conference finals storylines: Can Bill Belichick deliver again?

NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots

076637835aacc15ce91dc23891f7af9f NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots
Tom Brady #12 of the Patriots stands on the field with Belichick of the New England Patriots prior to playing against the during the 2013 game at on January 13, 2013 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.
(January 12, 2013 – Source: Jim Rogash/ North America)

(PhatzRadio / SI) — The Baltimore Ravens have worked hard and admirably persevered through multiple challenges this season to get back to the same position they were in last year: playing at New England in the . But history says the chances of the outcome being different for Baltimore are abysmal. The Ravens lost a heartbreaker, 23-20, to the Patriots last January, and they’d have to look back at more than 60 years of championship game results to find the last time a team won revenge against the same opponent, after losing the first meeting the year before.

Did you get the historical heft of that statement? The last time a team won being in the exact situation Baltimore finds itself this Sunday was more than six decades ago, when the 1951 Los Angeles Rams beat the Cleveland Browns 24-17 in the in L.A., after having lost the 1950 30-28 to the Browns in Cleveland.

It’s an astounding trend. The past 11 times teams have met back-to-back in , AFL or AFC, NFC championships, the same team has won both games. When you throw in the Cowboys-Bills consecutive Super Bowls of 1992-93 (each won by Dallas), it’s an 0-12 rematch record for the team losing the first of two back-to-back .

There is just one caveat: If those teams faced off three consecutive years in championship games, the team that lost the first two meetings won the third showdown three times (San Francisco over Dallas in the 1994 NFC title game; Oakland over Pittsburgh in the 1976 ; and Cleveland over Detroit in the 1954 NFL championship).

So there’s hope for Baltimore to beat New England in next season’s AFC title game, but not much Sunday night, based on the repeat factor at play in professional football since well before the 1970 merger and even before the seminal 1958 NFL title game between the Colts and Giants — the overtime classic that is credited with putting the pro game on the map.

Keep in mind as well, even without the rematch factor, the statistical odds don’t favor the Ravens. New England is 7-2 all-time in AFC/AFL championships, including a 4-0 record at home. The Ravens, who moved to Baltimore for the 1996 season, are just 1-2 in AFC , all of them coming on the road.

Here’s the data to back up the sizable task the 12-6 Ravens face against the 13-4 Patriots at in Foxboro:

– First in the AFC or AFL….

* Broncos over Browns, 1986-87 AFC title games — Denver beat Cleveland twice in a row, the first time in Cleveland (Can you say “The Drive”?) and then in Denver (Earnest Byner fumbles). Adding more salt in the wound, the Broncos and Browns took a year off, then squared off again in the 1989 AFC title game, with Denver winning easily in Denver.

* Steelers over Oilers, 1978-79 AFC title games — Pittsburgh swept Bum Phillips’ Houston Oilers, who never did quite kick that door down in that rivalry with the vaunted Steelers. The first meeting was a 29-point blowout, but in the rematch, a controversial non-touchdown call in the end zone, on a late-third-quarter catch by Houston receiver Mike Renfro, was pivotal in Pittsburgh’s 14-point victory.

* Steelers over Raiders, 1974-75 AFC title games — Oakland used to lose AFL-AFC title games like nobody’s business, dropping seven out of its eight appearances in a 10-year span between 1968-1977. They lost close games to the Steelers in 1974-75, but then came back to beat Pittsburgh in 1976, the Raiders’ first of three Super Bowl-winning seasons.

* Bills over Chargers, 1964-65 AFL title games — The Bills might be 0-4 in Super Bowls, but might forget they had a little AFL dynasty going in the mid-60s, going to three consecutive AFL Championship games, and winning the first two, both against the San Diego Chargers. Buffalo beat the Chargers a combined 43-7 in those two games, with quarterback and future U.S. Congressman Jack Kemp leading the way.

* Oilers over Chargers, 1960-61 AFL title games — In the first two seasons of the newly formed AFL, Houston swept the Chargers, who were based in Los Angeles the first year and San Diego the second. The Oilers peaked early in their franchise history, because between them and the transplanted Titans, they haven’t won another league championship since. The only title the Chargers own came with a 1963 AFL Championship game victory over the Boston Patriots.

– And then in the NFC or NFL….

* Cowboys over Bills, 1992-1993 Super Bowls — It’s the only time in the 46-season history of the Super Bowl that we’ve had the same pairing in consecutive years, and Dallas won both games handily, giving Buffalo its third and fourth of a record-setting four Super Bowl defeats in a row.

* Cowboys over 49ers, 1992-93 NFC title games — Dallas versus San Francisco was the game’s best rivalry in the first half of the ’90s, and Jimmy Johnson’s team won a pair of entertaining title games against George Seifert’s club. The 49ers, as we noted, did get a measure of revenge in 1994, beating Dallas in their third consecutive NFC title game meeting.

* Cowboys over 49ers, 1970-71 NFC title games — This was a Dallas-San Francisco rivalry of a different, earlier vintage, when Tom Landry and Dick Nolan coached the two teams, and the quarterbacks were Craig Morton and Roger Staubach for the Cowboys, and the underrated John Brodie for the 49ers. San Francisco couldn’t get over the hump against Dallas, losing 17-10 at home in 1970 and 14-3 in Dallas in 1971.

* Packers over Cowboys, 1966-67 NFL title games — The rematch is the one everyone remembers, the legendary “Ice Bowl” at Lambeau Field, won in the final seconds by Green Bay on Dec. 31, 1967. Vince Lombardi’s Packers won the first two Super Bowls after earning these two wins, and the snakebit Cowboys remained “Next Year’s Champions.”

* Packers over Giants, 1961-62 NFL title games — Lombardi won his first two NFL championships by sweeping the star-studded but title-starved Giants. From 1958-63, New York reached the NFL’s final game five out of six years, but lost all five. Green Bay routed the Giants 37-0 in 1961, but squeaked by them 16-7 in the rematch, in frigid conditions at Yankee Stadium.

* Colts over Giants, 1958-59 NFL title games — Everybody knows the Colts outlasted the Giants 23-17 in overtime in ….wait for it… “The Greatest Game Ever Played.” But the rivals met again the following year, without anywhere near as much drama occuring in Baltimore’s 31-16 victory at home. In the pre-Super Bowl era, those were the only two NFL titles the Baltimore Colts ever earned.

* Lions over Browns, 1952-53 NFL title games — Detroit and Cleveland met in the NFL championship three years in a row, but the Lions and Hall of Fame quarterback Bobby Layne got the best of the Browns and Hall of Fame quarterback Otto Graham in the first two showdowns, winning 17-7 in Cleveland in 1952 and 17-16 in Detroit in 1953. The Browns got a heap of revenge in 1954, winning 56-10 at home.

* NOTES: In the past nine seasons, only New England (four), Pittsburgh (three) and Indianapolis (two) have won AFC titles. The Ravens can become first team to crack that three-team domination since Oakland in 2002…… No matter who wins in the NFC, San Francisco or Atlanta, there will be a new NFC champion for the 15th consecutive season. The last team to repeat in the NFC were the 1996-97 Packers. Eleven different teams have won the previous 14 NFC championships……

The four coaches working this weekend know their way around the NFL playoffs. (11 playoff berths in 18 seasons), John Harbaugh (5 in 5 seasons), Mike Smith (4 in 5 seasons) and Jim Harbaugh (2 in 2 seaons) are a combined 28-15 in the postseason, with Belichick’s 18-7 record and John Harbaugh’s 7-4 mark leading the way….. While the Patriots have played in five of the past 11 Super Bowls, the Ravens are trying to get back for the first time since 2000. The droughts are even longer in the NFC. Atlanta hasn’t made a Super Bowl since the 1998 season, and San Francisco last went in 1994.

NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots  NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots  NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots  NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots  NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots

 NFL AFC Championship Game: History not on Ravens’ side as they try to get revenge on Patriots