May 24, 2013

5 things we learned from Obama’s speech

366e6743063c7cfee5932f3e50acb249 5 things we learned from Obamas speech

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Obama says America at “crossroads,” and fight against terror must be more targeted
He defends the use of against terror suspects overseas
Obama makes new push to close in Cuba
Woman interrupts speech, urged Obama take action on “Gitmo”

() — President recast the U.S. fight against terrorism as no longer a “boundless ” but a targeted effort to dismantle specific extremist networks.

He said America was at a “crossroads” and should no longer see it as a “self-defeating” perpetual fight, but one that must at some point end, “like all wars.”

Obama said “the core of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan is on a path to defeat,” but its affiliates elsewhere pose dangers. He also touched on new overseas and homegrown threats, and explained publicly the use of drones against terror suspects overseas.

He renewed his push to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and also sought to calm criticism around his administration’s investigation of national .

Obama, ‘troubled’ by leak investigations, asks for review

He even paused his prepared remarks to take on a woman in the audience from “Code Pink” who interrupted him several times in open disagreement.

“I think that the, and I’m going off script as you might expect here …. the voice of that woman is worth paying attention to,” Obama said to applause. “Obviously I do not agree with much of what she said and obviously she wasn’t listening to me in what I said but these are tough issues and the suggestion that we can gloss over them is wrong.”

Here are five things we learned from the speech:

1. are OK, but…

The Obama administration for the first time revealed Wednesday that drones had killed four American citizens since 2009. Obama used the speech to more definitively explain the U.S. policy on the use of and sought stricter review of its use.

Still, he said drones were both legal and effective to combat terrorists, and added that Americans overseas who wish to do the United States harm were fair game, in the most extreme cases.

“When a U.S. citizen goes abroad to wage war against America — and is actively plotting to kill U.S. citizens; and when neither the United States, nor our partners are in a position to capture him before he carries out a plot — his citizenship should no more serve as a shield than a sniper shooting down on an innocent crowd should be protected from a SWAT team,” Obama said.

He said ordering strikes is a heavy burden, but added that “to do nothing in the face of terrorist networks would invite far more civilian casualties.”

Obama said he is asking his administration to review proposals to extend oversight of lethal actions outside of war zones that go beyond reporting to Congress.

CNN’s senior political analyst Gloria Borger says Obama defends the use of drones.

“But he also really acknowledged that it can be overused, even by a president, and that you cannot just depend on drones for your national security.”

2. I wasn’t kidding about closing Gitmo…

When he was first elected in 2008, Obama vowed to shut down the military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, also known as Gitmo.

But in the years since, Congress has enacted significant restrictions on the transfer of detainees from the prison that made its closure impractical. And, as costs of running the facility balloon and detainees wage hunger strikes protesting their imprisonment, the administration has quietly dialed back the intensity of the push to shut down the facility.

But that changed Thursday.

“The original premise for opening GTMO — that detainees would not be able to challenge their detention — was found unconstitutional five years ago,” said Obama. “In the meantime, GTMO has become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law.”

He called on Congress to “lift the restrictions on detainee transfers from GTMO,” appointed a special envoy to “achieve the transfer of detainees to third countries,” and lifted the moratorium on detainee transfers to Yemen, where 56 of Gitmo’s 86 detainees are from.

3. No leaks, but there’s that freedom of the press thing…

Obama has come under fire for recent investigations into leaks by his Justice Department where phone records were seized from reporters and editors at The Associated Press and a Fox News reporter was labeled in a Justice Department affidavit as “potentially being an ‘aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator’” to the crime of disclosing secret information.

“As commander-in-chief, I believe we must keep information secret that protects our operations and our people in the field,” Obama said. “But a free press is also essential for our democracy. I am troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable.”

“Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs. Our focus must be on those who break the law,” he added.

He vowed to push for a federal shield law for journalists and convene a group of media organizations to review existing guidelines about investigations that involve reporters.

4. A new term brings a new policy

Obama clearly used the speech to redefine U.S. policy on the so-called “war on terror,” acknowledging that where once the battle was fought on foreign soil, the threats have moved.

“Now make no mistake: our nation is still threatened by terrorists. From Benghazi to Boston, we have been tragically reminded of that truth. We must recognize that the threat has shifted and evolved from the one that came to our shores on 9/11. With a decade of experience to draw from, now is the time to ask ourselves hard questions – about the nature of today’s threats, and how we should confront them.”

“From our use of drones to the detention of terrorist suspects, the decisions we are making now will define the type of nation — and world — that we leave to our children,” Obama said.

“I was listening to a president who was saying to us, ‘Let’s get beyond where we were when I first took office, and let me tell you how my thinking has evolved since I’ve been president of the United States,’” said CNN’s senior political analyst Gloria Borger. “He said, ‘We must define the nature and scope of this struggle or it will define us.’”

5. Free speech also means ‘you listen’

A loud woman interrupted the president several times during his speech, calling on Obama to close the Guantanamo Bay facility. But the president was talking about just that when he was interrupted.

“You are commander-in-chief — you can close Guantanamo today,” she yelled. “It’s been 11 years!”

Obama stopped in the middle of his remarks and shot back. “This is part of free speech, is you being able to speak but also you listening and me being able to speak, alright?” Obama said.

The woman was identified as Medea Benjamin, a co-founder of the protest group Code Pink and was later escorted out of the building and released.

Later, he even tweaked his closing line to incorporate the heckler in the audience.

“Victory will be measured in parents taking their kids to school, immigrants coming to our shores, fans taking in a ballgame, a veteran starting a business; a bustling city street, a citizen shouting their concerns at a president,” he concluded.

Analysis: Changing Assad’s calculus

57640fb614d56d5e3046561db8453274 Analysis: Changing Assad’s calculus

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) — AMMAN, Jordan – and 10 European and Arab foreign ministers gathered here Wednesday night to again talk about helping Syria’s rebels.

Even as the international community discusses “grand strategy,” -Assad is taking decisive action.

With the help of thousands of fighters from , Iran and Iraq, he is close to achieving some of his largest military gains in two years.

Kerry, in a press conference, played down Assad’s military advances as “very temporary.” In truth, the and his foreign are gaining the upper hand in the conflict.

The Syrian opposition is in disarray; approving a major American military intervention is politically impossible in post-Iraq Washington; and a rift between Saudi Arabia and Qatar has slowed their delivery of weaponry to the rebels. Diplomatically, Washington’s key interlocutor is Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, one of Assad’s primary international defenders.

One key factor favors Assad’s survival. Assad, his Allawite allies, Hezbollah and Iran are “all-in” inside Syria. They are hurling vast amounts of manpower, weaponry and money into the fight.

On the other side, supporters of Syria’s rebels are still trying to decide just how much assistance to offer. There is a strategy, but it is incremental.

The American “grand strategy” is threefold. First, increase to the rebels, but not American aid.

Last month in Istanbul, Saudi Arabia and Qatar promised additional military assistance to General Salam Idris, the of moderate Syrian opposition forces. They also pledged to curtail their support to the hard-line Islamist fighters who now dominate the opposition on the ground in Syria.

A senior State Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity said the Saudis and Qataris appear to be keeping their word. They have supplied weaponry to Idris’s force and their shipments to hard-line Islamists appear to be slowing.

“Indicators are good,” the official said, “but we want to see more.”

Meanwhile, American diplomats are trying to unite Syria’s fractious opposition. Since the head of the Syrian National Coalition, Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, resigned last month, the group has struggled to name a leader. In Syria, the Istanbul-based coalition is still regarded as ineffectual. It is Islamist groups, flush with weapons, cash and hardened fighters, that dominate.

This week, the opposition council will expand from 60 representatives to between 90 and 100 members. This larger group will then choose a prime minister and other leaders.

Finally, Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov will host peace talks next month in . Theoretically, the opposition will be more militarily powerful and politically united.

At the same time, Russian officials have said that Assad’s prime minister, Wael al-Halqi, will attend peace talks in Geneva. The United States has also quietly dropped its objections to Iran being allowed to have some role in the talks.

In a best-case scenario, increased military support for the rebels and Russian pressure force will force Assad to bargain seriously. The centrifugal forces now unraveling Syria – sectarian tensions, jihadist fighters and foreign funding – will ebb.

“We don’t need more proof that now is the time to act,” Kerry said in his opening statements at the talks here. “What we need to do is act.”

American officials agree that their strategy depends on changing Assad’s calculation. “The balance of power on the ground must change,” said the senior State Department official.

Given the extent of support Assad is receiving from Iran and Hezbollah, that appears unlikely. Hezbollah fighters are playing a crucial role in the battle to take the strategic town of Qusayr. Iranians are now advising Syrian government units in Qusayr and around Damascus. Members of Iraqi Shia militias are fighting alongside Assad’s forces in several battles.

Assad and the Iranians are winning. If the Obama administration and its European and Arab allies want to support the rebels, they must do so now.

For the last two years, Washington and its allies have carried out a half-intervention. They provide enough aid to prolong the conflict but not enough to end it.

If the Obama administration and its allies are not going to sharply increase military assistance, their false talk of decisive aid should end. More empty rhetoric will prolong the bloodshed.

David Rohde is a columnist for Reuters, two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize and a former reporter for The New York Times. His latest book, “Beyond War: Reimagining American Influence in a New Middle East,” was published in April.

Kerry at Mideast corner of optimism and skepticism

0df193d9c9a8994b97b764cdfd87a9e5 Kerry at Mideast corner of optimism and skepticism

(PhatzNewsRoom / CNN Security) — If there is one thing Israelis and Palestinians can agree on, it’s that doesn’t lack enthusiasm.

Arriving in Israel on Thursday on his fourth trip since taking office, the secretary of state seems determined that will be enough to coax Israelis and Palestinians into restarting long-stalled talks.

Kerry has made it clear the Israeli-Palestinian issue will be the centerpiece of his tenure as America’s top diplomat and hopes solving it will be his legacy.

He has spent more time on this issue than any other, is in almost daily contact with Israeli Netanyahu and speaks with Abbas several times a week.

Kerry is confident he is the man to solve the conflict, now a half-century-old. Kerry feels the decades he has spent working on this issue and longstanding relationships with the has earned him the trust needed to hammer home a deal.

But U.S. officials lament that Kerry still acts like a senator – mostly working the issue with input from only a few close aides and leaving the majority of the State Department’s senior staffers out of the loop.

Even with the parties themselves, Kerry has been tight-lipped about his peace plan. But Israeli and say he has begun to lay out broad strokes on how to get the parties back to the table.

The package Kerry is working on is said to include confidence-building measures by both sides aimed at creating a more fertile climate for talks.

In addition to a for restarting negotiations and for Israel, Kerry is also trying to increase economic development and private investment in the West Bank.

All sides recognize this as a key aspect for the creation of a Palestinian state and Palestinians have long complained that over the West Bank, with its military check points and travel restrictions, has been the main impediment to their economic growth.

Arab states are also heavily involved in Kerry’s strategy, who was recently able to persuade the 22-member Arab League to reintroduce a decade-old peace offer to Israel with new incentives to sweeten the deal – a significant development given the absence of in more than four years.

Neither side doubts Kerry’s good intentions and his clear sense of mission. What is missing is a tangible progress as a result of Kerry’s efforts, and faith those efforts will bear fruit.

More importantly, neither Israelis nor Palestinians have matched Kerry’s enthusiasm with actions that indicate they are serious about renewing the peace process.

Before sitting down with Kerry on Thursday, Netanyahu acknowledged the American’s efforts, telling him, “You’ve been working at it a great deal.”

“It’s something I want. It’s something you want. It’s something I hope the Palestinians want as well,” Netanyahu said. “And we ought to be successful for a simple reason: When there’s a will, we’ll find a way.”

Kerry returned the praise for the Israeli leader, thanking him for the “seriousness” with which he is approaching a possible resumption of talks.

Yet last week Kerry had to phone Netanyahu to voice U.S. concern at Israel’s plan to legalize four unauthorized settler outposts in the West Bank.

American officials point to Israeli restraint in recent weeks from issuing new bids for Jewish settlement construction as a gesture to the Palestinians in advance of talks.

But the government continues to approve plans for new homes in certain settlements as part of previous agreements. The Palestinians have said they will not return to the table while Israel continues to build.

They also insist Israel releases Palestinian prisoners and accept the pre-1967 border as the contour of a future Palestinian state before talks can begin.

Israeli officials say Palestinian preconditions call into question Abbas’ seriousness about negotiations.

“The Palestinians are on negative automatic pilot,” one senior Israeli official said. “John Kerry is doing some very good work, and we will be very disappointed if President Abbas doesn’t pick up the ball.”

But Palestinians consider these issues Israeli obligations that go the heart of the mistrust they have for Israeli intensions and unless they are met, talks would be pointless. They say Netanyahu wants negotiations, but is unwilling to make peace.

“What we are staying is give (us) negotiations that have credibility, meaning legality and bring Israel to compliance and we will negotiate,” Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the executive committee of the PLO, told CNN.

“People see a lot of motion but haven’t seen results yet. Palestinians have been twice bitten by all this motion without any substance without any results. The Palestinians are understandably extremely skeptical because the moment they see the U.S. administration willing to stand-up to Israel and Israeli violations then they will take these steps seriously,” she said.

Palestinian officials say they are working on a “day-after” strategy if Kerry does not meet a June 7 deadline for introducing a proposal for talks. This strategy includes plans to seek membership in key international organizations.

Last September, the Palestinians won recognition from the U.N. General Assembly as a non-member state. This upgraded diplomatic status gives them access to U.N. bodies. Now Israel fears the Palestinians will seek membership in international agencies like the International Criminal Court, where it can press for war crimes charges against Israel.

None of this points to positive prospects for Kerry’s diplomatic efforts. Kerry acknowledged the uphill battle Thursday at his meeting with Netanyahu.

“I know this region well enough to know that there is skepticism; in some corridors, there’s cynicism,” he said. “And there are reasons for it. There have been bitter years of disappointment. It is our hope that by being methodical, careful, patient, but detailed and tenacious, that we can lay out a path ahead that could conceivably surprise people, but certainly exhaust the possibilities of peace.”

Kerry’s words may seem well-worn and cliché to a war-weary region, but they should not be taken for granted.

After years of complaining that the United States was not fully invested in the peace process, Israelis and Palestinians now have an American secretary of state willing to devote considerable time and political will to solving the conflict. It remains to be seen whether the parties will seize upon his determination and do some of the hard work themselves to help him solve it.

Syria opposition struggles to forge transition plan before talks

e4cc1d2ecae067d8c5414c0513a871e7 Syria opposition struggles to forge transition plan before talks

(Reuters) – Syria’s divided have failed to back a plan by their outgoing leader for President Bashar al-Assad to cede power gradually to end the country’s , highlighting the obstacles to talks expected next month.

The 16-point plan proposed by Moaz Alkhatib, who resigned as head of the Western-backed opposition National Coalition in March, urges Assad to hand power to his deputy or prime minister and then go abroad with 500 members of his entourage.

Alkhatib’s proposal appeared to win little support from other Syrian at a three-day meeting in to decide how to respond to a U.S.-Russian proposal to convene peace talks involving Assad’s government next month.

The coalition is under international pressure to resolve internal divisions ahead of a conference Washington and Moscow see as crucial to hopes of ending two years of civil war which has allowed al-Qaeda linked militants a growing role in Syria.

Looming large over the Istanbul meeting, which began on Thursday, is the shadow of , the main Arab of the opposition, which according to coalition sources is pushing to have the transfer of power in Syria top the agenda in .

“Saudi Arabia is not happy that Geneva does not look like it will lead with the exit of Assad on day one,” a senior coalition source said.

Opposition leaders said the coalition was likely to attend the planned , which could take part in Geneva in the coming weeks, but doubted it would produce any immediate deal on Assad’s departure.

Coalition spokesman Khaled Saleh said the 60- supports “any conference that helps transition the situation into an elective government away from the dictatorship” but would not go without indications Assad is on his way out.

Assad, who has defied Western and Arab calls for him to go, has not confirmed his government would attend the peace talks, although Russia said on Friday his administration had agreed in principle to attend.

NEW LEADERSHIP

Syria’s opposition in exile also aims to elect a coherent leadership during the talks in Istanbul.

It has been rudderless since the resignation in March of Alkhatib, a respected Damascene cleric, who had floated two initiatives for Assad to leave power peacefully.

His latest plan, posted on his Facebook page, calls on Assad to step down in favor of Prime Minister Wael al-Halki or Vice-President Farouq al-Shara, a veteran politician who has kept a low profile since the revolt began in March 2011, prompting opposition claims last year that he planned to defect.

Alkhatib said Assad should respond within 20 days and that he should then be given a month to dissolve parliament. Once Assad had ceded power, his government should stay in office for 100 days and restructure the military before handing over to a transitional government “which should be agreed upon and negotiated within the framework of international assurances”.

Opposition figures in Istanbul were dismissive.

“He has the right to submit papers to the meeting like any other member but his paper is heading directly to the dustbin of history. It is a repeat of his previous initiative which went nowhere,” a senior coalition official said.

Assad and his father before him have ruled Syria for four decades. He has vowed to defeat what he calls the “terrorists” behind an uprising that began with months of peaceful protests. His violent response eventually ignited an armed revolt.

More than 80,000 people have been killed in what is now a full-scale civil war that has dragged in Lebanon’s guerrillas and is spilling into other neighboring countries.

Washington has pressured the opposition coalition to resolve its divisions and to expand to include more liberals who can act independently of Islamists.

“The international community is walking a little faster than the opposition. It wants to see a complete list of participants from the Syrian side for Geneva and this means that the coalition has to sort its affairs,” a European diplomat said.

Burhan Ghalioun, a strong candidate to become the new head of the opposition, said the coalition was likely to agree to go to Geneva because it did not want Assad to gain political advantage from the meeting, although, he said, it was unlikely to produce any deal for a transition of power.

Other possible candidates include Ahmed Tumeh Kheder, a prominent opposition campaigner from the eastern province of Deir al-Zor, which borders Iraq’s Sunni Muslim heartland; Louay al-Safi, a professor who has taught in the United States; and acting coalition president George Sabra, a Christian who led pro-democracy demonstrations early in the uprising.

(Additional reporting by Oliver Holmes in Beirut, Thomas Grove in Moscow; editing by Nick Tattersall and Philippa Fletcher)

China says hopes visit of North Korean envoy can ease tension

f64225bc2e605bd51313224a08c0dd5e China says hopes visit of North Korean envoy can ease tension
(Choe Ryong-hae (C), director of the General Political Bureau of the ’s Army (KPA) of North Korea, walks with Chinese Ambassador Liu Hongcai (2nd R) before departing Pyongyang airport for China, in this May 22, 2013 picture released by the North Korea’s KCNA news agency in Pyongyang. Credit: /KCNA)

(Reuters) – China hopes that this week’s visit by a senior North Korean envoy can ease tension in the region and help spur efforts to rid the of , a said on Friday.

Choe Ryong-hae, a special envoy of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, met in the highest-ranking visit by an official from Pyongyang in about six months.

“We hope that this visit can ameliorate the present tension on the Korean peninsula and give new impetus to pushing for the of the peninsula,” ministry spokesman Hong Lei said at a daily briefing.

On Friday, Choe met General Fan Chonglong, vice chairman of China’s powerful , who warned Choe about tension on the peninsula threatening peace.

“In recent years, the state of affairs around the Korean peninsula frequently turns into one escalation of tensions after another,” China’s Xinhua state news agency cited Fan as saying.

“The conflicting strategies of all parties have intensified, jeopardizing peace,” Fan said.

Choe responded by saying peace could not be assured although North Korea wanted it in order to build the country, and it was willing to work with all sides in solving problems.

“The situation on the Korean peninsula and in Northeast Asia is complex and extraordinary, and there is no guarantee of peace,” Xinhua cited Choe as saying.

“The North Korean people need a peaceful and to build their country,” Choe was quoted as saying. “The North Korean side wishes to work together with all parties and, through dialog, seek a means to resolve the problem.”

On Thursday, Choe told another senior Chinese official that North Korea was willing to return to talks, although the prospect for those in the near future is dim.

Tension has been mounting between North Korea and China even though China is the North’s most important economic and political backer.

Ties have been hurt between the two supposed allies by the North’s third nuclear test in February, despite China’s disapproval, and by China agreeing to U.N. sanctions on the North in response and starting to put a squeeze on North Korean banks.

(Reporting by Terril Yue Jones; Editing by Robert Birsel)

Pentagon responds to GAO report on propaganda

62a7668f5f55fb400a6822f4ea3df145 Pentagon responds to GAO report on propaganda

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) — In this Q & A, . Col. James Gregory responds to criticism of the ’s propaganda programs in a report obtained by USA TODAY. The military calls propaganda programs Military Information , or MISO.

The GAO cites three “weaknesses” in how the Pentagon judges the effectiveness of the programs.

Q: The first, “without comprehensive tracking of MISO activities, the Pentagon and Congress do not have a complete picture of Defense Department’s MISO activities and the federal resources used to support them.”

A: The Defense Department is revising both its tracking and reporting requirements such that the Geographic Combatant Commands, with the support of both the and U.S. , can more accurately and completely account for and report their MISO activities. Recently published guidance codifies this requirement and places the Defense Department on the road to a more complete picture of MISO and other information-related capabilities in each of the areas of responsibility.

Once a quarter, the Defense Department submits an exhaustive report of all MISO activities to key . This report, often well in excess of 100 pages, provides comprehensive tracking of all MISO activities and the resources used to support them. After eight such quarterly reports had been submitted, the Committee on Appropriations included in its report on the Defense Department appropriations bill specific laudatory language for the efforts of Defense Department to improve government and oversight; “The Committee appreciates the significant oversight and attention the Department has given to these programs and believes that progress is being made to address the Committee’s concerns.” Further, it concluded that, “The Committee appreciates the Department’s efforts to provide more detailed information regarding the budgets for these activities.”

Q: Second, lacking the adequate assessments, “it will be difficult for the Defense Department to identify the overall impact” of MISO activities and determine where changes should be made.

A: US Special Operations Command has requested and the Congress has allocated specific funds for assessment of the effectiveness of MISO activities. The initial pilot effort under this program proved so successful at demonstrating the effectiveness of MISO when discretely assessed that the program is being expanded to more comprehensively assess these activities. This program will establish criteria for success that enables assessment of Military Information Support Teams’ effectiveness to include termination criteria. Once standardized and accepted, geographic combatant commands and supporting theater special operations commands can better measure MIST progress. Additionally, a quarterly assessment of MISO activities is included in our report to Congress so that direct return on investment determinations can be made. The assessment is now listed parallel with the funds expended in a comprehensive and exhaustive spreadsheet. Commanders at all levels compile the cumulative effects across the full range of programs into their assessment report narratives to give a holistic picture of the combined effects of multiple programs within a specific region or focused on a particular group or issue.

Q: Third, “the absence of clearly-defined end goals” means the Defense Department “does not have reasonable assurance that it is putting resources into countries where MISO capabilities are needed.”

A: The development of plans to include benchmarks, milestones, and end goals for MIST deployment requires that the U.S. ambassador in the supported country, the Commander, (Special Operations Command) and the Geographic Combatant Commander all agree that the deployment and employment of the MIST is consistent with the Embassy’s Mission Strategic Plan, the Combatant Commander’s Theater Campaign Plan and (Special Operations Command) Trans-regional MISO Program. It is only when there is a commonality of objectives and purpose among these the documents that the Embassy’s request for MISO support results in an approved mission. The ambassador’s cable that requests the force explains the parameters of the mission and serves to guide the decisions as to whether the goals of the mission are being reached. Revised policy in soon to be published Defense Department Instruction O-3607, “Military Information Support Operations,” will emphasize the planning requirement and direct Geographic Combatant Commands to work closely with (Special Operations Command) to develop effective plans for all stages of MIST operations.

Obama speech to focus on drones, Gitmo

130516164138 01 inside guantanamo 0516 horizontal gallery Obama speech to focus on drones, Gitmo
(Guantanamo Bay’s detention facility opened in 2002 with 700 detainees. More than a decade later, 166 remain and more than half are in political limbo, waiting for the Obama administration and Congress to decide whether to close the prison. The frozen status of the detainees has led to hunger strikes, which grew from about a half-dozen inmates at first to more than 100 now.)

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Obama to lay out framework and legal rationale for counterterror policy
He will make case that al Qaeda weakened, but that new dangers out there
U.S. acknowledges for first time four Americans killed in drone strikes overseas since 2009
Administration considering a shift in drone operations from CIA to military

Washington () — From the targeted killing of Americans overseas to the future of the at Guantanamo Bay, President Barack Obama will lay out the framework and legal rationale for his administration’s in a widely anticipated speech on Thursday.

Administration officials tell CNN that Obama will use the speech to continue to call on engagement with Congress on aspects of , more transparency in the use of , and a review of threats facing the United States.

He will make the case that the al Qaeda terror network has been weakened, but that new dangers have emerged even as the U.S. winds down operations in Afghanistan after more than a decade of war triggered by the 9/11 attacks.

Threats that have emerged come from al Qaeda affiliates, localized , and homegrown terrorists.

The address will also build on remarks Obama made in his annual State of the Union address earlier this year when he said his administration works “tirelessly to forge a durable legal and to guide our counterterrorism efforts.”

It also comes on the heels of a couple confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill for members of Obama’s national security team where a pitched political battle over the use of drones was waged.

At John Brennan’s confirmation hearing to be CIA director, Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky mounted a 13-hour filibuster demanding the administration detail whether it would be legal to strike suspected American terrorists on U.S. soil.

Attorney General Eric Holder responded in a letter to Paul that the president did not have such authority.

In a letter to congressional leaders on Wednesday, Holder disclosed the administration had deliberately killed Anwar al-Awlaki, an and radical Muslim cleric who was said to be the face of the al Qaeda franchise operating in Yemen.

Holder said he was actively plotting to attack the United States and so targeting him was justified legally and from a policy standpoint.

“This disclosure was also intended to coincide with the speech the president will give (Thursday) in which he will discuss our broader counter-terrorism strategy – including the policy and legal rationale for our use of targeted, lethal force against al Qaeda and its associated forces,” a White House official told CNN.

The letter also disclosed that three other Americans were killed overseas in counterterror strikes but that those suspected terror figures were not deliberately targeted by the United States.

In an interview with CNN Chief White House Correspondent Jessica Yellin last year, Obama said the drone issue was a daily “struggle” for him.

“That’s something that you have to struggle with,” he said. “Because if you don’t, it’s very easy to slip into a situation in which, you end up bending rules, thinking that the ends always justify the means. That’s not been our tradition. That’s not who we are as a country.”

The administration is considering shifting lethal drone operations currently run by the CIA over to the military “due to a desire for greater transparency in who is being targeted,” a U.S. official told CNN earlier this week.

By law, the military is not able to act in the covert way the CIA can in this particular arena, and must answer to Congress.

In his confirmation hearing, Brennan expressed a desire to move the agency away from paramilitary operations, and back to traditional areas of espionage.

“The CIA should not be doing traditional military activities and operations,” he said.

Another flashpoint Obama will discuss is the fate of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention facility.

While he worked to close it early in his first term, Congress enacted significant restrictions on the transfer of detainees from the prison that made its closure impractical.

Earlier this year, the State Department reassigned the special envoy who had been assigned in 2009 to deal with closing the facility and lowered the post’s profile by assigning the job to the department’s legal adviser’s office.

“Guantanamo hasn’t been a full time job for a year,” one senior administration official told CNN earlier this year in reference to the congressional restrictions on the repatriation of detainees who have been cleared for release.

But with more than half the facility’s 166 inmates engaging in various forms of hunger strike, more than 20 of them being force fed, the failure to close the facility established in 2001 is a continuing problem for the administration.

There are some 86 inmates at Guantanamo that have been cleared for transfer, 56 of them from Yemen.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday the Obama administration was ready in the coming weeks to jump start efforts to close the prison – including lifting the prohibition on sending detainees to Yemen.

“We’re in the process of working on that now, we’re looking at candidates,” who could lead the process of helping close Guantanamo, Attorney General Eric Holder said at a press conference earlier this month. “The president has indicated that it’s too expensive, that it’s a recruitment tool for terrorists, it has a negative impact on our relationship with our allies, and so we’re going to make a renewed effort to close Guantanamo.”

Syrian rebels, U.S. disagree on peace talks

faa57466347751b860377d1cf1ad8243 Syrian rebels, U.S. disagree on peace talks

Story Highlights

Syrian ’s stand is in direct conflict with the push by the U.S.
urged the Syrian government to attend the proposed peace talks
Iran, a chief ally of Syria’s Bashar Assad regime, may attend the negotiations

(PhatzNewsRoom / AP) — ISTANBUL — The Syrian opposition said Wednesday it welcomes the promise of increased U.S. involvement in finding a solution to two years of war, but that it would not accept peace talks if top members of the regime of Bashar Assad are involved.

The stand of the country’s leading , the Syrian National Coalition, is in direct conflict with the peace talks that the Obama administration are seeking to help organize next month in .

Secretary of State John Kerry urged the Syrian government Wednesday to attend the proposed peace talks that would also include Russia, a chief patron of Syria that has refused to support rebel demands that Assad be forced out in return for peace.

“We hope the U.S. will lead the international role to solving the conflict,” said Khaled Saleh, spokesman for the Syria National Coalition. “The coalition welcomes any solution as long as it meets the democratic aspirations of the Syrian people but it must start with the departure of Assad.”

Saleh repeated that the rebellion needs the United States and other Western nations to impose a no- over Syria to stop Assad’s warplanes as well as strategic on . Kerry on Wednesday threatened to give non-lethal aid, such as medical kits and food, to the rebels if Assad did not join talks.

The back-and-forth seems to indicate that Kerry’s endeavor on behalf of President Obama will satisfy none of the principals involved in the conflict. Kerry met with in Jordan on Wednesday to win for the peace talks.

The finer details of the proposed Geneva talks have yet to be ironed out while the presence of Iran, a chief ally of the Assad regime, has not been ruled out. Speaking in Cairo, Lakhdar Brahimi, the United Nations-Arab League mediator, said that both the opposition and regime are preparing to take part in the conference.

Diplomacy has so far failed to stop the violence in a conflict the United Nations says has cost the lives of more than 80,000 people and forced more than 1 million to flee Syria’s borders. SNC members will gather in Istanbul on Thursday for a three-day meeting to elect a president and decide if it will attend the Geneva conference.

Speaking with USA TODAY last week, interim SNC President George Sabra said he held little hope for the joint U.S.-Russian diplomatic effort and would not commit to attending talks before seeing who would be invited from the regime’s side. Russia has made statements that Assad’s regime was overreaching in its attempts to stay intact, but it has not said it would seek to force the leader out.

“Assad is threatening the entire region as we’ve seen in Turkey and Lebanon recently and I think Russia is starting to recognize it is making a mistake,” Saleh said. The (Geneva) conference is an example of that.”

Analysts said the call for talks represents a change in U.S. policy by not insisting that Assad agree to vacate his position immediately.

“The goal of the U.S. is to help bring about a solution by bringing the regime and the opposition together,” said Fawaz Gerges, director of the Middle East Center at the London School of Economics. “This is a major shift — the U.S. no longer insisting on Assad’s departure as a precondition to talks.”

“It’s important because what John Kerry is trying to do now is to convince America’s regional allies and the allies of the opposition, in particular Turkey and Qatar, to at least convene in Geneva and to convince the political opposition to take it seriously and form a negotiating team to go to Geneva,” he said. “The U.S. is acting now because it’s afraid that war could expand into regional war.”

Oklahoma tornado rips away safety of school

0e8bdbb06ec1263f930917661335af06 Oklahoma tornado rips away safety of school
Workers continue to dig through the of Plaza after a tornado moved through Moore, Okla.(: Sue Ogrocki, AP)

Story Highlights

Plaza Towers Elementary sat directly in the path of the tornado
Seven of the 24 killed by the tornado were students at Plaza Towers
decided to keep students on campus during the tornado

(PhatzNewsRoom / ) — MOORE, Okla. — Kelly Nichols ran up to the front door of Plaza Towers Elementary to retrieve her 9-year-old son, Ethan, and had to stop to catch her breath: the school’s front glass façade had been pulverized, the roof was gone, walls had been punched in, and a car lay flipped inside the main .

The muscular tornado that mauled through town moments earlier had pummeled the school. Ethan was inside.

“That was the worst moment,” Nichols, 36, said on Wednesday, as she picked through the ruins of her home, which is two blocks from the school. “I’ve never felt like that in my life.”

Plaza Towers Elementary sat directly in the path of the tornado that ravaged Moore and parts of on Monday. Unlike past tornadoes, this one into town just past 3 p.m., when students were still in class. School officials made the difficult, though oft-rehearsed, decision to keep students on campus.

That decision turned deadly at Plaza Towers. Seven of the 24 people killed by the tornado were students at the school, including at least four third-graders who huddled in the same building as Ethan, a second-grader, Nichols said. Briarwood Elementary, less than two miles west, was equally damaged by the storm but no students died there. Neither of the schools had safe rooms.

Moore Public Schools Superintendent Susan Pierce said earlier this week that the district launched its crisis plan as soon as officials learned of the impending .

“When our children are at our schools, they are in our care,” Pierce said. “When it was time to shelter, we did just that.”

School officials haven’t released details of what happened inside Plaza Towers on Monday. But interviews with parents whose children attend there offer a glimpse into those terrifying moments when an EF5 tornado roared into their classrooms.

Kristopher Lawson, 33, had just gotten home from work when the TV stations started to warn of a large tornado forming in the area. He hopped in his car and sped across the street to Plaza Towers to get his son, Chandler, a second-grader, who was in the back building. A school official told him they were keeping the students at school but he was free to get him “at your own risk,” Lawson said.

Lawson got Chandler from his classroom and told him to run to the car. They sped off to Lawson’s father’s home across town, which has a storm shelter.

The decision to get Chandler was an easy one, he said.

“I wanted him with me, no matter what,” Lawson said. “I’d feel horrible if I’d left him in there.”

Nichols was home when the TV stations showed a tornado touching down and headed her way. She had attended grade school at Plaza Towers, was head of its Parent Teacher Association and knew the routines school officials practiced for sheltering students on campus during storms. She decided to leave Ethan in school rather than get him.

“I figured the kids will be safe in school,” she said. “I didn’t think (the tornado) could do that to a school.”

She jumped in her pickup truck and drove north, away from the path of the storm. When she returned, her neighborhood had been transformed into an unrecognizable landscape of flattened homes and the school was a clump of debris and rubble. As she ran to the school, its principal, Amy Simpson, ran out, screaming for help, Nichols said.

“I kept saying, ‘Where’s Ethan? Where’s Ethan?’” she said. “All that mattered was getting him out.”

When Ethan finally emerged, his face masked in blood from a small cut over his eye, Nichols pulled him into a massive hug. “I just lost it,” she said. “I never felt so helpless in my life.”

Holder: Drone strikes have killed four Americans since 2009

120928065457 05 drones dod horizontal gallery Holder: Drone strikes have killed four Americans since 2009
(A MQ-1 Predator UAV assigned to the California Air National Guard’s 163rd Reconnaissance Wing flies near the Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, California, on January 7, 2012. Iranian jets fired on a Predator on November 1 over the Persian Gulf, an incident the Air Force says took place over .)

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledges toll in letter to Senate chairman
Latest disclosure was classified until now; Obama asked Holder to release info
Admission comes one day before President Obama delivers speech on terror policy
NEW: Holder letter reveals details on alleged bomb plots involving U.S. aviation

Washington (CNN) — Counterterrorism drone strikes have killed four Americans overseas since 2009, the U.S. government acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday, one day before President delivers a major speech on related policy.

In a letter to Chairman Patrick Leahy, Attorney General Eric Holder said the United States specifically targeted and killed one , al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, in 2011 in Yemen, alleging he was plotting attacks against the United States.

The letter provided new details about al-Awlaki’s alleged involvement in bomb plots targeting U.S. aviation.

Holder also said the Obama administration was aware of three other Americans who had been killed in counterterrorism operations overseas.

Holder said Samir Kahn, Anwar al-Awlaki and Jude Kenan Mohammed were not targeted by the United States but he did not add more details about their deaths.

The letter represents the first U.S. admission that the four were killed in counterterror strikes even though their deaths had been reported in the media.

Abdul Rahman Anwar Al-Awlaki was the 16-year-old son of the al Qaeda cleric and was killed in Pakistan about two weeks after his father’s death.

Khan produced the English-language magazine Inspire for al Qaeda’s affiliate in the Arabian Peninsula, which included bomb-making instruction. He was killed alongside the elder al-Awlaki.

Mohammed, who was once on the FBI’s Most Wanted list, was indicted in July 2009 as part of a North Carolina-based terror ring. He was charged with plotting to murder, kidnap or maim persons overseas and provide material support to terrorists. Mohammed was never arrested and for a time reportedly was living in Pakistan.

The Justice Department did not say when he was killed or provide any details.

Obama will deliver long-promised remarks on Thursday at and will speak at length about the policy and legal rationale for how the United States takes action against al Qaeda and its affiliates, including the use of , according to a White House official.

Obama will discuss the administration’s rationale for why those strikes are legal and necessary, the official said.

Targeting Americans with in counterterror operations overseas was a controversy that flared publicly during confirmation hearings for CIA Director John Brennan earlier this year.

Senators aggressively sought the administration’s legal reasoning for those operations.

Some lawmakers were critical of the practice and questions were raised about whether drones might ever be used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism who were on American soil.

Holder said Obama directed him to release the latest details, which had been classified “until now.” He said the unprecedented disclosure was made as a way to build on Obama’s commitment in his earlier this year to “continue to engage” with Congress on counterterror efforts and to “ensure that they remain consistent with our laws and values.”

Holder noted in one of his own speeches last year he had made it clear the United States would only use lethal force against an American citizen “who is a senior operational leader of al Qaeda or its associated forces, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans.” He also said no American would be targeted unless he or she posed an imminent threat and could not be captured.

The senior al-Awlaki was believed by U.S. authorities to have inspired acts of terrorism against the United States. It was said his facility with English and technology made him one of the top terrorist recruiters in the world. He was considered the public face of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

But Holder said in his letter that it “was not his words that led the United States to act against him” but his “direct personal involvement” in the “planning and execution” of terror attacks against the United States that “made him a lawful target.”

For instance, Holder said al-Awlaki “planned a suicide operation” for Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow up a U.S.-bound jetliner.

Holder noted al-Awlaki directed Abdulmutallab to detonate his bomb, which was hidden in his underwear, only when the jet was over U.S. soil. The plot that ultimately involved a Delta Air Lines flight bound for Detroit on Christmas Day in 2009 failed.

The letter also provided new details about al-Awlaki’s alleged involvement in a 2010 plot to blow up U.S.-bound cargo planes with explosives hidden in printers. Holder said al-Awlaki was so involved he even participated in the development and testing of the explosives used in the plan that was foiled.

Calling the decision to use lethal force “one of the gravest our government” can face,” Holder said the operation targeting al-Awlaki received “exceptionally rigorous” legal review and additional policy screening by the administration. Congress was also briefed on the possibility of targeting the al Qaeda figure and informed once the decision was made in 2010.

In his letter Holder said Obama approved a policy document this week that “institutionalizes the administration’s exacting standards and processes for reviewing and approving operations to capture or use lethal force against terrorist targets outside the United States and areas of active hostilities.”