June 18, 2013

Urban X Awards Kicks Off With Friday Party

4e945f697e9d7d4b2a55e79c9891e6f2 Urban X Awards Kicks Off With Friday Party

, Calif.—The countdown to the Urban X Awards officially begins with a kick-off party tomorrow night at the Cabana Club in , hosted by director Alexander DeVoe and star Nyomi Banxxx.

Doors open at 10 p.m. and attendees are strongly urged to arrive before 11 p.m. to guarantee entrance. The event is open to the general public, is reserved for those 21 and older and an upscale and hip dress code is in effect.

Some of the adult stars confirmed to attend include Sophie Dee, Lee Bang, Melrose Foxxx, Tara Lynn Foxx, Alisha Madison and Angelina Valentine.

The 4th annual Urban X Awards will take place in downtown at the 740 Club on July 23.

For more information, visit the official site at UbanXAwards.com.

The event is presented by Get Em Girl Promotions, in association with Runaway Fridays.

Industry can RSVP to Get Em Girl for the guest list, VIP and bottle service at (818) 880-7263, or Hidden Email Address.

The Cabana Club is located at 1439 N. Ivar Street in Hollywood.

UK court agrees Assange extradition to Sweden

27806914e14e1041eba97ae009e1da33 UK court agrees Assange extradition to Sweden

(Reuters) – A British court agreed on Thursday to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to where he is wanted for questioning over crimes, dismissing claims the move would breach his rights.

Swedish prosecutors want to question Assange about allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denies, made by two WikiLeaks volunteers during his time in Sweden last August.

“I have specifically considered whether the physical or mental condition of the defendant is such that it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite him,” Judge Howard Riddle told London’s top-security Belmarsh Magistrates’ Court.

“I am satisfied that extradition is compatible with the defendant’s (European) Convention rights, I must order Mr Assange be extradited to Sweden.”

Lawyers for Assange, who has angered the government by releasing thousands of secret diplomatic cables on his , said they would against the decision at London’s High Court, putting the extradition on hold.

Mark Stephens, a lawyer for Assange, said the case showed that extraditions under the fast-track European arrest warrant were a form of “tick-box justice”.

“We are still hopeful that the matter will be resolved in this country. We still remain very optimistic about our opportunities on appeal,” he told reporters outside court.

One of the alleged victims accuses Assange of sexually molesting her by ignoring her request for him to use a condom during sex. The second woman has said Assange had sex with her while she was asleep and that he was not wearing a condom.

Prosecutors say the second allegation falls into the least severe of three categories of rape in Sweden, carrying a maximum of four years in jail.

Assange is a controversial and flamboyant character who inspires strong loyalties among his supporters, but his former right-hand described him in a recent book as an irresponsible, autocratic bully.

Scores of reporters from around the world have covered the court case and celebrities including British director Ken Loach and Australian journalist John Pilger offered sureties in December to persuade the British court he would not abscond.

FAIR TRIAL

During three days of legal argument earlier this month, lawyers for Assange argued he would not get a fair trial in Sweden and said Swedish prosecutors had mishandled the case against the 39-year-old Australian computer expert.

They argued that he might wind up being sent to the United States where he could face execution for leaking secrets.

Assange’s lawyers also accused Sweden’s Fredrik Reinfeldt of creating a “toxic atmosphere” in Sweden and damaging his chances of a fair trial by portraying him as “public enemy number one”.

However, Judge Riddle dismissed each of the defense’s arguments in turn, even describing Assange’s Swedish defense lawyer as an “unreliable witness”.

The judge said Swedish prosecutors had tried to interview Assange before he left the country but had been unable to do so.

He said the European arrest warrant, under which the fast-track extradition request as made, was valid and the alleged crimes were serious. Publicity surrounding the case was also not a reason to refuse extradition.

“I think it is highly unlikely that any comment has been made with a view to interfere with the course of public justice,” Riddle said.

The Swedish prosecution authority had no immediate comment.

Looking for that Right Date???

86eeaaedd95de69295ca8c96025a1bbc Looking for that Right Date???

Are you ready to start seriously looking for a long-term relationship, but don’t know where to start? Have you exhausted all possible leads from your friends and family? Do you ever feel like you’re never going to meet someone that you can like, love, and trust?

Nobody has ever said that meeting someone is easy — especially after a divorce. It’s hard to start dating after years without practice, and facing the dating scene today is especially challenging. But take heart: people just like you start relationships every day.

What are the best ways to find and meet potential partners? What are the expectations between couples these days? How do you venture out as a single — safely and successfully? What’s the first step?

Are you ready?

If you aren’t emotionally ready to start a new relationship, you won’t end up with the right person. Barbara De Angelis, relationship expert and the author of Are You the One for Me?: Knowing Who’s Right and Avoiding Who’s Wrong (Delacorte Press) recommends asking yourself these questions to determine whether you’re ready to have an intimate relationship.

1. Are you still angry and resentful towards your ex?
2. Do you dislike who you are? Do you feel lonely and desperate without a relationship?
3. Are you still in love with your ex?
4. Do you feel like you have nothing valuable to offer someone?

If you answered “yes” to even one of these questions, you probably aren’t ready for a new relationship. Perhaps you need more time to recover sufficiently from your relationship breakdown before you try again. If you suspect that you aren’t ready for love, work on improving your relationship with yourself first. When you can honestly answer “no” to each of these questions, you’ll be ready. Meeting strategy # 1: develop a hobby

The first thing to learn is there is no one right or wrong strategy for finding someone. If you think long and hard about it, you’ll realize that you actually have limitless opportunities to meet people. Try something you’ve never done before — or something you used to enjoy before your marriage. For instance, perhaps you loved hiking or biking, but stopped going because your ex didn’t enjoy those activities. Or maybe you loved to dance, but your ex had two left feet. Taking some dance lessons is a great way to meet new people with a similar interest, and boost your self-confidence. You’ll probably make some great new friends along the way as you become more involved with a variety of activities. After all, a person with interests is automatically interesting to others who share the same hobbies. Go places where the sort of people you’d like to meet might be — whether that’s a dance club, a wine tasting club or a scuba diving club. But remember that meeting someone is not a life-or-death mission: it should be fun. Lighten up, go out to a place or event you’ll enjoy, and take a friend with you the first time, if you feel nervous. Do whatever it takes to make yourself comfortable, and start today!

Introduction services

Introduction services are gaining in popularity as people find they need help to find Mr. or Ms. Right in these hectic times. There is a range of dating services available today: some do the matchmaking for you; others let you select from videos or from short bios. What they all have in common is a client-base of individuals who are looking for a relationship.

Matchmaking services will typically ask new members to fill in a detailed questionnaire about themselves, their likes and dislikes, and what kind of person they’re looking for as their ideal mate. Most will perform an in-depth personal interview with each member. You’ll work with a company consultant who will attempt to find close matches for your personality profile — which includes your attitude, emotional maturity, and social skills — and provide you with detailed information and phone numbers of appropriate matches. Both parties are usually notified of a potential match, so that either can initiate the first phone call. After the call and possibly first date, each member calls his or her consultant to provide feedback. Hopefully an on-going relationship will eventually develop between two members and no further referrals will be supplied unless the relationship breaks down, at which point the process starts over again.

A matchmaker may also help you identify your strengths and weaknesses, and tell you how you might be perceived by others. Since no two dating services are alike, call several to request information about their procedures, policies, and prices. Don’t hesitate to ask questions, and don’t be pressured into making a decision on the spot. Matchmaking services can be expensive, but they will save you the time and effort of attending socials or sorting through and responding to personal ads. Before signing with a matchmaker:

* Talk to at least three agencies to compare costs and services.
* Check the agencies with the Better Bureau or your state licensing board.
* Ask for testimonials or referrals to satisfied clients.
* Ask how long the agency has been in business.
* Ask how many people in your age range they have on their register of each sex.
* Know exactly what the services are, and what they will cost.
* Ask about methods of payment. Do they require all the in advance of services, or can you pay in installments?

The personal approach

Personal ads are not for everyone, but many people have found love through this method. “Placing a personal ad is not only a cost-effective way to meet someone but it exposes you to a lot of people quickly,” says Emily Thornton Cavlo, co-author of 25 Words Or Less a new book on how to write an effective, personal ad. “Psychologically, placing an ad puts you into the dating mode, and it helps to know that there are lots of other people just like you who want to meet someone but don’t want to go through the club or bar scene.”

If you get bogged down in the process of writing an ad, start by letting your subconscious do all the work: just jot down all the things that come to mind when you think of a potential mate, and what you consider your best points to be. Once you’ve laid the groundwork, refining your ad is relatively easy.

Cavlo and her co-author, Laurence Minisky, recommend keeping three things in mind when writing and responding to a personals ad:

1. What kind of person are you looking for? We all have a list of traits we want in a partner. These traits can be anything from “kind and sensitive” to a “non-smoker who likes children under the age of four.”
2. What kind of person are you? Make a list of words that describe you, then select the words that really paint a picture about who you are — the ones that make a reader see, hear, smell, and taste who you are. By doing this, “generous” becomes “volunteer reader for the blind,” and “loves to cook,” becomes “you’ll love my sun-dried tomato lasagna.”
3. What level of commitment are you looking for? If you clarify the level of commitment and intimacy you’re looking for, you’ll target the people who are looking for the same type of relationship. Being straightforward about what you want ensures you don’t get involved with someone with a different agenda than yours. And don’t respond to ads with an incompatible level of commitment, no matter how interesting the person sounds.

Once you’ve written your masterpiece, you must decide where to place it. “Opportunities as to where you should place your ad are growing daily,” says Minisky. “A way to choose where to best place your ad is to look at the publication’s target readership. If it’s important to you to date someone who lives close by, place an ad in the local newspaper, or on your supermarket bulletin board. If you’d like to date a single father, seek out a single-parent’s newsletter or website, and so on. If you place your ad in the wrong place, you’ll have a hard time finding the right person for you.”

The cost of placing a personal ad can range from free to hundreds of dollars. If your budget allows, place your ad in a publication you read or website you visit yourself.

Responding to an ad is a kind of advertisement in its own right. Use the same three criteria (above) to introduce yourself to the person who placed the ad. Refer to something about the ad you particularly liked, so the recipient knows that you’re responding to him or her specifically — that you’re not just sending form letters to everyone.

Telephone personals

This form of meeting someone is fairly new but growing at a fast rate. Telephone personals services such as Chit Chat, ’s #1 Talkline, and Telepersonals allow you to record an ad, which other members can then to over the phone. If you pique someone’s interest, he or she will leave a message for you. Of course, you can to other members’ messages and respond to as many as you like. When you call in, an automated voice prompts you through a series of choices to route you to a specific part of overall system.

Many services are completely free for women, since there are usually more men than women using the service.

It’s also usually free for men to record their ad and listen to ads, but men usually have to pay to respond to ads and to pick up their messages. With many services, you would first select an age group, then what kind of relationship you are looking for (from friendship to marriage), and then the basic personality of the person you are hoping to meet.

Once you’ve hit it off and exchanged several messages with someone, take the time to have two or three long phone conversation before deciding to meet. This gives you the opportunity to explore whether your interests, attitudes, values, and relationship goals are compatible, and to judge the character of your prospective date. Taking the time to talk to each other not only helps you build a rapport, it also helps you better determine if the person is right for you.

“I decided to use a telephone personals company because it was fast, easy, and inexpensive,” says Shawn, a former member of a telephone personals service. “As a part-time single dad with a demanding career as a computer programmer, I didn’t have a lot of time to spend looking for the perfect mate. I joined from home, and listened to ads after the kids went to sleep. I never met anyone on the system that I didn’t like, and I dated two or three nice women before meeting Debbie. We talked for a couple of hours before we met (which is amazing because I hate phone conversations), so I knew we were intellectually compatible. As soon as she walked into the restaurant, I knew that she was the one. We got married last spring — three years from the day we met.”

Computer compatibility

The Internet connects over 25-million people from over 60 countries every day. More and more people are joining this cybersociety at a fantastic rate. It’s accessible 24 hours a day — come rain or shine, sleet or snow — from the comfort of your own home. All you need to launch yourself into cyberspace is a computer, a modem, some communications software, an internet provider (such as AOL) and a phone line or cable access to your provider.

Online matchmaking services, such as Match.com and Lavalife, provide a user-friendly way to meet people.

A leader in online personals, Match.com offers a fun and safe way to meet other singles. With more than 1.2-million members, this service offers a large member pool of quality singles, the majority of whom range in age from 25 to 45. Their “Super Search” allows you to quickly find profiles which fit your criteria, and will also send you new profiles that match your wants as they are posted. Match.com offers all users a free seven-day trial with unlimited access to browse through its member profile database.

Lavalife has been around for over 15 years. With more than 50,000 messages being posted everyday, Webpersonals offers three distinct destinations: one for men and women to connect; one for gay men (“manline”); and one for gay women (“womanline”). Once you’ve picked a destination, you can choose which community you’d like to join: “Dating,” Romance,” or “Intimate.” You can sign up in any or in all communities, then search each one for someone interesting. Their search engine allows you to be very specific about what kind of person you’re looking for; once you have your results, you can read any of the selected bios you wish.

Much like real-world dating, some people treat online dating as a fun way to pass time — a novelty. Others treat it as a genuine and meaningful way of socializing, hopefully leading towards a long-term relationship.

“Meeting online means you really have to work on your skills,” says Nina, a Toronto cosmetician who met Brian from Colarado. “It cuts through the superficial small talk, so you can immediately get to know someone. There’s no time to talk about the weather.” For the last two years, the two have gotten to know each other via the internet, and spent to two weeks vacationing together last summer. Now, the couple is making plans for Brian to move to Toronto to be with Nina. The discussions in cyberspace often cut through the small talk and superficiality of ordinary life. People can be intimate without being self-conscious, which can lead to deeper conversations (or cybersex, if you’re so inclined). It’s not without dirty spots, but cyberspace can be like the real world: it’s an exciting terrain to explore.

Wining and dining

Singles dances and parties are held on a weekly or monthly basis in every major city in . When you go to a function sponsored by a singles organization, the key is to make conversation with a number of different people and really listen to what they’re saying (both verbally and with body language).

Remember, it’s not enough to simply place yourself in a meeting environment: you need to maintain a positive attitude and give off inviting vibes (“inviting” does not mean promiscuous! Be appropriate). If you’re unfriendly, no one will take the time to get to know you. If you go with friends, don’t cling to them; approaching a pack of men or women can be too intimidating for someone who’d otherwise love to talk you.

Since we all have to eat, dinner groups can be an excellent way to meet someone and enjoy a great meal at the same time. The Single Gourmet offers events across North America — including New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. It has more than 1,000 members in each of these cities. The Single Gourmet attracts single professionals who have a love of fine food, conversation, and socializing with other interesting singles. This atmosphere offers singles the opportunity to meet while dining together at a wide variety of the cities’ restaurants on a weekly schedule.

One terrific way to meet a lot of eligible people at once is host a dinner party with seven or eight other friends, each of whom is asked to bring one or more attractive eligible people of the opposite sex with whom they are not personally involved. Roger, a business executive with little spare time for socializing, began to hold monthly parties where he invited male friends to bring the most fascinating women they knew as long as they were not romantically linked. When it became clear that many of the invitees were showing up alone, Roger enlisted the help of women who had been to past parties to invite their single female friends. Hosting single soirees, theme parties, and other events is a great way to expand your network quickly.

Cultural encounters

Theater enthusiasts, music lovers, dance devotees, museum goers, and art aficionados will be happy to know that there are many people who share your interests — and many organizations and events that can bring you together.

When it comes to theater, you could attend a benefit for a theater company, see a play with other singles, or even take an acting class or audition for the community theater.

Most cities boast at least one museum. In addition to exhibits, your local museum might offer special events, such as silent movie programs, modern film classics programs, concerts, lecture series on arts, and hands-on art classes.

Another way to meet someone with the same appreciation for the arts is take a class. Consider signing up for group lessons in painting, ceramics and pottery, or dancing (take some private lessons first to brush up or gain confidence). You’ll not only meet great new people who share your interests, but you’ll have the fun of participating in a new hobby.

Parties for a Purpose

Involvement with non-profit organizations offers gratification in more ways than one. By investing your time, energy, and/or money as a volunteer, or by participating in fundraising events, you may experience a fruitful social life and feel good about making a contribution to a worthwhile cause. The more involved you become, the better you’ll get to know others who share your sensibility and desire to “do good.”

Many organizations offer volunteer opportunities, but may require a serious time commitment; take this into consideration when selecting which organization to support. Charities and special-interest groups and organizations are also a great way to connect with like-minded men and women. Many of the non-profit helping organizations — such as The American Red Cross, The American Society, The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, or The Multiple Sclerosis Society — wouldn’t be able to provide services to those in need without their dedicated volunteers. The rewards for helping others really can’t be measured. You’ll experience a genuine feeling of self-worth and of real usefulness — valuable indeed if you’re going through a difficult separation or divorce.

Better yourself

Life after divorce can be emotionally as well as physically exhausting. Depending on your unique situation and needs, a retreat, some exercise, or education could work wonders for your health, your peace of mind, and your social life. If you feel good about yourself, it shows — and that makes you much more attractive to others.

What’s the best kind of exercise? The one you enjoy doing, because you’ll actually do it. If you’d like the opportunity to meet people while getting or staying fit, choose a group activity such as co-ed volleyball, skiing, hiking, or a biking club. If you’re feeling self-conscious about your athletic ability, choose a more relaxed “fun” team or club. Don’t choose a sport you hate just because you think you’ll meet more potential dates; if you’re having a lousy time, you’re going to be lousy company.

Another way to improve yourself, and increase your opportunities to meet people, is to take some classes. You can study almost any subject in the world, from academic subjects (such as history, philosophy, literature, and ) to yoga to desktop publishing. You can learn how to play the stock market or how to play chess, fix your car or bake bread. The Learning Annex and the Seminar Centers in your area offer great classes on a variety of subjects. There are even classes on how to find your soulmate! Your classmates will be people like you: they’ll be interested in knowing more about an intriguing topic, and might just be hoping to meet new people and develop new friends.

Travel

Travel offers wonderful opportunities for singles. Adults-only resorts such as the Allegro Jack Tar in Mexico and Hedonism II in Jamaica provide a relaxed atmosphere and activities designed to encourage guests to mingle and meet. You could also join a singles tour geared to your tastes and interests — whether that’s visiting European art galleries or going on Safari in Africa. If you’re traveling alone, you can request a roommate (lowering your expenses and giving you a companion), and you’re sure to befriend others in the group.

“Group tours can really expand your horizons,” says Martha Chapman of Signature Vacations. “You’ll have the opportunity to visit a destination you’ve always wanted to see, take advantage of the package prices, and you have access to lots of company if you want it. You’re alone, but not lonely.” Chapman also recommends taking advantage of the benefits that an all-inclusive package can offer. “All- inclusive resorts can offer you lots of security, activities, and an ambiance that allows you to meet a lot of new people. Everything is included and offered right there at the resorts, giving you the opportunity to try something new — such as scuba diving, windsurfing, sightseeing, or going on an archeological dig. You’ll be taking those lessons and day trips with many other guests of the resort, many of whom will probably become good friends and companions for the rest of your stay.”

Some all-inclusive resorts are very singles-oriented or offer adult-only stays. Call your travel agent, who should be able to help you find the perfect destination, package, or tour for you.

Get out and socialize

“I took a survey among my friends who are married or in a serious relationship,” says Diane, a single professional who works for an insurance association. “There are many ways to meet your soul mate, but none of them involve sitting at home doing nothing.”

Still have no idea where to find single people? No problem. These suggestions are sure to put you where you want to be — with other great singles! If you’re shy, try the approaches that scare you the least to start with.

* Bookstores. Select an interesting book, then approach someone and ask them if they’ve ever read it or know the author’s work.
* Single Parent Support Groups. If you’re a single parent, this is a great way to share your concerns, get helpful ideas, and meet other like-minded single parents.
* Coffee Houses. A casual and popular spot for singles these days. Sit down with a copy of Divorce Magazine (it’s a great conversation piece!) and enjoy the exotic blends. Some coffee houses offer poetry readings and live music as well.
* Parks. A great place to walk or picnic. Check with your local department of parks and recreation and get on their mailing list. They sponsor some great activities, like dancing in the park, arts, and craft shows. And walking a cute, friendly dog is a great way to meet people — they’ll come to you!
* Video stores. Are you into comedy? Or maybe you need a little drama in your life. Find someone interesting in the oldies section. Reminisce with him or her about how they just don’t make movies like that anymore, then discuss your favorite classics.
* Commuting. Taking the train or bus from work doesn’t have to be boring. Sit next to someone you find interesting, start up a conversation, and make the trip home an enjoyable one.

As you begin looking into one or more of these possibilities, you’ll discover more opportunities than you could have imagined to meet other single people in your area. Take a good look at the bulletin boards on the internet and listing section of your local newspapers and magazines for singles events that might interest you.

The opportunities for you to reach out and become involved in absorbing and enjoyable activities — to keep on learning and growing, to do some good, to make new friends, and perhaps even find new love — are all around you. All you have to do is seize them.

Dating safety rules

Caution is the keyword here. It doesn’t matter how or where you’ve met someone — whether it was through the personals, online, at a bar, or even though friends — don’t rush into too much intimacy too fast. Don’t be too quick to give your phone number, address, deeply personal information — or your body — to a virtual stranger. Some of life’s dangers are beyond your control, but you can protect yourself against others.

“Get to know someone on the phone before planning to meet up with them,” says Cavlo. “Take your time and get to know their sense of humor, their interests, and hear about their lives, so you have a better idea of who you are meeting — or if you really want to meet them.”

Use common sense when you plan to meet face-to-face with someone new. Here are a few tips to help keep you safe:

* Never invite strangers to your home until they are no longer strangers. This means you don’t give your address to anyone until you feel reasonably sure he/she won’t hurt you when you are alone with him/her, or try to break into your home to carry off your precious possessions when you’re away.
* Meet in a public spot, preferably during the day. Coffee is quick, and if things are going well, you can always extend it into a meal. But if you arrange to meet for dinner and a movie, your evening may seem like an eternity if things are going badly.
* Use your own transportation. After you’ve met the person, if you have any doubts at all about him or her, don’t allow yourself to be driven to dinner or to the theater. Take your own car. If you have strong doubts, don’t go.
* If you don’t have a car, make sure you have some cash and a credit card so you can get home.
* Carry change for a telephone or bring a cellular phone.
* Leave a trail. If you’re going out with someone for the first time, let a friend or family member know where you’re going, when you’ll be back, and who you’re with. Tell them you’re going out with someone you don’t know very well and give them your date’s name, phone number, and any information that you may have about the person.
* Be on the lookout for inconsistency. “Does the information you’re received during your date agree with the facts you got over the phone, through e-mail, etc.?” says Minsky. “If the person is still very secretive about where they work or live even after several conversations, this can be a sign that there may be a hidden agenda that isn’t in your best interests.”
* Keep your financial situation to yourself. Be wary of too many questions about your assets. Don’t be persuaded to invest in anything without full investigation.
* At the end of a date, make sure you aren’t being followed home. If you are being followed, drive to a police station or a friend’s apartment where you can call the police.
* If you don’t like the person, don’t give him or her your home phone number. Give a phony number, if it will let you make your exit without creating a scene.
* Trust your gut. If you have a feeling that there’s something wrong, then there’s something wrong. And you should go with that feeling. All in all, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Also remember not to take your date’s reticence on certain matters personally. They may just be protecting themselves in case you turn out to be a psycho. For the first few weeks, if he doesn’t want you to see his car, or she doesn’t want to tell you where she lives, that’s smart. If it’s been six months, however, you should smell a rat.

What happens next?

You never know what can come from a date: it may be nothing, it may be a friendship, it may be a romance. Don’t set impossible standards for yourself or your date. You may certainly have a wish list, but you’re now mature enough to know that no one person can be expected to meet all your needs. Allow yourself and others to be . That doesn’t mean accepting someone as partner if he or she doesn’t enrich and enhance your life in important ways, but it does mean getting rid of fantasies of the perfect mate.

Just be open to everyone you meet. Maybe you’ve found your next employer. A sister or brother-in-law. Or a new friend. Learn from your dates; even if they go badly, it can help you identify the qualities you don’t want in a mate. Have respect for yourself: you deserve to be treated well. Have respect for others: don’t be rude unless you have to. Above all, relax and enjoy yourself. Dating may seem very different this time around, but it’s still good fun and can be very rewarding.

How will you know?

You’ve meet someone you really like, but you’re wondering whether he or she is really right for you.

Take the time to see if you are compatible: physically, emotionally, socially, intellectually, sexually, professionally, and in your hobbies (add or subtract items from this list based on your own wants and needs).

In Are you the One for Me? Barbara De Angelis offers a “Sixty Second Compatibility Test” you can use to see how well matched you are with someone. She suggests you ask yourself the following four questions about your prospective or present partners:

* Would I want to have a child with this person?
* Would I want to have a child just like this person?
* Do I want to become more like this person?
* Would I be willing to spend my life with this person if he or she never changed from the way they are now?

If you answered “yes” to all four questions, you’re probably compatible with one another. If you answered “no,” ask yourself why.

Once you think you’ve found the partner of your dreams, what can you do to create a marriage in which you have the kind of intimacy you want but still retain your sense of self as an separate individual?

According to Victoria Jaycox, author of Single Again, “One step is to make sure that you and your partner have the same kind of marriage in mind. Talk through what each of you expects from a partner and try to work out any differences before you marry. Discuss how you will handle differences, your own separate responsibilities, and how you will be there to support each other. What you want to achieve is an understanding about the nature of your marriage.”

The second step is to decide whether you’re willing to make those efforts and compromises required by this relationship. Those are the costs. For the benefits to outweigh them, your new partner must be someone who meets your needs for caring, intimacy and autonomy,” says relationship expert Barbara De Angelis. “Although finding that person is rare, it does happen. And if it has happened to you, you better than anyone will be able to recognize and grab hold of the miracle it represents.”

Why America’s teachers are enraged

949c1d81dd2e5228f3634ac3b16fedde Why America’s teachers are enraged

Teacher Terry Grogan of Milwaukee takes part in protest at Wisconsin State Capitol on February 16.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Diane Ravitch: Teachers are rallying against Wisconsin plan to cut their benefits, union rights
* She says teachers have been singled out for blame on America’s problems
* Ravitch: How can we improve schools while cutting funding and demoralizing teachers?

Editor’s note: Diane Ravitch is a historian of education and the author of the best seller “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education.”

(CNN) — Thousands of teachers, nurses, firefighters and other public sector workers have camped out at the Wisconsin Capitol, protesting Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s efforts to reduce their take- pay — by increasing their contribution to their pension plans and health care benefits — and restrict their rights.

Republicans control the state Legislature, and initially it seemed certain that Walker’s proposal would pass easily. But then the Democrats in the Legislature went into hiding, leaving that body one vote shy of a quorum. As of this writing, the Legislature was at a standstill as state police searched high and low for the missing lawmakers.

Like other conservative Republican governors, including Chris Christie of , John Kasich of Ohio, Mitch Daniels of Indiana and Rick Scott of Florida, the Wisconsin governor wants to sap the power of public employee unions, especially the teachers’ union, since public education is the single biggest expenditure for every state.

Opinion: Public employees have to make concessions

Public schools in Madison and a dozen other districts in Wisconsin closed as teachers joined the protest. Although Walker claims he was forced to impose cutbacks because the state is broke, teachers noticed that he offered generous tax breaks to businesses that were equivalent to the value of their givebacks.
The uprising in Madison is symptomatic of a simmering rage among the nation’s teachers.
–Diane Ravitch

RELATED TOPICS

* Collective Bargaining
* Education
* Scott Walker
* Wisconsin

The uprising in Madison is symptomatic of a simmering rage among the nation’s teachers. They have grown angry and demoralized over the past two years as attacks on their profession escalated.

The much-publicized “Waiting for ‘Superman’” made the specious claim that “bad teachers” caused low student test scores. A Newsweek cover last year proposed that the key to saving American education was firing bad teachers.

Teachers across the nation reacted with alarm when the leaders of the Central Falls district in Rhode Island threatened to the entire staff of the small town’s only high school. What got their attention was that Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and President Obama thought this was a fine idea, even though no one at the high school had been evaluated.

The Obama administration’s Race to the Top program intensified the demonizing of teachers, because it encouraged states to evaluate teachers in relation to student scores. There are many reasons why students do well or poorly on tests, and teachers felt they were being unfairly blamed when students got low scores, while the crucial role of families and the students themselves was overlooked.

Teachers’ despair deepened last August when The Times rated 6,000 teachers in as effective or ineffective, based on their students’ test scores, and posted these ratings online. Testing experts warn that such ratings are likely to be both inaccurate and unstable, but the Times stood by its analysis.

Now conservative governors and mayors want to abolish teachers’ right to due process, their seniority, and — in some states — their collective bargaining rights. Right-to-work states do not have higher scores than states with strong unions. Actually, the states with the highest performance on national tests are Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Vermont, and New Hampshire, where teachers belong to unions that bargain collectively for their members.

Opinion: Reinvent unions, don’t gut them

Unions actively lobby to increase education funding and reduce class size, so conservative governors who want to slash education spending feel the need to reduce their clout. This silences the best organized opposition to education cuts.

There has recently been a national furor about school reform. One must wonder how it is possible to talk of improving schools while cutting funding, demoralizing teachers, cutting scholarships to college, and increasing class sizes.

The real story in Madison is not just about unions trying to protect their members’ hard-won rights. It is about teachers who are fed up with attacks on their profession. A large group of National Board Certified teachers — teachers from many states who have passed rigorous examinations by an independent national board — is organizing a march on Washington in July. The in Madison are sure to multiply their numbers.

As the attacks on teachers increase and as layoffs grow, there are likely to be more protests like the one that has mobilized teachers and their allies and immobilized the Wisconsin Legislature.

AVN Editor Calls Out NY Times On Condoms In Porn

2247490ceaa8828bfc0c3bd3aa5ff9ea AVN Editor Calls Out NY Times On Condoms In Porn

PORN VALLEY—The Times may be edited 3,000 miles from the “porn capital of the world,” but its ignorance of what happens in the adult industry gets read worldwide—and someone has to call them on it.

On February 9, Times correspondent Ian Lovett published an article on the current controversy, much covered on this website, about whether condom use should be required for all on-camera sex scenes. That article can be found here—but it is so error-filled that Senior Editor and Chief Legal Analyst Mark Kernes felt that a response was needed. That response, reproduced below, was emailed to The Times on February 10, but to date, there has been no response from the “Paper of Record.”

To the Editor,

I normally respect The ’ coverage of events, but there was so much incorrect in Ian Lovett’s article “Condom Requirement Sought for Sex- Sets” that I have to question whether he did any research at all?

The errors begin with the first paragraph, where he claims that the AIM Healthcare Foundation, the primary testing facility for adult performers, “abruptly shut its doors in December.” Mr. Lovett makes it sound as if this shutdown was voluntary, where in fact the clinic was served with an illegal “cease and desist” order from the Department of Public after the California Department of Public had given AIM 60 days from November 30 to supplement its application to the agency to become a licensed clinic. (AIM subsequently abandoned that route and became a medical corporation responsible, as the article correctly notes, only to the California Medical Board.)

Next error, paragraph 2: Los Angeles has NOT moved to fill AIM’s role in performer testing, though it has been clear for at least two years that they desperately WANT to do so, thinking that it will bring a large influx in income to the city—which it won’t. But the city has no current plans to open any performer testing facilities, and in fact has not done so.

Paragraph 3 implies that AIM’s closing was somehow connected to the performer who tested HIV positive in October, when in fact that performer allegedly became HIV positive on a porn set where condom use was mandated, and AIM picked up his HIV positive status at his next regular monthly test. The exact reason that performer became HIV positive is still under investigation, and the possibility that he contracted the disease through personal contact in his private life—he posted ads on the internet as a “male escort”—is considered likely.

Contrary to statements in the article’s 6th paragraph, there is not currently any legislation being considered by the Los Angeles City Council which would “impose safety standards specifically on the pornographic film industry.” The bill which just passed calls on the City Attorney to determine if the City Council (or the City Attorney’s office) has the power to force the agency which provides filming permits to all movie producers filming in the Los Angeles area to refuse such permits to adult producers unless the producers guarantee that the movie(s) being filmed will require that their performers use condoms during sex scenes. The City Attorney has been given 45 days to complete his study, and the City Council may take action as a result of his report, but there is currently no legislation proposed that would impact the “safety standards” of the adult movie industry.

Contrary to statements in the article’s 7th paragraph, there has not been a “string of actresses” who “contracted HIV and filed lawsuits against production companies.” Just one actress (stage name Brooke Ashley) filed suit, and it was with the California Development Department, seeking to force the producer of the movie wherein she caught HIV (in 1998) to provide her with unemployment compensation benefits as a result of her infection. She recently won that case. NO other suits have been filed against production companies due to HIV infection.

Contrary to statements in the article’s 8th paragraph. adult producers have NOT “agreed not to hire performers who had not been tested in the last 30 days,” much as many members of the adult industry wish they would. While it is true that MOST producers will not hire a performer with an “expired test” (one that is more than 28 days old), several have no problem doing so. Fortunately, most PERFORMERS will not work with another actor whose test has expired … but that’s not what Mr. Lovett wrote. Moreover, AIM doesn’t “hound” performers who had possibly been exposed to HIV to get them tested; it simply informs them that they should come in for such testing, and keeps a record (accessible only to movie producers) of whether they have done so, and when.

Contrary to statements in the article’s 10th paragraph, there have NOT been “just five cases of HIV infection among its performers … since a 2004 shut down the industry for a month”; there have been just five cases INCLUDING the 2004 , and contrary to Mr. Lovett’s assertion, three of those infections in 2004 were unquestionably due to on-set exposure. One further infection in 2009 was unquestionably NOT due to on-set exposure, and as mentioned earlier, there is some question whether the 2010 infection was set-related.

Contrary to the implications of the article’s 14th paragraph, AIM continued to arrange for performers’ HIV and STD tests during the period when the clinic itself was not open; it simply arranged for the performers’ blood and urine samples to be drawn by outside physicians and clinics, but the results of those tests were disclosed only to AIM and to the performers themselves, and became part of AIM’s producer database as well, a practice to which performers voluntarily agree when tested.

The adult industry continues to question the STD infection statistics promulgated by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, and AIM is currently in the midst of a self-initiated audit of its records to prove that the County has wildly inflated performers’ infection rates, which are at most 2.4 percent of the performer population during a “bad month,” and 1.8 percent during a “good month.” The idea that “a quarter of all performers each year” are diagnosed with a sexually-transmitted disease is ludicrous. The reason for the discrepency is that not only does the County count original infections in its statistics, but also each time a performer returns to the clinic to be retested before the disease has fully cleared his/her body—which performers frequently do since they are generally anxious to get back to work. Hence, the County statistics improperly record an original report of infection as well as perhaps four or five retests within the following two weeks as if there were five or six original infections.

The County’s flawed statistics seem to have inspired the anti-AIM vendetta by AIDS Healthcare Foundation’s (AHF) Michael Weinstein, but if Mr. Lovett had done even a bit of investigation, he would have discovered that AHF is funded in part by the condom industry, and that AHF’s own HIV testing program, which uses one of the “10 minute” antibody tests for HIV, is itself seriously flawed, and can produce negative results in HIV-positive test subjects for as long as six months after infection. That’s why the adult industry abandoned antibody testing in 1998 as being insufficently timely and accurate for commercial sex work. It has also been rumored that AHF itself would like a piece of what it sees as the “lucrative” field of performer STD testing.

In Mr. Lovett’s 22nd paragraph, he refers to “Previous efforts to pass legislation that would specifically require condom use.” There have been no such legislative attempts, although a reading of the California Health Code, in a section that was originally enacted to protect hospital workers, implies that not only condoms but also dental dams, rubber gloves, goggles and face shields may be required for on-camera sex scenes. This portion of the Health Code has been the subject of five public hearings so far between Cal/OSHA and the adult industry, and is far from being resolved.

Perhaps the next time Mr. Lovett decides to write about the adult movie industry, he might want to speak to some people who have actual working knowledge of the medical and legal issues involved.

Regards,

Mark Kernes, Sr. Editor, Adult Video News (AVN)

Nina Hartley Benefit Set for Feb. 17 in North Hollywood

7327152bcd0bd91e6fe45fa70db17916 Nina Hartley Benefit Set for Feb. 17 in North Hollywood

—A special benefit for legend Nina Hartley will be taking place on Thursday, Feb. 17 at The Federal located at 5303 Lankershim Boulevard in North . The event begins at 9:30 p.m.

Hartley was diagnosed with a tumor in her uterus and has to undergo surgery in March to remove this.

“It’s not cancerous, but it is something I have to get removed,” Hartley said. “I really need help to cover my recovery. Any support and help I can receive will be greatly appreciated, and I’m thrilled about this benefit, and really want to thank everybody on board.”

The star-studded event will be attended by some of the biggest and sexiest stars of the adult and mainstream film industries.

The door charge is $15 and all from the door goes directly to help Hartley. There will be a special onstage performance, and Hartley also will be auctioning off some items.

Some of the industry support participating in this event includes Galaxy Publicity, The Star Factory, LA Direct Models, ATM LA, X-Play, Simply Blown Glassware, Valley Babes XXX, Alexander DeVoe Productions, Happy Endings Oils and Inside The Industry Productions. The benefit event is produced by James Bartholet and Brad Thomas.

Stars Talk Triumphs at XBIZ Awards

047a1ca0d6ff68e59753d6fc197e85d5 Stars Talk Triumphs at XBIZ Awards

— Andy San Dimas fought back tears of joy. Tommy Gunn stood speechless. So many XBIZ Award winners displayed a range of emotions on Wednesday night backstage at the Hollywood Palladium after their names were announced.

“This is so amazing,” San Dimas said. “I can’t believe I won Female Performer of the Year.”

San Dimas’ outstanding body of work included lead roles in several high-profile feature movies as well as some 30 gonzo releases in 2010, capping a memorable year for the former adult store clerk from Baltimore, Md.

Gunn, who is in his eighth year as one of porn’s most reliable studs, was humbled by his win for Male Performer of the Year.

“I’m just happy to be doing what I do,” Gunn said. “I just showed up and did my best. I’m kind of speechless to be honest, but this is a great day.”

Winners were crowned in more than 100 award categories covering every major sector of adult at Wednesday’s event. The ninth annual gala was the largest in XBIZ Awards history.

After the star-studded parade of red-carpet arrivals generated national media coverage, the show unfolded in front of a crowd of more than 1,000 adult industry professionals at the iconic Palladium. exclusive and naughty comedian Whitney Cummings kept the mood lively as the hosts for the evening in between live that even included professional pole dancing.

But perhaps the most lasting images of the night were the looks on the faces of the victors, such as the Best Acting winners and Keni Styles, who both told XBIZ that careful preparation went into their performances.

Kross won Acting Performance of the Year-Female for her lead role in Digital Playground’s firefighter epic “Body Heat.”

“This is so rad. I’m so excited. This is freakin’ sweet!” Kross said, adding “my feet hurt!”

“‘Body Heat’ was the one movie I really cried for — real tears — so I think that says something,” she continued. “I worked with an acting coach with this specific script. I didn’t feel like I was doing porn, I felt like I was playing a role.”

The Asian sensation Styles was ecstatic with his triumph for Acting Performance of the Year in the Miss Lucifer Production “Malice in Lalaland” that was distributed by Vivid.

“I wish [director Lewis Xypher] could have been here,” Styles said. “I put a lot of work into researching Johnny Depp’s character in ‘Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas.’ I watched the movie again and again, trying to get down his characteristics. A lot of people just said it came naturally to me. I put myself into the role. And I’m already a zany character.”

Styles continued, “Working with [Sasha Grey] was really good. She helped me raise my game so much. I learned a lot from Sasha. … Lewis just had his first son and he is celebrating that [in Belgium]. When I call him up on Skype later this will be the cherry on top of the cake for him.”

The night was just as sweet for Wicked Pictures, which took home Feature Movie of the Year and Best Cinematography for their all-action, motorcycle drama “Speed,” in addition to Feature Studio of the Year honors. When “Speed” director Brad Armstrong & Co. took the stage, he said, “Thanks to the Wicked Girls, to my editor Scott Allen, to my videographers Francois Clousot and Mark Nicholson and to all the people who worked so hard on the cast and crew.”

Armstrong directed what will be remembered as one of the finest ensemble casts in adult history in “Speed,” which was lifted by the acting and sex performances of numerous established stars who each had equal screen time and billing.

Director Lee Roy Myers, meanwhile, collected honors for Director of the Year – Body of Work and Parody Movie of the Year for his New Sensations smash hit “The Big Lebowski: A XXX Parody.”

“I really love my job. I love directing, writing and producing, and the people I get to work with. I literally get to work with my best friends every day on my shoots. How can you beat that?” Myers said. “My crew made me. I’d be nothing without them.”

Myers added, “‘Lebowski’ is my baby. This project is based on my favorite movie. Everything just clicked on it, from the acting performances to the sex. I’m so glad it’s being recognized.”

Nominees traveled from all over the country to attend the XBIZ Awards.

“I literally just arrived [in L.A.],” said Gisele of GotGisele.com, who was named Web Babe of the Year and had just stepped off a plane from a couple hours earlier. “I was the first winner of the evening. I’m completely shocked. I was not at all expecting this.”

The former Hooters waitress started GotGisele.com 10 months ago after working for five years as a popular web cam model.

“I always had a fascination for nude modeling,” Gisele admitted.

R.J. from the Bay Area-based SexEntertain told XBIZ when he was on stage accepting the Content Licensor of the Year award, he thought simply, “I’m glad I dressed nicely.”

“I’m appreciative,” R.J. said. “I’m glad and I’m honored. … We are the largest and longest lasting content syndicator on the market.”

IVD/ECN founder Frank Kay, who traveled from his headquarters in Hightstown, N.J., thanked all his vendors for contributing to his company’s award for Distributor/Wholesaler of the Year.

“I’m very happy to win a great award like this,” Kay said. “We couldn’t accomplish this without all our staff and vendor support.”

Shap, the owner of Twistys.com, will bring a trophy home to Toronto after accepting the award for Solo Girl Affiliate Program of the Year for TwistysCash.

“This is awesome, a lot of hard work,” Shap said. “This is our first award as an affiliate program, and our second award overall. We pour our hearts into this. We’ll have our 10-year anniversary in 2011.”

Nicholas Steele, the director of ambitious parody “Bat FXXX: Dark Night” for Bluebird Films, was accompanied by “Bat FXXX” star and Bluebird exclusive, Madelyn Marie, in accepting his Best Director – Individual Project honor.

“Twenty years later, this is the first time I’ve won an award,” Steele said. “And this is my first digital movie.”

“Bat FXXX” later was awarded Best Special Effects for its cinematic quality.

Meanwhile, Chanel Preston, a native of Alaska who resides in Hawaii, completed a fantastic first year of performing by earning the coveted New Starlet of the Year award.

“When I look back I feel so lucky that I’ve had an extremely successful year,” Preston told XBIZ, adding that she’ll be going to the Magic Mountain amusement park to celebrate the victory. She gave a special “thank you” to Wicked Pictures and Brad Armstrong and Jessica Drake who “shot my third scene” and “really helped me a lot.”

Erik Teno and Cathy Beardsley of CommerceGate won for Billing Company of the Year – Merchant Services, a company is based in L.A., and Barcelona.

“This was a big surprise,” Teno said.

Beardsley added, “Our whole focus is taking care of our clients. Customer service is No. 1. We’re listening to our clients and we’re adapting.”

Justin Ross from the Screaming O recalled how six years ago he and Keith Caggiano started their company out of a garage and guesthouse, and now they run a 20,000 square-foot facility. For their mainstream friendly marketing endeavors they earned the award for Crossover Novelty Company of the Year.

“We have a product that is unique and able to cross over to different areas where others aren’t. It takes a lot of energy and effort,” said Ross, a former finance executive. “We knew if we executed our strategy right we would grow and we have even bigger plans than where we are now.”

Speaking of crossovers, Digital Playground’s Riley Steele said her win for Crossover Star of the Year means that “all my hard work is paying off right now.”

“And with ‘Top Guns’ and everything that’s coming this year I feel it just gets better from here,” said the blonde San Diego native, who had a memorable role in the feature film Piranha 3-D last summer and will star in a new season of Cinemax’s “Life on Top” this year.

Burning Angel founder Joanna Angel, who won Specialty Affiliate Program of the Year for Joanna Angel Bucks, said her award was especially gratifying.

“I’m so honored. This really feels amazing. I don’t know what to say. I’m shocked. There are so many incredible affiliate programs out there and to know we stood out,” Angel said. “I do it all myself. This is the root of my company. I’d be nothing with Joanna Angel Bucks.”

Another standout was the 6-foot-6 Flash Brown, who won New Male Performer of the Year. Just a few years ago the Memphis, Tenn., native was playing professional overseas.

“I feel privileged. I’m very honored and grateful,” said the 29-year-old former shooting guard.

Dale DaBone, who starred in Axel Braun’s hot-selling “Batman XXX” for Vivid last year and most recently played Elvis, won the award for Comeback Performer of the Year after returning to the industry in 2010 after a seven-year hiatus.

“I’m proud of ‘Batman’ and all the other stuff I’ve done,” said DaBone, who did professional motorcycle stunts, coached tennis and played drums while he was gone. “I told you about some of the mistakes I’ve made in the past and I’ve tried to make amends and it’s still going. Now I think ‘Elvis’ is going to be bigger than ‘Batman.’”

For a complete list of winners – click here

What Do Women Want? Part One

d31f35eb4a93b2a68890bae0f06a14e6 What Do Women Want? Part One

Meredith Chivers is a creator of bonobo pornography. She is a 36-year-old psychology professor at Queen’s University in the small city of Kingston, Ontario, a highly regarded scientist and a member of the editorial board of the world’s leading journal of sexual research, Archives of Sexual Behavior. The bonobo film was part of a series of related experiments she has carried out over the past several years. She found footage of bonobos, a species of ape, as they mated, and then, because the accompanying sounds were dull — “bonobos don’t seem to make much noise in sex,” she told me, “though the females give a kind of pleasure grin and make chirpy sounds” — she dubbed in some animated chimpanzee hooting and screeching. She showed the short movie to and , straight and gay. To the same subjects, she also showed clips of heterosexual sex, male and female homosexual sex, a man masturbating, a woman masturbating, a chiseled man walking naked on a beach and a well-toned woman doing calisthenics in the .

While the subjects watched on a computer screen, Chivers, who favors high boots and fashionable rectangular glasses, measured their arousal in two ways, objectively and subjectively. The participants sat in a brown leatherette La-Z-Boy chair in her small lab at the Center for Addiction and Mental , a prestigious psychiatric teaching hospital affiliated with the University of Toronto, where Chivers was a postdoctoral fellow and where I first talked with her about her research a few years ago. The genitals of the volunteers were connected to plethysmographs — for the men, an apparatus that fits over the penis and gauges its swelling; for the women, a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina and, by bouncing light off the vaginal walls, measures genital blood flow. An engorgement of blood spurs a lubricating process called vaginal transudation: the seeping of moisture through the walls. The participants were also given a keypad so that they could rate how aroused they felt.

The men, on average, responded genitally in what Chivers terms “category specific” ways. Males who identified themselves as straight swelled while gazing at heterosexual or lesbian sex and while watching the masturbating and exercising women. They were mostly unmoved when the screen displayed only men. Gay males were aroused in the opposite categorical pattern. Any expectation that the animal sex would speak to something primitive within the men seemed to be mistaken; neither straights nor gays were stirred by the bonobos. And for the male participants, the subjective ratings on the keypad matched the readings of the plethysmograph. The men’s minds and genitals were in agreement.

All was different with the women. No matter what their self-proclaimed sexual orientation, they showed, on the whole, strong and swift genital arousal when the screen offered men with men, women with women and women with men. They responded objectively much more to the exercising woman than to the strolling man, and their blood flow rose quickly — and markedly, though to a lesser degree than during all the human scenes except the footage of the ambling, strapping man — as they watched the apes. And with the women, especially the straight women, mind and genitals seemed scarcely to belong to the same person. The readings from the plethysmograph and the keypad weren’t in much accord. During shots of lesbian coupling, heterosexual women reported less excitement than their vaginas indicated; watching gay men, they reported a great deal less; and viewing heterosexual intercourse, they reported much more. Among the lesbian volunteers, the two readings converged when women appeared on the screen. But when the films featured only men, the lesbians reported less engagement than the plethysmograph recorded. Whether straight or gay, the women claimed almost no arousal whatsoever while staring at the bonobos.

“I feel like a pioneer at the edge of a giant forest,” Chivers said, describing her ambition to understand the workings of women’s arousal and desire. “There’s a path leading in, but it isn’t much.” She sees herself, she explained, as part of an emerging “critical mass” of female sexologists starting to make their way into those woods. These researchers and clinicians are consumed by the sexual problem Sigmund Freud posed to one of his female disciples almost a century ago: “The great that has never been answered and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my 30 years of research into the feminine soul, is, What does a woman want?”

Full of scientific exuberance, Chivers has struggled to make sense of her data. She struggled when we first spoke in Toronto, and she struggled, unflagging, as we sat last October in her university office in Kingston, a room she keeps spare to help her mind stay clear to contemplate the intricacies of the erotic. The cinder-block walls are unadorned except for three photographs she took of a temple in featuring carvings of an entwined couple, an orgy and a man copulating with a horse. She has been pondering sexuality, she recalled, since the age of 5 or 6, when she ruminated over a particular kiss, one she still remembers vividly, between her parents. And she has been discussing sex without much restraint, she said, laughing, at least since the age of 15 or 16, when, for a few male classmates who hoped to please their girlfriends, she drew a picture and clarified the location of the clitoris.

In 1996, when she worked as an assistant to a sexologist at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health, then called the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, she found herself the only woman on a floor of researchers investigating male sexual preferences and what are known as paraphilias — erotic desires that fall far outside the norm. She told me that when she asked Kurt Freund, a scientist on that floor who had developed a type of penile plethysmograph and who had been studying male homosexuality and pedophilia since the 1950s, why he never turned his attention to women, he replied: “How am I to know what it is to be a woman? Who am I to study women, when I am a man?”

Freund’s words helped to focus her investigations, work that has made her a central figure among the small force of female sexologists devoted to comprehending female desire. John Bancroft, a former director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, and Reproduction, traces sexological studies by women at least as far back as 1929, to a survey of the sexual experiences of 2,200 women carried out by Katharine Bement Davis, a prison reformer who once served as New York City’s first female commissioner of corrections. But the discipline remains male-dominated. In the International Academy of Sex Research, the 35-year-old institution that publishes Archives of Sexual Behavior and that can claim, Bancroft said, most of the field’s leading researchers among its 300 or so members, women make up just over a quarter of the organization. Yet in recent years, he continued, in the long wake of the surveys of Alfred Kinsey, the studies of William Masters and Virginia Johnson, the sexual liberation movement and the rise of feminism, there has been a surge of scientific attention, paid by women, to illuminating the realm of women’s desire.

It’s important to distinguish, Julia Heiman, the Kinsey Institute’s current director, said as she elaborated on Bancroft’s history, between behavior and what underlies it. Kinsey’s data on sexuality, published in the late 1940s and early ’50s in his best-selling books “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” and “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female,” didn’t reveal much about the depths of desire; Kinsey started his scientific career by cataloging species of wasps and may, Heiman went on, have been suspicious of examining emotion. Masters and Johnson, who filmed hundreds of subjects having sex in their lab, drew conclusions in their books of the late ’60s and early ’70s that concentrated on sexual function, not lust. Female desire, and the reasons some women feel little in the way of lust, became a focal point for sexologists, Heiman said, in the ’70s, through the writing of Helen Singer Kaplan, a sex therapist who used psychoanalytic methods — though sexologists prefer to etch a line between what they see as their scientific approach to the subject and the theories of psychoanalysis. Heiman herself, whom Chivers views as one of sexology’s venerable investigators, conducted, as a doctoral candidate in the ’70s, some of the earliest research using the vaginal plethysmograph. But soon the AIDS epidemic engulfed the attention of the field, putting a priority on prevention and making desire not an emotion to explore but an element to be feared, a source of epidemiological disaster.

To account partly for the recent flourishing of research like Chivers’s, Heiman pointed to the arrival of Viagra in the late ’90s. Though aimed at men, the drug, which transformed the treatment of impotence, has dispersed a kind of collateral electric current into the area of women’s sexuality, not only generating an effort — mostly futile so far — to find that can foster female desire as reliably as Viagra and its chemical relatives have facilitated erections, but also helping, indirectly, to inspire the search for a full understanding of women’s lust. This search may reflect, as well, a cultural and scientific trend, a stress on the deterministic role of biology, on nature’s dominance over nurture — and, because of this, on innate differences between the sexes, particularly in the primal domain of sex. “Masters and Johnson saw men and women as extremely similar,” Heiman said. “Now it’s research on differences that gets funded, that gets published, that the public is interested in.” She wondered aloud whether the trend will eventually run its course and reverse itself, but these days it may be among the factors that infuse sexology’s interest in the giant forest.

“No one right now has a unifying theory,” Heiman told me; the interest has brought scattered sightlines, glimpses from all sorts of angles. One study, for instance, published this month in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior by the Kinsey Institute psychologist Heather Rupp, uses magnetic resonance imaging to show that, during the hormonal shifts of ovulation, certain brain regions in heterosexual women are more intensely activated by male faces with especially masculine features. Intriguing glimmers have come not only from female scientists. Richard Lippa, a psychologist at California State University, Fullerton, has employed surveys of thousands of subjects to demonstrate over the past few years that while men with high sex drives report an even more polarized pattern of attraction than most males (to women for heterosexuals and to men for homosexuals), in women the opposite is generally true: the higher the drive, the greater the attraction to both sexes, though this may not be so for lesbians.

Investigating the culmination of female desire, Barry Komisaruk, a neuroscientist at Rutgers University, has subjects bring themselves to orgasm while lying with their heads in an fM.R.I. scanner — he aims to chart the activity of the female brain as subjects near and reach four types of climax: orgasms attained by touching the clitoris; by stimulating the anterior wall of the vagina or, more specifically, the G spot; by stimulating the cervix; and by “thinking off,” Komisaruk said, without any touch at all. While the possibility of a purely cervical orgasm may be in considerable doubt, in 1992 Komisaruk, collaborating with the Rutgers sexologist Beverly Whipple (who established, more or less, the existence of the G spot in the ’80s), carried out one of the most interesting experiments in female sexuality: by measuring heart rate, perspiration, pupil dilation and pain threshold, they proved that some rare women can think themselves to climax. And meanwhile, at the Sexual Psychophysiology Laboratory of the University of Texas, Austin, the psychologist Cindy Meston and her graduate students deliver studies with names like “Short- and long-term effects of ginkgo biloba extract on sexual dysfunction in women” and “The roles of and alpha-amylase in exercise-induced sexual arousal in women” and “Sex differences in memory for sexually relevant information” and — an survey of 3,000 participants — “Why humans have sex.”

Heiman questions whether the insights of science, whether they come through high-tech pictures of the hypothalamus, through Internet questionnaires or through intimate interviews, can ever produce an all-encompassing map of terrain as complex as women’s desire. But Chivers, with plenty of self-doubting humor, told me that she hopes one day to develop a scientifically supported model to explain female sexual response, though she wrestles, for the moment, with the preliminary bits of perplexing evidence she has collected — with the question, first, of why women are aroused physiologically by such a wider range of stimuli than men. Are men simply more inhibited, more constrained by the bounds of culture? Chivers has tried to eliminate this explanation by including male-to-female transsexuals as subjects in one of her series of experiments (one that showed only human sex). These trans women, both those who were heterosexual and those who were homosexual, responded genitally and subjectively in categorical ways. They responded like men. This seemed to point to an inborn system of arousal. Yet it wasn’t hard to argue that cultural lessons had taken permanent hold within these subjects long before their emergence as females could have altered the culture’s influence. “The horrible reality of psychological research,” Chivers said, “is that you can’t pull apart the cultural from the biological.”

Part Two on Friday

Fifth Cal/OSHA Meeting Breaks No New Ground

69c8476d83949c86c0b0c8756a8ddee8 Fifth Cal/OSHA Meeting Breaks No New Ground

OAKLAND, Calif.—It’s rare that meetings of the Cal/OSHA Subcommittees on Blood Borne Pathogens in the Film Industry (AFI) actually make it through their agendas, which made Tuesday morning’s meeting the exception—except that the purpose of the meeting was to finish up the agenda begun in meeting #3, which was the Advisory Subcommittee on Medical Issues.

One reason the meeting was so brief may have been the fact that subcommittee members who might have stoked one or more of the many controversies about adult performers’ health—Gail Bolan, former Chief of the STD Control Branch of the state’s Department of Public Health; Frank Strona, Chief of the San Francisco Department of Public Health’s STD/HIV Unit—STD Prevention & Control Section; Naomi Akers, Executive Director of the St. James Infirmary; and HIV specialist Dr. Aaron Aronow—were absent from the meeting.

Those who were in attendance—Dr. Peter Kerndt, Director of the Department of Public Health’s STD Program; Nurse Denise Bleak of Beyond AIDS and APIC; and Dr. Paula Tavrow of the UCLA School of Public Health—had few disagreements regarding their support for mandatory condom use in the , and two members present by phone—Dr. John Brooks of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Dr. Bruce Bernard of the National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)—were also generally in favor of the requirement.

The meeting was chaired once again by Cal/OSHA Senior Safety Deborah Gold, assisted by District Manager Peter Riley and attorney Amy Martin, and the audience included representatives from a spectrum of interest groups including attorney Brian Chase of AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Diane Duke and attorney Kevin Blank for , attorney Karen Tynan for AIM Medical Associates (formerly AIM Healthcare Foundation), attorney Paul Cambria for various adult companies, Mark Roy McGrath for the L.A. County STD Program, Christina Hart-Rodriguez for UCLA’s Interest Group, Stacey Swimme of St. James Infirmary and several others.

The meeting began with Gold summarizing the proceedings of the previous medical subcommittee meeting, then launching right into a discussion of Agenda Item #3: Assessing the risks of STD and other infections if condoms were or were not used for finger-fucking (not the term they used, of course), blowjobs, vaginal and anal intercourse and “other sexual or parenteral [skin-piercing] contact.”

Dr. Kerndt began the discussion by referring to a chart provided at the previous meeting by L.A. County Health Department’s Dr. Robert Kim-Farley and noting that he generally agreed with the “hierarchy of risk” set forth in Dr. Kim-Farley’s chart titled, “Review of Major AFI HIV/STD Health Risks.” That chart places non-condom anal sex as the highest-risk practice for both HIV and STD exposure, followed by vaginal sex, creampies in either the pussy or ass and cum contacting the membranes of the eye. Blowjobs and pussy-licking were considered low-risk for HIV but high for other STDs, while rimming, cumming in the mouth and sharing sex toys were considered low for HIV infection but “moderate” for other STDs, and skin-to-skin contact as “very low” for HIV but still “moderate” for other STDs.

“There is an important need to differentiate between treatable and non-treatable, because it can reduce the risk, mitigate risk through screening and treatment along with barrier protection to reduce it to an acceptable level,” Dr. Kerndt added regarding skin-to-skin contact. “But certainly barrier protection for anal, vaginal exposure, and I think the primary exposure for finger and other skin contact would be much less, and those would be probably the non-blood borne pathogens; the fecal-oral risk and also the ATM risk could be mitigated by cleaning the surfaces and protecting the membranes from exposure.”

When her turn came, Nurse Bleak referenced Free Speech Coalition’s Blood Borne Pathogen Exposure Control Plan, which it had introduced at the subcommittee’s first meeting, and began making minor corrections to the document before being reminded by Gold that she should be addressing the of which (if any) practices put adult performers at risk for infection. She then voiced general agreement with Dr. Kerndt’s analysis, as did Dr. Tavrow later.

“In response to the statement that this would drive the [adult] companies out of country to do their filming,” Nurse Bleak said of the possible requirement of condoms for blowjobs, “as well as what’s available for college students, where I work in the northern part of Los Angeles County, the San Fernando Valley, great hub of the adult film industry—it’s a large economic force there—so I’ve been told, especially by the Employee Health Services at CalState-Northridge … that many AFI performers are actually CSUN students; they get income from that to go to college. So it made sense to go to the websites of colleges and look at educational content on those college sites to see what kind of STD prevention they have. There’s really no discusson of barrier protection for oral sex there,” she noted.

“The adult film industry makes reference in some of their literature to the ‘pounding away’ at a receptive partner,” she continued. “The ‘pounding away’ phrase would mean repeated vigorous forceful insertion of a penis or other object into an orifice. I believe that’s well-known to cause some micro-abrasions… and that would be a portal of entry for a blood borne pathogen.”

However, when the subcomittee members were later questioned about whether condom use could cause such micro-abrasions, as actress Nina Hartley had reported at a previous meeting, the consensus was that if sufficient lube were used, and the condoms had not been treated with the anti-HIV chemical non-oxynol-9, that wouldn’t happen.

“It’s also pretty well known that condoms aren’t as disgusting as some people make them seem in the adult film industry,” Nurse Bleak added. “I rather liked them when I was handing them out in my homeless clinic duties and my AIDS Control Clinic duties. I like giving out condoms to people. I’m for them.”

Finally, regarding cumshots, she advised, “I just have maybe one term for the adult film industry that’s coming to your local theater: CGI. Computer graphics. So if you’re ready for computer graphics, then you can simulate that and … maybe you can consider not putting people at risk with actual secretions when you can simulate fake secretions; maybe make them more interesting.”

But Dr. Kerndt was not about to agree that condoms shouldn’t be mandatory for blowjobs or dental dams for pussy-licking, and he even had some cautionary words for mere skin-to-skin contact.

“I think there are other factors that aren’t knowable in each instance that may increase risk, such as a performer that may be menstruating, so there would be direct contact with blood without barrier protection that would greatly increase the risk,” he warned. “Also, any sexually transmitted infection that may be on an unscreened anatomic site or even a screened anatomic site but within the incubation period of that disease but outside of the sensitivity of the diagnostic method, and many of the STDs in the oral pharynx and rectum are known to be asymptomiatic, and when you have that STD, the normal protective mucosal membrane is not present, it increases the risk. Even without an STD, there is substantial risk of exosure to a viral or a bacterial sexually transmitted disease. So it really is about measures that can be taken to reduce that risk to an acceptable level through either screening or barrier protection.”

Other relevant factors that Dr. Kerndt noted were increased risks if an extra-large or vibrator were used, or if the performers engaged in double-anal or double-vaginal penetration, which he claimed was the case with some of those infected by “Patient Zero” Darren James in 2004.

There was also lengthy discussion of the difference in risk between those getting blowjobs and those giving them (referred to as “receptors”), and the panel generally agreed that the receptor was more at risk than the the person receiving the stimulus.

“In the 2004 outbreak, where one informer who was infected worked with 13 female performers, infecting three of them, for a 23 percent attack rate,” Dr. Kerndt said, “and that individual tested negative using PCR viral load, and he infected the first of those three women four days after his negative test, and worked until he was screened again at about 21, 28 days, and I believe… all three of the women were exposed to double-anal.”

However, a review of the movies in which James performed in 2004 indicate that none of the women infected by James participated in double-anal scenes with him.

The subcommittee also discussed whether STD testing such as the AIM testing regimen would be helpful if used with non-condom oral sex and in combination with barrier protections (condoms, dental dams, goggles/face shields, rubber gloves) during vaginal and anal intercourse, and in which types of situations—pre-screening, periodic screening and/or post-exposure screening—it would be most effective?

“If the status of the insertive partner would be known for both the treatable and chronic infections,” Dr. Kerndt stated, referring mainly to oral sex, “basically we would support medical monitoring of all workers and treatment of the treatable. The screening would be consistent with the incubation periods of the diseases, and they would be appropriate for the anatomic site of exposure… Currently, I think the expectation for the industry is that there would be barrier protection for oral sex, that there not be exposures to other potentially infectious material, even in cervical secretions, so right now, if the question is [whether] through screening and through limitations based upon chronic infection, whether the level of exposure and risk to the exposed individual could be reduced to an acceptable level, I would say maybe, but it depends on the infection status of some of these individuals and actually what the exposure in fact would be… If condoms were not used for oral sex, I think that there would have to be screening and limitations placed on the individual who had an untreatable condition. It may be a recurrent herpes outbreak, a primary herpes, it may be an HIV-infected insertive partner—I don’t think, with or without ejaculation, without protection should that be allowed. There should be a limitation placed on that exposure.”

“Certainly, if there was exposure,” he continued, “if there was a breach in the barrier method that exposed that worker, then I think that exposed individual should be screened.”

The subcommittee spent several minutes discussing what steps should be taken regarding contact in sex scenes with a known HIV-positive individual, even though there has never been any such reported incident in the hetero adult moviemaking community.

Dr. Kerndt challenged the frequency of talent testing by AIM.

“Certainly in a one-month interval, we’ve seen several examples where that interval has been insufficient to protect workers in this industry,” he said. “In the 2004 outbreak, the individual was screened, faithfully, monthly for four to seven years, and it worked during that period—or may have; we don’t know, really, how many exposures—but then this individual tested negative, and three days later infected the first of three of 13 women he worked with, and 23 days later when he was tested, it was found that he was infected, and during that 23 day window, 61 first- and second-generation persons were exposed. So the one month interval … is not going to exclude everything, but clearly if condoms had been used in those shoots, three fewer women would be infected with HIV.”

Dr. Kerndt also referenced the recent infection of gay performer Derrick Burts (who allegedly contracted HIV during an all-condom shoot), then claimed, “I think we can expect this is going to occur consistently in the industry, and I think another really important part is, maybe we don’t know all the answers, but we have to have the information as to the industry and the cooperation of the industry to really fully characterize the risk from these risks [sic] and really determine how the infections entered the industry and whether they’re acquired or transmitted in the workplace. Because there is a source for all of these infections; they’re person to person; they don’t spontaneously generate in an individual; they’re all person to person contact, and it’s either exposure in the workplace or exposures out of the workplace brought into the workplace. And obviously we can’t control everythign that occurs in the sexual context outside of the workplace.”

“It sounds to me that what you’re saying is, there’s an unacceptable risk to anything but full barrier protection?” asked Gold.

“Yeah, I think that if there is full barrier protection, the screening is less of an issue, the pre-screening,” Dr. Kerndt replied.

But when Gold asked if there were any point to screening (testing) in situations where “full barrier protection” were used in sex scenes, Dr. Kerndt equivocated, admitting that there might be.

“I think you could have oral exposures unprotected with appropriate screening,” he said.

In the end, all of the subcommittee members agreed that testing of some sort would be useful, even if condoms and other barriers were used for all on-camera sex acts, if for no other reason than to help gather statistics on STD infections rates in the industry.

Gold also noted that the CDC recommends that performers obtain all of the available anti-STD vaccinations, including those to counter Hepatitis A and B infections, as well as the recently-recommended HPV vaccines.

The hearing concluded just after noon, with Gold stating that the next meeting of the subcommittees would take place in March in Van Nuys, Calif., and will be a “business meeting” of the Cal/OSHA Standards Board, during which no public comments will be allowed. However, she said, prior to the commencement of the business meeting, audience members would be allowed to comment on the subcommittee recommendations (if any), but that no rule-making would take place at that meeting.

“Our chief, right now, is interested in possibly making a rule-making proposal,” she said. “In addition to that, the petitioner [AIDS Healthcare Foundation] or anybody else can still go back to the Standards Board. So we can propose something, Cal/OSHA can propose something; based on this record, the petitioner can go back and say, ‘Even though the division didn’t propose something we think you should act on, here is our modified petition.’ The Free Speech Coalition or any other person sitting here or not sitting here in this room can go to the Standards Board and say, ‘Look, a record has been created, and this is what we think you should do about it.’ Anybody can go to the Standards Board and say, ‘This is what we think you should do now.’”

Gold further stated that if any rule is proposed, that there would be a public hearing on it and “a lengthy public comment period, and that may modify the proposal.”

While neither Gold nor any other participant at Tuesday’s hearing indicated that they would definitely propose a new rule to modify the current California Health Code requirements, certainly the medical subcommittee seemed poised to advise the board that condom (and possibly other barrier) use be required for sex scenes in all adult movies shot in California, though the subcommittee’s view on requiring condoms for blowjobs appeared unresolved.

Keep checking back with AVN.com for information and analysis of Cal/OSHA’s continuing fight to force the adult industry to be “condom only.”

Through Ed Sabol’s lens, the NFL and its players became mythic

9b6a0a25bfc0edc52f15072b51320d9c Through Ed Sabol’s lens, the NFL and its players became mythic

Steve and Ed Sabol, the father and son team who created the legendary NFL Films, before the 1991 Super Bowl.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Ed Sabol loved filming his only son, Steve, playing pee-wee and high school football
* Big Ed bid on 1962 NFL championship, intending to bring Hollywood feel to highlight film
* From there, NFL Films was born, using new techniques to give players god-like qualities
* On Saturday, Hall of Fame selectors will vote on Ed and 14 other candidates

(CNN) — When Steve Sabol was a fourth-grader, he loved two things: football and the movies. Well, three things: football, movies — and football.

Steve, the only son of Ed Sabol, hereafter called Big Ed, played on a team of 70-pounders in southern New Jersey in the 1950s. Big Ed, using a Bell and Howell film camera, skipped out of work and shot the games, sometimes from the roof of the school. When Big Ed was done selling overcoats for the day, the Sabol often had the other kids on the team over for apple cider and Mom’s cookies — and a private screening.

Big Ed would set up the projector and the phonograph and revel in the exploits of the little lads in their leather shoulder pads. John Philip Sousa or Stan Kenton and Woody Herman would provide the soundtrack.

“My dad, he loved to make movies, and in football he found the perfect subject,” Steve said.

As Steve grew older and became a decent high school player, Ed kept at it, capturing every snap, tackle and touchdown on film. Years later, the boys on the film were replaced by named Hornung and Kramer and Lombardi and Bradshaw and Swann.

For in the Sabol house, the vision of NFL Films was born to a disgruntled salesman who thought football movies were fun to watch, but …

“I knew I could do better,” Ed said.

Ed Sabol is 94 now, retired and in Arizona. His creative mind is as fertile as ever, says his son, who took over NFL Films in 1987. The elder Sabol is on the ballot for Saturday’s Pro Football Hall of Fame as a contributor. Most of the men who have been inducted as contributors were coaches who changed the game or were past commissioners.

On Saturday, voters will select five men from the 15 finalists. Big Ed is the only non-player on the final ballot.

Sports Illustrated: See the final candidates

It’s time for him to be celebrated, many NFL observers say. After all, NFL Films changed the way the league was viewed, not just by fans but by all Americans.

“Every other major sports league is envious of the National Football League because it has NFL Films to document their history and grow the game,” said Ira Kaufman of the Tampa Tribune, a Hall of Fame voter who will make the case for Big Ed on Saturday. “You’ll always have your rabid fans, but NFL Films made it easier for the casual fan to grasp pro football and embrace it.”

We took what every fan felt about the game and added and sound, and we magnified and we glorified and we put it on a movie screen.
–Steve Sabol, NFL Films

RELATED TOPICS

* NFL Films Inc.
* NFL Football
* Super Bowl

In the early ’60s, the NFL was far from the most popular sports league in America. and the glamorous New York Yankees were king. College football was more popular than pro football.

Ed Sabol was selling coats. He hated it. He didn’t hate the coats; they were “very high quality,” but he wanted to do something else. He saw in the paper that the rights to film the 1962 NFL Championship were up for bid. Why not take a shot, he thought. I can do better, and if not, I’ll find someone who can help me do it.

So he bid $5,000, Steve says, and during a three-martini lunch (that turned into four) won over the of the NFL, Pete Rozelle.

Big Ed, who loved the films of director John Ford and the musicals of Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly, set out to marry the drama of the game to stirring music that elevated the men of the NFL to mythic proportions.

But that very first game was a near disaster for Big Ed, his son and the others who helped shoot it. For starters, it was brutally cold. Cameras broke. Film cracked. Lenses froze.

“My dad was so upset, he spent the whole second half in the (bathroom),” Steve said.

Big Ed says he just wanted to get away.

“At that particular moment, I was not interested in doing another game nor concerned about the future,” he said. “I just wanted to get out of the stadium, get and warm up.”

But weeks later, when the film, entitled “The NFL’s Longest Day,” was developed and edited, league officials loved it. And soon America would come to the short films, too.

Big Ed calls that first film his favorite and points to the end scene as something that set his group apart. The last shot is of the empty stadium after the game. Wind blows newspapers and programs around the lonely goal posts.

“I had a saying that I always told all of our cameramen: ‘Finish like a pro,’ ” he said, “and this cameraman got this memorable shot because he finished like a pro.”

Big Ed encouraged his crew to take risks (Steve’s words) though the father says: “In my eyes, they were not risks; rather (it was) doing film the way I felt it should be done.”

He chose employees for their passion, creativity and love of the game. It made his company legendary.

No longer were football movies just a series of real-time shots of players running past would-be tacklers. The Sabols slowed it down, using multiple cameras to capture the action in the trenches and the big hits people hadn’t seen before. They showed us the faces behind the masks, Kaufman says.

It took a few years, though, of learning through experimentation.

“We had to figure out what the hell we were doing,” Steve said. “The company was sustained by my dad’s personality. We were all a bunch of young kids trying to figure out how to make movies. Thank God there was one veteran (among the five staff members), a director named Dan Endy.”

Another innovation was to give voice to the game, putting microphones on the players and coaches.

One of the first coaches to wear a mic was one of the greatest of all time, Vince Lombardi. But the first time they wired up the legendary boss at a game in Minneapolis, they captured more than his gravelly tone, Steve says. The radio also picked up a nearby cab dispatcher.

“You’d hear Lombardi say, ‘What the hell is going on out here?’ Then you’d hear someone say, ‘We have a woman out here with a kid and a shopping cart; is there someone who can pick her up?’ ”

YouTube: NFL Films tribute to Vince Lombardi

But winning over Lombardi — getting him to let them follow him into meeting and onto the practice field — was a boon. Other coaches like Hank Stram followed.

By Super Bowl IV, the operation was humming, and the dialogue the Chiefs coach carried through the game and film enamored an audience that had no idea a football team could, in the words of Stram, “matriculate the ball down the field.”

Hollywood also took notice of the cinematic innovations.

”NFL highlight reels had a real impact on how movies get made, particularly montages,” two-time Academy Award winning director Ron Howard told the in 2000. ”Lots of different images. Images on images. Using the slow-motion, combined with the live action. The hard-hitting sound effects, juxtaposed against incredible music, powerful music, creating a really emotional experience for the viewer.”

Steve Sabol likes to recount how the late, great Sam Peckinpah told a Hollywood trade magazine that the epic climactic scene in “The Wild Bunch” was inspired by a football movie that used cameras ringing the action, shooting at different speeds with different perspectives.

Ron Shelton, who has directed five sports movies, said Hollywood could get away with things in those kind of films of the ’40s and ’50s that it can’t anymore.

“Once it was available on television, filmmakers had to step up their games, and the Sabols came along and said, ‘We’re going to put the bar way up here,’ ” said Shelton, who grew up loving the Los Angeles Rams. “They have great attention to every detail — to the lenses, to the speed (of the film), to the technical ability to follow a runner.”

if you watch a football movie like “Rudy” or “Brian’s Song” or even “We Are Marshall,” you’ll notice touches of NFL Films: the close-ups of the tight spiral of a pass, for example, or the key moments unfolding slowly.

The man who wanted to bring a Hollywood feel to football films ended up having an impact on Hollywood.

“We took what every fan felt about the game and added music and sound, and we magnified, and we glorified, and we put it on a movie screen,” Steve said.

“We distilled what they love about the game: the fierce physical nature, the competition, the history and the traditions, and also the humor.

“We gave it a mythology.”

Steve points to the film “They Call It Pro Football” as the movie that really elevated NFL players to divine status. It was also the debut of announcer John Facenda, whose rich, firm voice led to the nickname “The Voice of God.”

YouTube: “They Call It Pro Football”

Facenda was not a sportscaster, and the NFL owners wanted a more well-known personality like Curt Gowdy or Chris Schenkel, but Big Ed insisted that it didn’t matter that Facenda knew little about the game. Once again, Big Ed had to persuade the league to take a chance.

And when Facenda read one of the first lines of the film: “It starts with a whistle and ends with a gun,” the father and son knew they were right.

One hundred Emmys later, NFL Films still finds ways to be innovative. Fancy new technology helps, but for Big Ed and Steve, it was always about finding the right people who were willing to take chances.

NFL Films has grown from a recently retired coat salesman and his kid showing movies at Kiwanis Clubs or bar mitzvahs to a company with more than 300 employees and revenue of tens of millions, with programs on six networks.

Proponents of Big Ed’s Hall bid insist that you can’t tell the history of the NFL without including Ed Sabol and NFL Films.

Yet their place in the Hall of Fame is not a sure thing, because there are a lot of great players on the ballot and on future ballots.

“I’m a little concerned that a lot of voters won’t cast a vote for any contributor with the argument that there’s a backlog of players who deserve to get in,” Kaufman said. “I’m not buying that argument. I think Sabol’s overdue.

“He’s a towering figure in this league. Let’s do this now.”

Big Ed plays down the idea of being in the Hall. He’s enjoying retirement in Scottsdale, fully satisfied with a career of bringing the drama of Sunday’s gladiators to America’s TV screens.

If he wants to reflect on it all, he’ll have no problem. It’s all there on film.