June 18, 2013

Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal

330ed7cc77eb9aec090bb89e168ac8cd Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal

NEW YORK (AP) — Union chief Billy Hunter said Thursday “it’s obvious the lockout will happen tonight” after players and owners failed to reach a new , potentially putting the 2011-12 season in jeopardy.

Despite a three-hour meeting Thursday and a final proposal from the players, the sides could not close the enormous that remained in their positions.

“The is too great,” Hunter said.

MORE: What is at stake in labor negotiations?

The CBA expires at midnight, after which all league business is officially on hold, starting with the free agency period that would have opened Friday.

said “with some sadness” he would recommend later Thursday to the labor relations committee that the first lockout since the 1998-99 season be imposed.

“Needless to say we’re disappointed that this is where we find ourselves,” said.

Hunter said he hopes the two sides will meet again in the next two weeks.

The last lockout reduced the 1998-99 season to just a 50-game schedule, the only time the missed games for a work stoppage. Hunter said it’s too early to be concerned about that.

“I hope it doesn’t come down to that. Obviously, the clock is now running with regard to whether or not there will or will be a loss of games, and so I’m hoping that over the next month or so that there will be sort of a softening on their side and maybe we have to soften our position as well.”

The players’ association seems unlikely, at least for now, to follow the NFLPA’s model by decertifying and taking the battle into the court system, instead choosing to continue negotiations. Hunter said last week he felt owners believe the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, which is debating the legality of the NFL’s lockout, will uphold employers’ rights to impose lockouts.

The ’s summer league in Las Vegas already has been canceled, preseason games in Europe were never scheduled, and players might have to decide if they want to risk playing in this summer’s Olympic qualifying tournaments without the ’s help in securing insurance in case of injury.

Training camps usually open the last week of September and the regular season about a month later.

Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal

help Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
009b06f38695de0d0d383c24bf894a9e Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
help Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
1df4af0e6e8f900d91267ca68edfd555 Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
help Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
7f14bbf0b0c13fca3af83ff82c0b71ca Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
help Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
7c7d24e16ce9807a51c9caae4d336d4f Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
help Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal
91aee22704ce22d64901b00c11bedef5 Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal

325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 Breaking News: Union says lockout ‘will happen’ after sides fail to reach deal

Greece crisis: Greek MPs face second austerity vote

2d91846d1e6864efa74a130c7db7b891 Greece crisis: Greek MPs face second austerity vote

( Blog/ ) – Greece’s parliament is to hold a second vote on its programme, which it needs to implement to secure the country further financial support.

The vote is about putting into practice the tax hikes, pay cuts, privatisations and public sector redundancies approved in principle on Wednesday.

The vote was a retreat from the “grave scenario of default”, the EU said.

Public reaction has been very hostile, and the debate has been accompanied by strikes and violent protest.

continued on Syntagma (Constitution) Square outside parliament overnight, as police fired at stone-throwing youths.

Calm now appears to have returned and the ’s Malcolm Brabant in Athens says Athenian street-cleaning crews have come out in force removing debris from two days of battles in the square.

Thursday’s vote

Debate starts at 0930 local time (0630 GMT)
Vote itself not before 1400
Roll-call vote with verbal response by MPs
Possible additional votes on individual articles
Government has a majority of eight over all other parties
Cabinet to meet after the vote

Police have restricted access to the city centre to prevent from obstructing heading to vote on the new law.

Some Athenians have accused the police of heavy-handed tactics, and newspapers have railed against what one called “an orgy of state terror”, our correspondent says.

Some accused the police of over-using tear gas.

Scores of people were treated for injuries and severe .

Government confident

MPs are not expected to vote before 1400 local time (1100 GMT), and it is not clear how many votes will need to be held to push the measures through.

“Start Quote

All that has happened is that a default has been avoided at a moment when Europe’s banks are still vulnerable”

image of Gavin Hewitt BBC Europe editor

Greece vote: A Pyrrhic victory

say they are confident that those who supported them in Wednesday’s vote, when the package was approved in principle by 155 votes to 138, would also vote for implementation, known as enabling legislation.

Its measures include:

The setting up of a privatisation agency
Preparation for privatisation of state-owned real estate
Tax increases
Curbs on public sector recruitment
Social security regulations

The opposition New Democracy party, which voted against the government on Wednesday, has said that it will support some elements of the bill involving privatisation and spending cuts.

“We will do what we can to support the government,” said MP Nikos Dendias, a former justice minister, quoted by Reuters news agency. “We will vote for two chapters of the bill today.”

Greek tragedy

Total Greek debt
An old drachma note and a euro note
Greece is about to get a second bail-out from the EU, aimed at helping pay its debts until 2014. It also has to agree more cuts as part of the deal.

Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos has offered some concessions on tax, one of the most contentious parts of the package.

Some Socialist MPs have said they will vote against individual clauses such as an increase in heating oil levy and a rise in the minimum tax threshold.

The vote will enable Greece to receive the latest tranche of a 110bn-euro (£98bn) loan in time instead of defaulting.

But analysts say the real challenge will come after the loan is secured, and there is concern about whether the austerity measures can be effectively implemented in the face of so much public hostility.

Wednesday’s vote prompted a furious response from protesters in Athens.

Sporadic violent clashes were continuing in the capital in the early hours of Thursday between masked protesters – armed with stones and sticks – and riot police firing tear gas and stun grenades.

Despite the unrest, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and European Council President Herman Van Rompuy welcomed the result as a “vote of national responsibility” paving the way for a second aid package.

Crucial dates

June 29: Parliament approves new austerity package
June 30: MPs to vote on details of implementing package
July 3: EU will sign off latest bail-out payment to Greece – 12bn euros – if both votes are passed
July 15: Without the 12bn euros, Greece will default

Commentators: Does vote change anything?

The package of tax rises and budget cuts – worth about 28bn euros over five years – had been championed by Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou.

Had it been rejected, Greece could have run out of money within weeks. The EU and the International Monetary Fund have demanded that the measures are implemented before they extend further loans to Greece.

Greek unions are angry that the government’s austerity programme will impose taxes on those earning the minimum wage, following months of other cuts that have seen unemployment rise to more than 16%.

Once passed, European officials will start to finalise the details of a second bail-out, worth an estimated 120bn euros, designed to help Greece pay its debts until the end of 2014.

Obama pushes GOP on taxes in debt ceiling talks

9db6b670d634512f6f73eb479e1b4d9d Obama pushes GOP on taxes in debt ceiling talks

Obama: Congress should act ‘right now’
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

NEW: Speaker Boehner insists a including tax hikes will not pass the House
Obama calls for the GOP to move away from “maximalist positions” in debt talks
Obama says the does not apply to the U.S. intervention in Libya
Obama says it is up to individual states to determine if they will legalize same-sex

Washington () — President Barack Obama called on lawmakers Wednesday to overcome the “selfish” of politics and “do their job” in order to strike a deal on raising the federal government’s current $14.3 trillion by the start of August.

People shouldn’t get “spooked,” but “the yellow light (is) flashing,” he warned. “This is urgent.”

Top have warned of potentially catastrophic if the ceiling is not raised by August 2, including skyrocketing interest rates and a plummeting U.S. dollar.

The president blasted congressional Republicans for refusing to consider raising taxes on the as part of any deal. Congress needs to be willing to “take on their sacred cows and do tough things” while moving away from “maximalist positions,” he said.

He said Congress should cancel upcoming summer vacations if a deal isn’t struck by the end of the week.

“I want everybody to understand that this is a jobs issue. This is not an abstraction,” he said. “If the United States government, for the first time, cannot pay its bills — if it defaults — then the consequences for the U.S. economy will be significant and unpredictable. And that is not a good thing.”

David Gergen: Will Obama’s barbs help or hurt?

Obama made his remarks during a wide-ranging news conference covering the state of the economy, the wars in Afghanistan and Libya, and hot-button social issues such as same-sex marriage. It came at a time of rising questions over Obama’s ability to maintain control of the political narrative and boost in his stewardship in the run-up to next year’s presidential election.

GOP leaders have shown no signs of yielding in their opposition to higher taxes as part of any grand bargain with the White House. Recent bipartisan talks led by Vice President Joe Biden collapsed over the tax disagreement.

“The president is sorely mistaken if he believes a bill to raise the debt ceiling and raise taxes would pass the (Republican-controlled) House,” Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said after Obama’s news conference.

“A debt-limit increase can only pass the House if it includes spending cuts larger than the debt limit increase; includes reforms to hold down spending in the future; and is free from tax hikes,” Boehner added. “The longer the president denies these realities, the more difficult he makes this process.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, insisted earlier in the day that Republicans will “refuse to let the taxpayers take the hit when it comes to reducing the debt.”

The debate is “about holding Washington accountable for a change,” McConnell said. “It’s about refusing to subsidize the Democrats’ irresponsible spending habits another day.”

For his part, the president ripped Republicans for protecting “millionaires and billionaires,” oil companies, hedge fund managers, and owners of corporate jets.

The wealthy, he said, can afford to pay higher taxes.

“You can still ride on your corporate jet. You’re just going to pay a little more,” Obama said.

Gloria Borger: Where are the adults?

At the same time, the president pushed Congress to act on a series of pending measures to help strengthen the economy faster, including easing the ability of entrepreneurs to get patents, providing loans to private companies for infrastructure development, and approving free trade agreements.

RELATED TOPICS

Barack Obama
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Libya
War Powers Resolution

Obama noted that America’s economy has gone through a series of major structural changes.

As a result, the country’s economic problems are “not going to be solved overnight,” he stressed.

Turning his attention overseas, Obama dismissed criticism that his administration failed to obtain clear congressional approval before committing U.S. military forces to the NATO-led campaign in Libya.

Some representatives and senators on both sides of the aisle argue the White House has violated the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which gives a president 60 days to get congressional approval for sending U.S. forces to war, followed by a 30-day extension to end hostilities.

The combined 90-day period ended last week.

Will Cain: The number that’s killing the economy

Obama insisted that the War Powers Resolution does not apply in the case of Libya.

The law was intended to avoid a repeat of a Vietnam-style war, he said. In contrast, “this operation is limited in time and in scope.”

“We have engaged in a limited operation to help a lot of people against one of the worst tyrants in the world,” the president said. “A lot of this fuss” over the U.S. intervention in Libya “is politics.”

It’s become a “cause celebre for some folks in Congress,” he asserted.

“We have done exactly what I said we would do” in Libya, Obama argued. America’s allies “have carried a big load when it comes to these NATO operations” while “we’ve sent reams of information” to Capitol Hill.

“The noose is tightening” around longtime Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, he asserted.

The president reiterated the administration’s stance that Gadhafi’s removal from power is “the primary way that we can assure that the overall mission in Libya of people being protected” is successful.

Obama’s claims regarding the War Powers Resolution echoed those made Tuesday by Harold Koh, a top State Department legal adviser, who argued before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the law does not apply to American forces in Libya because the U.S. mission is limited in terms of its scope, means, exposure of forces, and chances of escalation.

In short, administration officials believe the U.S. role in Libya does not meet the law’s definition of hostilities.

Obama, however, overruled contrary legal opinions put forward by both the Pentagon and the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in declining to seek congressional authorization, according to the New York Times.

On Afghanistan, Obama insisted that the United States and its allies “can be successful in our mission, which is narrowly drawn.”

The president, who recently announced the withdrawal of 33,000 American “surge” troops by next summer, declined to use the word “victory” in reference to winding down the Afghan military mission. He instead stressed the success of U.S. forces in dismantling al Qaeda and preparing Afghan forces to assume responsibility for the country’s security.

Noting this week’s bombing of Kabul’s Inter-Continental Hotel, he warned that the violence in Afghanistan will likely continue for “some time.”

Turning to the debate over same-sex marriage, Obama refused to provide new specifics about his personal opinion. A supporter of civil unions, he has indicated in the past that his views on the matter are “evolving.”

He noted, however, that his administration has stopped defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act against legal challenges.

Obama argued it is up to states to determine if they will legalize same-sex marriage, as New York recently did.

“The president, I’ve discovered since I’ve been in office, can’t dictate precisely how this process moves,” the president said.

The nation is “moving toward greater equality,” Obama added. “I think that’s a good thing.”

Can GooglePlus shoulder way into social circle?

c7c76eaa6beb1a59fb280690c9dcea6b Can GooglePlus shoulder way into social circle?

( Blog/ USA Today) – As social-networking boot up computers, they may need to add a site alongside their already bookmarked Twitter, and accounts: GooglePlus.

After Google on Tuesday unveiled its next into the social-media world, critics were left wondering if it will be worth their while.

GooglePlus promises easier communication between , but networking giant Facebook has no need to sweat that its estimated 750 million members worldwide will abandon the site, says Josh Bernoff, analyst at .

“They’re very unlikely to dump Facebook for GooglePlus,” Bernoff says. “GooglePlus will be successful for people who want to have a simple connection with a social circle that they have, whether it’s their book club or their Boy Scout troop.”

STORY: Google+ bids for social (network) standing

GooglePlus’ developers have a mission: to humanize the Internet. Google says the of real-world interactions get lost in today’s online tools. Such tools are broken and need to be fixed, Google says. “It’s certainly our first attempt that spans all of Google,” Google engineer Vic Gundotra says. “It’s a social circle. We don’t believe it’s a social network.”

Among GooglePlus features:

•Circles. You can divide your friend list into Google’s Circles. Perhaps a “circle” for parents or college buddies or — and only share with a particular circle.

. There’s a text-messaging system that allows multiple on-the-go users to all communicate together; sending one message will go to all others in the group .

If you’re part of a “small group of people who go out every Thursday night to go drinking, it’s much easier to use some of the features that GooglePlus has supplied,” Bernoff says

•Hangouts. When people want to alert friends that they want to chat by video, they can log into “Hangouts” and chat with many people at once or one-on-one. Facebook doesn’t yet offer this feature.

•Sparks. Tweaking Facebook News Feed concept a touch, GooglePlus’ “Sparks” is a content feed that streams from various interests that users type into a search engine.

While Google has a huge case of Facebook envy in social networking, GooglePlus is not much of a threat right now. The social-networking giant would have plenty of time to match Google’s features, Bernoff says.

Facebook said in a statement: “We’re in the early days of making the Web more social, and there are opportunities for innovation everywhere.”

However, what’s unknown is how consumers will respond to GooglePlus. It’s still in trial among a small group of people for testing. And several Google products — including Buzz, social site Orkut and Google Talk— never really caught fire with consumers.

GooglePlus is far more promising than the other pieces they’ve put together, but the “devil’s in the details,” Bernoff says. “It has a good chance to be successful, but that success is going to be really relatively modest compared to the huge juggernaut that is Facebook.”

The evolution of courting customs

d5f7023ed165658454af429fe78c9b36 The evolution of courting customs

( Blog/ Match.com) - Dating as we currently know it is actually a relatively new, concept that had once been something much more private and formal. Our dating — or “courting” — habits have always changed with the times, but some have lasted for . Here’s a look at some common courting practices throughout history, broken down from earliest to most recent practices.

and romantic ideals (Middle Ages, 1100-1500)
Many women long for a chivalrous type of guy who will open doors, pull out chairs, and let her order first, much like the and troubadours (traveling poets and musicians) of medieval times. These men knew their lady’s wants and desires always came first and foremost in love; winning her heart was their ultimate goal. Wealthy won a woman’s hand through brave deeds, while the poets won them over through their use of words and songs. These ideas were inspired by “courtly love,” which was a highly idealized and extravagant forbidden affair (mostly among the noble class) whose core beliefs were the of the lady, the instability of desire, and the ennobling power of love.

Arranged marriages and dowries (English Renaissance, 1558-1603)
In Elizabethan England, marriages were not based on mutual love or attraction. Similar levels of wealth and social status were much more important for a successful match — especially among the upper class — and was very much a during these times. When a suitable husband was found for a woman, her father paid a dowry to the groom’s family (usually money, land, or some other valuable possession) in exchange for his daughter’s hand in marriage. For the lower class, a woman’s dowry could be something as basic as a farm animal. Sometimes, wealthier families arranged for their children to marry into a friend’s family of similar status before either child could walk or talk. Arranged marriages are still an active practice in some cultures today, including parts of India.

Bundling (Colonial America, 1700s)
Many betrothed couples engaged in a practice known as “bundling,” which involves both the man and woman lying in bed together fully clothed. Talk about taking snuggling to a whole new level! This was a way to spend some quality time together without actually consummating the relationship. The woman would sometimes wear a nightdress tied at the bottom (the idea being that it would prevent any “heavy petting” activities). It’s still not fully understood why both parties would both remain fully clothed. Some scholars have defended the practice on the grounds that many homes in early America had very poor, heating conditions (if any). Beds were also in short supply, and lying in bed fully clothed was a necessity — both out of modesty and personal comfort. Bundling is still common in some religious communities.

Calling cards and visits (Victorian Era, 1837-1901)
Respectability was the defining trait of the Victorian Era. Proper etiquette and manners were everything, so a gentleman had to follow certain rules in order to successfully court a young lady. He first had to ask permission from the woman or her parents to visit, or “call,” at a particular time. When he arrived at her parents’ house, he would leave a “calling card” (much like a business card that only listed his name). Then, the couple would enjoy a very formal visit, such as drinking tea together or playing cards in the family’s parlor or sitting room. At least one of the woman’s parents would usually be present during such visits. The suitor would be allowed to call again if he impressed the young lady’s parents.

Courting candles (Gilded Age, 1869-1896)
Candles were used for more than just light in a family’s home before the widespread use of electricity — they also helped to distinguish worthy suitors. When someone came to call on a man’s daughter, her father would put a candle in a twisted wrought-iron holder. Once the wax burned down to the metal, the visit was automatically over. During these visits, the father would moved the candle according to how much he liked his daughter’s suitor; if he liked the man calling on her, the candle would be moved up to prolong the visit; if he disliked him, he could cut the call in half by moving the candle down instead.

Dating (United States, 1920-1939)
Courting changed dramatically in the early 20th century, mostly due to urban sprawl. Young people were moving out and planning fun, social nights on the town instead of sitting at home under their parents’ watchful eye. “‘Dating’, as opposed to ‘calling,’ started among the working class and young people in cities who didn’t have a parlor to sit in,” says Beth Bailey, social historian and the author of From Front Porch to Back Seat: Courtship in Twentieth-Century America. “More young people from small towns were drawn by the promises of city life and things like dance halls and music halls. Because those places cost money and the young men were the ones who had the money, they often paid. It became a rite of passage that the man would pay. ‘Dating’ was understood by people to be a sort of economic transaction. Money was at the center of dating in a way that it wasn’t at the center of the practice of calling.”

Particularly in the 1920s — a decade defined by excess and living in the moment — dating was an activity that more closely resembled a popularity contest than way to find a spouse. “The idea was to go out with as many people as possible, as visibly as possible, with someone as high a status as possible,” Bailey says. Some singles still clung to the idea of finding a spouse, while others, Bailey says, felt that “if you could only date one person, that’s kind of pathetic. Young people would go to dances and you would never dance with the same person you came with.”

Going steady (1945-1960)
After World War II, playing the field was out and settling down with one person was in. Perhaps this shift came from the thousands of young men who had gone off to war and came home with a renewed outlook on life. Or maybe it came from the thousands of young women who had gotten a taste of independence by getting a job and relying less on mom and dad. Either way, young people finally had the means to support themselves, and starting families of their own became an important goal for them. “People became obsessed with the idea of going steady,” Bailey says, and this became the model for the traditional family marriage idealized in the 1950s, lasting until the cultural revolution of the 1960s. “Women started thinking that dating was oppressive,” Bailey explains. “The attitude became, ‘If you date me and want something in return, I don’t want to be part of that.’” The ‘60s caused a major shift in common dating practices and had the single greatest impact on romantic relations in the 20th century. It would balance the traditional gender roles (among other things), empowering women to claim their own gender-based independence and helped lay the foundation for many of our current approaches to finding love and marriage.

Sara Hodon is a freelance writer based in Northeast Pennsylvania. She is a former columnist for Online Dating Magazine.

The New Marital Boundaries

04189d9f31d4fcd3d1df4f832b213429 The New Marital Boundaries

( Blog/ ) - In an era when anything goes, one woman explores the rules of remaining faithful. When do flirty e-mails and late-night drinks cross the line?

In my late 20s and early 30s, I had a male best friend I’ll call Peter. We were both straight and sometimes even single at the same time, but the was truly platonic on both sides. Nonetheless, I adored him, and he adored me back. We were like family, so close that I could go over to his apartment and wax my (okay, I did that only once, and I was in the other room) while he obsessed about his intense crush on a female lawyer at the law firm where he worked as an administrative assistant.

With Peter acting as , I fell in love with his best friend from high school. My friendship with Peter was unaffected; the three of us hung out in bars together, went to , met for dinner. But then Peter and his lawyer fell in love. And our friendship was … over. She couldn’t tolerate my close friendship with Peter, so she engineered its demise by bad-mouthing me to him. As soon as I heard this, irrational as it may have been, I no longer trusted Peter. I was heartbroken. They came to our wedding, just as we went to theirs, but there was no longer any sense of closeness between me and Peter. I couldn’t be comfortable with him, knowing how she felt about me.

After several easy, , my ran off the track and became bogged down in treacherous territory. Out of intense and a need for attention, I had a series of two or three ongoing with men I had crushes on — never sexual but highly charged and intense. I often drank too much at parties and flirted, sometimes outrageously. My husband was never jealous or possessive — in fact, he liked to flirt himself — but even so, I knew internally I was crossing lines, and it didn’t feel good, but I couldn’t stop myself; I felt as if I were starving. Transgressing felt like a survival mechanism; it enabled me to stay in my marriage without imploding. Finally, I even had a brief, desperate affair. I was intolerably unhappy, of course, and I needed to leave, but instead I stayed, or tried to, and ended up behaving badly. Two and a half years ago, after 12 years of marriage, I finally left for good.

Given my history, I hardly consider myself a poster girl for marital etiquette. But I do have strong ideas about these matters, based on my own experiences, namely that platonic opposite-sex friendships are healthy, crossing marital lines out of unhappy yearning is painful and humiliating, and it’s much better to leave a marriage, if it’s over or close to it, than stay and stray. And controlling jealousy is lunatic and pathetic.

Three years ago, a friend of mine found herself suspected of having an affair with a married male colleague. His wife spied on them, reading their e-mails and texts, watching them together, and gathering evidence, or so she thought — even though my friend has been happily married herself for 15 years. “We were definitely flirting,” says my friend, “and definitely hot for each other. But sleeping together? Never! To this day, she still thinks we were.” His marriage ended because of it. When I asked my friend if she regretted flirting with her colleague, she answered, “No! A strong marriage would have easily withstood it. He didn’t seem to love her. That was the point — not me. But she hates me with almost scary venom. I keep looking over my shoulder for a hit man.”

“It’s pathetic to think that in a marriage, you can no longer have friends of the opposite sex,” says my friend Cathi, a novelist who lives with her husband, Dan, a fellow writer and editor, and their two kids in a New England college town. “I have a few male friends whom I e-mail and occasionally see. Dan has never expressed jealousy about any of it, and I’m very glad; I’ve never done well with being controlled, but also it makes me appreciate him more to know he’s a grown-up about certain freedoms.”

Couples as secure as they are can tolerate a lot. “I did once go out drinking till all hours with a male friend,” Cathi remembers. “I was away on a book tour, so my husband never would have had to find out, but I told him anyway, because why not? I had nothing to hide. And in the end, at least part of why nothing happened is that I didn’t feel my husband deserved to have anything happen.”

On the other hand, such a trusting relationship affords Cathi the luxury of cavalierly tossing out “What I don’t know won’t hurt me” about her husband’s activities. In any case, any uncomfortable situations are neatly avoided by geographic distance. “Dan rarely sees any of his female friends because none live around here,” she says. “But even if he did, I don’t think I’d be jealous because I totally trust him.”

But even in the happiest of marriages, a content husband has been known to do a bit of harmless flirting. My sister Susan would practically encourage it if she could get her everlastingly loyal Dutch husband to partake. “I love seeing Alan flirt and flirted with,” says my sister, who runs a yoga center in Amsterdam. “He has a whole life in another town where he works as a high school art teacher, where God knows what goes down — we joke about the other family he has there — but I also deeply trust his dedication to our marriage. And given that the guy spends most of his time with ripe, hormonal, navel-pierced 16-year-olds, I never feel jealous, even when he spends a week in Rome each year with a giggling gaggle of them.”

Obviously, none of these marriages are in any danger of running off the same rails mine did. These wives all sound committed, mature, rational, and accepting of the flatlining of passion and romance that happens in just about every long-term marriage I’ve ever heard of. And their husbands are all devoted and true.

Now let me speak for the other half, as both a wife who did cross lines and a female platonic friend who was ousted by a possessive wife. I have developed, through these painful experiences, my own sort of inner compass. I understand that the urge to control — like the urge to cheat — often comes from a lack of true closeness with one’s spouse. Feeling insecure and threatened by another woman — or, conversely, feeling drawn toward another man beyond the enjoyable innocent fantasy — indicates that something is amiss in the union itself, something that needs addressing; the other person is often not the point.

If there’s a rift in the marriage — if someone feels neglected, frustrated, tempted by others, or unsure — then trouble can easily arise. My friend Peter’s wife no doubt sensed that his closeness with me was too intimate to be tolerable to her. She had to come first with him, and I was in the way. I understand that now.

Even secure, nonpossessive spouses want primacy with each other. “If Cam did have a purely platonic relationship with another female,” says my sister Emily, who lives in New Zealand with her husband and their four kids, “I would want to have first place with him, even timewise, or I probably would end up resenting the other woman, even if there was nothing going on between them.”

This also makes perfect sense to me. Six months after I left my husband, I fell in love with a much younger man. Now, after two years together, I feel this way about Brendan, as he does about me. Even though he and I are both guilty of misbehavior in prior relationships, we’re deeply devoted to each other. Neither of us has any interest in anyone else, and that, as they say, is that. When he goes out with a female friend, I’m not threatened or worried. And with my male friends, I am extremely conscious of boundaries, and I never even come close to violating them. The thought of doing so literally sickens me now; the memories from the last years of my marriage are still raw and painful. It gives me immense pleasure to be trustworthy, faithful, and true, to have the kind of romantic bond that inspires this.

I’ve never felt more boring or been happier.

Kate Christensen’s sixth novel is The Astral.

Does Revenge Ever Make a Scorned Woman Feel Better?

79a1248a58c0d1bcbfe9238190e9bd11 Does Revenge Ever Make a Scorned Woman Feel Better?

( Blog/ The Stir) – I can’t imagine having my destroyed. All of my beloved dresses and shirts. All of my , shorts, and jeans. As much as I hate shopping for that fit my woman parts in an appealing way, that last one would hurt the most. You don’t just into any ol’ store and stumble on a good fitting pair of pants. So I better not just home and discover that the ones I’ve managed to find have been bleached and sliced into fabric mulch.

It happened to a gal in Atlanta a few weeks ago after her lesbian lover finally relinquished the clothes she’d been asking for from their one-time shared . Turning more than $2,000 worth of gear into scarecrow stuffing ended up getting Sally Scissorhands arrested. Oh geez.

Revenge makes for good stories (and blog posts!) but have you ever regretted doing something to “get back” at your soured honey?

C’mon. You can share. Because let me be the first to say that I’m not passing judgment or looking down from on high at nan a person who takes the vengeful route. I’ve been known to pull a spiteful move if I think somebody’s trying to play me. I’ve just never gone the destroy-physical-property-and-run-the-risk-of-being-arrested route, mainly because I admit: I’m terrified of . Even for a few hours. Even for the of getting revenge on a dirty rat bastard, if I had one I wanted to get on.

Heck, as broke as everybody in my is, Lord only knows how long it would take them to wrangle up some bail money. So no thank you very much. I’ll stay on the right side of the law if you don’t mind.

That doesn’t mean I don’t respect other women when they take matters into their own hands and get creative with their random acts of revenge.

Back at my old apartment in the heart of the ‘hood, where vigilante justice reigns supreme and folks pull Jerry Springer-like on the daily, I watched a woman get out of her truck — in broad daylight, now — and break every single window in some blissfully unsuspecting man’s Ford Explorer. My girl even busted out his side view mirrors. I mean, she was thorough with her vandalism. Then she daintily placed a note under his windshield wiper and went back to work or school or the mall or wherever you go after you maul the glass in somebody’s vehicle in the middle of the afternoon.

Of course, I forgot I hadn’t checked my mailbox yet that day and suddenly felt compelled to go have a looksee right at that very moment. I just so happened to pass the victimized vehicle on my way. The note, scrawled in black Sharpie letters said, “I know you f—ed her. Now I’m f—ing you.”

Dayum. Dayyyyyuuuuummmm. I like her style. I wasn’t around when he came out of the house — I’m surprised I couldn’t hear his screams from anywhere in the 10-mile radius of Washington, D.C. — but I’m sure that’s a message he’ll remember for a mighty long time. I hope the extracurricular lovin’ was worth it, but I’m pretty sure in retrospect, he’d say it wasn’t.

Now there are times when revenge goes way over the top. I’m sure by now y’all have heard about the dude who took out a billboard to accuse his ex-girlfriend of aborting their unborn baby? I can’t even begin to imagine the kind of mean-spiritedness that goes into making that decision. Even though all’s supposed to be fair in love and war, that was hitting way below the belt, especially considering the woman he’s accusing maintains that the loss of their baby was because of a miscarriage, not a willful ending of the pregnancy. Now wouldn’t he qualify to be called and considered a certified ass if he was completely off the mark?

If vengefulness could be rated in spices, like salsa or Chipotle seasonings, mine would be mild with the potential to kick it up into a medium. I don’t even have a really juicy story about playing get-back and I’m slightly disappointed in myself. Still, I believe if you intentionally cross someone, you have to realize that you’re setting yourself up for, say, a busted windshield or a sliced up stack of clothing. That doesn’t make it the mature way to handle the situation. But sometimes, in the heat of an emotional overload, ration takes a backseat to revenge.

So just don’t do whatever it is that might get you caught up on the wrong side of the acting out and you should be a-OK, hmm?

Obama Lures Trade-Deal Support From Business

5491b7b9ed0d04180eb32ede8b0a5a77 Obama Lures Trade Deal Support From Business

( Blog/ Bloomberg) – President won support of the largest U.S. business lobbying groups while Republicans balked at his plans to attach aid for displaced workers to stalled trade deals with South Korea, Panama and Colombia.

The endorsement from groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents companies such as Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and PepsiCo Inc., came with a call for Republicans to drop their objections. It was a turnaround for business leaders, who in the past joined Republicans in criticizing Obama’s policies.

“For members of Congress who care about American jobs, this is a moment of truth,” Thomas Donohue, the Chamber’s president, said in a statement. “I urge members of both parties to seize a reasonable compromise and move the trade agenda forward.”

Consideration of the trade agreements, which have languished since 2007, got a boost yesterday when the Senate Finance Committee set plans for a hearing tomorrow on the accords. Draft legislation submitted by Democratic Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the committee chairman, with support from the Obama administration would attach Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers to the South Korea deal. Republicans protested connecting the two issues.

“I’ve never voted against a trade agreement before, but if the administration were to embed TAA into the Korea trade agreement, I would be compelled to vote against it,” Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told reporters. It makes the debate “needlessly complicated and contentious.”

Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, the panel’s top Republican, said he also opposed linking the trade deals with worker aid. Republican opposition means Democrats, who have split on previous trade deals with nations such as Mexico and Oman, must round up bipartisan support for the accords in the Senate.

Unusual ‘Configuration’

“This particular configuration is unusual,” said Michael Moore, a professor at George Washington University in Washington and an economist in the administration of President George W. Bush. “Certainly in the last 30 or 40 years, I can’t think of an example where you would have serious opposition from Republicans” to trade deals.

Obama reworked the three free-trade agreements completed by his predecessor, George W. Bush, in response to concerns among Democrats on issues such as labor rights. The administration has been pushing to get the deals approved by Congress before a recess in August.

Legislation to implement the agreements would be given fast-track treatment, a procedure that guarantees trade bills submitted to Congress by the president can’t be amended before an up-or-down vote.

‘Mock Markup’

“The road to this point has not been an easy one, but our economy needs these jobs and these opportunities,” Baucus said yesterday in an e-mailed statement.

“There really can be no more excuse for inaction,” John Engler, the president of the Washington-based Business Roundtable, which represents corporate chief executive officers, said in a statement. “Support for a broad, positive trade agenda enjoys a long bipartisan tradition in Congress, as do such programs as Trade Adjustment Assistance.”

What the Senate panel announced yesterday was a “mock markup” session, held before the administration submits the legislation, that gives lawmakers a chance to offer amendments. The administration can accept or disregard any amendments made in the hearing before sending the measure to Congress.

The Trade Adjustment Assistance program augments health and unemployment benefits to workers who lose their jobs because of overseas competition. As part of the stimulus legislation in 2009, it was expanded to include service workers such as call- center employees. The added benefits expired in February.

The proposal from Baucus and the White House would continue most of those benefits through 2013, and provide retroactive assistance to those left out so far this year.

Paying for Aid

To pay for the extended worker assistance, the measure includes a provision to reduce reimbursement rates for medical imaging such as CAT scans and MRI scans by $400 million over the next 10 years, which could hurt companies such as General Electric Co. (GE) The measure also would require prisons to submit the names and Social Security numbers of inmates in an effort to avert tax fraud, and would set fines for false unemployment- insurance claims.

In earlier incarnations, the trade assistance was extended for five years rather than two years.

“This is a great deal, but it puts us back to where we are now in two years,” said Howard Rosen, a fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, has long maintained that the worker aid “should be dealt with separately from the trade agreements, and that is how we expect to proceed,” Brendan Buck, Boehner’s spokesman, said in an e- mailed statement.

Losing Fast-Track

If the Republican majority in the House seeks to amend trade legislation Obama submits, the measure would lose its fast-track status, which wouldn’t necessarily be a setback in the House, where Republicans control the process, said Caitlin Webber, a Bloomberg Government trade analyst.

“But under that scenario, a House-passed Korea trade deal could die on the Senate floor without fast track,” Webber said.

John Brinkley, a spokesman for the South Korean embassy, declined to comment on the agreement, saying he hadn’t had an opportunity to review it. Carmen Mora, a spokeswoman for Panama’s embassy in Washington, didn’t return a call for comment.

Trade Preferences

The agreement “marks the beginning of the formal congressional review process toward approval” of the accords, said Gabriel Silva, Colombia’s ambassador to the U.S. “As the agreement was signed more than four years ago, we are pleased to see the pathway toward approval in sight.”

Representative Sander Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, said this week that he would oppose the free-trade agreement with Colombia, because the administration refused to write provisions on labor rights into the legislation.

The draft legislation for the Colombia accord from Baucus and the administration includes renewal of trade-preference programs for poor nations, which had expired in February.

The South Korea deal is the largest of the three pending accords. That deal was initially opposed by Ford Motor Co. and the United Auto Workers union until the Obama administration negotiated to scale back reductions of tariffs. Total trade in goods with South Korea climbed to $88 billion in 2010, making the deal the biggest for the U.S. since the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada in 1994.

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Drajem in Washington at Hidden Email Address; Eric Martin in Washington at Hidden Email Address

Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended

a3e334b52a65ca589c182d2e9c2646d8 Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Casino regulators on the British Channel Islands on Wednesday suspended the gambling license of , halting the company’s online card games and intensifying its legal problems in the U.S.

The Alderney Gambling Control Commission said in a statement it was immediately suspending Full Tilt’s license after an investigation prompted by earlier federal indictments in New York, accusing company executives and associates of , and other crimes.

Full Tilt officials did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

Online poker operations are illegal in the U.S. under a 2006 law that forbids financial institutions from processing payments related to illegal online gambling. Prosecutors in New York say employees of Full Tilt, Poker Stars and skirted this law by disguising payments, creating shell retailers online and pushing money through as sales for things like and flowers.

The Alderney commission said its internal investigation showed that Full Tilt employees and associates operated contrary to its gambling laws. It set a hearing on the matter for July 26 in London.

“The decision to suspend the eGambling license was in the public interest and, because of the and urgency of the matter, it required that immediate action be taken ahead of the regulatory hearing,” said Andre Wilsenach, the commission’s executive director.

PokerScout, a website that tracks online poker traffic worldwide, showed zero users playing on Full Tilt for Wednesday, down from an average of 9,000 at any given moment during the past week.

The commission’s move prompted gambling regulators in the Isle of Man to reaffirm the licensing status of PokerStars, the world’s largest online poker site that has faced the same legal trouble as Full Tilt.

“PokerStars continues to demonstrate compliance with its license conditions in the Isle of Man,” the Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission said in a statement. “PokerStars continues to offer withdrawals to any players who wish to withdraw their funds, including players in the USA to whom PokerStars does not currently offer real-money gaming.”

Withdrawals have been a sticky topic for players loyal to the sites.

PokerStars, Full Tilt and Absolute Poker have all taken steps toward agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice to repay players who deposited online funds with the sites. But only PokerStars has begun actually repaying funds.

The site said in a statement it has repaid about $120 million to Americans, keeping funds segregated from operating accounts.

PokerStars said it also remains in compliance with regulators in other jurisdictions including France, Italy and Estonia.

Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended

help Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
009b06f38695de0d0d383c24bf894a9e Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
help Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
1df4af0e6e8f900d91267ca68edfd555 Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
help Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
7f14bbf0b0c13fca3af83ff82c0b71ca Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
help Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
7c7d24e16ce9807a51c9caae4d336d4f Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
help Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended
91aee22704ce22d64901b00c11bedef5 Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended

325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 Poker: Full Tilt’s offshore gambling license suspended

Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga

0768aaaffa8c929809226cc2659b6875 Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
of Spain in action during his quaterfinal round match against of the United States on Day Nine of the Championships at the All and Croquet Club on June 29, 2011 in London, England.
(June 28, 2011 – Photo by Clive Brunskill/ Europe)

(PhatzRadio/ ) - , England — Each of the four men in Friday’s semifinals carries a particular burden beyond the obvious hardware at stake.

bears the weight of his country. hopes to keep his crown. craves the No. 1 ranking. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga wants to fulfill his talent.

VIDEO: Tennis Channel Day 9 recap
PHOTOS: The top shots from Wimbledon

It makes for a tantalizing matchup of firepower and feet power from four of the game’s biggest hitters and best movers: No. 1 Nadal vs. No. 4 Murray, and No. 2 Djokovic against No. 12 Tsonga.

Three of them — Nadal, Djokovic, Murray — have been to this stage at the All England Club more than once before.

But only Nadal, who is riding a 19-match winning streak on the lawns of London, has pushed past, including victories in 2008 and 2010 (he missed 2009 because of injury).

“I feel like if he plays like that, he’s probably the favorite on this stage,” American said after his 6-3, 6-3, 5-7, 6-4 quarterfinal loss to Nadal on Wednesday.

The interloper is Tsonga. The explosive Frenchman with the soft hands ended third-ranked ’s bid for a record-tying seventh with a stirring comeback from two sets down.

“He kind of crashed the party, but he did it in spectacular fashion,” ESPN’s Patrick McEnroe said.

Murray has the most on the line. The 24-year-old is trying to become the first British man to hold the trophy aloft in 75 years.

And he faces Nadal, who beat him in last year’s semifinals and holds an 11-4 head-to-head advantage, including two meetings on grass.

The key will be if Murray, sometimes prone to passive play, can summon enough offense to break down the Spaniard’s defensive wall.

“I haven’t done it at Wimbledon,” Murray, who is in his third consecutive semifinal, said after beating Feliciano Lopez 6-3, 6-4, 6-4. “I know come Friday I’ll have to play great tennis if I want to win.”

Most worrisome for Nadal is his left foot, which he injured during a fourth-round defeat of Juan Martin del Potro. Nadal said Wednesday he was frightened because the injury felt like the stress fracture he suffered in 2004 that sidelined him for four months. He concluded that defending his Wimbledon title was worth the risk.

“My foot is not fine,” said Nadal, who is taking an anesthetic to numb it during matches. “But, you know, we are in quarterfinals of Wimbledon. Is an emergency, so I had to play.”

Djokovic, who has reached his fifth consecutive Grand Slam semifinal, overcame 18-year-old Bernard Tomic of Australia 6-2, 3-6, 6-3, 7-5.

For the second time this month, Djokovic is one match away from realizing his lifelong dream of being No. 1. Federer ended that bid in the French Open semifinals. If the 24-year-old Serb can get past Tsonga, he is guaranteed the top spot in next week’s rankings.

“I’m very close to reaching the No. 1, but I try not to think about that too much,” said the reigning Australian Open champion, who is 46-1 this season.

Keeping that thought far from his mind is a good idea against Tsonga, who is 5-2 against Djokovic, though they have never met on grass.

Tsonga, showing new calm and self belief since splitting with his longtime coach in May, served spectacularly against Federer. The Swiss managed only one break point in the five-set contest.

“I think I improved a lot mentally,” said the gifted Tsonga, 26, who has struggled with injuries and lapses in motivation. “I played three years not far from the top 10, or in the top 10, and now I want more.”

The Muhammad Ali lookalike will have maintain his level to knock off Djokovic, who hasn’t played his best but beat Tsonga in both Grand Slam meetings on hardcourts at the Australian Open, including the 2008 final.

“He certainly has enough firepower,” McEnroe said of Tsonga. “He’s keeping it together mentally, which is huge. To be on his own has been good for him to mature a little bit. He will be the underdog, but it’s not as if he has nothing to lose.

“You never know when you’re going to be back here again,” McEnroe said.

Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga is a post from: PhatzRadio.com

 Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga

help Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
009b06f38695de0d0d383c24bf894a9e Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
help Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
1df4af0e6e8f900d91267ca68edfd555 Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
help Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
7f14bbf0b0c13fca3af83ff82c0b71ca Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
help Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
7c7d24e16ce9807a51c9caae4d336d4f Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
help Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga
91aee22704ce22d64901b00c11bedef5 Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga

325472601571f31e1bf00674c368d335 Wimbledon: Big stakes on line for Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Tsonga