May 24, 2013

Top US commander in Afghanistan warns Karzai comments increase risk

karzai Top US commander in Afghanistan warns Karzai comments increase risk

(PhatzNewsRoom/ CNN Security) —- The commander of the Force in Afghanistan is warning his top commanders of new risks of attacks due to rising tensions between and the Afghan president, an ISAF official told CNN Thursday.

The personal e-mail Gen. Joseph Dunford sent Wednesday is not a formal threat advisory, said the official, who did not want to be identified.

The tensions between the NATO-led – especially those from the United States – and President escalated after a bomb blast in Kabul last weekend that killed nine people.

Karzai said afterward that there are “ongoing daily talks between Taliban, American and in Europe and in the Gulf states.”

Dunford quickly denounced Karzai’s remark.

“We have fought too hard over the past 12 years. We have shed too much blood over the past 12 years. We have done too much to help the Afghan Security Forces grow over the last 12 years to ever think that violence or instability would be to our advantage,” he said.

In the e-mail sent Wednesday, Dunford told commanders that Karzai’s recent statements “could be a catalyst for some to lash out against our forces – he may also issue orders that put our forces at risk.”

ISAF is currently in discussions with the Afghan government about the terms for the turnover of the at to the Afghans, as well as the withdrawal of U.S. from Wardak Province following still unsubstantiated complaints about U.S. troop misconduct there.

Dunford met with Karzai Wednesday to discuss the transfer of the detention center. The general said it “must be done in a way that meets the needs of Afghan while mitigating the real threats that some of these detainees pose to Afghan and coalition forces.

“We will complete the transfer when the remaining issues have been resolved,” Dunford said in a statement on ISAF’s website.

Several media reported Karzai gave a speech Tuesday in which he suggested the government would take unilateral actions to assume control of the detention center if the transfer was delayed much longer.

In his e-mail, Dunford calls Karzai’s remarks about Bagram “inflammatory speech.”

ISAF called the general’s warning “prudent given increased coalition casualties in recent days.”

“ISAF routinely conducts assessments and adapts its protection posture to ensure our forces are prepared to meet potential threats and that they have a common understanding of the situation here in Afghanistan,” the ISAF statement said. “General Dunford’s e-mail is simply an example of this vigilance.”

Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit

ce4b93e40f847d4435744411bebe196c Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit
Beverly Kearney resigned as University of Texas when it appeared she would be fired.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Lawyer: Coach was negotiating a raise when informed university was set to fire her
Woman told university she had an relationship with the coach in 2002
Timing of the report is suspicious, coach’s lawyer suggests
Kearney led Texas to six since she arrived in 1993

() — The woman who had a with the of the Texas women’s track team 10 years ago reported the affair to the university about the same time the was negotiating a significant raise and contract with the university, the coach’s attorney said Monday.

Derek A. Howard suggested it was no that the now 30-year-old woman who was involved with Coach Bev Kearney in 2002 came forward in October while Kearney was discussing a $150,000-a-year raise and a new five-year deal.

“It’s curious that someone from her very distant past would report this as she was being offered a substantial raise and ,” he said.

Howard said he was speculating, but thought it was likely that “others encouraged her to do this.”

The university had no immediate comment when asked about Howard’s suggestion.

Kearney, a coach who led the to six , resigned Saturday after meeting with about the affair.

Howard said that the affair began in August 2002, which is not long after the university put a policy into its handbook about consensual relationships. The relationship dissolved after Kearney was paralyzed in an SUV accident in December 2002, and the coach spent many months in recovery.

There was no bitter breakup, Howard said.
2012: Beverly Kearney profiled

In an to on Sunday, Patti Ohlendorf, head of the university’s legal affairs department, said: “In and the coaching profession, it is unprofessional and unacceptable for a to carry on an intimate relationship with a student-athlete that he or she is coaching. We told Coach Kearney and Mr. Howard that such a relationship crosses the line of trust placed in the for all aspects of the athletic program and the best interests of the student-athletes in the program.”

Told the university was going to fire her, Kearney — the first African-American to serve as a head coach at Texas — resigned.

Howard said Monday that he and Kearney are discussing her legal options, including a gender and race bias lawsuit. He planned to file open-records requests with the school this week, he said.

He claimed that male coaches and professors at the school had similar relationships and weren’t punished.

Ohlendorf denied Sunday that gender played a role in the university’s review and said she knows of no other “UT head coach who has entered into such a relationship with a student-athlete on his or her team.”

A CNN story in August profiled the coach, who learned to walk again after she was injured in a December 26, 2002, accident that killed two of her friends.

Thrown more than 50 feet from an SUV, she suffered extensive spinal injuries that left her partially paralyzed.

Kearney said she never doubted her ability to walk again and continued to lead her team from her hospital bed.

“When they told me I was paralyzed, it went in one ear and out the next … because I had to get up and coach,” she said.

Track practices were recorded and then played for Kearney on a VCR in her hospital room.

“Because I was an intuitive coach … whatever it is you need to do, I can describe it in a way that you internalize it and you feel it without me having to demonstrate it,” she said in the August story.

She also started a foundation that connects young people with mentors.

“If I can expose you to the best … it has a great chance of inspiring you to be the best,” Kearney explained.

Kearney had been a head coach at Texas since 1993. She was inducted into the U.S. Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association in 2007.

Neither the university nor Kearney, who first told the Austin American-Statesman of her decision to step down, identified the athlete.

Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit  Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit  Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit  Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit  Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit

 Track and Field: Coach was set for big raise when she was forced to quit

NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move

ab9e2e3724c5080e6429073285d8b9ba NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move
players, shown at a September meeting, overwhelmingly voted to allow the union to dissolve itself.(Photo: Mary Altaffer, AP)

Story Highlights

could choose to negotiate again before dissolving union
Donald Fehr says he’s willing to talk during holidays
Disclaimer would free up players to pursue antitrust lawsuits

NHL players have given their union permission to officially go away.

Players overwhelmingly authorized the executive board to issue a “disclaimer of interest” to dissolve the union.

“No surprise,” NHL Bill Daly said via . “Any other result and I certainly would have questioned the of the union.”

The NHL Players’ Association executive board and negotiating committee was scheduled to hold a conference call , on Day 97 of the lockout, to determine the next step. The doesn’t have to issue a disclaimer immediately and could choose to attempt another round of negotiations before embracing that move.

NHLPA Donald Fehr said in a Thursday that he didn’t view the upcoming holidays as an to negotiating.

The NHL last week filed a preemptive lawsuit in federal court in New York, which historically has been more favorable to businesses. According to the lawsuit, the union planned to decide by Jan. 2 whether to dissolve.

The NHL has canceled games through Jan. 14, and that appears to be close to the date when the league will have to make a decision about whether to cancel the season. has said he likely wouldn’t want to have a season with fewer games than the 48 played after the 1994-95 lockout.

If the NHLPA notifies the NHL that it no longer is representing the players anymore, that opens the door for individual players to file antitrust lawsuits to have the lockout declared illegal.

NFL and both followed this path in their most recent , but in both situations, a new CBA was agreed upon before the lawsuit was allowed to play out. NFL players Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Tom originally won an injunction in Minnesota to end the lockout in 2011, but that decision was overturned on appeal. If NHL players file an antitrust suit from triple damages, it likely would be in Minnesota or in California, which historically has been favorable to unions,

Although the NHLPA has accepted the league’s request for a 50-50 split of -related revenue, they have been at a stalemate over several issues, including the league’s desire to cap the length of individual contracts. Owners are seeking a five-year limit on individual contracts, with an allowance of seven years for teams trying to re-sign their own player.

Owners are also seeking a 5% year-to-year variance limit to prevent teams from giving out back-diving contracts that circumvent the salary cap by tacking on lower years at the end.

The two sides also don’t agree on how long the new CBA should last: Owners want a 10-year deal with an eight-year opt-out clause, and players want an eight-year deal with a six-year opt-out.

Another major issue is the NHLPA’s desire to allow teams to buy out some players’ contracts to help teams to fit more easily under the lower salary cap that would result by players accepting a reduction in their share of the revenue from 57% to 50%.

The two parties have kept in touch, but they haven’t met since last week when federal mediators failed for the second time to help them resolve their differences.

NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move  NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move  NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move  NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move  NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move

 NHL Lockout: Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move

NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

4bbbc5b45f9af901b1691cb1663a2988 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

NEW YORK (AP) — The could be one step away from canceling another because of a labor fight with the players.

In the latest round of , the NHL on Thursday wiped out all games through Jan. 14. More than 50 percent of the schedule has been lost, and the rest is now in great danger, too.

“I don’t want to characterize what today’s mean or don’t mean,” NHL Bill Daly told the Associated Press in an e-mail. “I will stand on the announcement that was made.”

So far, 625 regular-season games have been called off, including nearly 100 in the announcement made Thursday — the 96th day of the NHL’s . The ’s Day and the All-Star game also have been lost.

The NHL had previously canceled games through Dec. 30.

Daly said in a Wednesday mid-January is likely the latest the sides could go to make a deal to save the season. When pressed, however, he said he expects the season will be played.

No drop-dead date has been announced by the NHL, which is the only North American to cancel a season because of to a . The 2004-05 season was lost to a lockout.

Daly said the sides hadn’t been in contact with each other Thursday, and no new talks are planned.

The groups have remained apart since two days of meetings with a federal mediator last week produced no progress. There haven’t been since Dec. 6 in New York, when talks broke down after a of bargaining.

Since the sides split last week, there has been limited contact — phone calls and a brief e-mail exchange.

The NHL believes should resume only when there is something new to say.

“I don’t think either party is refusing a meeting,” Daly said Wednesday. “But unless there is an indication one side or the other is prepared to move or has a new idea to move the process forward — and so far neither side has indicated — I am not sure what we would do at the meeting.

“What is the agenda? Who is directing the conversation? We don’t have anything new to say right now.”

Union executive director Donald Fehr said Wednesday he was glad to hear Daly’s belief there would be a season, and added he hopes Daly is right.

“Hopefully, we’ll get back together and negotiate out the remaining issues as soon as possible,” Fehr said. “(We aren’t talking) because the owners have not indicated a desire to resume.

“We’ve indicated any number of times that we’re willing to resume when they are (and) we’re willing to resume without preconditions. So we’re waiting to hear back from them.”

NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14 is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

4bbbc5b45f9af901b1691cb1663a2988 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

NEW YORK (AP) — The could be one step away from canceling another because of a labor fight with the players.

In the latest round of , the NHL on Thursday wiped out all games through Jan. 14. More than 50 percent of the schedule has been lost, and the rest is now in great danger, too.

“I don’t want to characterize what today’s cancellations mean or don’t mean,” NHL Bill Daly told the Associated Press in an . “I will stand on the announcement that was made.”

So far, 625 regular-season games have been called off, including nearly 100 in the announcement made Thursday — the 96th day of the NHL’s lockout. The ’s Day and the All- also have been lost.

The NHL had previously canceled games through Dec. 30.

Daly said in a Wednesday mid-January is likely the latest the sides could go to make a deal to save the season. When pressed, however, he said he expects the season will be played.

No drop-dead date has been announced by the NHL, which is the only North American to cancel a season because of to a . The 2004-05 season was lost to a lockout.

Daly said the sides hadn’t been in contact with each other Thursday, and no new talks are planned.

The groups have remained apart since two days of meetings with a last week produced no progress. There haven’t been since Dec. 6 in New York, when talks broke down after a of bargaining.

Since the sides split last week, there has been limited contact — and a brief e-.

The NHL believes should resume only when there is something new to say.

“I don’t think either party is refusing a meeting,” Daly said Wednesday. “But unless there is an indication one side or the other is prepared to move or has a new idea to move the process forward — and so far neither side has indicated — I am not sure what we would do at the meeting.

“What is the agenda? Who is directing the conversation? We don’t have anything new to say right now.”

Union executive director Donald Fehr said Wednesday he was glad to hear Daly’s belief there would be a season, and added he hopes Daly is right.

“Hopefully, we’ll get back together and negotiate out the remaining issues as soon as possible,” Fehr said. “(We aren’t talking) because the owners have not indicated a desire to resume.

“We’ve indicated any number of times that we’re willing to resume when they are (and) we’re willing to resume without preconditions. So we’re waiting to hear back from them.”

NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14 is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14  NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

 NHL Lockout: NHL cancels all games through Jan. 14

Obama to backers: Call Congress on fiscal cliff

 Obama to backers: Call Congress on fiscal cliff

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) — President ’s campaign is setting up a new phone bank.

In an Monday to supporters, Deputy Campaign Manager Cutter urged in Republican to call their lawmakers on behalf of Obama’s plan to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.”

Cutter advised supporters to stress that, without a deal, from the George W. Bush era will expire, and everyone’s taxes will go up.

“Who will decide if your taxes increase in just 22 days?” Cutter wrote. “A few dozen members of the , that’s who.”

It’s the latest effort to maintain the grassroots organization fueled Obama’s re-election win, in the hopes that it can help push his legislative agenda.

Also wrote Cutter:

“We know we can affect change in Washington when we raise our together. So pick up the phone and make a few calls. Republicans in the House need to hear from their constituents.”

HOOKSET, N.H. (AP) — Fear and frustration course through the lunch crowd at Robie’s Country Store and Deli, a popular outpost 500 miles from where Washington is again locked in tense negotiations over taxes and spending as a critical deadline looms.

“I’m worried,” Lorraine Cadren of nearby Manchester says between bites of her chicken sandwich. Her doubt in the nation’s elected leaders is palpable: “I’m not sure what’s going to come out of Washington next.” Not that she has the time to pay much attention; the 64-year-old is unemployed and preoccupied with finding a new job as Christmas approaches.

A few tables away, John Pfeifle shares Cadren’s angst while trying to enjoy his $6.99 chicken parmesan special.

“Somebody’s gotta have some smarts,” says the 63-year-old business owner, complaining that both President Barack Obama and House Republicans seem willing to allow the nation to go over the “fiscal cliff,” triggering broad tax increases and massive spending cuts that economists warn could lead to another recession.

“I have no faith at all they’ll do the right thing,” Pfeifle said of Congress.

And why would these voters have confidence in Washington?

The scene playing out on Capitol Hill is a familiar one as lawmakers with competing ideologies wage an 11th-hour battle to avert a predictable crisis. This one comes just a year after an equally divided Washington nearly let the country default on its loan obligations — a debt-ceiling debate that contributed to the electorate’s deep lack of faith in their elected leaders and a drop in the nation’s credit rating.

Evidence of Congress’ plummeting popularity is everywhere.

From New Hampshire diners to Colorado coffee shops, weary residents report widespread concern. They relate the debate in Washington over their tax dollars with their own lives: average Americans who are struggling every day to make ends meet. And already distracted by the holidays and tired of politics after a bitter presidential campaign, they are calling on Washington to get its act together.

“It’s pathetic. Nobody’s doing their job,” said Laura Hager, a retiree from Lancaster, Pa. “The rest of the country is being held hostage to this entire situation.”

She said the uncertainty makes it difficult to shape a personal financial plan; she can’t imagine what business leaders must be going through. “Nobody can plan. Nobody knows what they’ll do,” she said.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., warned that the public’s disgust with Congress would reach new heights if lawmakers and the White House fail to reach an accord before the year-end deadline.

“Ninety percent disapproval rating is going to go up to 99 percent disapproval,” the senator said at a panel discussion last week in Washington on the fiscal cliff’s impact on businesses.

Warner overstated Congress’ unpopularity, although not by much.

A recent Associated Press-GfK poll found that 74 percent of Americans disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job; just 23 percent approve. The figures are virtually unchanged from June and slightly above Congress’ recent low point of 12 percent approval during the debt ceiling debate in August 2011.

Some voters are trying to ignore the debate altogether, although near-constant news coverage is making that difficult, especially as Obama and his Republican opponents work to rally their supporters.

In a campaign-style event Monday in Michigan, the heart of industrial America, Obama warned that he “won’t compromise” on his demand that the wealthiest Americans pay more in taxes. Polls find that most voters agree with the president’s deficit-cutting plan to raise tax rates on income over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, although House Republicans are reluctant to agree.

The conservative group Crossroads GPS is running television ads across the country describing Obama’s solution as “a huge tax increase” with “no real spending reforms.” ”Call President Obama and tell him it’s time to show us a balanced plan,” the ad says.

Most voters interviewed in recent days are calling for an immediate compromise and seem willing to raise taxes on the wealthy so long as the middle class is protected.

There is a vague sense that the “fiscal cliff” is more serious than other recent Capitol Hill clashes. But barely a month after the presidential contest ended, most people say they’re not following the daily developments that consume Washington.

In a Denver coffee shop, interior designer Roxann Lloyd, 42, is mystified by the sound and fury out of Washington over the cliff.

“I don’t think they have any idea what a big deal is to an average person,” she said. “I’m just ignoring it.”

Lloyd said she isn’t surprised by the partisan bickering over the issue. “I don’t feel like they are really looking out for us,” she said of Congress.

John Baker, 65, a Denver psychologist, said he had little faith in Congress’ ability to fix the problem: “I don’t think Congress can fix a flat tire.”

“It’s a typical Washington, ‘Let’s hit the panic button and keep people scared so they will let us do what we want to do,’” Baker said in a downtown Denver Starbucks. “Ultimately, it will be fixed but not until a lot of pockets are lined.”

It’s unclear whether members of Congress are hearing the message.

Rep. Charlie Bass, a New Hampshire Republican who lost his re-election bid last month, says it’s unclear whether his GOP colleagues will “face the reality that the president, at least at this point, is not going to accept anything other than a tax rate increase.”

A stalemate would result in “painful uncertainty,” Bass said, offering his caucus a bit of advice: “We best get on with it — get it done.”

Back at Robie’s, store owner Debbie Chouinard says she’s burned out from election season and “tired of all the bull.”

“I honestly haven’t been paying attention,” she said while feeding her 2-year-old granddaughter lunch during a brief lull. “People should be working together to get this country going.”

___

Associated Press writers Nicholas Riccardi in Denver and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

U.S. weighing arming Syrian rebels, recognizing opposition

syrianconflict  621x414 U.S. weighing arming Syrian rebels, recognizing opposition

(PhatzNewsRoom / CNN Security) —- The United States is closely watching how operate inside Syria, and what their end objectives might be as the Obama administration weighs whether or not to provide arms to the Syrian opposition.

“Will providing arms to the opposition convince the people who support [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad, in many cases because they are afraid of their own existence, or will it simply lead to more fighting – that is the question that we are considering,” , the U.S. ambassador to Syria, said during a panel discussion in Washington on Thursday on the crisis in Syria.

“Arms are not a strategy, arms are a tactic,” Ford said about the the administration is undertaking on the question, and that a “” is not the best path forward for Syria.

“The president has never taken the provision of arms off the table,” he said. “And so, as we think about our policy of sending arms or not, and today we do not, we want to make sure that tactic plays into and helps us achieve a strategy of enabling the Syrian people to reach a political solution.”

Defense Secretary said Thursday the United States is not providing surface-to-air missiles, which have been seen used by the rebels.

The United States has not provided any support to the armed opposition, said spokesman Tommy Vietor.

“Our position on assistance to the Syrian opposition has not changed. The United States remains committed to providing to the Syrian people and providing non-lethal equipment and training to unarmed, civilian-led ,” Vietor said in an .

The question comes as the international community studies a new comprised of Syrian opposition elements fighting for political change inside Syria. The United States has not yet endorsed the group as the legitimate representative of the Syrian opposition. Both the Britain and France have made that recognition already.

“We would like to see them continue to develop as an organization, as a coalition that are making real progress and I expect that our position with them will evolve as they themselves develop,” Ford, who was present at the group’s unveiling in Qatar earlier this month said Thursday. “I want to be very clear that we welcome the establishment of the coalition and that we will work with them.”

Obama administration officials told CNN a decision has yet to be made on whether to formally recognize the opposition group. Officials say an upcoming meeting later this month of the so-called “Friends of Syria” group in Marrakesh, Morocco, would be a logical date for an announcement.

But that recognition would be contingent on the group strengthening its organizational structure, and forming technical committees on issues such as health and agriculture that could go about the process of establishing government structures in parts of the country that are liberated and putting in place a template of governance that would represent the broad cross-section of religious and ethnic groups inside Syria.

“That is an opportunity for them,” an administration official told CNN about the upcoming meeting. “They know that the world is going to be seeing them at the Friends of the Syrian people meeting, so we’ll just have to see how much progress they make between now and then.”

And while efforts to strengthen the Syrian opposition continue, the continued presence of extremists exploiting the situation is still a major concern for the United States.

Extremists “are absolutely there, and I think frankly their presence is growing stronger,” Ford said, adding that included a front operating for al Qaeda. “We have certainly raised in our discussions with other countries the importance of isolating extremists and not helping them. Those are the conversations that continue.”

Those discussions are also likely to include conversations with countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who are supplying weapons to rebels on the ground inside Syria. The Washington Post reported Thursday that Qatar was in the process of providing a small number of shoulder-fired missiles to rebels to target aerial resources of the Assad regime.

Such a development could be seen as something of an equalizer Ford said in terms of complicating Assad’s prosecution of a civil war that has claimed more than 40,000 lives.

But the use of such weapons would be unlikely to usher in the sort of game-changer that would bring about the downfall of the regime, and a new political order for Syria.

“I don’t think the mere presence of shoulder fired missiles is going to lead the people who are fighting for Bashar al-Assad to stop fighting for Bashar al-Assad,” Ford said.

But a U.S. official told CNN the “armed opposition is maturing” and having an impact on the regime.

“It’s making important tactical gains that could eventually trigger a strategic shift in the conflict,” the official said. “They haven’t reached that point yet, but the span of regime control is narrowing, and Assad’s forces are having greater difficulty beating back the insurgents’ progress.”

Ford is still operating as the U.S. envoy to Syria from his office in Washington. He left his post in Damascus last February when the United States closed its embassy due to the deteriorating security situation.

CNN’s Jill Dougherty, Elise Labott and Pam Benson contributed to this report

Politics: GOP divide over Obama tax plan goes public

121128074522 bts obama fiscal cliff remarks 00025405 story top Politics: GOP divide over Obama tax plan goes public

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Tim Geithner will meet with
Republican Rep. Tom Cole says the House should pass President ’s tax plan
Obama is making his case directly to the American people this week
Republicans complain Obama refuses to provide a detailed deficit plan

Washington () — An angry warning by President Barack Obama delivered well over a year ago foreshadowed his campaign-style approach on Wednesday aimed at pressuring Republicans to compromise and reach a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff.

In remarks at the White House, Obama urged Americans to call, e-mail and tweet their members of to urge immediate passage of his proposal to extend for most Americans while allowing rates on the wealthiest 2% to increase to 1990s levels.

“Let’s begin our work with where we agree,” the president said, noting the Senate has passed the measure and that both parties agree on holding down rates for the majority of taxpayers. “If we can get a few House Republicans to agree as well, I’ll sign this bill as soon as the House sends it my way.”

To applause from the White House audience that included those described by organizers as middle-class Americans, the president held up a pen to demonstrate his willingness to sign the law as soon as it reaches his desk.

Meanwhile, a rift among House Republicans on whether to give Obama what the wants became public Wednesday, with two conservatives saying the tax proposal would likely pass if brought to a vote.

John Boehner immediately shot down the call by veteran Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma for the chamber to approve the , saying he disagreed with his colleague. House GOP aides insisted there was no plan to bring the proposal up for a vote.

However, the public call by Cole — which echoed similar statements from conservatives in recent weeks — as well as his prediction that the Senate proposal would pass in the House showed an increasing desire among House Republicans to move beyond an issue that has harmed them.

Conservative Rep. Tim Scott of South Carolina also said he thought the Obama tax plan would pass the House, though he made clear to CNN he would oppose it.

The political maneuvering comes as Obama and Congress negotiate a possible agreement to avoid tax increases and deep spending cuts set to take effect in five weeks — the fiscal cliff scenario that analysts fear could push the country back into recession.

Obama also wants any deal reached in the current lame-duck session of Congress to include an increase in the federal debt ceiling, which is expected to be needed as soon as February or March.

On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Rob Nabors, Obama’s director of legislative affairs, will meet separately with congressional leaders of both parties, aides said. Geithner is the administration’s point man in the negotiations.

Republican rejection of any kind of increase in taxes has been a major contributor to the inability of Obama and Congress to work out a comprehensive agreement in the past two years to reduce the nation’s chronic federal deficits and debt.

Obama, who demands some increased tax revenue as part of what he calls a balanced approach with spending cuts and entitlement reforms, became so exasperated at one point during the endless budget battles that he decided to take his argument to the American people.

In July 2011, Obama told House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, one of the lead Republican negotiators, that it was time to make a deal or face the consequences.

“Don’t call my bluff,” the president said in ending the White House meeting, according to Cantor. “I’m going to the American people with this.”

Obama subsequently held a series of events around the country, mostly in swing states for the November election, in which he pushed for higher taxes on the wealthy as part of his main campaign theme to restore equal opportunity for the middle class.

Re-elected and facing the same fiscal issues — a seemingly unbridgeable divide with Republicans over taxes and spending — Obama is again taking his case to the people this week.

“The lesson is that when enough people get involved, we have a pretty good track record of making Congress work,” Obama said Wednesday.

Cole and some other conservatives say such pressure is the reason to simply give the president what he wants and move past the immediate tax issue.

“If we agree that taxes shouldn’t go up on 98% of the people, shouldn’t we take that now and get that set aside and make sure they know their taxes aren’t going up?” Cole said Wednesday night on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.”

Sounding a lot like Obama, Cole said that “if we can give assurance to most Americans that their taxes are going to be fine, I think that’s helpful to them in planning their lives going forward.”

Fellow Republican Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho disagreed with Cole, but also said letting Democrats pass a tax increase would saddle them with resulting economic stagnation.

“I think right now my advice to the leadership is that they should let the Democrats pass a tax increase because we will see that the economy will stall because of that tax increase, and then they will own it completely,” Labrador said, despite his personal opposition to such a measure.

He and other Republicans complained that Obama and Democrats had yet to propose any serious proposals to also cut spending and reform entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid as part of a broad deficit reduction deal.

“I think we’re making a mistake that we’re running around trying to think of ways to deal with the president when the president doesn’t want to deal in good faith,” Labrador said.

Obama argued Wednesday that settling the tax question for middle-class families would clear the way for the broader agreement everyone wants.

“We can do it in a balanced a fair way, but our first job is to make sure that taxes on middle-class families don’t go up,” Obama said. “And since we all theoretically agree on that, we should get that done. If we get that done, a lot of the other stuff is going to be a lot easier.”

Obama wants to let tax rates for income over $250,000 for families or $200,000 for individuals return to higher 1990s levels, while maintaining current rates for the rest of the country.

While Cole and other Republicans now say to let that happen, Boehner made clear Wednesday he wanted to keep his strongest bargaining chip.

“I told Tom earlier in our conference meeting that I disagreed with him,” Boehner said of Cole, who he described as a “wonderful friend” and strong supporter. “The goal here is to grow the economy and control spending. You’re not going to grow the economy if you raise taxes.”

At the same time, Boehner reiterated his willingness to include increased tax revenue, as long as it doesn’t come from higher rates and is part of a deal that includes spending cuts and entitlement reforms.

Later Wednesday, Obama met with chief executives of major corporations.

Congressional Republicans and Democrats talked separately with deficit-reduction gurus, including former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles, who co-chaired a special panel appointed by Obama in 2010 to study the matter.

“We are going to have to have real compromise. Nobody can be an absolutist, nobody can win everything,” Bowles told reporters after his meetings.

Meetings and events on both sides showed the high-profile tactics being used to demonstrate to the nation, including financial markets, that a deal can happen

Stocks opened lower Wednesday as investors grew increasingly concerned about whether Congress can adequately and swiftly address the situation. By the end of the day, after reports of Cole’s remarks and other developments, stocks recovered to post a solid gain.

With the U.S. economy showing more signs of improvement in its long recovery from recession, economists point to fears about higher taxes in 2013 as a potential threat to rising consumer confidence.

The fiscal cliff resulted from a failure to reach a deficit reduction agreement in the past two years due to longstanding differences between Democrats and Republicans on taxes — particularly whether to extend tax cuts from President George W. Bush’s administration.

Obama made the issue a central theme of his election campaign, and now the White House believes the president’s re-election validated his call for including more tax revenue in addressing the nation’s chronic federal deficits and debt.

Last week, Obama’s former campaign manager, Jim Messina, said the president’s re-election campaign and its grass-roots resources will “live on,” most likely as a tool to promote the president’s second-term policies.

Republicans seeking to shrink the size of government oppose increasing any tax rates, arguing that Obama’s plan would hinder job growth because some small business owners who file personal returns would pay higher taxes under it.

While aides on both sides have been talking, no follow-up meeting between Obama and congressional leaders has been scheduled after their initial post-election discussion on November 16.

Time running out on debt ceiling

Instead, Obama met Tuesday with small business owners to launch his week of campaign-style events.

Andra Rush, who founded Rush Trucking of Wayne, Michigan, said her message to Obama was that failure to extend the tax cuts to the middle class could stall what she called new economic momentum in the country.

“I would have higher tax rates,” Rush conceded, adding that it was more important for “ordinary Americans” to have more money to spend instead of paying it in taxes if everyone’s rates go up.

Boehner and other influential GOP figures have declared their willingness to consider other ways to boost tax revenue as part of a broader deal that includes entitlement reforms and spending cuts.

That position undermines the no-tax-increase pledge championed by anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, which Democrats consider to be a major to a deficit reduction deal.

House Republicans launch PR offensive on fiscal cliff

Republicans insist Democrats must agree to cut discretionary spending and make significant reforms to Medicare and Social Security as part of a deficit reduction deal.

However, organized labor and other elements of the Democratic base oppose any major reforms to the popular entitlement programs. While some Democratic legislators express willingness to reform Medicare and Medicaid, they reject making Social Security reform part of the fiscal cliff negotiations, saying it is self-funded and therefore doesn’t add to the deficit.

A CNN/ORC International poll released Monday also showed that a solid majority of respondents — two thirds — supports the Democratic stance that any agreement should include a mix of spending cuts and tax increases. Of that total, Republicans favor such an approach by 52%-44%.

Another poll on Wednesday by ABC News and the Washington Post showed a strong majority favoring the Obama tax proposal to raise tax rates on the wealthy. In addition, the survey indicated most Americans oppose raising the eligibility age of Medicare, one of the possible reforms proposed by some in the deficit debate.

US Intel believes some Benghazi attackers tied to al Qaeda in Iraq

b8ed075b8c5f4491271926dd7b29a743 US Intel believes some Benghazi attackers tied to al Qaeda in Iraq

( News / CNN Security) — U.S. intelligence believes that connected to were among the that attacked the in Benghazi, a U.S. government official told CNN.

That would represent the second al Qaeda affiliate associated with the deadly that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

Previously, intelligence officials said there were signs of connections to al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African wing of the .

The revelation that members of al Qaeda in Iraq are suspected of involvement in the Libya attack comes at a time when there is a growing number of fighters from that group also taking part in the Syrian civil war.

Doubts surface over on claim of responsibility for Benghazi attack

It also surfaces as questions persist about Benghazi security and the Obama administration’s response to the attack that have become issues in the presidential campaign. Republicans have said issues around the attack illustrate weaknesses in President Barack Obama’s foreign policy.

The weakened al Qaeda affiliate has had a resurgence in Iraq since U.S. forces left the country at the end of last year. The group had used Libya as a source for fighters. In a 2008 cable, Stevens described a of Derna as “a wellspring of Libyan ” for al Qaeda in Iraq.

The latest intelligence suggests the core group of suspects from the first wave of the attack on the Benghazi mission numbered between 35 to 40. Around a dozen of the attackers are believed to be connected to either al Qaeda in Iraq or al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the government official said.

The attack had two waves: The first targeted the main compound where Stevens and another diplomatic official were believed killed. A second stage a few hours later involved an annex building approximately a mile away.

According to the official, others in the core group are suspected of having ties to the Libyan group Ansar al-Sharia, and many of them are believed to be Egyptian jihadis.

A suspect in the attack is being held in Tunisia where the United States has been denied access to him, according to Sen. Saxby Chambliss, the ranking Republican on the Intelligence Committee.

Chambliss would not name the suspect, but CNN has been told it is Ali Ani al-Harzi, a Tunisian connected to extremist groups in North Africa.

Details about al-Harzi were first reported by the Daily Beast.

In a statement Chambliss said, “Tunisian authorities have a suspected terrorist in custody, yet our guys aren’t able to interrogate him.”

An aide to Chambliss said the suspect was first arrested in Turkey and later sent to Tunisia.

CNN has learned that the United States first became aware of al-Harzi when he apparently posted details of the attack on social media while it was happening.

At the request of the United States, Turkish officials detained al-Harzi when he entered that country after leaving Libya. Turkey then transferred him to Tunisia.

The United States fully expects to have access to him and is trying to figure out how that will happen, another U.S. official told CNN. The FBI is leading the investigation and the intelligence community, according to the official, is working behind the scenes to help with that as well.

Video from one security camera at the Benghazi mission was recovered from the site, but a U.S. official would not say whether al-Harzi or any other suspects were identified from the video.

E-mails obtained by CNN made clear that less than 30 minutes after the attack began, the State Department notified officials within the agency, the White House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Pentagon and the FBI that an attack was underway and that Stevens was in the compound.

And just two hours later, one of the e-mails indicated the Libyan extremist group Ansar al Sharia was claiming responsibility for the attack on social media websites. “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” the e-mail said.

Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told CNN the e-mails show the attack was not a spontaneous demonstration in protest of an anti-Muslim video as the intelligence community and Obama administration officials initially claimed.

“So what you saw in the e-mails in that real time was a real description,” Rogers told Soledad O’Brien on “Starting Point.” “And, as you noticed, there was no talk of demonstrations or other things. And it was clearly very early identified with a terrorist affiliate of AQIM.”

Eight hours after the first e-mail was sent by the State Department to officials around the government, another message, obtained by CNN on Wednesday from a government official, said that the personnel in the “shelter location” in Benghazi were “under attack by mortar fire.” It added there are reports of injuries to staff.

The timing of the message suggests the “shelter” referenced was the CIA annex a mile from the main diplomatic mission where, ultimately, two former Navy SEALs were killed in an effort to fight the attackers.

The email will likely be cited by critics to show that the administration knew within hours about the military nature of the attack.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the documents did not tell the whole story, describing conclusions drawn from the one document as “cherry picking.”

“Posting something on Facebook is not in and of itself evidence, and I think it just underscores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be,” Clinton said.

Moreover, intelligence officials do not believe Ansar al-Sharia is solely responsible with indications now that some of the attackers were associated with al Qaeda in Iraq, al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and an Egyptian jihad network.

A spokesman for Ansar al-Sharia denied the group was responsible the day after the assault.

Advice For Dudes: How To Call A Phone Sex Line

fbe7d224892431661628986ef8a74f74 Advice For Dudes: How To Call A Phone Sex Line

( News / The Frisky) — Phone Miranda Austin has graciously shared with us a chapter from her book Phone Sex: Aural Thrills And , available both on .com and Audible.com (oh la la!). Here she explains how a should make a to a phone sex line.

In order to get the most from your phone sex experience, you as the customer have a few responsibilities. (Yes, yes, I know you’re paying, but you still have to help.)

First and most important, tell the operator what you want. It sounds simple enough, and for some people it’s easy. Some callers just go ahead and say, “Hi Kristi, I’d like for you to role-play that you’re Mother Goose and I’m a , and when I come over to put out the fire in the giant shoe, you recite nursery rhymes as I eat your pussy.”

Great! Fantastic! Now I know exactly what to do. If you have a fantasy like this and you’re too shy to tell me about it, it’s likely that you’ll have a tough time having it fulfilled. Face facts: no one is going to be able to guess that one. Try writing your fantasy down and reading it to your phone sex girl, or sending it to her in . She probably won’t find it as strange as you might think.

Once you get started, be an active in the call. You may not want to talk much, and that’s fine. If you’d just like to listen, we don’t mind. But it really helps if you let your phone sex girl know that the call is going well for you. A simple “mmm, yeah” or a moan now and then tells her that she’s on the right track. Some guys are so quiet that I literally don’t know whether they’re blissfully stroking their cocks or have gone out for a snack.

If the operator says something like, “How’re you doing, sweetie?” or “Still with me?” that’s probably a that she’s wondering if you’ve fallen asleep. You might want to give her some direction, like: “Oh yeah, this is great” or “Tell me more about your tits.” This is also the perfect opportunity to let her know if the call is not going well. It’s completely within your rights as a customer to ask her to go in another direction (“Nah, this dominatrix thing isn’t doing it for me, let’s pretend you’re my ex-wife instead,”) or talk dirtier, or move the call along faster.

In fact, do that anytime you feel things aren’t going quite right. You don’t ever need to continue a call that isn’t working for you. There’s no blame attached — sometimes personalities just don’t click. You’re paying for this, so if you’re not enjoying it, hang up. No one will be offended.

Set the boundaries on small talk. Many phone workers will start a call with a few questions about you. This isn’t about her trying to keep you on the phone longer — early conversation serves an important purpose. It lets the worker get to know you just a bit, and helps nervous callers to relax. But you’re not required to make small talk if you’d rather not. It’s perfectly acceptable for you to say, “If you don’t mind, I’d rather just tell you about my fantasy.”

Respect her limits. Remember, the phone sex operator is a human being, too, and she has limits of her own. Just because you’re paying her, doesn’t mean she’s required to do anything you ask. Common fantasies that some operators will refuse include rape or other violence, sex with children or animals, and bathroom calls. If your phone girl has a website, you can probably get a good idea of her limits from that. If not, just ask.

Don’t try to wangle a free call. The phone sex operator is not going to give you a freebie because it’s your first time, or it’s your birthday, or your wife is sick, or you just retired, or you’re about to get your paycheck, or you swear you’ll send the money tomorrow, or the boss said it’s okay, or all the other girls give you free calls. No matter how charming you think you are, you’re not going to sweet talk your way into free phone sex.

Don’t expect anything beyond the phone call. While the occasional phone sex operator does personal sessions or appearances, the vast majority would never consider it. I suggest that you don’t even bring up a real life meeting, but if absolutely can’t stop yourself, ask once. When she says no, move on.

Don’t try to turn professional phone sex into something it isn’t. Enjoy it for what it is — a sexy, seductive break from reality!

Miranda Austin is a writer, sex educator, BDSM enthusiast, and professional arts advocate. She has a couple of academic degrees, spends too much time at her computer, and lives with her husband, his weapons collection, and their brood of extremely dominant household animals. Learn more at MirandaAustin.com (NSFW).