June 20, 2013

At G8 summit, it will be 7 vs. 1 over support for Syria

130616182522 cameron putin syria 00003502 story top At G8 summit, it will be 7 vs. 1 over support for Syria
UK, Russia differ over Syria

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

NEW: “Best days are yet ahead” for Northern Ireland, says
G8 summit to focus on ending Russia’s support for Assad regime in Syria
Putin admonishes the West for supporting rebels who “kill their enemies and eat their organs”
Corporate taxes, the NSA’s Internet monitoring also on the agenda

(CNN) — Ending Syria’s will take on fresh urgency at this week’s in Northern Ireland, where global leaders are poised to pressure Russia’s defiant president over his support for Syria’s government.

The conference of eight of the world’s most powerful nations comes days after the United States pledged to play a greater role in assisting Syrian rebels, citing evidence that President Bashar al-Assad’s regime used chemical weapons against the rebels and his own people. The move was backed by seven of the eight nations represented at this week’s conference in Loch Erne, while Russia remains the sole G8 nation supporting al-Assad.

On Sunday, sharply criticized the decision to provide arms to Syrian rebels, referencing a widely circulated video of an opposition fighter appearing to eat the heart of a dead solider.

Speaking to reporters in London after meeting with British Prime Cameron, Putin warned against arming Syrian rebels “who kill their enemies and eat their organs.”

“Do you want to support these people? Do you want to supply arms to these people?” Putin asked.

The White House announcement last week that it was increasing the “size and scope” of its to Syrian rebels came after months of over the U.S. role in the conflict. Great Britain and France, two other G8 members, were strong backers of the May decision to end the European Union arms embargo on Syria, and both countries asserted that al-Assad’s regime had used chemical weapons before the United States did.

Russia, however, has downplayed the claims of chemical weapons use, and Putin has opposed outside intervention into the county’s 2-year-old internal conflict. G8 leaders hope a unified front against al-Assad will help pressure Russia to end its support for al-Assad’s regime, which extends back to al-Assad’s father and the Cold War.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Putin will discuss Syria one on one Monday, the first time the two leaders will have spoken face to face since last year’s G-20 summit in Mexico.

“They clearly have a very broad agenda to discuss,” Obama’s deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes noted, adding the pair would also talk about counterterrorism and arms control.

“It’s in Russia’s interest to join us in applying pressure on Bashar al-Assad to come to the table in a way that relinquishes his power and his standing in Syria, because we don’t see any scenario where he restores his legitimacy to lead the country,” Rhodes continued.

Other G8 nations have expressed similar viewpoints, calling on Russia to back United Nations intervention in Syria. Russia’s permanent position on the United Nations Security Council has made action through that body difficult for countries intent on removing al-Assad from power.

Before this week’s meetings, Obama spoke by videoconference with the leaders of Britain, France, Italy and Germany to discuss “ways to support a political transition to end the conflict” in Syria, the White House said.

Cameron — who met with Putin one on one Sunday — said that during the videoconference, Obama said further intervention into Syria “should be done on our own timeline.”

“We have already taken some decisions in that Britain is helping to give technical assistance, training, advice, help, shaping, to the Syrian opposition, and we do that along with the Americans, French and others and will continue to do that, and we will take time to make these decisions with our allies,” Cameron said.

The White House has not yet publicly specified what exact steps it would take to support members of Syria’s opposition, though sources have told CNN small arms, ammunition and possibly anti-tank weapons would be part of the assistance package.

On Friday, Rhodes said further discussions with other nations were necessary to determine next steps.

“This is a fluid situation, so it’s necessary for (Obama) to consult with all the leaders at the G8 about both our chemical weapons assessment and the types of support we’re providing to the opposition,” Rhodes said.

The G8′s Syria discussions will come in a setting imbued with reminders of American diplomatic involvement overseas. The U.S.-brokered Good Friday Agreement, signed in 1998, created the current system of government in Northern Ireland and helped end the decades-long violence between republican and loyalist forces in the region.

Before the G8 summit officially began, Obama delivered remarks on the U.S.-supported in Belfast, though massive security operations served as evidence of Northern Ireland’s still-shaky peace.

“It has been 15 years since the Good Friday Agreement; since clenched fists gave way to outstretched hands; since the people of this island voted in overwhelming numbers to see past the scars of violence and mistrust, and choose to wage peace,” the president said, promising U.S. support as long as North Ireland continues to pursue peace.

“We will always be a wind at your back. And like I said when I visited two years ago, I am convinced that this little island, that inspires the biggest things — its best days are yet ahead.”

Cameron, the host of this week’s conference, named the problem of tax avoidance by large corporations as a central issue for G8 leaders to resolve at this year’s summit. The hopes to secure agreements among nations on sharing tax information, with the goal of ensuring global companies aren’t able to dodge tax bills.

The measure met resistance from firms’ chief executives, though Cameron said he’s willing to withstand corporate ire for a fairer global tax system.

“You don’t get anywhere unless you are prepared to give the lead and perhaps make a few enemies along the way,” Cameron said. “In setting the G8 agenda around trade, tax and transparency, yes, you are taking on some vested interests, you are taking on some difficult decisions. But actually will it help both the developing world and us in the West? I believe it can.”

Cameron also hopes to finalize a long-in-the-works trans-Atlantic trade deal between the European Union and the United States.

While in Europe, Obama will also likely be forced to defend U.S. Internet surveillance techniques that were disclosed in a series of newspaper articles in early June. The intelligence programs, which were previously considered top secret, involved large tech companies who operate globally, including Facebook, Goggle and Yahoo.

Individual privacy online is highly regarded in Europe, but leaders there have faced a quandary in publicly condemning the American program called PRISM, which monitors e-mails, photos, search histories and other data from American-based Internet companies.

A robust intelligence-sharing network exists between some members of the G8 and the United States, and intelligence gathered through the NSA’s program has the potential to benefit other countries targeted by terrorists.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has nonetheless vowed to discuss the program with Obama during his visit to Germany and told CNN in an interview that other European officials are also concerned about PRISM. She said she wanted the greatest possible transparency on issues of surveillance and privacy.

The European Union — represented at the G8 by European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso — also has “serious concerns” about the reported large-scale surveillance of online data by U.S. authorities, European Commission Vice President Viviane Reding said.

Rhodes said on Friday that the president would defend the programs, which also came under fire from civil libertarians in the United States.

“We certainly understand that — like the United States — countries in Europe have significant interests in privacy and civil liberties, so we will want to hear their questions and have an exchange about these programs and other counterterrorism programs that we pursue in the United States and in partnership,” Rhodes said.

Syrians losing patience, confidence in revolution

3b99e3af806aec84bf4226457edcef71 Syrians losing patience, confidence in revolution

Story Highlights

vows $45 million in humanitarian aid
U.K. also giving rebels $15 million in non-lethal support
Off the battlefield, some Islamist groups help shore up humanitarian aid

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) — ALEPPO, Syria — Mahmoud Abu Kador managed to keep working as a tailor despite the intense firefights between rebels and for almost a year.

But he shut down recently, not because of the violence but over relentless demands for bribes from rebels and the drift of the rebellion from a demand for democratic change to desires for an Islamic state.

“At first, I believed in the revolution because I believe in civil rights, but now the revolution is going in a different direction, and Islamist groups are spreading all over the country,” Kador says.

“I hope Syria will find the middle way, not too secular and too conservative,” he says.

Monday, President said the United States is working with Britain to strengthen the moderate opposition in Syria. At a conference alongside British Prime Minister David Cameron, called the violence in Syria appalling. Cameron announced more than $45 million in humanitarian aid for Syria and more than $15 million in non-lethal support for opposition rebels.

Forces opposing Syrian dictator Bashar Assad include members of the Free Syrian Army, a of and officers from the Syrian Army, but also and jihadists with ties to al-Qaeda and other Islamist terror groups. The fighting has killed more than 70,000 people, and 1.4 million Syrians live as refugees outside the country, according to the United Nations.

Since last summer, Aleppo has been essentially divided between the opposition forces and government troops battling for control of what was once the of Syria and its largest city.

enforce the divide. Cars are no longer allowed to cross from one side to the other. For businessmen such as Kador, it is almost impossible to make a profit under such circumstances.

Many Syrian civilians caught in the middle of the conflict say they support neither Assad nor the opposition.

“Before the fighting started, people here (Aleppo) supported Assad, but after they saw what happened in Homs and other places, they joined the revolution, but now that they see the problems, they are questioning the revolution,” says Abu Ahmad, who runs a backpack factory in Aleppo.

“This is not freedom,” he says. “We were supposed to get it without the destruction.”

Shortly before the fighting started, Ahmad borrowed materials from suppliers to make backpacks for students. No one bought his backpacks after the fighting broke out, and he is $75,000 in debt, a small fortune in Syria, and struggling to keep his inventory safe from the fighting and looting.

Throughout Syria, it has become hard to make a living. In opposition-controlled areas, few people are able to work, and most people live off savings and humanitarian aid. The country has seen a sharp spike in crime. In many areas, kidnapping is emerging as a serious threat.

The family of Aleppo resident Abu Yousef had to pay almost $40,000 to kidnappers who took Yousef’s cousin. A strong supporter of the revolution, Yousef says a corrupt faction of the FSA was responsible for the abduction. No one has faced any charges or legal action in courts run by the opposition movement.

“Even now, I’m afraid that someone will come into my shop and kill me or kidnap me,” says Yousef, a former jewelry maker who works in his uncle’s tire shop. “If no one helps the revolution, then more people will be like these criminals and steal for a living. If it goes on like this much longer, maybe even I will get this idea.”

Yousef has lost his house to an airstrike. His car was crushed when a building hit by tank fire collapsed on it. His jewelry shop is on the front lines and has been damaged considerably.

He says he still supports the revolution and believes it is made up of many honest people. Like many Syrians, he hopes Islamist groups will win control of Syria because he says they have a reputation for being honest and evenhanded.

Over the course of the country’s two-year uprising, Islamist groups have developed strong bases of support.

Off the battlefield, Islamist groups such as Jabhat al-Nusra, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. Treasury Department, provide humanitarian assistance and run Islamic courts to settle civil disputes or criminal cases in opposition-controlled areas.

“The Islamic revolution is better than any other side, but there is one problem with this side: They don’t accept anyone else’s opinions,” says Abu Yousef, a lawyer in Aleppo who shares the same name as the former jeweler.

“People in Syria can’t accept Islamic government, but at this time, they are needed,” he says. “But when Assad goes, they will not be needed. I think there will be another revolution against the Islamists.”

Kador may not wait around to see who prevails. He managed to stay in business selling his T-shirts on the government side of the city, but now that is not feasible because of the obstacles. He has stopped working and lives off his savings, which he estimates will last only a few weeks.

“I don’t believe in joining any groups like the (Free Syrian Army),” he says. “If I can legally emigrate somewhere else, I will.”

Obama calls IRS targeting of certain groups ‘outrageous’

 Obama calls IRS targeting of certain groups outrageous

Story Highlights

IRS targeted for closer scrutiny
Field office personnel singled out ‘’ groups and those critical of government
Obama faced questions about e-mails related to Benghazi talking points

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) —- WASHINGTON — Facing a wall of outrage from GOP lawmakers over revelations that the targeted “tea party” groups and non-profit organizations that criticized the government, President Obama on Monday called the actions by agency personnel “outrageous” and said “there is no place for it.”

The president, who appeared alongside British Prime Minister at the White House, weighed in on the IRS controversy for the first time and attempted to head off snowballing criticism from that he hadn’t personally condemned the agency’s targeting of conservative for extra scrutiny.

Obama said he first learned about the IRS actions from news reports Friday. He said those responsible for the practice should be held “fully accountable.” Jay Carney said later on Monday that White House Counsel’s Office was alerted during the week of April 22nd that the agency’s inspector general was completing a review about matters involving the office in Cincinnati.

Lois Lerner, the IRS director of exempt organizations, on Friday admitted the agency made “mistakes” in the last few years and that employees in the agency’s Cincinnati office routinely required seeking non-profit status to undergo more scrutiny.

Multiple conservative groups have said their applications were delayed and returned with lengthy requests for supporting materials, sometimes including website printouts and lists of guest speakers.

“You don’t want the IRS ever being perceived to be biased,” Obama said.

Even as Obama attempted to make clear his unhappiness with the IRS, Republicans continued to level their criticism against the agency and the administration.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., on Monday called for Obama to fire acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller.

“It is clear the IRS cannot operate with even a shred of the American people’s confidence under the current leadership,” Rubio wrote in a letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew. “Therefore, I strongly urge that you and President Obama demand the IRS commissioner’s resignation, effectively immediately. No government agency that has behaved in such a manner can possibly instill any faith and respect from the American public.”

Some Democrats, including Sen. Max Baucus, on Monday joined Republican calls for a Congressional investigation of the IRS.

“I want to review the inspector general’s report first, but the IRS should be prepared for a full investigation into this matter by the Senate Finance Committee,” said Baucus, of Montana, who is chairman of the committee. “The IRS will now be the ones put under additional scrutiny.”

Obama added that neither party wants the IRS to be perceived as “anything less than neutral in terms of how they operate.” He added: “This is something that I think people are properly concerned about.”

Still, the president pointed to the inspector general’s ongoing investigation, saying he would not comment prematurely on specific findings.

The president added that his administration will get to the bottom of what happened at the IRS. “I have no patience for it. I will not tolerate it. ”

Obama also faced a difficult question about the administration’s response to last year’s terror attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

E-mails unveiled last week show the State Department and other senior administration officials asking that references to and prior warnings be deleted from a unclassified memo on talking points about the incident shortly after the Sept. 11 attack.

GOP lawmakers have also criticized the State Department board that reviewed the incident for not interviewing then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the president held his press conference, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa announced that he had sent letters to Benghazi Accountability Review Board (ARB) co-chairs, former ambassador Thomas Pickering and former admiral Mike Mullen, requesting that they submit to transcribed interviews in anticipation of a public hearing on the board’s investigation.

“Three senior State Department officials who testified at the hearing criticized the ARB’s work as ‘incomplete’ and flawed because the ARB did not interview key witnesses and failed to hold senior officials accountable,” wrote Issa in the letter to Pickering. “On May 12, 2013, you defended the ARB’s work on Face the Nation. You stated that those criticisms are ‘unfair.’ … The White House and the State Department have touted the ARB’s report as the definitive account of how and why the Benghazi attacks occurred. It is necessary for the committee to understand whether the criticisms of the ARB’s work that we heard from witnesses on May 8, 2013, are valid.”

But the president pushed back, saying his administration officials have been forthcoming about Benghazi and suggesting that Republicans are more interested in scoring political points than figuring out how to prevent such incidents from happening again in hot spots where U.S. diplomats and other personnel are deployed.

“There is no there, there,” Obama said.

Obama and Cameron met for about hour at the White House before the news conference. Cameron said their talks centered on the economy, the ongoing civil war in Syria and next month’s Group of Eight summit that Cameron will host in Northern Ireland.

Both Cameron and Obama acknowledged they have a difficult task in persuading Russia to abandon Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime.

Obama noted that there are long-term “suspicions” by Russia toward the G-8 alliance — which includes the USA, Britain and Russia — but both he and Cameron were trying to “break down” some of those suspicions.

“As a leader on the world stage, Russia has an interest and obligation to resolve this issue that can lead to an outcome we all want to see in the long-term,” Obama said.

“Syria’s history is being written in the blood of her people,” Cameron said. He added, “and it is happening under our watch.”

Syria peace conference already hitting snags: Russia

f529bbd0a94dde564b29d0c44d303923 Syria peace conference already hitting snags: Russia

(Reuters) – Russia said on Saturday there was disagreement over who should represent the opposition in a Syrian peace process, only days after Moscow and Washington announced a to bring government and rebels to an international conference.

The dispute bodes ill for a civil war in which more than 70,000 people, mostly civilians, have died, and that has left foreign powers looking increasingly helpless.

A senior Kremlin official who attended talks on Friday between President and British Prime Cameron said it would be impossible to meet a of holding the conference by the end of May.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister tried to free a two-year diplomatic logjam on Tuesday by saying they would seek to organize a conference, ideally this month.

The Russian official said there was broad agreement that the situation in Syria was dire. “Beyond that there are very many differences: who can take part in this format, who is legitimate and who is not legitimate,” the state-run Itar-Tass agency quoted him as saying, on condition of .

Russia has been al-Assad’s main protector and weapons supplier and says that, although it is not wedded to him, it will not allow his departure, demanded by Western and many Gulf powers, to be a of talks.

Kerry appears to have shifted the U.S. position by saying Assad’s exit should be the outcome of negotiations on a , rather than the starting point.

REBELS DIVIDED

But the opposition remains divided, not least between those who will and will not consider talking to Assad.

Samir Nashar, a representative of the umbrella Syrian National Coalition, which says Assad’s departure must be guaranteed in any talks, said Russia wanted “groups other than the National Coalition to be present, such as the National Coordinating Body”.

Most leaders of the rebellion dismiss the NCB because it opposes the and also talks to the government.

Nashar said the National Coalition, whose leaders operate outside Syria, had decided it could not accept an invitation to the conference unless Assad’s removal was guaranteed.

“We feel that we cannot discuss a political solution with a man who is responsible for killing thousands of people and destroying thousands of homes,” he said. “The United States is trying to convince us that the result of these talks would be Assad’s removal, but we remain unconvinced.”

Russia has long argued that rebel intransigence – encouraged by Western and Gulf Arab insistence that Assad must go – is the main obstacle to a peace process.

“It is impossible to do this without the opposition,” the Russian official said. “But what opposition? That’s the question. We believe there is no clear center with which it is possible to conduct negotiations so that the commitments would then be fulfilled.”

Nashar said the United States was considering trying to circumvent the official leadership of the National Coalition by enlisting figures such as Moaz Alkhatib for the conference.

RESPECTED LEADER

The Sunni Muslim cleric resigned as head of the Coalition after other leaders, particularly those linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, opposed his proposal of talks with Damascus in exchange for the release of political prisoners.

But his resignation has not yet been accepted, and he remains one of the few leaders of the uprising to enjoys real popularity on the ground and, perhaps more importantly, the respect of pro-Assad Syrians, who regard him as a potential negotiating partner.

Separately, the state-run Russian news agency RIA cited a diplomatic source as saying that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, already invited to Russia by President Vladimir Putin, wanted to visit him in Sochi next week.

RIA also cited a source in Jerusalem as saying the possible delivery of Russian S-300 air defense systems to Syria would be the main topic on the agenda. An Israeli official said only that Netanyahu and Putin were likely to meet sometime soon.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing U.S. officials, that Israel had told Washington that Syria had begun payments for a $900 million upgrade of its Russian-made air defenses to the S-300 system, and an initial delivery was due within three months.

The system is designed to shoot down planes and missiles at up to 125 miles, and its use would complicate any outside military intervention in Syria’s civil war.

Russia has expressed concern about Israeli air strikes in Syria this year, which Israeli sources say were aimed solely at preventing advanced weaponry getting to the Shi’ite Muslim militant group Hezbollah, a major Assad ally, in Lebanon.

The Kremlin official declined to specify to reporters whether Russia would be supplying the more advanced system.

“We are fulfilling contracts signed earlier,” he said. “All weapons delivered under old contracts are purely defensive.”

(Additional reporting by Denis Dyomkin in Sochi; Writing by Kevin Liffey; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Soccer: Suarez accepts 10-game ban and seeks forgiveness

1040c6e551a87b4a0f427612fe24bdf2 Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness

(Reuters) – Liverpool striker has asked for forgiveness after accepting a 10-match ban for biting Chelsea defender Branislav in last weekend’s Premier League match.

The international had until Friday lunchtime to contest an FA ’s decision to add to the usual three for a charge but opted against it.

“I hope the people I offended last Sunday will grant me forgiveness and I again repeat my personal apology to Branislav,” Suarez said on his account.

“While 10 games is clearly greater than those bans given in past cases where players have actually been seriously injured, I acknowledge my actions were not acceptable on the so I do not want to give the wrong impression to people by making an appeal.”

Suarez, who bit Serbian international on the arm during the 2-2 draw at before later scoring an injury-time equalizer, will not be eligible to play for Liverpool in until September.

It is the second time the 26-year-old has been punished for biting an opponent after he bit PSV Eindhoven’s Otman Bakkal on the neck while at Ajax Amsterdam in 2010, earning a seven-match ban.

Suarez was also banned for last season after being found guilty by the FA of racially abusing Manchester United defender in October 2011.

“TRULY EXCEPTIONAL”

The Commission issued the written reasons for his latest on Friday, hours after British Prime Cameron had accused Suarez of setting an “appalling example”.

It concluded that “biting an opponent in itself was extremely shocking, unexpected and truly exceptional. Whilst there are numerous cases arising out of physical bodily contact between players, the incidents of biting an opponent are very rare”.

The Commission report added: “We believe it is our duty to discourage any players at any level from acting in such a deplorable manner or attempting to copy what they had seen on the television.”

Suarez’s previous disciplinary record was not taken into consideration, the report continued, adding the player had “not fully appreciated the gravity” of the incident which could have had health implications for Ivanovic.

Liverpool, who have fined Suarez, reiterated their disappointment with Wednesday’s decision to ban their leading scorer for 10 games.

“The charges against Luis were his to consider and we have to respect his decision to not appeal the 10-game ban,” managing director Ian Ayre said.

“We are all disappointed at the severity of the punishment and, in particular, the differing standards that have been applied across various previous incidents.

“Luis is an important member of our team and nothing has changed in that regard,” added Ayre.

“We are committed to helping him improve his conduct and he will be given our full support. We look forward to him returning to the team next season when he is available for selection.”

Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers has also criticized the FA’s tough stance after the incident was missed by the referee and there was some sympathy from rival managers on Friday.

“In this case the proportionality looks very severe considering what other players have been punished for,” Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger told reporters.

“I think what has gone completely against Suarez is his history, that is very heavy on the offence front. That’s why he has been punished so severely, that’s the only explanation I can find.”

Manchester City’s Roberto Mancini told a news conference: “Five or six games was enough, this is my opinion but I don’t work for the FA”.

(Additional reporting by Mark Meadows, editing by Alison Wildey and Tony Jimenez)

Soccer: Suarez accepts 10-game ban and seeks forgiveness is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness  Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness  Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness  Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness  Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness

 Soccer: Suarez accepts 10 game ban and seeks forgiveness

Ex-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher dies at 87

 Ex British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher dies at 87
Baroness Margaret Thatcher inside 10 Downing Street in London in 2010.(Photo: SUZANNE PLUNKETT AFP/)

(PhatzNewsRoom / BBC News) — Former Prime Minister Baroness Thatcher has died “peacefully” at the age of 87 after suffering a stroke while staying at the Ritz hotel in central London.

called her a “great Briton” and the Queen spoke of her sadness at the death.

Lady Thatcher was from 1979 to 1990. She was the to hold the role.

She will not have a state funeral but will be accorded the same status as Princess Diana and the Queen Mother.

The ceremony, with full military honours, will take place at London’s St Paul’s Cathedral.

The union jack above Number 10 Downing Street has been lowered to half-mast while Parliament will be recalled from its Easter recess on Wednesday to enable MPs to pay tributes to the former prime minister.

tribute

After cancelling planned talks in Paris with French President and returning to the UK, Mr Cameron made a statement outside No 10 in which he described Lady Thatcher as “the patriot prime minister” and said she had “taken a country that was on its knees and made it stand tall again”.

“Margaret Thatcher loved this country and served it with all she had. For that she has her well-earned place in history – and the enduring respect and gratitude of the British people,” he said.

“Start Quote

In an era in which politicians are all too often greeted with indifference, it is easy to forget that Britain was once led by a woman who inspired passion – both love and loathing.”

Nick Robinson Political editor

Lady Thatcher, who retired from public speaking in 2002, had suffered poor health for several years. She had been staying at the Ritz hotel since being discharged from hospital at the end of last year.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said Lady Thatcher – whose husband Denis died in 2003 – had been a controversial politician who inspired “passion” among her critics and supporters.

Her government privatised several state-owned industries and was involved in a year-long stand-off with unions during the Miners’ Strike of 1984-5. She was also in power when the UK fought a war following Argentina’s invasion of the in 1982.

Lady Thatcher survived an assassination attempt in 1984, when the IRA bombed the Brighton Grand Hotel, where she was staying for the Conservative Party’s annual conference.

During her later years in office she became increasingly associated with Euroscepticism. She is also seen as one of the key movers behind the fall of communism in eastern Europe.

She stood down in 1990 after she failed to beat Michael Heseltine by enough votes to prevent his leadership challenge going into a second round.

LIFE OF MARGARET THATCHER

13 October 1925 – Born Margaret Hilda Roberts in Grantham, Lincolnshire
1951 – Married businessman Denis Thatcher
1959 – Becomes MP for Finchley
1970 – Made minister for education
1975 – Elected Conservative leader
1979 – Becomes UK’s first female prime minister
1982 – Falklands War
1983 – Elected prime minister for second time
1984 – Survives Grand Hotel bombing
1984-5 – Takes on unions in Miners’ Strike
1987 – Wins third term in Downing Street
1990 – Resigns as prime minister
1992 – Stands down as MP and accepts peerage
2002 – Retires from public speaking
8 April 2013 – Dies after suffering a stroke

World leaders and senior UK figures have been paying tribute to Lady Thatcher.

US President Barack Obama said the world had “lost one of the great champions of freedom and liberty” and that “America has lost a true friend”.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she would “never forget her part in surmounting the division of Europe and at the end of the Cold War”.

Ahead of his return to the UK, Mr Cameron told the BBC: “Margaret Thatcher succeeded against all the odds. The real thing is she didn’t just lead our country; she saved our country.

“I believe she will go down as the greatest British peacetime prime minister.”

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: “The Queen was sad to hear the news of the death of Baroness Thatcher. Her Majesty will be sending a private message of sympathy to the family.”

Lady Thatcher was born Margaret Roberts, the daughter of a shopkeeper and Conservative councillor in Grantham, Lincolnshire, in 1925.

She studied chemistry at Oxford University and worked for a plastics company before marrying businessman Denis Thatcher in 1951.

She gave birth to twins Mark and Carol in 1953, the year she also qualified as a barrister, and served as MP for Finchley, , from 1959 to 1992.

Having been education secretary, she successfully challenged former prime minister Edward Heath for her party’s leadership in 1975 and won in 1979, 1983 and 1987.

Sir John Major, who replaced Lady Thatcher as prime minister in 1990, called her a “true force of nature”.

He added: “Her outstanding characteristics will always be remembered by those who worked closely with her: courage and determination in politics, and humanity and generosity of spirit in private.”

‘Unique’

Funeral route for Margaret Thatcher

Baroness Thatcher is to have a ceremonial funeral – a step short of a state funeral – with military honours to be held at St Paul’s Cathedral in London
The funeral parade will begin at Chapel of St Mary Undercroft at the Palace of Westminster
A hearse will take the body to the RAF Chapel at the church of St Clement Danes on the Strand
Baroness Thatcher’s coffin will be transferred to a gun carriage and drawn by the Kings Troop Royal Artillery to St Paul’s Cathedral
The route is to be lined by all three armed forces

Former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair called her a “towering figure”, while his successor Gordon Brown praised her “determination and resilience”.

Labour leader Ed Miliband said Lady Thatcher had been a “unique figure” who “reshaped the politics of a whole generation”.

He added: “The Labour Party disagreed with much of what she did and she will always remain a controversial figure. But we can disagree and also greatly respect her political achievements and her personal strength.”

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg described Lady Thatcher as one of the “defining figures in modern British politics”, adding: “She may have divided opinion during her time in politics but everyone will be united today in acknowledging the strength of her personality and the radicalism of her politics.”

Others to pay tribute included former chancellors Lord Howe and Lord Lawson, who resigned from her government following differences over economic policy, Europe and her leadership style. Lord Howe said the former prime minister was a “remarkable person” and a “very good” leader.

London Mayor Boris Johnson said Lady Thatcher’s memory would “live long after the world has forgotten the grey suits of today’s politics” while Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond described her as “a truly formidable prime minister whose policies defined a political generation”.
‘Party’ in Brixton, south London “Parties” are being held in Glasgow and in Brixton, south London, following Baroness Thatcher’s death

But Lady Thatcher’s economic policies and political style also came in for criticism.

Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said income inequality had grown sharply during her time in office while Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams said she had “prolonged the war and caused great suffering” in Northern Ireland by the use of “draconian, militaristic policies”.

In a statement, The National Union of Mineworkers said Lady Thatcher had “set out to serve those whose interests were profit for the few” and this had led to the “decimation” of the coal industry.

And “parties” have been taking place in Glasgow and in Brixton, south London, to mark Baroness Thatcher’s death. BBC reporters said about 250 people are attending the event in Glasgow and 100 in Brixton.

Taliban peace talks flounder: Mutual distrust between key players makes it difficult for peace talks to gain momentum.

 Taliban peace talks flounder: Mutual distrust between key players makes it difficult for peace talks to gain momentum.
U.S. forces patrol the Moqur market, an area that was firmly in the control of Taliban forces until the creation of checkpoints manned by Afghan forces. The villages around the market are, however, still occasional havens for militant fighters.(Photo: Carmen Gentile for USA TODAY)

Story Highlights

The began nearly two years ago
Kabul and Washington frustrated that Pakistan isn’t watching recently released prisoners
U.S. and working together to expedite

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — The Afghan peace effort is floundering, fraught with mistrust and confusion among key players even though the hard-line Taliban militants show signs of softening and their reclusive, one-eyed leader made a surprise offer to in a post-war Afghanistan.

The U.S. and its allies hope the peace process, which began nearly two years ago, will gain traction before most international forces withdraw from the country in fewer than 23 months. But although the Taliban appear more ready to talk than ever before, remain elusive because of among a rising number of — all trying to get some kind of negotiations started.

Members of the Taliban are in contact with representatives from 30 to 40 different countries, according to senior U.S., Afghan and other officials the Associated Press interviewed in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Moreover, the relationship among the key players — the U.S., Afghanistan and Pakistan — is marked by distrust that keeps tugging momentum away from the peace process.

Many of the officials spoke on condition of because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the sensitive contacts with the Taliban.

Finding a path to the negotiating table will be a topic when Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistan President Asif Zardari hold a series of meetings beginning Monday with British Prime Minister . The meetings in London come amid fresh tensions between Kabul and its western allies.

Karzai recently warned the West not to use peace talks as a lever against his government. As well, both Kabul and Washington are frustrated that Pakistan is not monitoring the whereabouts and activities of Taliban prisoners it released in recent months. Miffed by the criticism, Pakistan says it freed the prisoners at the request of the Afghan government and doesn’t have the resources to keep tabs on them.

No one in either Pakistan or Afghanistan seems to know where the dozens of released prisoners have gone. Last week, the Taliban issued a statement by freed former Taliban Justice Minister Mullah Nooruddin Turabi on behalf of all the prisoners — an indication that at least some might have rejoined the ranks of the insurgency.

“There were no preconditions to their release and we are getting criticism from our own people inside Afghanistan about that and it is valid criticism,” said Ismail Qasemyar, a senior member of the Afghan High Peace Council.

The peace council, which Karzai set up to carry out peace negotiations, handed Pakistan the list of prisoners, including Turabi, that it wanted freed. They have also asked for the release of the Taliban’s former second in command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, but Washington has urged Pakistan not to release him, U.S. and Afghan officials said.

For its part, the United States has tried to accelerate the peace process by working with Britain, Norway and Germany to reach out to the Taliban, said a senior Western diplomat familiar with the negotiations. Both France and Tokyo have hosted meetings that have been attended by Afghan officials, opposition leaders and the Taliban, although the Taliban insist their participation should not be misinterpreted as negotiations.

One senior U.S. official said the process is so nascent and egos so fragile that it’s like negotiating a minefield. A European diplomat told the AP that there are so many backdoor talks going on that it’s hard to keep track of who is talking to whom.

This week, Karzai said he wanted an end to all these talks. Speaking at a water management conference in the Afghan capital, Karzai expressed suspicion that the peace process was being hijacked by the West to strengthen his opponents and undermine his government.

His spokesman, Aimal Faizi, told the AP in an interview on the sprawling palace grounds in Kabul that the president was frustrated by what he perceives are attempts by his political opponents and the West, including the United States, to use the peace process to lay the groundwork for a post-2014 Afghanistan led by those hand-picked by them.

This latest flap between Karzai and the West could halt or at least delay the official opening of a Taliban office in the Middle Eastern state of Qatar. The office is intended to give the Taliban an address from which they can conduct peace talks. Faizi said Karzai supports the office “in principle,” with some conditions.

“This office should be used only as an address for talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban,” Faizi said. “This office should not be used for any other purpose.”

Faizi also said the president wants the Taliban to publicly announce that they will negotiate peace only with the Afghan High Peace Council. So far, the Taliban have resisted, although officials close to the president say privately that they appear to be softening their hard-line stance.

Taliban spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid, seemed uncompromising when he spoke to the AP.

“There is no change in the policy of the Islamic Emirate of not talking to the Karzai government,” he said “The Karzai regime is powerless and installed by others. Real parties to the conflict are those who have committed aggression.”

But still the Taliban have shown signs of moderating their positions in recent months.

According to several , who are involved or knowledgeable about the process, the most telling sign of flexibility came in a statement issued late last year by Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. In the statement marking the Islamic holy holiday of Eid al-Adha, Omar for the first time offered to share power. He also said he had no interest in starting a civil war.

“As to the future political destiny of the country, I would like to repeat that we are neither thinking of monopolizing power nor intend to spark off domestic war,” he said.

While still firm on his demand for Sharia or Islamic law, in Afghanistan, the Taliban leader, who rarely speaks and has a $10 million bounty on his head, did seem to take a few steps back from the harsh and regressive edicts and interpretations of Islamic law that characterized the Taliban’s five-year rule. Many of those edicts were directed at women, denying them education and the right to work. He also seemed to extend an olive branch to Afghanistan’s other ethnic groups.

“We will guarantee rights of both male and female of the country, build economic structures and strengthen social foundations and facilities of education for all people of the country,” he said.

But Omar’s flexibility only went so far. He still insisted on an Islamic education system. While the West has been pressing for secular education, many of Afghanistan’s current leaders support a Quran-based education system.

A senior member of the High Peace Council, who met with Taliban on the sidelines of the two conferences in France and Tokyo, said they also vowed to make child marriages illegal and outlaw a common practice among ethnic Pashtuns to use their daughters as barter to settle disputes.

Death toll climbs past 80 in Algerian attack

 Death toll climbs past 80 in Algerian attack
(Britain’s Secretary of State for Defense Philip Hammond, left, speak to the media with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta during a news conference at Lancaster House in London on Jan. 19. The U.S. and British defense chiefs said Saturday the hostage crisis in Algeria ended with more deaths, but that details remained unclear. Jacquelyn Martin, AP)

(PhatzRadio / USA Today) — The from the bloody terrorist siege at a natural gas plant in Algeria has climbed past 80 as the country’s forces searching the refinery for explosives found dozens more bodies, many so badly disfigured they could not immediately be identified, a security official said.

Algerian stormed the plant on Saturday to end the four-day siege, moving in to thwart what government officials said was a plot by the to blow up the complex and kill all their with mines sown throughout the site.

The government said after the assault that at least 32 and 23 hostages were killed. Then, on Sunday, Algerian bomb squads sent in to blow up or defuse the explosives found 25 bodies, said the security official, who spoke on condition of because of the sensitivity of the situation.

“These bodies are difficult to identify. They could be the bodies of foreign hostages or Algerians or terrorists,” the official said.

In addition, a wounded Romanian who had been evacuated died, raising the overall death toll to at least 81.

Algerian spokesman Mohamed Said said Sunday that he expects the death toll to rise.

“I am very concerned that this preliminary death toll will be, unfortunately, revised upwards in the coming hours,” he said.

Special forces continue to secure the facility and look for more victims, Said added.

On Monday, Philippine Foreign Affairs officials said six were among the hostages killed. Spokesman Raul Hernandez told reporters that 16 have been accounted for and four others are still missing.

David Cameron said Sunday were killed and another three are believed dead, as is a British resident.

“Now, of course, people will ask questions about the Algerian response to these events, but I would just say that the responsibility for these deaths lies squarely with the terrorists who launched a vicious and ,” Cameron said.

Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said his country is awaiting word on five missing workers.

“We have to face the fact that Norwegian lives might have been lost,” he said. “But we also have to feel relief that (eight) have been already saved.”

One American, Frederick Buttaccio of Texas, was confirmed dead Friday. The Algerian government reported that 685 Algerian and 107 foreigner workers were freed during the four-day standoff.

In the final assault Saturday, the remaining band of militants killed seven hostages before 11 of them were in turn cut down by the special forces, Algeria’s state news agency said. The military also said it confiscated heavy machine guns, rocket launchers, missiles and grenades attached to suicide belts.

The Algerian government defended its actions against the al-Qaeda-linked group who call themselves “Signers in Blood.”

“The terrorists were determined to be successful in their operation; they had planned to blow up the gas complex and execute all the hostages,” Said said, citing the “sophisticated arsenal” of weapons recovered.

The State Department issued a travel warning Saturday night for Americans in or traveling to Algeria, citing credible threats of the kidnapping of Western nationals. The department also authorized the departure from Algeria of staff members’ families if they choose to leave.

Militants attacked the Ain Amenas gas plant early Wednesday after initially assaulting a bus with facility workers en route to the local airport.

The terrorists, made up of at least six nationalities, then retreated to two different sections in the facility. Algerian special forces began an assault on the facility to free the hostages Thursday, in a move that took Western nations by surprise because they weren’t consulted beforehand.

Algeria has been fighting a war against militants for two decades and refuses to negotiate with terrorists.

After Saturday’s assault, French President gave his backing to Algeria’s tough tactics, saying they were “the most adapted response to the crisis.”

“There could be no negotiations” with terrorists, the French media quoted him as saying in the central French city of Tulle.

Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day

96a9658b807feb82a220d4fb77a583ad Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day

(Reuters) – Bells rang across Britain on Friday to signal the final countdown to the Olympic Games, which open with an exuberant and eccentric ceremony celebrating the nation in an explosion of dance, music and fireworks inspired by Shakespeare’s “Tempest”.

The three-hour showcase created by Oscar-winning “Slumdog Millionaire” director Danny Boyle takes spectators on a journey from Britain’s idyllic countryside through the grime of the Industrial Revolution and ending in an explosion of pop culture.

Watched by 60,000 people at the main built in a run-down part of east London and a global audience of more than a billion, the event will have passages described by British Prime Cameron as “spine-tingling”.

The spectators will be urged to join in sing-a-longs and help create spectacular visual scenes at an event that sets the tone for the sporting extravaganza, when 16,000 athletes from 204 countries share the thrill of victory and despair of defeat with 11 million visitors.

The Games will also answer the question on Britons’ lips — were seven years of planning, construction and disruptions, and a price tag of $14 billion during one of the country’s worst recessions, actually worth it?

“There is a huge sense of excitement and anticipation because Britain is ready to welcome the greatest show on Earth,” said Cameron. “This is a for our country so we must seize it.”

There have, however, been bumps along the way.

Media coverage was until recently dominated by G4S’s admission that it could not provide enough guards for Olympic venues. Thousands of extra soldiers had to be deployed at the last minute, despite the company’s multi-million- from the government.

Counter-terrorism chiefs have played down fears of a major attack on the Games, and Cameron said that a safe and secure Olympics was his priority.

“This is the biggest in our peacetime history, , and we are leaving nothing to chance.”

Suicide attacks on London in July, 2005, killed 52 people. This year the Games coincide with the 40th anniversary of the 1972 Munich massacre when 11 Israeli Olympic team members were killed by Palestinian militants.

Heavy traffic in central London and severe delays on Britain’s creaking train system have added to the grumbling.

A series of doping scandals have tarnished the Games’ image in the buildup, with at least 11 athletes banned, and Greek triple jumper Paraskevi Papachristou became the Olympics’ first “ victim” when she was withdrawn from the team over tweeted comments deemed .

An early diplomatic faux pas, when the flag of South Korea appeared at a women’s match between North Korea and Colombia, prompted fuming North Korean players to walk off the pitch and delayed kick-off by more than an hour.

SATANIC MILLS

All of that is likely to be forgotten as attention around the globe turns to the opening ceremony, which begins at 2000 GMT and ends more than three hours later.

While Boyle has urged the 10,000 participating volunteers and large crowds at rehearsals this week to keep the show a secret, some elements are already in the public domain.

Titled “Isles of Wonder”, it opens with a recreation of bucolic bliss, complete with fields, hedges, sheep, geese, a shire horse, shepherdesses and even a game of village cricket.

The mood then darkens as “England’s green and pleasant land”, from a poem by William Blake, makes way for the sooty chimneys and smoking steel works of the “dark Satanic Mills”, evoking the 19th century urban settings of Dickens.

Stirring music from Britain’s past and present provides the soundtrack, which comes to the fore in the latter stages with a psychedelic celebration of pop culture including songs, sitcoms and cinema classics.

Cyclists with illuminated “wings” circle the arena, creating a stunning effect for cameras suspended from the stadium roof.

Boyle’s ode to the National Health Service, a politically charged topic in Britain where people are emotionally tied to the ideal of a welfare state, may make less sense to people watching from afar.

But a closing performance by ex-Beatle Paul McCartney should have global appeal for a ceremony that will contrast sharply with Beijing’s tightly choreographed, large-scale version.

Boyle had 27 million pounds ($42 million) to spend on his spectacular, well under half the amount estimated to have been spent in China in 2008.

There are still plenty of secrets, including who will have the honor of lighting the Olympic cauldron, the moment symbolizing the opening of the Games and ending the Olympic torch’s 8,000-mile journey the length and breadth of Britain.

On Friday, the torch made its way up the River Thames aboard the royal barge Gloriana, which was used in Queen Elizabeth’s Diamond Jubilee in June.

The 86-year-old monarch will be in the crowd, along with U.S. First Lady Michelle and a host of dignitaries and celebrities.

Showers forecast for London after a week of sunshine are expected to clear in time for the ceremony, according to Britain’s Met Office.

In his final news conference before the Games, International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge said a crackdown on dopers had proven a success with more than 100 athletes caught for doping violations in the months leading up to the Games.

“This is a good sign for the fight against doping,” Rogge said. “This is proof that the system is working and is effective.”

ARCHERY WORLD RECORD

South Korean men’s archers set the first world records of the Games, the team totaling 2,087 for 72 arrows at Lord’s Cricket Ground. Im Dong-hyun, who suffers from severe myopia and just aims at “a blob of yellow color”, broke his own 72-arrow world record with a score of 699.

The Games’ first medals will be decided in the women’s 10 meters air rifle final on Saturday with the big action coming in the men’s road race where world champion Mark Cavendish is favorite to become Britain’s first gold medalist.

In the evening, Americans Michael Phelps and Ryan Lochte are scheduled to line up for a classic confrontation in the men’s 400 meters individual medley final.

Phelps, swimming in seven events after winning a record eight gold medals four years ago in Beijing, is bidding to become the first man to win the event for three Games in a row.

However, he was beaten by Lochte in both last year’s world championships and this year’s U.S. trials.

“This is going to be a special race,” said Gregg Troy, head coach of the American men’s team. “I can’t imagine a better way to promote our sport than a race like this on the first day.”

(Additional reporting by Stephen Addison, Gene Cherry, Guy Faulconbridge, Vincent Fribault, Peter Griffiths, Sara Ledworth)

Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day

help Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
009b06f38695de0d0d383c24bf894a9e Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
help Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
1df4af0e6e8f900d91267ca68edfd555 Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
help Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
7f14bbf0b0c13fca3af83ff82c0b71ca Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
help Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
7c7d24e16ce9807a51c9caae4d336d4f Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
help Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day
325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day

325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 Olympics: Bells peal across Britain on Games opening day

Analysis: West struggles to understand Russia’s Syria stance

b679e1c2313d0a3210d86cf8311fa086 Analysis: West struggles to understand Russias Syria stance

(Reuters) – Western states trying to oust Syrian al-Assad are increasingly struggling to deal with, or even understand, Russia’s dogged support for him.

Arms deals, Russia’s naval base in Tartus and fear of Islamist militancy in a post- are all held up as potential explanations. But Russian officials and some others say that misses the wider point.

They say Moscow’s opposition to foreign-backed “regime change” reflects a fundamental disagreement with the West over sovereignty and the rights of states to deal with domestic instability by whatever means necessary.

“The Russian position can be explained by their hostility to any interference in the internal affairs of a country, especially in the current climate, because at home they have things to be worried about,” says Denis Bauchard, a former diplomat and expert on the Middle East at the French Institute for International Relations (IFRI).

Time and time again, have confidently briefed that Putin was on the brink of dumping his long-term ally, only to be disappointed.

On Saturday, Russian Foreign Minister and counterparts from other major powers are due to meet in Geneva.

Once again, diplomats from several Western countries were predicting a shift. For the first time, they said, Russia had agreed with former U.N. Secretary-’s plan and its requirement for a gradual transition of power.

But late on Thursday, it emerged that Russia had put forward amendments that the United States, Britain and France said were unacceptable.

At a Group of 20 summit in Mexico this month, was embarrassed after suggesting that Putin had agreed Assad should go, only to have Putin himself dismiss the idea.

French President talked at length about the importance of winning Russia over, but had an awkward press conference with Putin in May having clearly failed to do so.

AWKWARD MOMENTS

For every argument Hollande made before the assembled media, Putin had a counterargument. When Hollande asked if Russia would take Assad in exile, Putin replied that the Assad family had been invited to Paris much more often than to Moscow. While it is not clear that was true, Hollande still had to squirm.

Putin said the ousting of leaders did not necessarily lead to peace. He cited the case of Libya, where Moscow believes it was tricked by the West into supporting military intervention.

“Has it become safer there? Where are we moving? Is there an answer?” he asked.

Western states are still hoping that a series of military reverses for Assad will begin to tip the balance and force Putin to drop him. But it may not be that easy.

A in Syria of well over 10,000 seems unlikely on its own to change Putin’s mind. Estimates vary widely of the number of dead in Chechnya – a conflict in which he was involved as prime minister and president – but often exceed 100,000.

Rights activists and other witnesses say that conflict often involved artillery attacks on civilian areas, massacres and disappearances: potential war crimes now being reported in Syria.

Mindful of rising anti-Putin protests, not to mention separatist worries in the Caucasus, leaders in Moscow – and perhaps also Beijing, which has its own worries about unrest in Tibet, northwest China and many other areas – fear they might themselves have to adopt similar tactics again one day.

But it is the growing suggestion that Western democracies in particular might intervene militarily or otherwise to help such uprisings that really unnerves Russia’s leaders, many believe. The ‘Orange’, ‘Rose’ and ‘Tulip’ revolutions in former Soviet Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan have added to such concerns.

“Putin has spent the last decade obsessing about ‘color revolutions’,” says Stephen Sestanovich, principal State Department officer for the former Soviet Union between 1997 and 2001 and now senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“He hates the idea that the international community has anything to say about who holds power in a country whose leaders have done something awful. He tends to sympathize with those leaders.”

COST OF REVOLUTION

It can also be argued that the price of a revolution such as Syria’s is simply too high.

“Russia probably knows the true cost of revolutions better than most other countries,” Lavrov wrote in the Huffington Post on June 15.

“We are fully aware that revolutionary changes are always accompanied by social and economic setbacks as well as by loss of human life and suffering. This is exactly why we support an evolutionary and peaceful way of enacting long-awaited changes in the Middle East and North Africa.”

Russian officials say they are not wedded to Assad but want stability to return, and have so far not seen a strategy that would achieve this.

There is little doubt that the situation in Syria also feeds into wider Russian concerns.

Many Western diplomats suspect Russia fears that Syria after Assad could become a haven for Islamists, not least those fighting Russia in Chechnya.

While Russia’s naval base at Tartus is regarded as little more than a refueling stop, it does give Russia a Mediterranean harbor that could prove valuable if trouble with Ukraine or Turkey obstructed the operations of its Black Sea Fleet.

In Alawite-run Syria, and perhaps to a lesser extent in Shi’ite Iran, Russia also has a regional counterweight to an increasingly vocal bloc of Sunni Muslim-led countries allied with Washington, primarily Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.

Some also suspect that Russia may see frustrating Western interests and embarrassing its leaders as an end in itself as it looks to reassert itself as a global power – or at least as a useful short-term tactic until a clearer picture emerges.

“In the West we often exaggerate Putin’s dictatorial side,” says former U.S. official Sestanovich.

“In Russia, many criticize him for indecisiveness. It may be that in Syria he’s actually confused about what to do, and is slowly concluding that Assad has had it. That’s the hopeful interpretation: Putin the conflicted ditherer.”

(Additional reporting by Louis Charbonneau at the United Nations, Gleb Bryanski in Moscow, John Irish in Paris, Tom Miles in Geneva; Editing by Kevin Liffey)