May 21, 2013

'Disaster' feared as oil slick creeps to shore

0b82e3ffc553186f11b9615be23097c6 'Disaster' feared as oil slick creeps to shoreff8972975542de64030a7b12e30fcc06 'Disaster' feared as oil slick creeps to shore

Homeland Secretary Napolitano: This is a spill of national significance

The Coast Guard is investigating reports that oil has started washing ashore on the Gulf Coast from a leaking offshore well.

Up to 5,000 barrels of oil a day are thought to be spilling into the water after last week’s explosion on a -operated rig, which then sank.

has pledged “every single available resource” to help.

The US has been deployed to help avert a looming environmental disaster.

The Coast Guard said it had sent investigators to confirm whether crude oil had begun to wash up on parts of the Louisiana shoreline.

President Obama’s administration has banned oil drilling in new areas of the US coast pending investigations into the cause of the oil spill off Louisiana.

“No additional drilling has been authorised and none will until we find out what happened,” White House adviser David Axelrod told ABC television.

Last month President Barack Obama eased a moratorium on new offshore drilling.

‘Mind-boggling’

David Kennedy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration described the oil spill as a very, very big thing.”

He told the Associated Press news agency that the clean-up efforts could be “mind-boggling”.

An emergency shrimping season was opened on Thursday to allow fishermen to bring in their catch before it was fouled by the advancing oil.

The has designated the oil spill as an “incident of national significance”. This allows it to draw on resources from across the country.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has declared a state of emergency and asked for federal funds to deploy 6,000 National Guard soldiers to help with the clean-up.

The Louisiana coastline, with its rich shrimp and beds, is the most threatened by the spill. There are also fears of severe damage to fisheries and wildlife in Mississippi, Alabama and .

Navy vessels are helping to deploy booms to contain the spill.

President Obama has dispatched high-level administration officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, to the area.

He said they would “ensure that BP and the entire US government is doing everything possible, not just to respond to this incident, but also to determine its cause”.

Speaking at the White House, Mr Obama also said: “While BP is ultimately responsible for funding the cost of response and clean-up operations, my administration will continue to use every single available resource at our disposal, including potentially the Department of Defence, to address the incident.”

Meanwhile, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said there was no reason so far to reconsider the president’s recent decision to support plans for increased offshore drilling.

“Our focus right now is: one, the area, the spill; and two, also to ultimately determine the cause of it and see the impact that that ultimately may or may not have,” Mr Gibbs said.

‘Devastating’

Eleven workers are still missing, presumed dead, after the rig exploded on 20 April.

The US Coast Guard said earlier that up to 5,000 barrels of oil a day – five times the previous estimate – might now be leaking into the water.

BP’s chief operating officer of exploration and production, Doug Suttles, said the company was using remote operative vehicles (ROVs) to try to find out how much oil was leaking into the sea.

MAJOR OIL SPILLS
April 2010: Blast at BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig causes crude to spill at rate of up to 5,000 barrels (210,000 US gallons) a day
1991: 520m gallons deliberately released from Iraqi oil tankers to impede US invasion
1989: 11m gallons spilt into Alaska’s Prince William Sound in the Exxon Valdez disaster
1983: 80m gallons split off Iran over months after a tanker collides with drilling platform
1979: 140m gallons leak over nine months after a well explosion off Mexico’s coast
1979: 90m gallons leak from a Greek oil tanker after collision with another ship off Trinidad

BP in choppy waters after spill
In pictures: Efforts to contain leak
Send us your comments

“This is very, very difficult to estimate,” Mr Suttles told reporters.

“Down below the surface we actually can’t meter this oil so we can just observe it… what our ROV pictures show to us on the sea floor hasn’t changed since we first saw the leak… but what we can say based on what we’re picking up on the surface it looks like it is more.”

Mr Suttles estimated something between 1,000 and 5,000 barrels a day were leaking.

A resident of Bay Saint Louis in Mississippi, John Gerger, told the BBC the smell of oil was becoming stronger along the Gulf Coast.

“It’s as though a diesel truck is parked in the front yard,” he said. “The potential impact of the slick could be devastating on an area that has just recovered from [Hurricane] Katrina.

“Fishing and shrimping is such an important industry here, and could take a massive hit. Local fishermen have been advised to go out and try to recover as much as they can before the slick approaches land.”

Lawsuit

Efforts to stem the flow are being complicated by the depth of the leak at the underwater well, which is about 5,000ft (1,525m) beneath the surface.

Wednesday saw a US Coast Guard crew set to part of the oil slick in an attempt to save environmentally-sensitive wetlands.

A “controlled burn” of surface oil took place in an area about 30 miles (50km) east of the Mississippi River delta.

Engineers are working on a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels, but it may be weeks before this is in place.

It is feared that work on sealing the leaking well using robotic submersibles might take months.

BP is also working on a “relief well” to intersect the original well, but this is experimental and could take two to three months to stop the flow.

Under US law, BP will be expected to meet all the costs of the spill clean-up operation.

oil spill slide 30 466 'Disaster' feared as oil slick creeps to shore

Young sex slaves offered escape

4189ff7097204aae1da22aeb53ec89b5 Young sex slaves offered escape

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Group fights to prevent sexual trafficking of Nepal’s and girls
* Anuradha Koirala, 61, started Maiti Nepal following an abusive relationship
* More than 12,000 Nepali women and girls have been rescued and rehabilitated since 1993
* Do you know someone who should be a CNN Hero? Nominations are open now

RELATED TOPICS

* Nepal
* India
* Trafficking
* HIV and AIDS
* Domestic Violence

Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) — Geeta was 9 when she began wearing makeup, staying up until 2 a.m. and having with as many as 60 men a day.

“I used to be really sad and frustrated with what was happening in my life,” she said.

The daughter of Nepalese peasant farmers, Geeta — now 26 — had been sold to a brothel in India by a member of her extended . The member had duped Geeta’s visually impaired mother into believing her daughter would get work at a company in Nepal.

“The brothel where I was … there [were] many customers coming in every day. The owner used to verbally abuse , and if we didn’t comply, [she] would start beating with wires, rods and hot spoons.”

It was not until Geeta was 14 that a police officer rescued her and brought her to a safe house compound run by Anuradha Koirala. The 61-year-old woman and her group, Maiti Nepal, have been fighting for more than 16 years to rescue and rehabilitate thousands of Nepal’s sex trafficking victims.

“Families are tricked all the time,” said Koirala. “The trafficking of the girls is done by people who are basically known to the girls, who can lure them from the village by telling them they are getting a nice job. It’s a lucrative .”

By raiding brothels, patrolling the India-Nepal border and providing safe shelter and support services, Koirala and Maiti Nepal have helped rescue and rehabilitate more than 12,000 Nepali women and girls since 1993.

Do you know someone who should be a CNN Hero? Nominations are open now

According to the U.S. State Department, some 10,000 to 15,000 women and girls from Nepal are trafficked to India and then sexually exploited each year.

Koirala’s own history in an abusive relationship led her to her crusade. For most of her young adulthood, she taught primary school English in Nepal. But when her relationship took a violent turn, her life’s “purpose and responsibility completely changed,” she said.

“Every day, there was battering. And then I had three miscarriages that I think [were] from the beating. It was very difficult because I didn’t know in those days where to go and report [it], who to … talk to.”

After the relationship ended, Koirala used a portion of her $100 monthly salary to start a small retail shop to employ and support displaced victims of sex trafficking and domestic violence.

By the early 1990s, an increasing demand for help and persistent cases of violence against women compelled Koirala to do more. Maiti Nepal was her brainchild for giving voice, legal defense and rehabilitation to victims of sex trafficking.

Roughly translated, Maiti means “Mother’s .” The group has facilities throughout Nepal and India, but most of the rehabilitation work takes place at its main campus in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Koirala said girls from the brothels arrive empty-handed, sick, in many cases pregnant or with small children, and “psychologically broken.”

“When the girl first comes to Maiti Nepal, we never, never ask them a question. We just let them [be] for as long as they need. We let them play, dance, walk, talk to a friend,” Koirala said. “They are afraid at first, but eventually they will talk to us on their own.”

The group also takes in rape and domestic violence survivors, as well as abandoned children.

“I cannot say no to anybody,” Koirala said. “Everybody comes to Maiti Nepal.”

Accommodating its population of close to 400 women and children requires a large staff of teachers, counselors and medical personnel — and dozens of bunk beds. Many of the staff are sex trafficking survivors now committed to helping rehabilitate other girls. The work is funded by grants and donations from around the world.

Post-rescue recovery is comprehensive. Maiti Nepal provides medical treatment, psychological and legal counseling, formal court filings and criminal prosecution, all for free.

While some of the girls are able to return to their families, many of them — particularly those with HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases — become socially stigmatized and are no longer welcome in their home communities. For these girls, Maiti Nepal becomes their new, and possibly last, home. A hospice on the compound’s grounds houses terminally ill patients.

“The hardest part for me is to see a girl dying or coming back with different diseases at an [age] when she should be out frolicking,” Koirala said. “That’s what fuels me to work harder.”

The group’s ultimate goal is to help girls become economically independent and reintegrated into society.

“We try to give them whatever work they want to do, whatever training they want to do, because when you’re economically empowered, people forget everything. People even forget [she is] HIV-positive or was trafficked,” Koirala said.

Koirala and at least 50 trafficking survivors also participate in what she calls social preventive work outside the campus. Their community awareness camps educate families in rural villages and city slums about the dangers of sex trafficking, and a daily patrol at crossing points along the India-Nepal border successfully rescues an average of four Nepali girls a day.

“Our girls are border guards who have been trafficked themselves. They easily recognize a girl that is being trafficked or will be trafficked,” Koirala said. “The girls need no from me. They know the horrors of the brothel, and they are here to save their sisters.”

Some girls who are trafficked choose to remain prostitutes for life because their home villages will not accept them. But Koirala says that among those rescued by Maiti Nepal, there isn’t a single case when a girl has returned back to the streets.

Geeta’s recovery is one of the group’s success stories. Today, she works at Maiti Nepal as a peer educator and also helps with the group’s awareness camps. She credits Koirala and Maiti Nepal for the strength to keep living and the confidence to join the fight against sex trafficking.

“Anuradha is a hero. … She’s courageous,” Geeta said. “She gave me my faith back. … If Maiti Nepal wasn’t there for me, I would be dead by now.”

Want to get involved? Check out the Maiti Nepal and see how to help.

Wayward driving hampers Tiger at Quail Hollow

c7UpAFTI Wayward driving hampers Tiger at Quail Hollow

In rough start, Woods hits just four of 14 fairways, nine of 18 greens in regulation By Mark Soltau / TigerWoods.com

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Tiger Woods knew he would have challenging days following a five-month layoff, especially on difficult courses. Thursday was such a day.

Seldom in sync with his swing, Woods struggled to a 2-over-par 74 at Quail Hollow Club in the first round of the $6.5 million Quail Hollow Championship. Bo Van Pelt carded the low score of the day with a 65.

The top-ranked Woods hit only nine of 18 greens and four of 14 fairways in regulation. Only a sharp short game — Woods used 28 putts — prevented further damage.

“It wasn’t the driver, it was everything,” said Woods, who was making only his second start of 2010. “I had a two-way miss going, which was great, all day.”

Woods, who won here in 2007, has three top-five finishes here in four starts.

An early back-nine starter with Stewart Cink and Angel Cabrera, Woods began strong, crushing his opening drive down the par-5 10th fairway. He came up just short of the green in two and hit a deft pitch shot three feet from the hole for an easy birdie.

It would be the only fairway he found on the side.

Playing in cool conditions — in which breaths were visible — and with heavy dew in the rough, Woods made a nice par-save at the 11th, getting up and down from just short of the green on the par 4.

At the 456-yard, downhill, par-4 12th, Nick Watney made an eagle in the group in front, holing out his second shot with a 6-iron. Woods wasn’t as fortunate, driving into the left rough. He then punched a low hook just short of the green, hit his third shot 12 feet right of the hole and missed his par putt.

Woods hit a nice tee shot at the 200-yard, downhill, par-3 13th, finishing nine feet right of the hole. His birdie try slid low-left, and he settled for a par.

At the short, water-flanked, par-4 14th, Woods laid up off the tee, played to the center of the green and two-putted for a par from 25 feet.

He made a great par-save at the uphill, par-5 15th. After driving under a holly tree on the right, Woods did well to punch out down the fairway but wound up in thick rough, just above the water on the left side of the hole. His third shot wound up in a left, greenside bunker, where he blasted seven feet short of the cup and converted the putt.

Woods’ driving woes continued at the long, par-4 16th, where he pulled his shot into the left rough and was fortunate to have a backswing. His approach finished just left of the green, and he chipped to three feet and saved par.

At the tough, 217-yard, par-3 17th, Woods found water off the tee, reteed and two-putted for a double bogey.

“Just a bad shot,” he said.

The demanding, par-4 18th also got him, as he drove into a creek along the left side of the fairway. Woods took a drop, hit his third shot just short of the green and chipped to three feet to salvage a bogey, making the turn in 3-over 39.

With the course blanketed in warm sunshine, Woods hit another poor drive way right at the par-4 first hole, leading to a bogey when his 10-foot par putt refused to fall. But he rebounded with a 14-foot birdie putt at the par-3 second.

Suddenly finding rhythm with his swing, Woods found the fairway at the par-4 third hole, his first fairway hit since his opening tee shot. He knocked his second shot 25 feet from the cup and ran his birdie attempt seven feet right of the hole, polishing off the par putt.

Woods also hit the fourth fairway and flagged a beautiful approach shot eight feet above the hole but was unable to convert the birdie opportunity.

At the par-5 fifth, he reached the green in two with a 5-wood and two-putted for a birdie from 35 feet, grinding in a testy, four-foot comeback putt from above the hole.

Woods made a nice up-and-down save for par from just short of the green at the par-3 sixth, holing a four-foot putt.

He missed a good birdie chance at the reachable-in-two par-5 seventh — driving in the right rough — and missed the green into the gallery left with his second shot. Woods hit a nice flop shot from a downhill lie to within 10 feet but missed the slick, left-to-right putt.

At the short, par-4 eighth, Woods drove into the left rough, then nearly holed a sand wedge for an easy birdie.

But he dropped a shot at the par-4 ninth, hitting his second shot over the green and wound up two-putting for a bogey from 15 feet.

“I chose the wrong club on the last hole there,” said Woods. “The wind came up, and I thought I could take something off a 4-[iron] and hit it over the green. It should have been just a 5-, put it in the center of the green, two-putt and move on, but I didn’t do it.”

All in all, a tough day he would just as soon forget.

“I just didn’t have it,” he said.

Woods decided to forgo practicing after the round. Not that he is counting himself out of the tournament.

“I’m trying,” said Woods. “But when you’re fighting a miss like this and trying to piece together a round to keep myself in the tournament, it’s pretty tough. It can be had.”

Woods had a huge gallery pulling for him all day.

“Oh, they’re incredible,” he said. “The fans here all these years that I’ve been here have been extraordinary, and with it being 50 degrees this morning or 45 degrees, for them to come out there and support was cool.”

Woods starts Friday’s second round at 12:50 p.m. ET off the first tee with Cink and Cabrera.

How to Build a Better Husband

l 4ef1cf68d465d647c83848292c4abb1d How to Build a Better Husband

Picked a fixer-upper? New shows you can mold your partner into a better version of himself.

researcher Eli Finkel, Ph.D., likes to describe a hypothetical couple named Dave and Jasmine. Dave always dreamed of being charming and outgoing, but self-doubt made him a wallflower. Then he met Jasmine. She laughed at his jokes and eagerly set up his one-liners: “Tell the one about the guy who … ” With Jasmine cheering him on, Dave became more confident. Now he’s a new man — the life of every party.

This kind of transformation — in which one partner encourages the other to become the person he or she wants to be — can have powerful effects, says Finkel, associate professor of at Northwestern University.

He and his team recently studied the process by which partners sculpt each other, known as the Michelangelo phenomenon, and according to their research, it can improve the of the relationship and each partner’s happiness level.

“Personal growth is satisfying — and having a partner help with that growth makes the relationship satisfying,” says Finkel. But the point here isn’t to “fix” what you perceive as your partner’s flaws. “The Michelangelo effect works only if your ideal image of your partner dovetails with his own, and vice versa,” he says. “In the case of Jasmine and Dave, she helped him acquire the qualities he wanted to acquire.”

Partners can help each other do that by being explicit about their goals and ambitions. Have a frank talk about who you want to be in ten years — whether it’s more outgoing, more patient, or more adventurous, suggests Finkel. Doing so can help ensure that you understand and support each other’s vision for “how I see my best life.”

More from Oprah.com:Why one is moving out, but staying married

How I Knew She Was a Keeper

54c4a5b181c85e5712c67223934af77f we How I Knew She Was a Keeper

Guys share when they knew they’d found The One

It happens to most men sooner or later: He’s dating someone, things are going well, then… wham! The does something small and seemingly inconsequential that makes him fall for her, hard. What, you may be asking yourself, is that special element that changes his thinking from “She’s fun” to “She’s The One?” Well, it turns out men are more than happy to walk down memory lane and reveal those pivotal moments—and Catherine Cardinal, Ph.D., dating expert and author of The Cure for the Common Life, explains what everywhere can learn from their stories!

“She got my weird sense of
The case history: “Not long after we’d begun dating, Anneli unexpectedly showed up on the set of a short I was making. The scene we were shooting was… how can I put it? A little bit crude. I’ve dated girls that have been kind of uptight about stuff I think is hysterical, so after the scene was over I didn’t know what to expect. I was relieved — and kind of surprised — to see that it made her laugh. In fact, she was laughing so hard that tears were streaming down her face and she could barely breathe. That’s when I knew I had a good one. Two months later I proposed.”
—Matt Ballard, 35, , NY; married to Anneli for two years

lesson learned: A shared sense of humor is essential
Let’s face it: No matter how much you love someone, your life together will get dull if you can’t laugh your way through it. “Choosing someone who is not rigid and who can let go with a good belly laugh, especially over the same things you find funny, is a win-win situation,” says Dr. Cardinal. “It ensures you’ll have an animated, lively life.” And how great is it to know your mate finds you fun and entertaining? In other words, she gets you!

“She challenged me to do the right thing”
The case history: “I knew Marianne was The One when she encouraged me to work through a tough situation I was having with a co-worker. She allowed me to vent but also challenged me to see things from another perspective and not take the easy way out and ignore the situation, which was my impulse. Because of her influence, I was able to approach my co-worker and get a better understanding of where he was coming from. After that I knew Marianne would never be someone who walked behind me, but someone who would always stand next to me.”
—Ken Kish, 33, San Clemente, CA; married to Marianne for six years

Love lesson learned: Disagreements can help you grow closer
It’s easy to unconditionally support someone’s every decision. Challenge your date to live up to certain standards, though, and you’ll gain even more points by showing you’ve got a backbone—and that he or she will become a better person as a result. “Anyone who encourages you to face a challenge is more likely to be a consistent, predictable partner—and one who realizes that unless you grow, you both get held back,” says Dr. Cardinal.

“She allows me to pursue my passion, even though it takes time away from her”
The case history: “I knew Marnie was a cool girl when she never gave me grief about being a surfer. That was a big deal because my previous girlfriend was always mad when I went surfing instead of spending every nanosecond with her. The clincher? Once, Marnie drove eight hours with me from Atlanta to just so I could get in the water. After that, how could I not fall for her? Even now, she’s still OK with me taking off to the beach every weekend. She lets me do my thing because she knows it keeps me centered and happy. I don’t know many guys — or any surfers — that get away with that!”
—Dirk Aulabaugh, 36, Los Angeles, CA; married to Marnie for ten years

Love lesson learned: Respecting someone’s interests creates greater intimacy
Everyone needs a personal passion or two; otherwise life can become unfulfilling. Allow your partner to find inner satisfaction this way, and he or she will be happier with life, him- or herself and with you. “As far as spending time together, remember this: It’s quality, not quantity that matters,” says Dr. Cardinal. A person who values you, who makes the most out of the time you spend together and doesn’t whine about separation, is a grown-up. That’s someone to plan a life with.

“She’s not put off by my bad habits”
The case history: “Marissa is the only girl I’ve dated that doesn’t get grossed out by my bad habits. I’ll put the empty OJ carton back in the fridge, and I’ve been known to make certain bodily noises at inopportune times (like when I’m standing right next to her). I knew she was a keeper, though, while I was clipping my toenails in bed one night. A toenail flew out and hit her on her eyebrow! Most girls would have freaked out, but she just laughed and punched me in the arm. Obviously, I have some bad traits… so for her not to hassle me about them? I’m the luckiest guy I know.”
—Danny Murphy, 31, Clarksville, TN; dating Marissa for three years

Love lesson learned: Accept him flaws and all, and he’ll love you for it
Each of us has a version of cutting our toenails in bed and wants to be loved in spite of it: It’s all part of being . We’re not saying women shouldn’t speak up if something truly bothers them, but that they should do so gently, pick their battles—and be at peace with the possibility that he may not change. “Tolerance is vital in a relationship,” says Cardinal. “We all have bad habits, but with tolerance, you’ll share days together that feel safe and comfortable.”

“She preferred take-out and TV to a night on the town”
The case history: “I knew Dana was special when she took a seven-hour bus ride from NYC to come visit me in Richmond, VA. That may not sound like a big deal, but let me tell you, anyone who’s spent the night on a Greyhound can attest to how hellish it is. But she did it for me and she did it without complaining. As if that wasn’t enough, when I picked her up, she told me she’d rather get cheap and take-out and watch 80s movies all weekend, instead of going out on the town. Man down! Now we have two kids and a mortgage… and I love her more than I ever have.”
—Marcus Ashley, 34, Austin, TX; married to Dana for five years

Love lesson learned: Men go gaga for low-maintenance gals
It’s cliché but true: High-maintenance women who need to be wined, dined, and paid attention to every moment will wear a guy out. “You shouldn’t have to tap dance for your mate!” says Dr. Cardinal. So before you insist on receiving flowers every month or going to the most expensive restaurants in town, ask yourself: Do all these trimmings really matter if you’re with someone you truly adore? And trust us, he will adore you all the more when he sees he can kick back and be himself.

Kristin Bailey Murphy has written for Tokyopop.com and Realfamiliesrealfun.com. For the other side of this story, readFirst Date Signs He’s a Keeper.

Dating and Mating Rituals … Decoded

008 Dating and Mating Rituals ... Decoded

Anthropology professor Dr. Helen Fisher shares what’s really going on with your date’s body language…

When it comes to flirting in the hopes of finding The One, what works? The direct approach, “Hey, I couldn’t help but notice your beautiful eyes”? Subtle glances? Playing hard to get? These were among my questions as I headed out on a field trip with Dr. Helen Fisher, a professor of anthropology at Rutgers University, and the author of Why We : The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic . Dr. Fisher has devoted her career to understanding mating rituals — and her knowledge applies perfectly, she added, to today’s pickup scene. “Even in this modern age, humans adhere to courtship strategies that are as old as the hills, and used throughout the animal kingdom,” says Dr. Fisher. And that’s why she and I headed out for a night of café- and bar-hopping, to observe what works (and what doesn’t) when it comes to mingling and the mating call. Six hours, two coffee shops, and one — or was it two? — bars later, we had some interesting findings. Come along with as we make the rounds — and learn!

Destination #1: The classic coffee bar for flirting how-to’s
Our first stop: Starbucks. To me, the in the green shirt is sipping a cappuccino and catching up with friends. But in Dr. Fisher’s eyes, something much more primordial is happening: The in green is on the hunt, and has already staked out her quarry — a tall man in a blue-checkered button-down sitting next to her.

“See how her body’s twisted toward him in the ‘crouch’ position, with her hands near her face when she laughs?” Dr. Fisher whispers to me as she sips her chai latte. “It’s the ‘broken wing’ tactic. She’s sending a subtle signal his way that says, ‘protect me.’ Men love that.”

Indeed, Dr. Fisher says that secret signals of are at work whenever people mingle. The way you sit down with your cappuccino or Corona begins the courtship dance. “The first thing all animals do when attempting to find a mate is to set up their territory,” says Dr. Fisher. People who place laptops on their table or their coat and bags on a chair next to them, she explains, are attempting to carve out a perimeter so they can proceed to the next stage of courtship: Attracting attention.

“Notice how that guy’s stirring his drink with his entire arm?” Dr. Fisher points out. “He’d never bother to do that at home.” The man then casually stretches his arms back in a gesture Dr. Fisher calls the “chest thrust” to appear as large and formidable as possible. “Pretty much all courtship postures fall into two categories: Attempts to look big and attempts to look little,” she explains. Traditionally, men generally try to look big, or “loom,” while try to look small, or “crouch.” The direction someone’s feet are pointing can also convey interest: Smitten turn pigeon-toed; men pivot outward. “Feet can be a real giveaway,” says Dr. Fisher. “People are quite conscious of their body and hands, but forget to control their feet.”

So, how do hopeful singles transition from a “loom” or “crouch” to an actual pounce? For women, Dr. Fisher suggests trying the tried-and-true “five-part flirt.” “You catch someone’s eye, cock your head to the side, raise your eyebrows, look down, then away,” she explains, adding that women are usually more socially adept than men and thus better at initiating courtship. But at some point, she conditions, a transfer must happen: In other words, the man has to pick up the ball and make his move.

Destination #2: A quirkier coffee bar for connection lessons
Dr. Fisher and I decide to move along to a coffee bar with more of a lounge-around atmosphere. Here, we observed some more mating rituals: “See those two girls over there? I think they want to be picked up,” Dr. Fisher says, nodding toward two bubbly twenty-somethings in cool, dressed-down clothes and knit caps, who are sitting in the corner of Grey Dog’s Coffee. While hardly dressed to impress, the two young women are nonetheless employing a different courtship strategy called “handicapping.” “They’re saying, ‘I’m so cool I don’t have to show off,’” Dr. Fisher explains.

While four men seated nearby can’t help but notice the two giggly girls, no one works up the guts to break the ice, and their reluctance is understandable: After all, what can you say to a complete stranger that won’t come off as corny? Fisher suggests trying questions (“Excuse me, do you know a good place around here to grab dinner?”) and compliments (“That’s a great laptop case. Where’d you get it?”) since both require a response and get you engaged in the next stage of courtship: “grooming talk.” “It’s called ‘grooming talk’ because it really doesn’t matter what you say,” Dr. Fisher says simply. “If someone’s interested in you, they’ll keep talking.”

As the conversation heats up, a behavior called “mirroring” can kick in, says Dr. Fisher, furthering the connection. When mirroring, sip their coffee or cross their legs in unison, subtly mimicking each other’s movements. “It’s a very powerful way to develop rapport, since it actually helps your brain waves get in synch,” Dr. Fisher explains.

Singles should also keep an eye out for “intention .” “Basically that means the other person wants to touch you, but since she’s not sure if you’re receptive, she’ll rub her own arm or leg,” says Dr. Fisher.

We notice a couple in the corner, plying each other with forkfuls of cake. This is more mating in action, says Dr. Fisher. To further forge a bond, couples may engage in “courtship feeding” — each offering the other a sip of tea or a bite of food. “Nuptial gifts of food are common among many animal species,” Dr. Fisher notes. “When a male chimpanzee offers a female a piece of sugar cane, she’ll copulate with him and then eat the sugar cane. Humans don’t move that quickly, but we all know there’s no such thing as a free lunch!”

While both men and women respond similarly to many courtship cues, one area where they’re wired very differently is eye contact. To prove her point, Dr. Fisher gestures towards a man who’s moved his chair so he can sit next to a woman rather than across from her. “That’s because while women gain intimacy from face-to-face interactions, men would rather avoid it — they find it uncomfortable, even invasive,” she explains. The reason for this dates back to the dawn of mankind, when males were forced to face their enemies, but sat side by side with their friends. It’s also why, these days, men love nothing more than sitting at a bar with their buddies watching the Rams vs. the Redskins, while women love nothing more than staring into their amour’s eyes over a candlelit dinner. “When couples fight over these types of differences, they’re also fighting millions of years of evolution,” Dr. Fisher explains. “Men and women are fundamentally different in many ways, and nothing’s going to change that overnight.”

Destination #3: A busy bar on Friday night for the laws of mating
We decide to see how the courtship dance looks when in a more “intense” pick-up environment — a bar called Peep. As we sit down, Dr. Fisher points out that clearly, the couple sitting next to us is in love. They’re mirroring each other’s movements, “courtship feeding” off each other’s cocktails, and displaying other tell-tale signs of a honeymoon period. Even so, their mating dance is far from over, says Dr. Fisher. At this point, keeping the person they’ve got, or “mate guarding,” becomes a priority, and this pair illustrates this principle perfectly. “Now, normally the man would offer the woman the seat against the wall to signal he’s protecting her,” says Dr. Fisher. “But in this case, he’s in the back seat and she’s sitting facing him with her back to the room. It could be due to what she’s wearing.”

The clothes in question? A camisole with a plunging neckline that, had the woman been seated facing the crowd, would have probably had every guy in the vicinity eyeing her. “By dressing that way, she’s asking to be mate guarded,” Dr. Fisher explains. “And maybe that’s why he took the back seat: So she attracts less attention.”

Such displays of possessiveness are hardly unnecessary or “Neanderthal,” as some people might put it. One recent study found that 60 percent of men and 53 percent of women admitted to “mate poaching,” a practice of stealing partners who are already taken. While it’s distressing to think that someone we love could be so easily ensnared by new prospects, Dr. Fisher points out that a little competition also pushes us to become more caring, attentive, and in short, better mates.

In fact, as we look across the bar, we see this principle in action: A woman in a slinky tank top, jeans, and stilettos who’s flirting with two men. “She’s giving them equal attention,” Dr. Fisher notes. “Since she obviously hasn’t made up her mind which one she likes, both of those men are working really hard.” We head home before finding out which man, if either, wins in the end. But it gets me wondering: Does courtship really boil down to winners and losers? Is the game of love really that cutthroat rather than warm and fuzzy? “The game of love is not nice,” Dr. Fisher says, “but then again, you’re playing for the biggest stakes in town. Nothing is so important.” And after listening to Dr. Fisher call the play-by-play on our night out on the town, I feel like my skills are definitely ready for the high-stakes game of romance.

Judy Dutton is the executive editor of Happenmag.com. She lives in Brooklyn, NY, and has contributed articles to Women’s , Redbook, Cosmopolitan and other national magazines.

Doc Love: You're All-In, But She's Not

257e1f72c4844944ae70278a32761fb9 Doc Love: You're All In, But She's Not

This week’s question comes from a guy who fell too hard, pushed too hard and lost hard. His problem? He’s all-in, but she’s not.
reader’s question
Hey Doc,

I hope you can be patient with me. I did everything wrong and I know it.
too much, too soon
I’m 28 and work with an amazing girl, Kelsey. From the very first moment I saw her I thought she could be the one. I wanted to meet her like crazy but I didn’t go for it for two reasons: First of all, because she is so beautiful that I wouldn’t even dream that a girl like her would be available. Second, I’m not a fan of people I work with. But I really liked her!

One day, a few months after I first saw her, we talked on the phone for a reason. The talk was so warm that she invited me to her office for coffee. We met, and I could sense that she liked me too. At that point we started talking via e-mail. Everything looked good so I asked for her phone number and called her the same night. She started bombing me with calls. She even asked if I was single.
two strikes and a base hit
A few days later, Kelsey said that she just came out of a five-year relationship. (She dumped the guy.) She told me it was a bad period for her and she didn’t want to rush things, but she liked me a lot and wanted to take it really slow. Over the following days I asked her twice to go out, but she said it was too soon. I didn’t ask her again and suddenly, one night, she said she wanted to see me the following day.

We went out for a drink and then she asked me to take her to the beach. I tried to her but she backed off. She told me that me would make things more complicated because then she would start to feel things for me. I told her no problem, take your time and perhaps we can go out some other time if you want to. Then she grabbed me and kissed me and we made out for hours. I left with the feeling that we finally made a start.

The next night, I was out with friends and sent Kelsey a couple of instant messages early in the morning; she didn’t reply. The next morning Kelsey told me that she felt pressure. She kissed me at the beach because she thought that she could overcome that feeling of pressure, but it didn’t work out for her after all. She told me that at the moment she couldn’t offer anything to me. All she wanted is to be with her friends and have fun. I told her that she can have as much space and time as she wants, and that I like her so much I can wait for her to clear her mind.
he’s all-in
We haven’t spoken for days since, apart from one time at work for business. I know I rushed things a hell of a lot and revealed too much. I know that I probably did all the wrong things because I’m stuck on her, but please coach me. My question is: What should I do now? I want Kelsey. I am sure you think I’m an idiot, but Kelsey is the of my life. Her birthday is next week. Should I give her a present? Send flowers? Thanks for any insight.

Shelton – who’s all-in, but she’s not
doc ’s answer

Hi Shelton,

When you do everything wrong and you know it, why don’t you slow down instead and do everything right? If you have an opportunity with a girl, why don’t you practice Self-Control and stop yourself from rushing headlong into rejection? Like the great Doctor Freud once said: “It doesn’t make any sense to keep making the same mistakes over and over, does it? That’s just crazy!”

Being all-in when she’s not is a problem that more guys than just Shelton encounter…

Dude, you don’t know that Kelsey is an amazing girl. She’s a complete stranger to you. You know nothing whatsoever about her. Like my cousin Sal “The Fish” Love says: “For all you know, she’s a serial killer.” And you might think she’s the one for you, but what does she think?
no woman is that beautiful
If you thought that Kelsey was so beautiful that you couldn’t get her, then you’re underrating yourself. If I trained you, you’d think that she was the lucky one to get you. It’s true that you could lose your job over dating someone you work with, but the more important point here is that you’re always talking about how much you like her and not at all about how much she likes you. I’ve said a thousand times that it’s only the woman’s Interest Level that counts — not yours.

It’s great that Kelsey invited you over for coffee because it indicated incoming interest. But how could you “sense” that she liked you? What did she do that convinced you of this, pal? Like my cousin Rabbi Love says: “Was it only a figment of your imagination, my son?”
giving away the store
Instead of gabbing by e-mail, you should have disappeared instead. You’re on the friendship path here, and you’re also giving away the store. Plus, from the beginning you admitted that this was all a big mistake. So why don’t you abide by the rules of “The System”? It’s because your Interest Level is in the stars and you can’t practice Self-Control. And that means you’re going to lose. Like my cousin General Love says: “The soldier with the most Self-Control stays alive and wins the war.”

Why did you call this girl the same night that you got her phone number? You’re supposed to wait a week. Again, you have no Self-Control — whatsoever.

Of course Kelsey dumped her ex. She’s beautiful, isn’t she? When she told you that she wanted to take it slow, you should have listened to her. I’ve interviewed over 10,000 and their biggest complaint is that men push too hard. If they would just sit back, relax and go in slowly things would work out a lot better. So when you asked Kelsey out and she said it was too soon, you shouldn’t have pressed the issue. When you ask a girl out twice and she refuses, it doesn’t matter if it’s too soon or too late or the moon is green — it’s over. And that’s it.
mauled at the beach
When Kelsey told you out of the blue that she wanted to see you, I know you didn’t say you were busy because that would have been working Challenge and showed her that you were a real man. Instead, you were mauling her at the beach. You don’t kiss a woman at the beach; you kiss her at the doorstep when you drop her off.

When Kelsey told you that you were making things complicated, it was Womanese for: “You’re rushing in way too fast!” But then you told her that you wanted to go out with her in the future. Why are you talking about the future? This is one more anti-Challenge boner. Have you ever read even one of my articles, ever, Shelton? Instead of making out with this babe for hours, you should have pushed her away. You should have said: “Please, don’t kiss me. You’re pushing things too fast and I need my space and we have to go really slowly,” which is what she had just told you.

You should never instant message a woman — ever. Kelsey didn’t reply to your messages and you asked her out twice, so you’re out. Again, you’re like a bull in the proverbial china shop, buddy. Know why this girl felt pressure? Because you’re pushing too hard. And by the way, if she’s experimenting with you to see if she’ll feel pressure, she’s a little loony!
if you love something, set it free…
What should you do now? Back off. No contact. Let Kelsey come at you. Do I think you’re an idiot? Shelton, I don’t think you’re smart enough to be an idiot. Kelsey might be the woman of your life, but are you the man of hers?

I think you should give her a new Mercedes for her birthday, guy. But seriously, you’re not sending her any flowers because she’s not your . You’re not sending her anything — and that includes even a card.

Remember, guys: unless you practice Self-Control, you will never, ever be successful with women.

To hear my LOVE RADIO SHOW, send me your love questions or to find out more about “The System,” visit me at www.doclove.com or call (800) 404-2644. For the past 30 years has asked thousands of women, “Why do you stay with one man versus another?”

'Should Obscenity Be Illegal?'

30375d9031c79488ec8852c1bc6df071 'Should Obscenity Be Illegal?'

WASHINGTON — Reason.tv again takes a look at Evil Angel founder John Stagliano’s obscenity prosecution that is scheduled to go to trial this summer.

Reason.tv has just released a 6:15-minute news short produced by staffers Dan Hayes and Nick Gillespie titled “Should Obscenity Be Illegal?”.

Stagliano, who faces a possible term that could mean imprisonment for the rest of his life if convicted, makes a compelling case with his statements on whether obscenity prosecutions make sense because the productions are created and consumed by consenting adults in private.

“I make my porno movies for the people who porno,” Stagliano said in the news video. “They are my fans that’s who I make it for.”

Stagliano faces up to 32 years in federal prison for distributing “Milk Nymphos” and “Storm Squirters 2: Target Practice” and a promotional video for similar material on his .

He contends in Reason.tv’s piece that if the government can try his case, prosecutors could extend it to even lighter fare, despite not clearly spelling out what obscenity really is.

“I didn’t know I was breaking the law,” he said. The prosecution of adult material is “another area where the government thinks it should be able to run our lives. They could easily extend that from looking at porn to consuming fast food” and other activities.

Reason.tv, in the video, attempts to compare age-old works of art that also were deemed obscene — “Lady Chatterley’s Lover,” “Ulysses” and “I Am Curious Yellow”— to show that such prosecutions are subjective and selective.

Separately, federal prosecutors this week filed an opposition to Stagliano’s motion to preclude evidence in his 2008 copyright case against Kaytel. Prosecutors says they want three documents introduced to the jury that will decide Stagliano’s case.

The government wants to introduce Stagliano’s testimony, deposition and the first amended complaint in the Kaytel case. But Stagliano attorney Allan Gelbard said they plan to squash the request.

“We don’t want prosecutors to use the earlier copyright case in these court proceedings,” Gelbard told XBIZ. “It’s not what we want the jury to hear. We don’t want to bring it up at all.”

Judge Sets Settlement Conference for Pink Visual Suit

4745e630bea5dab9c24a8b39ba18a43f Judge Sets Settlement Conference for Pink Visual Suit

Scheduling a conference a routine move in such legal action

—According to documents filed in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck has ordered a settlement conference for May 19 between the parties in a copyright infringement lawsuit involving plaintiff Ventura Content and defendant Mansef Inc.

The Order signed by Peck requires that counsel attending the conference “must have full settlement authority and their client(s) must be present at the conference, as must a representative of the client’s insurance company where the decision to settle and/or amount of settlement must be approved by the insurance company.”

By May 12, the parties must file a confidential settlement memorandum with the court that explains “the factual and legal background of the case as it impacts on settlement negotiations; the status of prior settlement discussions between the parties, if any; and the party’s settlement proposal (range).” In the document the judge strongly suggests that the memo not exceed 15 pages and the settlement proposal “should be the realistic settlement range of that party, not just the party’s ‘opening bid.’”

Scheduling the settlement conference is a routine move in such legal action and indicates no prediliction on the part of either ligitant to settle. According to one source, “Judges always order opposing parties in civil litigation to try to settle.”

AVN originally reported on the lawsuit in February. Ventura Content, the copyright-holding company for adult content producer Pink Visual and the TopBucks network, filed a multimillion-dollar copyright infringement lawsuit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against Mansef, Inc., a Canadian-based company also know as Mansef Productions, and 6721851 Canada Inc.

The complaint alleges that the defendants own and operate four tube sites—www.keezmovies.com, www.extremetube.com, www.pornhub.com and www.tubeb.com—and that by means of those sites they have willfully engaged in direct and contributory copyright infringement as well as inducement of copyright infringement.

US oil slick 'five times bigger'

 47742345 oilcollectiongetty466 US oil slick 'five times bigger'

Vessels swept some oil into a -resistant boom for a “test burn”

The Coast Guard says five times as much oil as previously thought could be leaking from a well beneath where a rig sank in the last week.

Rear Admiral Mary Landry said 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) a day were now thought to be gushing into the sea 50 miles (80km) off Louisiana’s coast.

A third leak had also been discovered at the site, Adm Landry said.

One fire-fighting expert told the BBC the disaster might become the “biggest in the world”.

“Probably the only thing comparable to this is the Kuwait fires [following the Gulf War in 1991],” Mike Miller, head of Canadian oil well fire-fighting company Safety Boss, told BBC World Service.

“The Exxon Valdez [tanker disaster off Alaska in 1989] is going to pale [into insignificance] in comparison to this as it goes on.”

If US Coast Guard estimates are correct, the slick could match the 11m gallons spilt from the Exxon Valdez within less than two months.

Earlier, a coast guard crew set fire to part of the oil slick, in an attempt to save environmentally fragile wetlands.

The “controlled burn” of surface oil took place in an area about 30 miles (50km) east of the Mississippi river delta, officials said.

But Mike Miller warned that burning off leaking oil was not a long-term solution at all.

“The object of this game is to shut off the flow,” he said.

Engineers are believed to be working on a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels but it may be weeks before this is in place.

ANALYSIS
Andy Gallacher
Andy Gallacher, BBC News, Venice, Louisiana

Despite efforts to burn off the oil, the crews here are now battling against the odds.

The US Coast Guard’s discovery of another leak spewing oil from the collapsed rig has many here bracing for an environmental disaster on a huge scale.

An estimated 5,000 barrels of oil a day are now pouring into the Gulf of and forecasters say a new front could push the slick towards this coastline at an even faster rate. The state of Louisiana is now asking for emergency assistance as the oil slick draws closer.

It now seems inevitable that Louisiana’s coastline will be hit and at least another two states could be affected.

Weather forecasters have meanwhile warned that changing winds could drive the oil slick ashore by Friday night.

Adm Landry said experts from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) had increased their estimate for the leak based on aerial surveys, applying dispersants, studying the trajectory of the slick, local weather conditions, and other factors.

“This is not an exact science when we estimate the amount of oil. However, the NOAA is telling me now they’d prefer we use at least 5,000 barrels a day,” she told reporters in New Orleans.

Adm Landry also said she had been told of “a new location of an additional breach in the riser of the deep underwater well”, about 5,000ft (1,525m) under the surface.

President had been briefed on the new developments, and the government had offered to have the defence department help contain the spill, she added.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has requested emergency assistance from the federal government.

“Our top priority is to protect our citizens and the . These resources are critical to mitigating the impact of the oil spill on our coast,” he said in a statement.

 47743826 oil spill 466 29 US oil slick 'five times bigger'

The oil slick currently has a circumference of about 600 miles (970km) and covers about 28,600 sq miles (74,100 sq km). Its leading edge is now only 20 miles (32km) east of the mouth of the Mississippi.

The first of the leaks causing it were found on Saturday, four days after the platform, to which the pipe was attached, exploded and sank.

Eleven workers are missing and presumed dead after the worst oil rig disaster in almost a decade.

OIL SPILL DISASTERS
1991: 520m gallons were deliberately released from Iraqi oil tankers during the first Gulf War to impede the US invasion
1979: 140m gallons were spilt over nine months after a well blow-out in the Bay of Campeche off Mexico’s coast
1979: 90m gallons leaked from a Greek oil tanker after it collided with another ship off the coast of Trinidad
1983: 80m gallons leaked into the Gulf over several months after a tanker collided with a drilling platform
1989: 11m gallons were spilt into Alaska’s Prince William Sound in the Exxon Valdez disaster

Richard Black’s blog
In pictures: Efforts to contain leak

On Tuesday Adm Landry, who is in charge of the clean-up effort, warned that work on sealing the leaking well using robotic submersibles might take months, and that the coast guard would attempt to set light to much of the oil.

With the spill moving towards Louisiana’s coast, which contains some 40% of the nation’s wetlands and spawning grounds for countless fish and birds, she said a “controlled burn” of oil contained by special booms could limit the impact.

Environmental experts say animals nearby might be affected by toxic fumes, but perhaps not as much as if they were coated in oil.

On Wednesday afternoon, two vessels dispatched by the coast guard and the British oil company – which had hired the sunken rig – swept the thickest concentrations of oil into a fire-resistant boom.

They then towed it to a five-mile “burn zone” set up inside the slick, where it was set alight shortly before nightfall and allowed to burn.

If the test is deemed successful, BP is expected to continue the controlled burns as long as the weather conditions are favourable.

Possible solutions

BP says it has not been able to activate a device known as a blow-out preventer, designed to stop oil flow in an emergency.

HAVE YOUR SAY

People can prevent a number of environmental disasters.

Valeriia
Send us your comments

Doug Suttles, the chief operating officer for exploration and production at BP, said it had not yet given up on engaging the valve, but was considering other possible solutions.

The idea of placing a dome directly over the leaks has only been done in shallow water before and is still two to four weeks from being operational.

BP will also begin drilling a “relief well” intersecting the original well, but it is also experimental and could take two to three months to stop the flow.

Forty-nine vessels – oil skimmers, tugboats barges and special recovery boats that separate oil from water – were working to round up oil, BP said.

 47720959 oil rig bop 466 US oil slick 'five times bigger'